KFC & Pizza Hut-AG 890523 (3)R~v. 4-24-89
AGENDA
CIT~ COUNCI~
ITEM CAPTION:
'--~I~i'~ARING in consideration of a zoning'
sCanommercial Special Use P~e.;~, it, for a p~oposed
dy Lake Road on Dent~Fap, next to the
Kentucky Fried Chicken./"
.EVALUATION OF ITFiW;
FORM
May 23, 1989
(R) Retail to C-Sup)
Fried Chicken south of
at the request of
Russell R. Doyle, P.E.,
City Engineer
STAFF R. EP. :.~evin Peiffer, P.E., Ginn, Inc.
DATE: May 15, 1989
On April 20, 1989, the Plan.ing and Zoning Commission approved (6-0) this item with theTequested
variance. Due to Staff's timing in getting the Public Notice published, this case could not be
presented for a public Hearing on May 9, 1989, as regularly scheduled, but is presented tonight.
The monument sign was deleted on the Exhibit furnished the P & Z Commission {see attached
Staff Report and P & Z Minutes) in this packet.
Staff cannot support the additional driveway since the o~iginal plan for the Sandy Lake Crossing
Development proposed the lot using the main entrances to the Development as entrances to each
side of the tract (see Development Plan approved with the Preliminary Plat,on July 14, 1987)
and the proposed drive is too close (less than 150 ft.) to the existing common d~ive with
McDonald's.
BIq)GET AMT.:
~OMMENT$:
N/A
AMT. ESTIMATED:
AMT. +/- BUDGET:
FINANCIAL REVIEW BY:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Date: April 20, 1989
PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
RE: Case #S-1042
LOCATION: South of Sandy Lake Road on Denton Tap, next to the
existing McDonald's restaurant.
REQUEST:
Zoning change from (R) Retail, to (C-SUP) Commercial
Special Use Permit, for the operation of a Kentucky
Chicken restaurant.
Fried
APPLICANT: Kentucky Fried Chicken
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
(See Zoning Map)
SUMMARY:
Staff has no objections to the Special Use Permit in
general; however, staff does not support the request of an
additional drive-way, since it does not meet the
Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Also, staff recommends
the monument siqu be deleted from the SUP request, and
handled separately.
ALTERNAT IVES:
ATTACHMENTS:
1) Approve with variance requested.
2) Approve without variance requested
3) Deny
1. Location map
2. Zoning exhibit
3. Letter from Ginn, Inc., dated April 13,
1989
S1042STF
GINN, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
April 13, 1989
Mr. Russe/l~oyle,
City of yoppell
P.O. Bg~ 478
Coppel~, TX 75019
P.E.
Re: Kentucky Fried Chicken
Zoning Request and Final Plat/Construction Plans
DRC-Engineering
Dear Mr. Doyle:
We have reviewed the above referenced project and offer the
following comments.
Regarding the Zoning Change Request from Retail to Commercial-
Special Use Permit with Drive-Thru, we suggest the monument sign
not be indicated on the Site Plan at this time under the SUP but
rather be handled as a separate issue. Also, a Variance Request
should be added on the Site Plan for a north-drive access to be
allowed off of Denton Tap Road. These Site Plan revisions can be
made conditions of any motion when considering this issue at the
Planning & Zoning meeting with the revisions being requested to
be made prior to the Zoning Change Request going forward to city
Council.
Regarding the Final Plat we have the following comments.
Applicant should re-verify the square footage and acreage
calculated for this site.
Per the City's Comprehensive Floodplain Management
Ordinance, paragraph 4 o~i pa~e 34, a Floodpl~in Permit note
needs to be added to the plat. This site, however, is not
within the limits of any existing floodplain or floodway,
therefore, a permit number for development would not be
applicable.
Any proposed fire lanes outside the limits of the platted
site need to be dedicated by separate dedication
instruments. These instruments should be executed,
notarized and provided to the City prior to the Final Plat
being submitted to the City Council for consideration.
The floodplain note shown on the Final Plat is not required
to be on the plat, and thus, can be deleted.
17103 Preston Road · Suite 100 ® LB 118 · Dallas, Texas 75248 · Phone 214/2484900
The need for the Variance Request for a north-drive is due
to the Sub-Division Ordinance requiring, for a 35 mph
roadway, 100 feet be provided between drives and for a 40
mph roadway 120 feet be provided. Approval of the variance
would allow a driveway spacing of only 72 feet
approximately. Circulation will still exist without this
drive via the common access drive between McDonalds and this
site. Please reference the attached excerpts from the Sub-
Division Ordinance.
Regarding the Construction Plans we offer the following comments.
Power feed from TU Electric should be an underground feed
from Denton Tap.
