Loading...
TR9701-CS 961003C J MRS M o -03 -96 P03:03 IN = =loo Parsons 1701 N. Market Street Brinkerhoff Suite 410 Dallas, TX 75202 214 - 747 -6336 Fax: 214 - 741 -1937 10 / FAX X75 to Atul Patel, E.I.T. from Tony R. Tramel City of Coppell date October 2, 1996 tele no. 214 - 747 -6336 ext. 28 no. 23417A fax no. 972 - 304 -3673 no, of pages (including this page) 21 comments Pleas review the attached ASAP. I believe that we have taken care of your review comments you provided. You will note my comments and the disposition of your comments on the attached material. I am also sending you a complete copy of the scope again with the changes made in this October 1, 1996 version. An original of this fax will follow via regular mail for your records. It is hoped that you can recommend to Ken that you are in concurrence with this scope at this time. If this is the case please have Ken sign the concurrence form and send back to us via FAX at 214 - 741 -1937, ( I hope that you have the FAX number problem solved by now!), as soon as possible. We must have this concurrence letter tomorrow to meet our scheduled Commissioner's Court meeting. If you have any problems with transmission and /or did not receive all of the pages, please call (214) 747 -6336. Over a Century of Engineering Excellence D:\GENERAL\G04- 5FAx\COPPELL \1996\016. DOC — �00 MAM October 1, 1996 Mr. Atul Patel, ELT City of Coppell 255 Parkway Blvd. Coppell, Texas 75019 Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, TX 75202 214- 747 -6336 Fax. 214- 741 -1937 Subject: Disposition of Design Review Comments For Scope Of Services Request For Concurrence of Proposed Services for 8 Signal Improvements Dear Mr. Patel: Attached is the revised Proposed Scope of Services, dated October 1, 1996, for CMAQ Project 75 signal timing improvements for the 8 intersections located in the City of Coppell, Texas. This revised scope considered your review comments of our September 18, 1996 correspondence. Your review comments are attached along with their deposition for reference. Please review the Design Review Comment Form and the revised Proposed Services and provide any additional comments directly on the attached forms. It is hoped that we have resolved your previous comments to your satisfaction. If you concur with the revised Proposed Services, please note by your signature in the place provided on the Concurrence Form. Otherwise, provide your review comments to the CMAQ office for disposition. Upon receipt of your concurrence forms and approval of the TIP Amendment by NCTCOG, the Proposed Services will be formally forwarded through Dallas County to TxDOT for assignment of a CSJ number. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me 747 -6336 ext. 26 or Tony Tramel at ext. 28. Sincerely, Ivan F. Nicodemus, P.E. Project Manager Attachments: 1) Proposed Services - Sverdrup, Inc. w /Exhibits 2) Concurrence Form 3) Review Comment Form cc: Allen Bud Beene, P.E. Dallas County Director of Public Works Gary Taylor, P.E., w/o attachments Texas Department of Transportation Over a Century of Engineering Excellence D:I GENERAL% G04CORR1G4- 10U11COPPELL119961007.DOC ATTACHMENT 2 CONCURRENCE (Please check one box and sign) I have reviewed the Proposed Services dated October 1, 1996 for the traffic signal timing improvements for Project 75. EJ I concur with the submitted Proposed Services contained herein, please accept this as the City's request to forward this material through the Dallas County CMAQ Program to TxDOT for implementation. Mr. enn G ffin P.E. As stant City anager City of Coppell 10 Date Signed I have included additional comments, on the attached review sheets, which need to be F1 resolved before this project is forwarded to TxDOT. Mr. Kenneth Griffin, P.E. Assistant City Manager City of Coppell After signing, please return only Attachment to: Parsons Brinckerhoff CMAQ Program Office 1701 N. Market Street Suite 410 Dallas, Texas 75202 Date Signed D:%GENERAL%G04CORR \G4 -1 OUl1COPPELL11996\007.DOC = 100 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS DALLAS COUNTY CMAQ PROGRAM ATTACHMENT 3 Project: City of Coppell A -8 Submittal: DISPOSITION OF REVIEW Date: October 1, 1996 Sheet: of: 8 of 30 Signal required to implement the timing plans. Use of COMMENTS 1 2 Improvements contract limitation is necessary, Reviewer. Atul Patel Organization: City of Coppell Reviewer Telephone Number: 972 -304 -3682 Comment Drawing No. / Comment - (state fully action required, i.e., Response Action No. Report clarify, change, add, delete, etc.) 2 B -1, 2nd Bullet Delete "Monday" Page /Section A 3 B -2, 2. 1 A -8 Clarify Attachment A, par 4, how much time is Replace "timely manner" with A required to implement the timing plans. Use of "within 45 calendar days ". A "timely manner" is too vague. contract limitation is necessary, otherwise length of service required of the Engineer is undetermined. 2 B -1, 2nd Bullet Delete "Monday" Agree A 3 B -2, 2. Change time period of recording machine Agree A counts from "Thursday through Monday" to "Tuesday through Sunday" in first sentence. Change "Thursday" to "Tuesday" and change "Tuesday" to" Sunday" in second sentence. 