Northlake 635(10)-AG 931012AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITY COUNCIL M~:~:I'ING C~etnhor I~. lqq~
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM
Consideration and approval of a zoning change from (LI) to (LI. S.U.P.), Case # S-1069, Special Use Permit
request to operate a paint and body shop at Nikor Commerce Center, located at the southwest corner of
Wrangler Drive and Crestside Drive at the request of Fred Shade.
SUBMITTED BY:~
EVALUATION OF FI?EM:
Date of Planning and Zoning Commission: September 16, 1993
Decision of Planning and Zoning Commission: Approval (7-0)
Please see attached staff report for further details.
. STAFF REP.: Gary L_ gleh
D/rector of planni~ & Comm. ~ervices
OTHER REP.:
DATE:
BUDGET AMT.
AMT. +/- BUDGET
AMT. ESTIMATED
FINANCIAL REVIEW B
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM REVISED 2~93
REVIEWED BY CM'~~..~
P & Z HEARING DATE:
C. C. HEARING DATE:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE #: S-1069
September 16, 1993
October 12, 1993
LOCATION:
Southwest comer of Wrangler Drive and Crestside Drive.
SIZE OF AREA:
9,735square feet.
CURRENT
ZONING:
Light Industrial (LI)
REQUEST:
Approval of a zoning change from Light Industrial (LI) to Light
Industrial Special Use Permit (LI.S.U.P.).
APPLICANT:
Mr. Fred Shade
617 Loch Lane
Coppell, TX 75019
HISTORY:
A commercial strip center was built on this site in the mid 80's.
Item 6
TRANSPORTATION: Traffic enters this site via Beltline Road and Wrangler Dr.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - Vacant; (LO zoning
South - Vacant; (LI) zoning
East - Vacant; (LI) zoning
West - Middle school; (C) zoning
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The comprehensive plan suggests light industrial uses for this area.
ANALYSIS:
The applicant is requesting approval of a paint and body shop, in the
Nikor Commerce Center. He presently operates a paint and body shop
located in Dallas, but he states most of his customers reside in Coppell
and would like to relocate in Coppell.
Other tenants within the center include a church and an auto repair shop.
In the near future, the YMCA plans to relocate within this
center.
The cars will remain indoors and night and will not be parked in the
parking lot.
ALTERNATIVES:
I) Approve the special use permit request.
2) Deny the plat special use permit request.
3) Modify the special use permit request.
A3"I'ACHMEN-TS: 1) Site plan.
·stf
WRANGLER
DHIVE
TCW REALTY ADVISOR
September 27, 1993
Ms. Taryron Bowman
City of Coppell Planning Department
255 Parkway Boulevard
Coppell, Texas 75019
FAX: ¢2141 3934)948
Re: Your Case
Dear Ms. Bowman:
Thank you for taking time today to discuss your case #S-1069 related to the special use permit
considered at public hearing on September 16, 1993 by the Planning and Zoning Committee.
You confirmed that the committee approved the special use permit at Nikor Commerce
Business Center and that the committee unanimously approved the request but stipulated in
its approval certain requirements with respect to parking, sate-of-the-arts technology and the
fact that all waste material be removed on a regular basis, by a professional waste disposal
company. You also indicated that planning and zoning files have documentation and pictures
evidencing these facts.
Based upon this conversation, we rescind our September 10, 1993 letter objecting to the
special use permit.
Sincerely,
RRL:lgw
Mr. Lawrence A. Eisenberg - VIA FAX (214) 369-2076
Newmarket Grunnah Cole
File 252/5.1
86S SOUTH f[gueroa STReet / LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-~5~3 / (213) 683-4200
FAX (~13) 683-~201
October 12, 1993
SCIENTIFIC CONSULTING LABORATORIES, INC.
Coppell City Council
Environmental Concerns regarding Special Use Permit request # 5-1069 from
Mr. Fred Shade
1)
2)
3)
The proposed paint and body shop has no volatile organic compound (VOC)
emission controls. All VOCs generated during operations will be exhausted
to the outside where they can be drawn into other tenants fresh air intake
ducts. Due to the close proximity of tenants, particularly those serving children,
I believe there is a high probability that tenants and their customers will be
exposed to VOCs at concentrations above the Texas Air Control Board Health
Effects Screening levels.
An environmental and area safety impact assessment could not be made
because the following information was not provided by Mr. Shade for review:
a) Material Safety Data Sheets for proposed chemical usage
b) Projected chemical usage in gallons per month
c) Details concerning chemical storage facilities for virgin and waste
materials ( including flammables)
d) Details concerning chemical use activities which will be performed
outside the paint booth
e) Details of any activities which could result in discharge of chemicals to
the sanitary sewer system
The operation is likely to be exempt from Texas Air Control Board and
Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission regulations with regard
to air emissions and hazardous waste. Therefore, the city of Coppell can
not rely upon these agencies to enforce environmental regulations. If the
SU.P. is eventually granted, the best way to protect against environmental
and health problems in the area is to write specific provisions into the S.U.P.
to address these concerns. At a minimum, it appears that add on equipment
should be required to dramatically lower the V.QC. emissions from the paint
booth exhaust stack. In addition, adjoining tenant walls should be air tight
and the S.U.P. approval tied to Texas Air Control Board Health Effects Screen-
ing Levels. These levels should be the maximum concentrations of VOCs to which
tenants and customers in the complex should be subject. Provisions should also be
established to fund periodic inspections to verify that compliance with State and
Federal regulations and S.U.P. stipulations is maintained. Failure to abide by these
regulations and stipulations should result in closure of the business if not corrected
in a timely fashion.
(214) 241-4468 15,,~8 V;~lwood Parkway SLJJtO 110, Carrollton, TX 75006 FAX (2~4) 241 454 ~
Recommendation:
Due to the lack of information necessary to properly determine the affect this operation
will have on nearby tenants and their customers, SCLI recommends that a vote on this
S.U.P. request be postponed until an adequate environmental and safety review has
been conducted and appropriate protective S.U.P. provisions formulated.
Sincerely,
Greg Hawk REM, RI-IS?
Director of Environmental Services
SCIENTIFIC CONSULTING LABORATORIES. INC.