Loading...
Gateway BP (1.1)-LR 900831 Dallas · Fort Worth · Houston · Austin ........ SOIL MOIS~ , DENS~ ~ST ~PORT[ IN ~ P~CE ~STS BY ~CL~ ~ODS CLIENT: C~v~ent Cor--Xp. ,'~ REPORT DATE: 08/31/90 PROJEC~Gateway Business Park Phase I ] TM1 tLEPORT NO.: DC90-147- 21 : ~ ~--~-~ ~/ REPORT DISTRIBUTION: To: ~ ~ Catellus Development Corp., City of Coppell ~ Albert H.Halff Assoc. Inc. c/o Engineering Deptartment ~ Co. 732 Deforest Road F.O.Bo. 478 itl! Coppell, TX 75019 SPECIFICATIONS TEST DATA Percent Compaction: 95-100 Moisture Content(%): Opt +5 CURVE TEST NO. METHOD 1 D698 2 D698 3 D698 D~cTm~: 08/27/90 Technician: R.C. Dygert MATERIAL REFERENCE CURVE DATA MATERIAL DESCRIPTION MA~ DRY OPTIMUM DENSITY(pc/] MOISTURE(%) Dark Gray Brown Clay w/ Calc. 90.3 27.8 Dark Gray Clay 86.5 29.4 Yellow Brown Silty Sand 101.0 15.5 IN - PLACE TEST RESULTS DEN$1~AND MOISTURE TESTS ARE PER ~TM D2922, D3017, RESPECTIVELY TEST LIFF OR LOCA~ON REF, DRY DENS1T' MOISTURE % OF MAX. NO. ELEVA~ON CURVE ~.c.£) (%) DRY DENSITY 1 Final Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 0+80 1 88.7 33.1 98.2 2 8th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 1+50 1 88.23 32.19 97.7 3 Final Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 1+60 1 80.1 33.0* 88.7 ** 4R Final Retest of #3 Dated 08/27/90 1 90.3 29.0 100.0 5 8th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 2+50 2 85.2 33.4 98.5 6 8th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+50 2 84.1 32.8 97.2 7 9th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 2+60 2 86.0 34.0 99.4 8 9th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+40 2 83.9 33.8 97.0 9 Final Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 2+20 1 86.0 30.1 95.2 10 10th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+20 1 88.3 31.6 97.8 11 Final Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 2+50 2 84.3 33.5 97.5 12 llth Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+50 1 85.9 31.6 95.1 13 12th Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+00 1 86.8 31.0 96.1 14 Final Backfill Line "B" @ Sra. 3+40 1 1 82.9 32.9 91.8 ** 15 1st Backfill Line "A" @ Sra. 7+50 3 96.8 15.1 95.8 16 1st Backfill Line "A" @ Sra. 8+50 3 97.1 14.9 96.1 NUCLEAREQUIPMENTLD, 13723 glD. DENS1TY COUNT 3015 STD. MOISlXJRECOUNT 572 AN "R'AFTER TH E TEST NUMBER INDICATES RETEST. TEST RESULTS COM PLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS INDICATED BELOW: · MOISTURE CONTENT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. ** PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (COMPACTION) DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. R~marks: Dallas · Fort Worth · Houston · Austin 2679 LOMBARDY, DALLAS, TX 75220 PHONE:ZI4--3.52.-8352 ...... SOIL MOISTURE ~ DENSITY TEST_ REPORT ...... IN -~ PLACE TESTS BY NUCLEAR METHODS CI.IFNT: Catellus Development Corp., PRO/ECT: Gateway Business Park Phase I To: City of Coppell c/o Engineering Deptartment 732 Deforest Road P.O.Box 478 Coppell,TX 75019 REPORT DATE: 08/31/90 TMI REPORT NO.: DC90-147- 21 REPORT DISTRIBUTION: Catellus Development Corp., Albert H.Halff Assoc. Inc. L.H.Lacy Co. SPECIFICATIONS TEST DATA Percent Compaction: 95 - 100 Moistur~ Content(%): 0pt +5 CURVE TEST NO. N~T~OD 1 D698 2 D698 3 D698 DatcT~teck 08/27/90 Teclmi~an: R.C. Dygert MATERIAL REFERENCE CURVE DATA MATERIAL DESCRIFrlON MAX. DRY OPT[MUM DENSITY(pc0 MOISTURe%) Dark Gray Brown Clay w/ Calc. 90.3 27.8 Dark Gray Clay 86.5 29.4 Yellow Brown Silty Sand 101.0 15.5 IN - PLACE TEST RESULTS DENSITYAND MOISTURE TESTS ARE PERASTM D2922, D3017, RESPECTIVELY TEST LIFT OR LOCATION REF. DRY DENSITY MOISTURE % OF MAX, NO. ELEVATION CURVE (,p.e.f.) (%) DRY DENSITY 17R Final Retest of #14 Dated 08/27/90 1 86.1 30.0 95.3 NUCLF~R EQUIPMF34T I.D. 13723 STD. DENSITY COUNT 3015 STD. MOISTURE COUNT AN "R~AFTER TH E TEST NUMB ER INDICATES RETEST. TEST RESULTS COMPLYWlTH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS IN DICATED BELOW: * MOISTURE CONTENT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, ** PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (COMPACTION) DOES NOT COMPLY WITH PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. Rcmarka: 572