Loading...
TR9303-CS 950124Leftwich & Associates 909 Shiloh Drive, DeSoto, Texas, 75115-528~ (214) 2304) 865, Fax (214)230-g 183 January 24, 1995 Mr. Ken Griffin, P.E. Assistant City Manager City of CoppeH P.O. Box 478 Dallas, Texas 75019 CITY OF COPPELL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY CITY OF COPPELL SANDY LAKE ROAD STUDY Dear Ken: Attached is a letter concerning the issue of my final invoice to IBM and J.W. Bryan's request for additional funds from the City of Coppell. The letter should give you more insight into the matter of my payment request to IBM. I am troubled by two apparent misconceptions in your January 18, 1995 letter to J.W. First, I am not asking for additional payment for work done under the Roadway Impact Fee Study. I am requesting that IBM honor their original contract with me for the modeling portion of the project. You also stated in your letter that the $2,300.00 Le~vich & Associates charged under a separate contract testing Sandy Lake as a 4 LD and 6 LD for the Year 2010 appears to be covered under the Roadway Impact Fee Study (my October, 1994 itemized invoice). Ken, my recollection of our discussions concerning the contract between Leftwich & Associates and the City of Coppell is as follows. You called to ascertain whether the Roadway Impact Fee Model tested Sandy Lake Road in the Year 2004 or 2010. I explained that the Roadway Impact Fee Model addressed only 2004 and did not include projected 2010 demographics and roadways. You asked that I provide a cost estimate to test Sandy Lake Road using 2010 demographics and roadways. I did so and upon your approval conducted the study. Leftwich 8: Associates completed the 2010 model and furnished you the results within the time requested. The charge for this project was under the estimated cost. Lethnich & Associates attempts to provide services that are satisfactory to the client, ff I am in error, I would appreciate you letting us know. I regret that I was not able to furnish plots. My problem is two-fold. I am not the licensed owner of TranPlan and any request for acquiring updates for state-of-the-art plotters would have to come through/BM. Since Alan Ross is no longer with that firm there is no one available in the Dallas office who has knowledge of the program and can astutely discuss plotters and programs with the TranPlan group. Second, since JBM has not paid my final invoice, I find that I lack the capital required to experiment with various plotting services in order to find one that can plot under the old plotter parameters. As I previously stated, Leftwich & Associates attempts to provide the best services possible to its clients. If there is a problem concerning our contract for Sandy Lake Road, please let me know. I will be more than happy to discuss with you any duplications of efforts and fee adjustments. Sincerely, Barbra L. Leftwich Principal IT" Leftwich & Associates 909 Shiloh Drive, DeSoto, Texa~, 75115-5283 (214) 2304)1165, Fax (214)230-111113 January 24, 1995 Mr. J.W. Bryan JBM Engineers & Planners 15400 Knoll Trail, Suite 111 Dallas, Texas 75248 CITY OF COPPELL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE STUDY FINAL INVOICE OF LEFTWICH & ASSOCIATES (94-001-21) Dear J.W.: I received your letter forwarding a copy of Ken C,-riffin's response today. I believe there has been a major misunderstanding concerning my request. From the tone of your initial letter to Ken and his response, I get the impression that you think I have gone over budget and am requesting additional compensation. In our conversations and my letter to you I have not asked for anything above my original contract (attached). My agreement with IBM at the start of this project was to perform the traffic modelling phase of the project and to assist Tom Herrin in the development of the land use portion of the project. I subsequently agreed to perform the land use phase of the project for the contingent total originally agreed upon, $19,890.00. As your December 7, 1994 letter stated, I have been paid $15,151.22. My final invoice of was $4,966.05. The invoice included the remaining balance of my contract, $4,738.78, and a charge of $227.27 in interest for all invoices not paid within 30 days (as stated in the original contract). In our previous conversations concerning this invoice you suggested that IBM should sign over the license agreement for TranPlan to ~ch & Associates in lieu of final payment. You then recanted and informed me that your company had decided to keep the program. You also stated that you could not pay my invoice unless you went back to the City of Coppell for additional funds. My response was to the effect that my contract was between IBM & Lefh~ich & Associates and that the City of Coppell should not be responsible. You indicated that was the only way you knew how to pay the invoice. I have had conversations with Alan Ross concerning the change in project managers. Alan indicated that Dannie Cummings charged his last month at IBM to the project without showing any progress toward completion. I believe that IBM, as prime contractor, is responsible for the administration