WA0302-PS050823city o f
coppell
EXCELLENCE
BY DESIGN
STREETS
UTILITIES
ENGINEERING
TRAFFIC
FACILITIES
FLEET
SERVICES
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Discussion concerning a recommendation to the City Council on the
Roadway Capital Improvement Plan; the associated Impact Fee; Land
Use Assumptions; Water and Waste Water Capital Improvement
Plans and the proposed Water and Waste Water Impact Fees.
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
The Planning and Zoning Commission is the Advisory Committee for the
City. Per Section 395.058 (c) of the 2004 Texas Local Government Code:
"The Advisory Committee serves in an advisory capacity and is established to:
(1) advise and assist the political subdivision in adopting land use
assumptions;
(2) review the capital improvements plan and file written comments;
(3) monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements plan;
(4) file semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the capital
improvements plan and report to the political subdivision any perceived
inequities in implementing the plan or imposing the impact fee; and
(5) advise the political subdivision of the need to update or revise the land use
assumptions, capital improvements plan, and impact fee."
city o f coppell
What is an Impact Fee?
Per Section 395.001 of the 2004 Texas Local Government Code:
"(4) 'Impact Fee' means a charge or assessment imposed by a
political subdivision against new development in order to generate
revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or
facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new
development."
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Terms you will hear me use:
Service Area: The area within the corporate boundaries served by the
capital improvements. For water and waste water, the service area can be
the entire corporate limits. For roadways, the service area is limited to six
miles.
Service Unit: Standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or
discharge attributable to an individual unit of development.
For water and waste water, the service unit is defined as the equivalent to a
water connection for a single family residence.
For roadways, the service unit is defined as a combination of the number
of vehicles traveling during the peak hour and the distance traveled by the
vehicles in miles.
This is referred to as a vehicle-mile.
city o f coppell
Basic Impact Fee Calculation Steps:
(1) Determine base year demand and deficiencies;
(2) Determine future year capacity added by new CIP;
(3) Difference of future year capacity of new CIP and base year demand
and deficiencies is the new capacity added;
(4) Determine cost of future CIP and eligible projects that have excess
capacity;
(5) Determine % of cost attributed to new capacity (3/2*4);
(6) Determine new demand in future year;
(7) If new demand is greater than new capacity added, then 100% of
cost of new capacity is used in calculations (6>3?);
(8) Determine Impact Fee (5/6).
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
c ty o f coppell
Reference in Texas
Local Go~rnment Code C°mlleti°n Action By... Required Action
Date
2004 Edition
n/a 3/8/2005 City Council Award contract to revise the In~vact Fee Study
395.053 5/13/2005 Freese/Nichols Soonest time to submit revised land use assun~tions and
capital improvements plan.
395.058 ( a ) & ( b ) 5/24/2005 City Council Reappoint Planning and Zoning as the Advisory Board and ensure one
(if needed) member is involved in real estate, development or the building industry.
395.053 7/12/2005 City Council Approve Ordinance calling a Public Hearing to receive infom~tinn on
land use assumptions, capital in~rovements plan and m~Pact fee amount.
n/a 7/18/2005 Staff Send public notice to Citizens Advocate
395.058 ( c ) 7/21/2005 Advisory Board Receive information on land use assumptions, capital m~Orovements plan
and tmPact fee amount.
395.044 ( b ) 7/22/2005 Citizens Advocate Publish notice in paper on public hearing on land use assumptions,
capital in~orovements plan and impact fee an~ount.
395.054 7/22/2005 Staff Make amendrrents to land use assumptions, capital tmprovercents plan
and in~act fee amount available to the public
395.056 8/15/2005 Advisory Board Last day to file written comrrents on amendments to land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan and impact fee arcount.
395.055 & 395.044 ( b ) 8/23/2005 City Council Public Hearing on amendments to land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan and impact fee amount.
395.057 ( a ) 9/13/2005 City Council Approve ordinance approving amendments to land use assumptions,
capital improvements plan and impact fee anaount.
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Land Use Assumptions
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city
o f coppell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
Figure 2,1
('ir,' of C'ot:~t.*¢11
Original 2005
Land Use Plum
~o~p.p.s&j
city o f
coppell
Figure 2.2
City ~f Coppell
(3rig/ual .01 ? ,: Buildou!