4 B -3 Will there be additional cost to the City once the No. Costs to the City are governed N/A numbers from Special Services are filled in? by the ILA Action Codes A - Agree, Designer will comply C - Disagree, Designer and Reviewer Resolution Required D - Delete, Reviewer Withdraws Comment E - Exception, Resolution Required N/A - Not Applicable Dispositioned By: Tony R. Tramel Title: Traffic En iq neer Date: October 1. 1996 Reviewer - Maintain a copy of your comments for future reference. Please enter Reviewer information at the top of the page. HAND WRITTEN COMMENTS ARE WELCOME. D:\GENERALIG04CORR\G4-IOUr\COPPELL\1996\007.DOC r\COPPELL \1996\007.DOC 5 A -3, A-4 Item numbers 4 and 6 are not consistent with The scope limits the number of A their description of the peak periods of analysis, timing plans to 6. The analysis will please clarify. determine the duration of the plans. Inserted "AM Off - Peak/Noon" in paragraph 4, page A -3 for clarification. 6 A -8, 4. May want to state "If the final timing plans See response to Comment 1. The N/A produced by Engineer in Task II B are not input Engineer can not be held by City personnel at existing signalized responsible for locations where it is intersections within _ weeks and also are not uncertain when signals will be input in proposed signals (i.e. Airline @Belt Line operational. If data is not entered ) once they are constructed by _ weeks , then within the 45 day time period, the Task II C shall be considered complete. Task is complete. 7 B -2 Clarify the hours of data collection for the AM- See response to Comment 5 N/A Off Peak as stated on A -3 DRAFT Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services TRAFFIC SIGNAL TIMING IN THE CITIES OF IRVING AND COPPELL The Engineer shall perform the following Basic Services relative to the optimization -of signal timing for 30 intersections (34 improvements) in the Cities of Irving and Coppell. These Basic Services and those authorized Special Services shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Project ". It is anticipated that the Project will be subdivided into two (2) or more geographical related sections or study areas of analysis. As a minimum, the following milestones shall be provided for each study area: 1) completion of data collection under Special Services, 2) completion of preliminary analyses, 3) completion of timing plan generation, and 4) completion of the Project's Final Report. I. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL The following represent tasks associated with Project Management and Control to be performed by the Engineer: A. Technical Review Progress/Meetings Attend and present/review material at Project review meetings held in Dallas County at a facility provided by the County or one of the participating cities. It is agreed for budgeting purposes that up to eight (8) review meetings will be held relative to the Project, which is expected to have a duration of approximately nine (9) months. The Engineer shall prepare and distribute minutes of all such review meetings. B. Project Schedule The Engineer shall develop a projected Project Schedule in accordance with Article 2. Project Schedule of this Contract. C. Interagency Coordination The Engineer shall maintain coordination with the County and the participating cities for the duration of the Project. This shall include documentation of the Engineer's meetings, telephone conversations, and correspondence with the County, and other parties including adjoining cities, and any other agencies involved in the Project. A -1 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECT\POIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC DRAFT Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services D. Project Administration and Control It is understood and agreed that the Engineer's contract is with the County and that all services shall be performed under the direct supervision of the Director. It is also understood and agreed that the Cities of Irving and Coppell and/or TxDOT's designated representative may communicate directly with the Engineer for the purpose of providing technical direction relative to traffic signal timing matters which affect their respective jurisdiction. In the event of discrepancy between the review comments of the various reviewers and agencies, it is mutually understood and agreed that the Director will provide final direction to the Engineer. II. SIGNAL TIMING OPTIMIZATION A. PrelimiM Analysis The Engineer will perform the following preliminary analysis: 1. Field Observations Prior to the development of new signal timing, the Engineer shall conduct field observation on each route and during each time period of analysis. Such observation shall be performed by a traffic engineer with extensive experience in the development and implementation of progressive traffic signal timing plans. Initial travel time runs will be made prior to the development of the new signal timing to establish baseline conditions (speeds, delay, and number of stops) and to determine appropriate progression speeds, areas where queue management is critical, and areas where recurrent congestion may affect progressive traffic movement. Additional runs will be made once the new optimized signal timing is implemented to assist in the fine- tuning and adjustment of the new signal timings. 