Loading...
TEEX-CS 891228~/FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI ;~200 ROSS AVENUE SUITE 2800 DALLAS~TEXAS 75201 HOUSTON WASHINGTON, D C. AUSTIN SAN ANTONIO DALLAS LON ~)ON December 28, 1989 Honorable Mark Wolfe Mayor, City of Coppell 255 Parkway Boulevard Coppell, Texas 75019 RE: City of Coppell, Extension Texas - Texas A & M University Dear Mayor Wolfe: The City of Coppell, Texas (the "City"), has asked us to review certain legal questions surrounding a proposal to locate an extension facility of Texas A & M University ("A & M") in the City. We have been advised that the proposal relates to a financing plan wherein the City would acquire land and construct a building which land and building would then be donated to A & M for use as an extension facility. It is our understanding that the funds to acquire the land and construct the building are anticipated to come from bond proceeds to be received by the City after approval of the qualified voters of the City is obtained at a bond election. Specifically, we have been asked to examine the questions of whether the City is authorized to issue debt to acquire the land and construct the facility and then donate both the land and the facility to A & M. Article III, Section 52-a was adopted in 1987 and provides: of the Texas Constitution Notwithstanding any other provision of this constitution, the legislature may provide for the creation of programs and the making of loans and grants of public money, other than money otherwise dedicated by this constitution to use for a different purpose, for the public purposes of development and diversification of the economy of the state, the elimination of unemployment or underemployment in the state, the stimulation of agricultural innovation, the fostering of the growth of enterprises based on agriculture, or the development or expansion of transportation or commerce in the state. Any bonds or other obligations of a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state that are issued for the purpose of making loans or grants in connection with a program authorized by the legislature under this section and that are payable from ad valorem taxes must be approved by a vote of the majority of the registered voters of the county, municipality, or political subdivision voting on the issue. An enabling law enacted by the legislature in anticipation of the adoption of this amendment is not void because of its anticipatory character. This constitutional provision requires legislative action in order to permit grants or loans by a political subdivision such as the City. Accordingly, the Texas Legislature must provide specific statutory authority for the implementation of the provisions of Article III, Section 52-a of the Texas Constitution. In 1989, the Texas Legislature did enact Article 835s, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended, which authorizes a city to acquire, by any lawful means other than eminent domain, land and to construct or otherwise acquire a building or other facility for the purpose of leasing the land, building or other facility to a political subdivision or agency of the state for public use or to an individual, private corporation or other private entity for use in manufacturing or another commercial activity. A & M would qualify as an agency of the state. The City, under Article 835s, is authorized to issue and sell bonds to finance the acquisition of land and construction of the facilities provided that the land and building are leased to the user. The statutes currently do not provide for land or facilities to be acquired by the City and then donated to the user. Accordingly, under current law, we do not believe that the acquisition of land and the construction of a facility with the subsequent donation of both to A & M is permitted in the general structure outlined above. -2- 0449L It is interesting to note that in 1940, the district attorney of Comanche County submitted an Attorney General opinion request asking whether the commissioners court had the power to call an election for the purpose of voting bonds for the purchase of land to be donated to A & M College for an experiment station as provided in the then applicable Article 149(c), Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes, as amended. In reviewing the law in effect at that time, the Attorney General's office concluded that Article 149(c) did not confer upon the county the authority to issue bonds for the purpose of purchasing such lands and that no other statute granted to the county that power. Accordingly, the Attorney General's office concluded that Comanche County was without power to call an election for the purpose of voting bonds of the nature sought to be issued. In response to the aforesaid opinion, in 1941 the Legislature enacted Article 163a which authorized counties to acquire and construct an agricultural experiment station and lease it to the State of Texas or any agency of the Federal Government. In 1946, another Attorney General opinion was requested as to whether or not a county could issue bonds for the acquisition of land to be given, sold or leased to A & M College for the purpose of establishing an adjunct or division of the College. The Attorney General concluded that Article 163a did authorize a county to issue bonds for an agricultural experiment station and thereafter lease the facility to the State of Texas or the Federal Government. Since the statute did not authorize the sale or donation of the facilities, the Attorney General concluded that a county was only permitted to lease the anticipated facilities and could not sell or donate the facilities. Given the current statutory authority provided by Article 835s, we believe that a lease of the desired facilities is the only alternative that would be able to be applied to the facts as set forth above. Should you have any questions or desire any additional clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Robert D. Dransfield RD:cf -3- 0 4 4 9 L