Land L%e Plan
i
x,
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Capital Improvement Plans
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Water System Improvements
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city of
coppell
Fi~r~
CiD' of CoppeJl
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f
coppell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
T
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Exist~g and Ptanned Improvements for the Water Distribution System, 2005-2015
No. Descr~ation of Project Percent Utilization Costs Based on 2005 Prices
10-Year
(Bmklout)
2005 2015 2005-2015 Estina[~d Cost Ctrrent Developn~nt (2005-2015)
24-~ch Sandy Lake Road and Coppell Road water line from
1 Denton Tap Road to Wagon Wheel EST 20% 100% 80% $985,030 $197,006 $788,024
12-inch water line along Ruby Road from Royal Ln to Coppell
2 Road 70% 100% 30% $324,480 $227,136 $97,344
12-~ch water line along western edge of City f'om Northpoint
3 Drive to Gatoview Drive 60% 100% 40% $526,320 $315,792 $210,528
4 Wagon Wheel 2.0 MG EST 7% 100% 93% $2,786,990 $183,202 $2,603,788
12-~qch SH 121 Water Line fi.om Sandy Lake to Coppell
5 Road 89% 100% 11% $212,616 $189,493 $23,123
6 Village Parkway Pun~p #6 0% 100% 100% $273,607 $0 $273,607
30 Sandy Lake Road water line kom MacArthm- Blvd. to
7 Denton Tap Road 28% 100% 72% $1,862,720 $518,949 $1,343,771
16-tach water line fi.om Bethel Road to Airline Drive along
8 Denton Tap 0% 100% 100% $578,500 $0 $578,500
9 16- ~ch Wator Lhae Along MacAthur Blvd. 0% 100% 100% $967,200 $0 $967,200
10 16-inch Water L~e Along Parkway Blvd. 0% 100% 100% $372,000 $0 $372,000
11 Star Leaf Pump Station 0% 100% 100% $2,304,000 $0 $2,304,000
12-inch SH 121 Water Line from Coppell Road to Denton
12 Tap 0% 100% 100% $l,420,154 $0 $1,420,154
12-kach water l~e along Belt Line Road and west Along IH
535 fi'om the existkng l 2-hch water line south of Lakeshore
13 Drive to the existing 12-~ch wa~r line at Freeport Parkway 0% 100% 100% $1,435,200 $0 $1,435,200
Rephcetrg~ o f Exist~g 12-~ch with 20-h~ch Water L~e
14 fi'om Elevated Stomgo Tank 0% 100% 100% $518,400 $0 $518,400
TOTAL $15,058,257 $2,001,652 $12,935,639
*Proiect Costs for Prc~iects # 1, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10 Drovided b~' the Clt~ of Co[~Dell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Projected Water Serv/ce Units for 2005-2015
2005 Ex/stag Water Service 2005 Existing 2015 Projected 2015 Projected 2005-2015Projected
Meter Size Water Meters Unit Equivalents Service Units Water Meters Service Units Growth in Service Units
5/8" 10851 1 10851 11209 11209 358
1" 109 1.67 182.03 166 278 96
1 1/2" 95 3.33 316.35 145 482 166
2" 420 5.33 2238.6 641 3414 1176
3" 34 11.67 396.78 52 605 208
4" 22 21 462 34 705 243
6" 3 46.67 140.01 5 214 74
8" 143 80 11440 218 17447 6007
TOTAL 11677 171 26027 12468 34354 8327
~ Residential (5/8'5 Proiected Water Meters based on proiected populatbn percent ~rowth fi.om 2005-2015
* Conanercial (1 "-8') Pmiected Water Meters based on ~miected comnerical acre ~rowth fi.om 2005-2015
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Maximum Impact Fee Calculation
The maximum impact fee that c.m~ be levied is equal to the projected capital cost
needed to serve 10-year development divided by the projected 10-year growth in
sea, ice units.
The total projected costs include the projected capital improvement costs to serve 10-
year development, the projected finance cost for the capital improvements, and the
consultant cost for preparing and updating the Capital Improvement Plan.
Maximum Water Impact Fee
The digible costs for water include the following:
Proposed Capital Improvement Costs $12~935,639
To~al Capital Improvement Costs $12,935,639
Financing Costs $3,545,658
Total Eligible Costs $16,481,297
Total Water Impact Fee Credit (50%) $989
The total eligible costs associated with the existing and proposed water system
improvements to meet projected growth over the next ten years is $16,481,297. The
increase in the number of service units due to growth over the next ten years is
projected as 8,327 service units.