2. Verification of Intersection Geometrics For each Project intersection, the Engineer will verify the following elements of intersection geometrics and pedestrian accommodation that affect signal timing: A -2 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:I PROJECI RPOIPRE IPI- 21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPR I.DOC ifi W 1 t Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services • The number of lanes on each approach and the required or permitted usage of each lane (i.e., "left only "; "left or straight "; "straight only "; "straight or right "; "right only "; or "left, straight, or right ", etc.) ; • Approximate street widths, crosswalk lengths, and grades; and • Existence of pedestrian signal indications (i.e., "Walk" and "Don't Walk ") and/or pedestrian actuation. • Proposed geometric improvements at each signalized intersection. 3. Adjust Count Data Using factors developed from the recording machine counts, the Engineer will estimate the vehicular volumes for those intersection approaches for which actual Saturday turning movement counts were not made. The Engineer will present the data collected and calculated at a Technical Review/Progress Meeting. 4. Determine Number of Timing Plans Required Based on an assessment of existing recording machine count data, it is anticipated that most areas should have unique timing plans for the AM Peak, AM Off Peak/Noon Peak, PM Off -Peak, PM Peak, Late Evening Off -Peak and Saturday time periods. For each control area, the Engineer shall review the newly collected count data to verify the number of plans. 5. Coordination with Adjacent Cities Along Belt Line Road the opportunity exists to provide some degree of coordination across Irving and Coppell at these city's mutual city limits. The Engineer will confer with the staffs of those cities.: • The existing control areas and cycle lengths by time of day in the areas contiguous with Irving and Coppell; and • The extent, if any, to which the other city would be willing to modify the control areas and/or the cycle lengths to enhance the opportunities for coordination across the mutual boundary with Irving and Coppell. A -3 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECfNPOIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC bi Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services DRAFT 6. Determine Control Area Boundaries The Engineer shall use the following process to determine the optimum control area boundaries for six (6) unique timing plans: • Review the new and previously existing count data to determine similarities in volume fluctuation patterns; • Review proposed signalized intersections that may be pending or scheduled for construction in the immediate future within the studied signal systems. • For each of the six (6) timing plan periods (e.g., AM Peak, AM Off- Peak/Noon, PM Off -Peak, PM Peak, Late Evening Off -Peak, and Saturday), determine approximate cycle length requirements for key intersections, which shall include all diamond interchanges and all arterial/arterial intersections. • Based on the above, and taking into consideration (1) the intersections groupings currently defined by the City of Irving or Coppell's signal systems and (2) the opportunities for mutual coordination across city limits, the Engineer will make an initial division of the overall Project area into control areas. This information will be presented in map form for review and subsequent interactive discussion. 7. Finalize Cycle Lengths and Control Area Boundaries The Engineer shall identify which signals should be coordinated; determine need, time, and duration of peak period timing plans using the following techniques: • Conduct a variability analysis of traffic demand through the day and week; and/or • Use of a numeric coupling index analysis using vehicle link demand to distance ratios, and/or • Use of computer software coordinability factors, grouping of natural isolated location cycle lengths; and/or other A -4 10/01/96 2:45 PM D.\PROJECIIPO I PRE1P I -21 CS WISVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI .DOC DRAFT Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services • Methodologies utilized in this analysis however such methods must be acceptable to the City jurisdictions. Coordination recommendations shall identify locations which are to perform as a coordinated system by time -of -day. Each timing plan shall include start and duration time and shall include the peak traffic demand periods. 