Loading...
Riverview Plaza-AG 901113 AGENDA REQUEST FORM CITY COUNCIL MRRTING November 13, 1990 ITEM NUMBER Cm~ide~-atica and apl~oval of a II'~llmlnn~ plat of the Rivet-view Plaza Addition~ located app~ximately Date of pl~n~o and Zo,n'{n~ Comm~m~ Meeting: STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Plannin~ Di~ct~r OTHER REP.: DATE: October 18, 1990 De~'i~em of ph.n~in~ n~a ZOnln~ Commi~io~: Apl~'oval The applicant is requesti~ eq~p.~val of a prelimitmry plat. If apl~oved~ the plat will allow f~ the eventual constructic~ of a 3-story office l~laln~o. Plense see attached staff repot for further BUDGET AMT. AMT +/- BUDGET AMT. ESlqM&TRr~ FINANCIAL REVIEW BY LEGAL REVIEW BY: AG[NDA ItRQUEST fORM S~O REVIEWED BY CM: P & Z HEARING DATE: C. C. HEARING DATE: CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT RIVERVIEW PLAZA - PRELIMINARY PLAT October 18, 1990 November 13, 1990 LOCATION: Subject parcel is situated at the southwest corner of Coppell Road and Coppell Road; approximately 850 feet of S.H. 121. east SIZE OF AREA: 1.015 Acres REQUEST: Approval of a preliminary plat. APPLICANT: Gary Sanford 224 Hurstview Hurst, Texas 76053 (817) 268-0917 Engineer Lou Home Engineering 11225 Garland Road, Suite 102 Dallas, Texas 75218 (214) 324-3435 HISTORY: City Council had previously granted approval of a final plat on this site in 1986. The plat was never filed with the County, and is now considered null and void. The applicant was required to reapply for consideration of final plat approval. TRANSPORTATION: Although the portion of Coppell Road south of this tract is proposed to be a four lane undivided thoroughfare, this part of the street is not on the thoroughfare plan. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - Vacant, Flood Plain Land, Zoned (C) East - Vacant, Zoned (A) South Vacant, Zoned (LI) West Mobile Home Park, Zoned (C) ITEM 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Plan shows this land oriented commercial uses. being utilized for highway ANALYSIS: This plat is similar to the plat submitted by the same applicant and owner four years ago. There are three differences: major l) A siqnificant decrease in the total square footaqe of the buildinq - Original plan indicated 18,000 square feet - the new plat shows 4500 square feet. 2) A reduction in the overall height of the buitdinq - The applicant had originally requested approval of a five story office building. The new request is for three stories; but is not to exceed the 37 feet maximum height requirement. 3) Deletion of screeninq wall along the western property line - A mobile home park is located along the west side of this property, although the current zoning classification is (C) Commercial. Because the mobile home park was in place prior to a permanent zoning classification being placed on the property, the mobile home park is considered as a non-conforming use. Therefore, a screening wall is not required to be constructed between the two properties. Because this plat is less intensive than the one submitted in 1986, staff is inclined to recommend approval. Two concerns have surfaced, however, and need to be resolved before approval is recommended by Commission. One, parking shown on the plat does not meet requirements of the ordinance. Two, the 5% landscaping provision should be carefully analyzed to insure the spirit, as well as the letter of the landscaping requirements are met. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the preliminary plat 2) Deny the preliminary plat ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Plat RVWPSTF