Maximum Water Impact Fee = 10-year Capital Improvernent Cost- 50% Credit
With Credit 10-year growth in Service Units
$16,481,297- $8,240,648
8,327 SU
$989/SU
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Wastewater System Improvements
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f
coppell
lrigm e 3A
C it.',, of C oppel!
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f
coppell
/ /
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Existing and Planned Improvements for the Sewer Collection System, 2005-2015
No. Descnptk)n of Project Percent Utilizatinn Costs Based on 2005 Prices
10-Year
(Buildout)
2005 2015 2005-2015 Estimated Cost Cun-entDevelo~n~ (2005-2015
E~xisfing 30-~ch forcerram in Basin C 60% 100% 40% $1,164,000 $698,400 $465,600
2 Existbg 24-ineh Cwavity Line in Basin A 70% 100% 30% $1,476,000 $1,033,200 $442,800
3 Fwds t~g 21-bch Gravity LWe in Bask] A 70% 100% 30% $357,600 $250,320 $107,280
4 F;xisting 18-inch Gravity Line in Basin A 70% 100% 30% $321,600 $225,120 $96,480
5 Existing 15 -inch Gravity Line in Basin A 70% 100% 30% $428,400 $299,880 $128,520
6 Existing 21-~ch Gravity Line in Basin B 40% 100% 60% $357,600 $143,040 $214,560
7 Existing 27-~2ch Crcav~:y Line in Basin B 30% 100% 70% $751,800 $225,540 $526,260
8 Existing15/24-inch Gravity Line in Basin E 50% 100% 50% $1,045,800 $522,900 $522,900
9 Eydsfing 30~inch Gravity Line in Basin C and E 30% 100% 70% $2,263,200 $678,960 $1,584,240
10 SaN Jones 30-inch forcema~n (discharge l?om Deforest PS) 0% 100% 100% $3,040,012 $0 $3,040,012
11 New 20-inch forcermin from Sandy Lake Lift Station 0% 100% 100% $1,168,409 $0 $1,168,409
12a and b Upsize Deforest and Sandy Lake Lift Stations 0% 100% 100% $2,587,755 $0 $2,587,755
13 Upsize 8"to 12"inNorthwest Sec6on of BasinA 0% 100% 100% $1,123,200 $0 $1,123,200
14 Add 12-inch Sewer Line in South ofBasin E 0% 100% 100% $187,200 $0 $187,200
TOTAL $16,272,576 $4,077,360 $12,195,216
*Costs for Projects # 10,11,12a and b rrovided by C~ of Co~pell
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Projected Wastewater Service Units for 2005-2015
2005 Existing Wastewater 2015 Projected 2015 2005-2015
Meter Wastewater Semice Unit 2005 Existing Wastewater Projected Projected Growth
Size Meters Equivalents Service Units Meters Service Unitsin Service Units
5/8" 10851 1 10851 11209 11209 358
1" 109 1.67 182.03 166 278 96
1 1/2" 95 3.33 316.35 145 482 166
2" 420 5.33 2238.6 641 3414 1176
3" 34 11.67 396.78 52 605 208
4" 22 21 462 34 705 243
6" 3 46.67 140.01 5 214 74
8" 143 80 11440 218 17447 6007
TOTAL 11677 171 26027 12468 34354 8327
* Residential (5/8') Projected Wastewater Meters based on projected population percent ~rowth ~?om 2005-2015
* C orrmercial (1 "~ 8'7 Proiected Wastewater Meters based on ]~roiected commerical acm ~rowth from 2005-2015
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f
~aximum Impact Fee Calculation
coppell
q~e maYamum impact fee that can be levied is equal to the projeeted c~ital cost needed
to serve lO-year development div/ded by the projected 10-year growth in service units.
The total projected costs include the projected capital in~provement costs to serve lO-
year development, the projected finance cost for the capital i.~mvements, and the
consultant cost for prelmnng and updating the Capital Improvement Phm.
Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee
The eligible costs for water include the following:
Proposed Capi~ Improvement Costs $12,195,216
Total Capital Improvement Costs $12,195,216
Financing Costs $3,342,709
Total Eligible Costs $15~537,924
Total Wastewater Impact Fee Credit (50%) $933
The total eligible costs associated with the existing and proposed wustewater system
improvements to meet projected growth over the next ten years is $15,537,924. The
increase in the number of semce units due to growth ove~ the next ten years is Prc0eeted
as 8,327 service traits.