8. Technical Memoranda For each control area, the Engineer shall prepare a Technical Memorandum which documents the following: • Proposed control area boundaries, with discussion of factors which went into their determination (e.g., cycle length requirements, volume fluctuation patterns, coupling indices, etc.); • Proposed coordination, if any, across city limits; • Proposed cycle lengths; and • Preliminary measures of effectiveness. In addition, the following information will be provided as an appendix to the technical memorandum: • Traffic counts, both raw data and adjusted values; • Initial travel time data. The Engineer will meet with the County and representatives of the local jurisdictions to receive comments on each such technical memorandum during the scheduled Technical Review/Progress Meetings (paragraph I. A.). The technical memorandum shall be formatted to facilitate its incorporation into the Project's Final Report. Changes which are agreed to at the Technical Review/Progress meetings will be documented in the minutes of A -5 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:IPROJECINPOIPRE\P 1 -21 CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI .DOC W ' o Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services the review meeting and will be incorporated into the Final Report in accordance with the following Article III. Deliverables. B. Generation of Timing Plans lans 1. Determine Controller Interval Timing Based on approach speeds, trrafic volumes and existing intersection geometrics and/or other CMAQ geometric improvement , the Engineer will determine the appropriate controller interval timing (minimum green, passage, yellow, all -red, walk, pedestrian clearance, MAX I, etc.). This data will be provided in tabular (spreadsheet) format for existing geometry and for proposed CMAQ geometry. After receipt of review comments, this data will be finalized and submitted in tabular format in accordance with the following Article III. Deliverables. 2. Generate Timing Plans Making appropriate use of PASSER II -90, PASSER III -90, or PASSER IV -94, TRANSYT7 -F, Syncro, or other County approved software, the Engineer will generate new signal timing plans. It is anticipated that six (6) unique plans will be generated for all subsystems of the new signal system. This will generally consist of unique plans for the AM Peak, AM Off- Peak/Noon, PM Off -Peak, PM Peak, Off -Peak and Saturday time periods. In addition, a "Late Evening Off - Peak" plan will be developed for each subsystem using traffic volumes derived as follows: • Using the recording machine counts, the ratio of the Late Evening Off -Peak volume levels to the Noon and/or PM Off -Peak volume levels will be determined; and • The Late Evening Off -Peak turning volumes will be estimated by applying this ratio to the counted Noon or PM Off -Peak turning volumes. Progression band widths for all timing plans will be optimized to the maximum practical extent through variation of the signal phase sequence (i.e., a particular left turn phase may A -6 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECTNPO1 PREP 1 -21 CSWISVERDRUPIIRVCOPRI.DOC W Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services be "leading" during one timing plan but lagging during one or more other timing plans). At locations where a "yellow trap" condition would result because of a lagging "protected - permitted" left turn phase on the opposite approach, the Engineer will confer with the Texas Department Of Transportation (TxDOT) or the local jurisdiction's staff to determine the feasibility of their implementing "Dallas" left -turn phasing to eliminate the yellow trap. This will include the Engineer considering vehicle driver sight distances at these locations. The final timing willuse Dallas left -turn phasing or other means that will not allow a yellow trap to occur. Each timing plan will include a cycle length, offset, and split. The plans, along with a computer - generated time -space diagram, will be submitted for review. At a subsequent review meeting, the Engineer will discuss the characteristics of each plan and receive comments. The Engineer will finalize each timing plan to incorporate such comments in accordance with the following Article III. Deliverables. 3. Finalize Timing Plans The Engineer will furnish the final timing plan data in generic form, i.e., cycle length in seconds, split times in both seconds and percent of cycle, and offset in both seconds and percent of cycle. Also included will be minimum green, amber, all red, max phase length, walk, and dont't walk intervals. Offsets will be referenced to the beginning of the first major street green phase (i.e., the "barrier "). The Engineer will prepare controller time sheets for each intersection from the generic timing plans. These will be prepared based on the individual input needs of the different controllers. Timing data will be entered by City personnel; and it is assumed that the Engineer's role relative to timing plan implementation will be limited to responding to questions that may arise during the implementation process. C. Timing Plan Fine - Tuning When the new timing is operational, the