Site should 'sewer (sanitary) from tke rear as per the
original Preliminary Engineering plan. This will alleviate
the need for the applicant to open cut approximately 65 feet
across the new Denton Tap Road pavement (3 southbound lanes,
median and 1 northbound lane). Public safety and reduced
liability will be better assured for both the applicant and
the City with this requested revision.
The 2" domestic water tap should be in the same trench as
the fire hydrant lead tap if the new Denton Tap Road
concrete pavement is existing at the time the site develops.
This will alleviate the need for 2 street cuts or tunnels
(whichever is required by Public Works) and only require 1.
Ail pavement shall be required to be 6" thick, 3000 psi at
28 days with a 6" lime stabilized subgrade (6%). This
includes any drives. Also, no cushion sand is allowed
between the subgrade and the pavement.
Applicant must submit written permission from the property
owner prior to the City allowing any pavement to be placed
outside either the platted area or outside any fire lane
easement boundaries. This shall be required prior to
approv~l cf the construction plans.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely, ? )
KP/dsp
cc:
Robert Howman, Ayres Assoc.
DRC
File 89305
I
1
I
I
i
i
i
!
!
i
i
!
DRIVEWAY R~)IUS
All d~$vewoys intersecting dedtcoted streets sholl bi built with o
cJ~culo~ curb ~odJus connecting the six-inch ~otsed curb of the ~oodwoy
to the design width poYement of the d~iveway. D~tveway$ Iholl be locoted
fo~ enough ¢~om the lnte~to~ p~ope~ty line to permit the curb ~odius to
loll entirely in f~ont of the sub,eot p~ope~ty. The City Engtnee~ sho]l
opp~ove the d~Jvewoy widths and d~lvewoy ~adius ot the time of site plan
~eview p~evtous to issuance of any building permit. ]n o~de~ thor the
definition of the location of the edge of pavement fo~ the tho~oughfo~e
mo¥ be mointained, d~tvewoy ~adii shall o]woys be designed to become
tongent to the street curb line. Two-way d~iveways shall ol~ays be
designed to intersect the street ot o 90-degree angle. One-woy d~ivewoy5
moy be designed to intersect o street at o minimum ~5-deg~ee ong]e.
DRlVE~AY iPACZNG ~ LOCAT]ON
The spoctng ond locotton of d=$vewoys sholl be =elated to
od~ocent d=ive~ays ond neo=by st=eet tnte=secttons. The spocing
between d=ivewoys shall be dependent upon the speed ][mit of the
tho=oughfo=e ond o=e =ecommended os follows: Isee Figure 21
20
25 65
30 ~0
35 100
~0 120
~S 150
50 200
Appendix
12
II
II
II
II
II
I
Minimum 5pacing sho]! no~ be mo~e ~hon ~e~ fee~ less ~hon ~he ~ecommended
spacings shown above. Spactngs between d~lvevays vll! be measu~®d along
the p=operty )ina from Lhe edge of one d~Jveway to t~e closest edge of
%he next d~ivewa¥ and not f~om ¢ente~]lne to cente~]~ne. At Jnte:secttons
wJ%h no f~ee ztght-tu~n ]one, the minimum distance A, Figure ~, of o d~ive-
way f~om the intersection of ma~o: ~ho~oughCa:es shall be fifty feet and
the m~nJmum distance A, Figure ~, of o d=Jveway f~om the ~nte:sect~on of
mina: ~ho~oughfo=es shall be th$=ty feet. Gene=al ~equJ=ements fo: d~Jve-
way design o~e shown ~n Figure ~. A summary of d~Jve~ay w~dth, radius
and ong)e :equi:ements is g~ven ~n Table II.
TABLE I ]
SUI~4ARY OF REQUIREMENTS
RESIDENT ]AL
W]DTH
Minimum
Maximum
R]GH1 TURN RADIUS (R)
M~n~mum
f~lximum
ONE-WAY DRIVE ANGLE
Minimum [deg:ees!
COI'~4ERCIAL
II~DUSTRIAL
20 ( 15 1-way) 20
30 ~0
10
20 25
45 45
MISCELLANEOUS THOROUGHFARE STAFDARDS
A. Specific detatls shall be os shown In the Design Standa:ds
fo: the City of Coppeil.
Appendix A
13
LEGEND
-D~stonce bQck from intersection
- Drivewoy radius
W- Approoch width
D- Distonce between driveways
!
II
I
II
I
II
50' Minimun
W
II
FIGURE 2 -- GEOMETRIC FOR DRIVEWAY DESIGN
!
I
f
H. T. ARDINGER, .IR.
(PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER)
LOT I BLOC~ A
P. McDONAld'S ADDITION
DENTON TAP ROAD
OI g. 0."~. )
T
(pROPOSED SHOPPIAIG CEIqTER)
TAP ROAD ( t 2 0' R. O. W. ) I
UTILITY SIGNATURK BLOCK
FINAL PL4T
SANDY LAKE CROSSING ADDITION