Maximum Wastewater Impact = I 0- year Capi~ h~,,uvement Cost - 50% Credk
With Credit 10-ye~ Growth in Service Urfits
$15,537,924 - $7,768,962 8327 SU
$933 / SU
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Roadway System Improvements
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
LEGEND:
IMPACT FEE ROADWAYS
...... RECOUPMENlr ROADWAYS
FIGURE 4.2
CITY OF COPPELL
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
COPPELL
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f
coppell
Z
SANDY LAKE ROAD
RUBY RD.
BETHEL ROAD I
!
I
! .,
BETHEL ROAD II
SOUTHWESTERN BLVD.
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
SANDY LAKE ROAD
IBETHAL SCHOOL RD.
I ~ ~,, BELT LINE ROAD ~'.
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
SUMM.a~RY OF PROJECT COST
RECOUPEMENT PROJECTS
COST wi
PROJECT ROADWAY FROM TO COST FINANCING
3* SANDY LAKE ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD MACARTHUR BLVD. $11,145,337 $14,935,000
4* SANDY LAKE ROAD MACARTHUR BLVD. CITY LIMrT (EAST) $5,193,720 $6,960,000
8* FREEPORT PARKWAY IH-635 BETHAL ROAD $1,017,629 $1,364,000
12' BELT LINE ROAD SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. MACARTHUR BLVD. $522,283 $700,000
Total: $17,878,969 $23,959,000
*Cost from City Contract Documents
EXPANSION PROJECTS
COST wi
PROJECT ROADWAY FROM TO COST FINANCING
1'* SANDY LAKE ROAD CITY LIMIT (WEST) COPPELL ROAD $5,802,578 $7,776,000
2** SANDY LAKE ROAD COPPELL ROAD DENTON TAP ROAD $5,115,927 $6,856,000
5** ROYAL LANE SANDY LAKE ROAD EXTEND SOUTH $771,750 $1,035,000
6** FREEPORT PKWY SH 121 SANDY LAKE ROAD $1,140,436 $1,529,000
7** FREEPORT PKWY RUBY ROAD SANDY LAKE ROAD $1,627,609 $2,181,000
9** BETHEL ROAD CITY LIMIT (WEST) FREEPORT PKWY. $8,994,000 $12,052,000
10'** ROYAL LANE IH~635 BETHEL ROAD $3,394,000 $4,548,000
11'** SOUTHWESTERN BLVD. ~COPPELL ROAD CREEK CROSSING $1,009,000 $1,353,000
13'** MACARTHUR BLVD. BETHEL SCHOOL ROAD BELT LINE ROAD $1,579,O00 $2,116,000
I I I Total:I $29,434,300I $39,446,000
**Engineer's P~obab/e Construction Cost Estimates provided by the City
*** Freese and Nicho/s Conceptual Level Cost Estimates
TOTAL ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS I $47,313,269 I $63,405,000
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Maximum Assessable Impact Fee
Line # Service Area
1 Total Veh-Miles of CapacityAdded bythe CIP 33,413
(From Projected Veh Miles of New Capacit)9
2 Total Veh-Mlles of Existing Demand on CIP Roads 14,969
From Yeh Miles of~risting Demand on CIP Roadways)
3 Total Veh-Mile of Existing Deficiencies on Existing Roads 4,133
From E~cess Capacity and Deficiencies)
4 Net A~tou nt of Ye h-M lie Capacity Added 14,311
Line gl-Line #2-Line #3)
5 Total Eligible Cost of CIP Within Service Area $63,405,000
rFrom Engineer's Opinion of Probable Constructton Costs)
6 goat of Net Capacity Supplied $27,157,029
~Net of Capacity Added/Total of Capacitp Added) *CIP Cost (Line fid/Line #1)*{Zinc #5)
7 goat to Meet Existing Needs and Usage $36,2471971
~Total Cost of CIP~7ost of Net Capacity Supplied) - Line #5-Line ~6
6 rural Veh-Mile of New Demand Over 10 Years 80,702
'From Projected Vehicle-Miles of New Demand/
9 % of Capacity Added A~tributed to New Growth 563.9%
(Total of New Demand/Net Amount of Capacity Added) - Line #S/Line fid
10 If Line 8 > Line 4, Reduce Line 9 to 100% 100.0%
11 Cost of Capacity Added Attributed to New Growth $27,1571029
(Cost of Net Capacity Supplied * Cost Att~ buted to New Growth) - Line g6 *Line#I O
12 Maximum Fee par Service Unit - Without Credit $337
(Cost of Net Capacity Attributed to New Growth/Total Veh-Mile of New Demand) - Line #II/Line ~
13 Percent of Fee Recoverable 50%
14 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit $168
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Impact Fee Information
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
FIGURE 4,1
CITY OF COPPELL