Engineer will provide qualified staff members for on -site fine- tuning assistance. During the course of this assistance, A -7 10/01/96 2:45 PM D :\PROJEC'I\PO 1 PREP 1 -21 C S W\S V ERDRUP\IR V CO P R I. DOC DRAFT Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT A Basic Services the Engineer will observe the actual operation of the new timing plans and suggest minor adjustments to improve the operation. For intersections in Irving and Coppell, Irving and Coppell personnel will participate in this process, thereby gaining familiarity with the timing plans and with the fine- tuning process. The Engineer will provide up to three (3) person weeks of on -site fine tuning for the intersections in Irving and Coppell. Actual timing adjustments will be entered by City personnel. If the final timing plans produced by the Engineer in Task II.B are not input by the City personnel within fourty five (45) calendar days, Task II.0 shall be considered complete. D. Final Report At the conclusion of the Project, the Engineer will prepare a Final Report in accordance with the following Article III. Deliverables which will include the following: • The updated information originally provided in the technical memoranda; • Summary of Project benefits as determined from an analysis of the initial and final data analyses; and • The following additional information, provided in the appendix: • Final signal timing data (in spreadsheet format) along with time -space diagrams; and • Travel time runs • Software input values used in the timing analysis for each timing plan. The Engineer will submit a draft Final Report for review and will subsequently meet to review comments during one of the Technical Review/Progress meetings. The Engineer will then submit the Final Report, incorporating appropriate review comments in accordance with the following Article III. Deliverables. A -8 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECTVOIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC N J'°1 Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract III. DELIVERABLES ATTACHMENT A Basic Services _I ; : ar r A. Technical Memoranda. Draft and Final Report The first technical memorandum shall be provided within a standard three ring binder with an identifying cover. The binder shall be of sufficient size to accommodate the total number of sheets to be provided by the Engineer for the Project Subsequent memoranda shall be printed on 8.5 "x11" three hole punched paper allowing these sheets to be inserted in the original supplied binders. The technical memoranda shall be prepared so that they serve as sections of the Draft/Final Report. The draft and Final Report therefore, shall consist of the provided technical memoranda with additional supplemented text. and graphics by the Engineer, including an executive summary, findings, conclusions and recommendations. After delivery of the initial memorandum for the Project, the Engineer shall provide a total of seven (7) three hole punched copies and three (3) non - punched copies of each subsequent technical memorandum, Draft and Final Report. The County will distribute the deliverables to participating cities or agencies. The Cities of Irving and Coppell, through the County, will receive two (2) copies of the three holed punched product, one of the unbound copies and one of the electronic copies of technical memorandum, draft and final reports provided by the Engineer. B. Electronic Files. The Engineer shall provide two (2) copies of each electronic file including the text, spread sheets, and graphics which are published and/or presented in technical memoranda/final report at the time the documents are provided to the County. The text shall be provided both in Microsoft Word version 5.0 format and Word Perfect version 5 format; spreadsheets shall be provided both in Lotus WK1 formats and Microsoft Excel version 4.0 formats; graphics or figures shall be provided in either MicroStation DGN format or AutoCADD DWG format. The media for these electronic files shall be 3'/2" double-sided/high- density diskettes with appropriate external and volume labels identifying the contents of the diskettes. Basic Services Fee shall not exceed: $ 00,000.00 A -9 10/0 1 /96 2:45 PM D:IPROJECT %POI PREP 1 -21 CSWISVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI .DOC 11 ? 1 Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT B Special Services Scope of Special Services: DRAFT A. Traffic Volume Data Collection The Engineer shall upon written authorization- from the County collect the following types of data at the locations identified in Exhibits A, B, and C of this attachment. 