ST9301A-CS 951114 SANDY ~ ROAD
Agencies/Consultant Coordination Conference
; ~-~ November 14, 1995
A .NO .S/CO.S '.TAHT COORD .^T ON
AGENDA & NOTES
A. City of Coppell Project 91-830:
1. Alignment:
a. Council did not consider this on 10/24/95.
b. County/Coppell/Consultant representatives are
meeting November 16, 1995 in an endeavor to
establish schedule for alignment approual,
completion of preliminary plans and completion of
R-O-W documents.
2. Right of Way Issues:
a. City of Coppell has now written to the County
requesting that the County consider acquiring right
of way, at City cost. Proposed schedule for County
reply is?
b. Right of Way in Coppell for bridge project; listed
in a subsequent category of this agenda.
.,3. Drainage Issues: Has City of Coppell been provided
anything more recent than the submittal dated March 19947
4. Horizontal Control: Has Abel been able to verify that the
issue (field control) has been resolved.
5. Preliminary Plan Submittal:
Are we ready to designate a submittal date for
preliminary plans?
6. Construction Estimate:
This information ($2.7 M paving and drainage, $342,000
Coppell reimburseables) was provided to Dallas County on
10-5-95, by David Howard (Sverdrup, Dallas).
B. City of Dallas. Bridge Proje¢~.91-8~8:
i.~/Coppell Right of Way Parcels for bridge project:
Harrington Property.--After City/County meeting with
Mr. Harrington it is apparent that there are more
issues than review of preliminary plans indicated.
Ken Griffin is actively working with Mr. Harrington
to resolve or mitigate his access and business
issues. However, ED process is a possibility. At
this time, are ~e able to predic~ a schedule for
acquisition?
Page 1'
#
b. D'~las county Property F~ision: has begun
~ ...... ~. p..liminary work (for bridge p~'oject only) prior to
~.~3,~ '~ "~.~ .... obtaining an Interlocal Agreement . Pro pert y
~., ~ i Dlvlslon personnel need 'an Interlocal Agreement
~ ~3~.^~/ / before going too far with the process. Question; is
.~.~' .D-z~,,~/ it proper and appropriate for the County to ask Ken
o /~/~-~ . Griffin's permission to begin preliminary contact
~/~/ _~ ~ with T%and the School District? ~, .
~ ~" parcel; Is December 15, 1995 a reasonable date?
b. Status/schedule for acquisition of the Stiles
parcel; Is December 15, 1995 a reasonable date?
~~ 3. Bridge Typical Section.
County will provide the consultant by l~terdated
November 13, 1995 a sketch showing the des~ bridge
typical section. The most significant change (from
typical shown on preliminary plans) deletes the raised
sidewalk.
GTE had previously requested' provisions be made for
including their conduit in the raised sidewalk. Irv will
communicate to GTE that they need to request another
method to mount the conduit to the bridge.
4. Schematic for 66" Tr~ Line:
County has reviewed schematic of proposed route submitted
by consultant for the 66" line from the Carrollton end of
the project. Consultant has been advised to design the
storm sewer using this route.
5. Charles Gojer's Letter of October 25, 1995.
Many of the issues involve those presented in Ken
Griffin's requests of October 10, 1995. County has now
replied (November 13, 1995) to the letter.
Other than~ the issues involving the Harrington and
possibly the Farrow property, are there any issues (from
Ken Griffin's October 10, 1995 letter) not resolved?
6. Dallas Water Utilities Transmission Line
Does the construction or the schedule for construction of
an additional 60" water line impact this project in any
way?
7. ~extplan sub~ittel:
Is December 8, 1995 a good date for submittal of final
plan check set?
8. Construction Estimate:
An estimate of $4,024,540 has been provided 'by
consultant. A cursory review of the estimate by
County yields a figure of approximately $4,500,000.(dit~
reimburseables' known at this time for pavement mar~ia~
and conduit should not exceed $70,000.
Page 2. . ·
~C. City of Car-~%llton Park Improvement
1. Park Improvements Plans:
a. Preliminary plans have now been provided and
reviewed by Dallas County. Does Carrollton or
consultant have any follow up to Dallas County's
letter of October 20, 1995 letter to Tim Tumulty
concerning the County's review?
b. Does Charles Gojer and Associates, Inc. have any
written comments?
2. Drainage Swale:
a. Has Schrickel Rollins been able to study Halff
Associates letter of November 1, 1995 and will
Schrickel Rollins be able to modify their design of
the swale to be more compatible to the already
permitted swale as requested in Halff's letter?
D. City of Carrollton Project 91-839:
1. Right of Way Acquisition;
a. County has now replied to City requests for Dallas
County to consider acquisition (at city cost)?
b. Is March 1996 the schedule for preliminary ROW
documents?
2. Drainage information:
a. Has City of Carrollton been able to consider and
respond to the drainage issues contained in County
letter dated November 3, 19957
b. Proposed schedule for submitting drainage design
information:
3. Preliminary Paving and Drainage Plans:
Proposed date for next plan submittal is when?
4. Construction Esti~ate:
This information, $3.7 million for the paving and
drainage project was provided Dallas County on October
10, 1995 by Kimley Horn.
E. Road and Bridge District #1 Topics:
1. Plan review of Park Improvements:
Does Mike Sharp have any additional comments (not
contained in October 20, 1995 letter to Tim Tumulty) to
the Park Improvement Plans?
flle: Irv: AGEI~DA6.838
Page 3