ROADWAY IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREA
COPPELL
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Original Roadway
Impact Fee Study
with Ten Zones
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Land-Use Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table
Dev. Trip Trip Veh-~ Per
ITELand Use Unit Rate Length Dev Unit
Residential
Residential (Meifiumffiow) DU 1.0] 4.20 4.24
~.csidendal (High Density) DU 0.62 4.20 2.60
Dther~ Not Specified DU 1.01 4.20 4.24
I)ffice
General Office Building 1000 sq. fl. 1.49 4.80 7.15
Medical/Dental Office 1000 sq. ~. 3.72 480 17.86
Othem Not Specified 1000 scI. lt. 1.49 4.80 7.15
Retail / Commercial
Shopping Center I000 sq. fi. 2.48 3.20 7.92
Hon~ Improven~nt Superstore 1000 sq. fl. 1.72 1.95 334
Super market 10~ sq. ~. 6.69 1.05 7.02
Resturant 1000 sq. It. 6.12 1,90 11.62
Fast food with drive thru 1000 sq. It. 17.32 2.15 37.24
Gasoline/Service Station with Conv Fueling Positions 5.89 0.90 5.30
Hotel Rooms 0.59 3.20 1.89
Bank with Drive Thru 1000 sq. fi. 27.44 1.25 3431
Othem Not Specified 1000scI. fi. 2.48 3.20 7.94
Light Industrial
Ganeml Light Indus trial 1000 sq. fi. 0.98 3.30 3.23
Industfial Park 1000 sq. fi. 0.86 330 2.84
Mini Warehouse (Self Storage) 1000 sq. It. 0.26 3.30 0.86
Othew Not Specified 1000sq. It. 0.98 3.30 3.23
Institutional
Priam/Middle School Students 0.15 2. i0 032
I~gh School Students 0.14 2.10 0.29
Ir. / Con~aunity College Students 0.12 3.00 0.36
Day Care Center Students 0.82 2.10 1.72
Church 1000 sq. t'~. 0.66 1,45 0.96
Dthers Not Specified 1000sq. It. 0.66 1.45 0.96
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
Proposed Plan Current Plan
ITE Land Use Veh-Mi per Dev. Veh-MI per Dev.
Unit Unit Reason for Difference
Residential
~esidential (Medium/Low) 4.24 2.85 Pre,,ious Plan used a lower rote thp
Residential (High Density) 2.60 2.01 Pre,,ious Plan used a lower rata tdp
Others Not Specified 4.24 2.85 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Office
General Office Building 7.15 3.99 Pre,,ious Plan was limited by a 3 mile tdp length
Medical / Dental Of~ce 17.86 n/a n/a
Others Not Specified 7.15 3.99 Pre~ious Plan was limited by a 3 mile tdp length
Retail I Commercial
Shopping Center 7.92 4.77 =re,,ious Plan used a lower rate trip
Home Impro,,ement Superstore 3.34 n/a ~/a
Supermarket 7.02 n/a 1/a
Resturant 11.62 3.50 =re~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Fast Food with Dd~e ThrU 37.24 3.64 =tedious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Gasoline/Se~ce Station with Conv. 5.30 n/a l/a, Different De,~lopment Unit
Hotel 1.89 1.34 =re',ious Plan was limited by a 3 mile tdp length
Bank with Dd,~e Tnur 34.31 2.11 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Others Not Specified 7.94 4.76 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Light Industrial
General Light Industrial 3.23 1.06 Pre~ious Plan wes limited by a 3 mile tdp length and had a lower tdp rate
Industrial Park 2.84 2.61 Pre~ioos Plan wes limited by a 3 mile tdp length and had a lower trip rate
Mini Warehouse (Self Storage) 0.86 0.66 Pre~ious Plan was limited by a 3 mile tdp length
Others Not Specified 3.23 2.61 Pre~ious Plan was limited by a 3 mile tdp length and had a lower tdp rate
Institutional
Pdmary/Middle School 0.32 0.03 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
High School 0.29 0.08 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Junior/Community College 0.36 0.36 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate length
Day Care Center 1.72 0.37 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate trip
3hurch 0.96 0.52 Pre,,ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
Others Not Specified 0.96 0.56 Pre~ious Plan used a lower rate tdp
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
PROPOSED PLAN vs. EXISTING PLAN
The calculation of the actual fee charged to development is a two-part process.