1. Turning Movement Counts New turning movement count data will be collected and reduced for the intersections and time periods shown in the attached Exhibit A. Data will be tabulated by 15- minute increment, by approach direction (i.e., northbound, etc.), and by turning movement (i.e., left, straight, or right). In addition, the number of vehicles with more than four tires will be classified by 15- minute increment and by approach. The time periods of data collection for locations identified in Exhibit A shall be defined as follows: • AM Peak = eight (8) consecutive 15- minute periods (normally 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM) on a non - holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; • Noon Peak = eight (8) consecutive 15- minute periods (normally 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM) on a non - holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; • PM Off -Peak = eight (8) consecutive 15- minute periods (normally 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM) on a non - holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; • PM Peak = eight (8) consecutive 15- minute periods (normally 4:30 PM to 6:30 PM) on a non - holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; and • Saturday = any eight (8) consecutive 15- minute periods between 12:00 Noon and 5:00 PM on a non- holiday'.Saturday. B -1 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECTNPOIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC id 1 ' 1 " 1 Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHM ENT B Special Services DRAFT It is understood that the beginning and ending times of the AM Peak, Noon Peak, PM Off - Peak, and PM Peak counts may be adjusted based on the results of recording machine count data. 2. Recording Machine Counts For each of the locations shown in the attached Exhibit B, new Tuesday - through Sunday recording machine count data will be collected and reduced. For each location and direction, a minimum of ninety -eight (98) hours of data will be recorded by 15- minute increment, beginning on or before 11:00 PM on a Tuesday and ending on or after 1:00 AM on Sunday. Counts will not be made on holidays. 3. Travel Time Runs Travel time runs will be made using floating car techniques for each of the routes and time periods shown in the attached Exhibit C. The number of runs per direction will be as shown in Exhibit C. B. Public Meetings The Engineer shall attend public meetings, provide technical support, and prepare appropriate presentation material for public meetings relating to the Project when requested by the County in writing. C. Expert Witness The Engineer shall provide technical assistance and assist the County in litigation with third parties arising from the development or implementation of the Project when requested by the County in writing. Fee Schedule For Special Services A. Traffic Volume Data Collection - Cities of Irving and Coppell, 30 Locations 1. Vehicle Turning Movement Counts (Per Exhibit A) 142 Hours of 1 Person Counting @ $00.00 Per Hour 124 Hours of 2 Peron Counting @ $00.00 Per Hour 2. Machine Counts Per 24 Hour Duration (Per Exhibit B) 17 Locations X 5 Days @ $00 Per Day B -2 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECT\POIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC I1 Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT B Special Services 3. Travel Time Runs (Per Exhibit C) 1,008 vehicle miles @ $0.00 Per Mile Subtotal $ 00,000.00 B &C. Public Meeting assistance and Expert Witness services to assist the County in litigation with third parties arising from the development or implementation of the Project. 1. Provide technical support 2. Prepare exhibits 3. Deposition, research, trial time, consulting Total Fee (rate per hour) Principal $0.00/Hour* Project Manger $0.00/Hour* Senior Engineer $0.00/Hour* Engineer $0.00/Hour* Analyst/Sr. Technician $0.00/Hour* Technician $0.00/Hour* Clerical $0.00/Hour* * Not included in the not to exceed Special Services Fee amount. Not to exceed lump sum amounts for these items shall be determined in accordance with the terms of the Contract. D. Other Final Documentation. When requested by the County, the Engineer shall provide (1) licensed copy of each traffic signal optimization software used in the development of the timing at current prices. The costs are estimated below as follows: Passer II -90 @ $0.00 per license* Passer III -90 @ $0.00 per license Passer IV -94 @ $0.00 per license* Transyt 7F @ $0.00 per license* Syncro @ $0.00 per license* B -3 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:IPROJECT W IPRET 1 -21 CSWISVERDRUPIIRVCOPRI.DOC e*"'* T Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT B Special Services * Not included in the not to exceed Special Services Fee amount. Not to exceed lump sum amounts for these items shall be determined in accordance with the terms of the Contract Total Special Services Fee shall not exceed: $ 00,000.00 B -4 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECT\POIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUPURVCOPRI.DOC Dallas County Consulting Engineers Contract ATTACHMENT B Special Services The Exhibits referenced follow this page: Exhibit A - Turning Movement Locations - One (1) Page Exhibit B - Recording Machine Count Locations - One (1) Page Exhibit C - Travel Time Run Locations - One (1) Page DRAFT B -5 10/01/96 2:45 PM D:\PROJECT\POIPRE\PI-21CSW\SVERDRUP\IRVCOPRI.DOC