of the contract, billing, and orchestration of the project. The change in project managers and failure to mrna. age the project responsibly is not the fault of my firm or the City of Coppell. IBM now expects someone else to pay for this lack of control within your own organization. I view JBIVI's response to this issue as unethical. The TranPlan program was purchased with funds from the project. By not honoring the contract JBM entered into with LeRwich & Associates and in keeping TranPlan for marketing to the public, IBM is, in essence, using my money to make a profit from and to place itself in direct competition with my firm. I expect full payment of my November 1, 1994 invoice. I will accept transfer of ownership and the site license for TranPlan. I regret to inform you that I cannot furnish the TranPlan data files and documents required under the agreements your firm entered into with NCTCOG and the City of Coppell until this matter is settled. If this matter cannot be settled by February 15, 1995, I will proceed with written complaints to the Texas Department of Transportation, it's Business Opportunity Programs Office, the North Central Texas Regional Certification Agency, the Better Business Bureau and begin legal action for collection of the unpaid portion of the contract. I look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Barbra L. Leflwich Prindpal Tom Swenson, IBM, KC Ken Griffin, City of Copper Leftwich & A~eociate~ Urba~ Transportation October 14, 199:5 Mr. Dannie Cumminge JDM Enginee~e & Piannere 15400 Knoll Trail. Suite 111 Pallae, Texae 7524~ Dear Dannie. Thi~ I~tter will e~rve ae an agreement between Lefravich & Aeeoclatee an~ JDM Enginoere & Planne~ ~ ~~ wo~ ~~d in ~e C~y ~ C~ll ~way Impa~ Foe ~tudy. I will p~ ~e ~ce~ we agre~ u~n a~ Ii~ in ~ume~. It le u~ere~ ~m ~ou ~11 ~al~ ~e r~mini~ ~ at ~e $10,~. $15,000 and $20,~ I~el~. At that ~me you ~11 ~mi~ ~e~er ~ co, hue wi~h ~e work ! have pu~ed. I ~11 eubm~ a m~ Invoice ~ my hour, accempiiehed, and ex~neee ~ be ~eim~med. Involcee ~11 be eubmittal. If a taek is not idenflfl~ on ~e at~ched d~u~nt ~ich pe~orm, I ~11 acquire e~her venal or ~t~n ap~al ~ ~ b~oro ~mpl~. If theee terme are acceptable to you, pleaee eign both coploe and return one ~o1~ to me. If you have any q, ueetione or need addi~ional information do not heeitat~ call. Barbra L. Leftwfch, ~ Manager L~twich & Aeeoc, iatee Dannle Cumminge, Manager JI~M Enojine~re & P'lannere Leffwich & Associates 909 Shiloh Drive DeSoto, Tx 75115 i_:~-_n~'impact Fee'study. ' ................. ~:..K~k.~._ .m_ .ee. ting .......... B. Detefmine use of Staff C0mmjttl _ee. ...................... DC :'-_::-.. '.. ...................... .... Ad~._~mmee" - ' .......... ~. C'_fly ap_~___int Adv[so.~ Committee ......... -" Dc I-^-:--I:~f~l~'serviCe'~ma~ ....... i--'."-'.-..i'i ....... ' ....... i . ....... ~ ..... B. Review previ.o.....~! .s' I.an. d.use. NOTOOG on m__ .o~.! .~_oJ~n~ BL - Review area ira_pact ~udle$ ....... BI_ .................. DC .~.-~dv~ Committee rev~w, and comments A. Review by City Council & c~ll for public heari_ng DC i~: .R_e~.).~_d. _Use a~$um PrioreSS::. c. Public hearing . . ................ DC ~..-Revise i~-u~"~m~,°ns ~i.. ~.~'~_~ri i~-ii~nd -use' a~.m-p.-i!-_61~ ..... ~.__A__c~l_ u_ir._e.._netw0rk., for 1990 & 2000 Modi~ for 1993 & 2003_i~-~_'.. ..... ' ............ ................ .. _B~. Ye¢~~_ar ,ep match T _sz_.. ........ .... _M_..o_.d_ '..dy.. ~r. city limits and. S..e~_ ic_e_..area ..bp..u_nd___a_r__i~.. C. Mod~.d_em_ographics based__o.~_ __n~w land use TH b: Determine scenarios and make modificmtions ...... ~i.. ' 'Run r.e.~ &-'re~.~ew for average_ trip lengt._h_ .... BL H. Correct for State Law limit of 3 miles BL : :.'~J_u_s.t .f0~ trip_' '6i:lfiii~i~at!.on_..: ............. .':.__:::-_-:_--_. _._---:-'B-[ ! (aP_.) ........................ DC/TH E~'r HB TH 10 TH 10 DG 0 BL 0 DG~TH BL,fl'H 4 BL 4 City of Coppell Roadway Fee Study 10114193 Leftwich & Associates 909 Shiloh Drive DeSoto, Tx 75115 ~..' ~Ject. m_ad.w._ay ca__pac_i_ty _ _l~..nc_h_m. a_r_ks.. .............. ~.'~ie~'~ify extstin, g ..d...e..fici~n_~ .~b~.~.9.n..m_..oJ~__ 5'."l-d~{~_~pr0.-vem._ en~ for._ "n_e_w. g_r_o~h.: ...... ~:-'jde-ntifiy new & recq. upmen_t .pro' .~._.. ..... -~ ....... ~..-~he ~r~-'~"i.)~i-l~ (u:__s~.- ~_ITE__T. Hp R._at_.eSJ__ DC BL DC BL DC BL DC BL 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 -'-~/e_-'_~ m~leJ'-rat'~''& c~mp~_re ........ DC - G: ~uia~e f~ ~ ~ un~ ~E~bli~" m-~im-~m '~e~ 's~i~ ~ ........ W~ ~h Ci~ S~ff & a~ney to deve~ -'~'-~di~h~-&'.f~ ~h~ule re~i~ o~e [ '~e~w'~'~ ~'~cii a~ ~11 for public hea~ ~.'-'~i~ b~ri~g .... b:" ~v~'OlP; f~ ~h~ui~; a~"°~ina~ ........... ~ ..... ~:. ~opt~n .................................................. ~ Fine! su~m~ re~ ................ : .............. --~nd u~ a~umptions -- i~pa~-'~ch'~ule ~ BL _..S~dY_~eth_~oJ~Y _.. ............ B. Maximum of 15~un~ .......................... ~:' '~li~i0n '~f ~._date .................... . IBL DC BL DC BL DC BL/TH N/A N/A I,~A TOTALS 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 $19,890 City of Coppell Roadway Fee Study 10/14/93 2