These parts are:
Part 1: Determine number of service units (vehicle-miles) generated by the development using the land-use vehicle-mile
equivalency table.
No. of Development Units x Vehicle-miles (Total Service Units) per Development Unit
= Development's Vehicle-miles
Part 2: Calculate the impact due by new development. This fee is based on the cost per service unit for the service area where
the development is located.
Development's Vehicle-miles (from Part 1) x Cost per Vehicle mile (from CIP calculation)
= Impact Fee due from development
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
A. Single-Family Dwelling
Existing Plan:
(1 dwelling unit x 2.85 vehicle-miles) / 1 dwelling unit = 2.85 vehicle-miles
2.85 vehicle-miles x $300 / vehicle-mile = $855
Maximum Plan:
(1 dwelling unit x 4.24 vehicle-miles) / 1 dwelling unit = 4.24 vehicle-miles
4.24 vehicle-miles x $168 /vehicle-mile -- $712
Recommended by P&Z Plan:
(1 dwelling unit x 4.24 vehicle-miles) / 1 dwelling unit -- 4.24 vehicle-miles
4.24 vehicle miles x $150 / vehicle mile = $636
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
B. 10,000 square foot (s.f.) General Office Building
Existing Plan:
(10,000 s.f. x 3.99 vehicles-miles) / 1000 s.f. units = 39.90 vehicle-miles
39.90 vehicle-miles x $300 / vehicle-mile --- $11,980
Maximum Plan:
(10,000 s.f. x 7.15 vehicle-miles) / 1000 s.f. units = 71.50 vehicle-miles
71.50 vehicle-miles x $168 /vehicle-mile: $12,012
Recommended by P&Z Plan:
(10,000 s.f. x 7.15 vehicle-miles) / 1000 s.f. unit = 71.50 vehicle-miles
71.50 vehicle-miles x $150 / vehicle-mile -- $10,725
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
C. 60,000 square foot (s.f.) Retail Shopping Center
Existing Plan:
(60,000 s.f. x 4.77 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. units = 286.20 vehicle-miles
286.20 vehicle-miles x $300 / vehicle-mile = $85,860
Maximum Plan:
(60,000 s.f. x 7.92 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. units = 475.20 vehicle-miles
475.20 vehicle-miles x $168 /vehicle-mile = $79,833
Recommended by P&Z Plan:
(60,000 s.f. x 7.92 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. unit = 475.20 vehicle-miles
475.20 vehicle-miles x $150 /vehicle-mile = $71,280
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
D. 100,000 square foot (s.f.) Light Industrial Development
Existing Plan:
(100,000 s.f. x 1.06 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. units = 106 vehicle-miles
106 vehicle-miles x $300 / vehicle-mile = $31,800
Maximum Plan:
(100,000 s.f. x 3.23 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. units = 323 vehicle-miles
323 vehicle-miles x $168 /vehicle-mile = $54,264
Recommended by P&Z Plan:
(100,000 s.f. x 3.23 vehicle-miles) / 1,000 s.f. unit = 323 vehicle-miles
323 vehicles-miles x $150 /vehicle-mile = $48,450
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
E. 4,000 Student Junior/Community College
Existing Plan:
(4,000 Students. X 0.36 vehicle-miles) / 4,000 units = 1
1,440 vehicle-miles x $300 / vehicle-mile = $432,000
,440 vehicle-miles
Maximum Plan:
(4,000 Students. x 0.36 vehicle-miles) / 4,000 units = 1,440 vehicle-miles
1,440 vehicle-miles x $168 /vehicle-mile = $241,920
Recommended by P&Z Plan:
(4,000 Students x 0.36 vehicle-miles) / 4,000 unit = 1,440 vehicle-miles
1,440 vehicle miles x $150 / vehicle mile -- $216,000
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS
city o f coppell
EXCELLENCE
BY DESIGN
STREETS
UTILITIES
ENGINEERING
TRAFFIC
FACILITIES
FLEET
SERVICES
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS