Villages C P3&4-AG 920714PUBLIC HEARING: Cossideration ~ approval of a replat of~e of Coppell, ~ ~~-
located at the southwest mew of Ane~ Road ~,,a DeForest , a request o Homes,
SUBM! l-rED BY:
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
Date of P & Z Meeting: June 18, 1992
Deci~o~ of P & Z Commissi~m: A~ed (4-0)
STAFF REP.: Planning Director. Gary L. Sieb
OTHER REP.:
DATE:
Please see attached staff report fcw further detnil~-
BUDGET AMT.
AMT +/- BUDGET
N/A
FINANCIAL LRVIE~f BY ~~
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
REVIEWED BY CM:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
VILLAGE OF COPPELL, PRASE III-B - REPLAT
P & Z REARING DATE: June 18, 1992
C. C. HEARING DATE: July 14, 1992
LOCATION:
The southwest corner of Allen Road and DeForest Road.
SIZE OF AREA:
REQUEST:
2.90 Acres containing 17 single-family lots.
Approval of a replat.
APPLICANT:
Grand Homes, Inc.
(Owner)
8800 N. Central Expwy.
Dallas, TX 75231
(214) 750-6528
Don Tipton Engineering
(Engineer}
6330 Beltline Road
Suite C
Garland, TX 75043
(214) 226-2967
HISTORY:
There has been no recent zoning history on this parcel - it
was zoned SF-0 several years ago although it has been
platted within the last two years.
TRANSPORTATION:
All streets within the replat area are local, neighborhood
streets, 27 feet wide contained within a 50' right-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - sparsely develo~edolder single-family; A
South - new single-family construction; $F-0
East - new single-family construction; SF-0
West - new single-family construction; SF-0
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows low density,
residential development for this area.
single-family
t'r~M 8
ANALYSIS:
This is basically a housekeeping exercise to insure proper
drainage results from development of this area.
When the property was originally platted approximately two
years ago, it was subdivided with an alley behind Lots
30-41. Subsequent to construction, it was brought to
staff's attention that for proper drainage to occur along
DeForest Road, and to insure there was not a sheer drop-off
between those lots and DeForest, it would be worth
considering eliminating the alley behind these lots so
proper grading and a gabian wall might be built.
Engineering has looked at that possibility, reported its
positive reaction to such a solution during development
review, and suggested a replat document. The Development
Review Committee has analyzed this proposal, and except for
the typical comments relative to 50 foot wide lots with
front entry, and the potential aesthetic problem created,
recommends approval of the replat which eliminates the
alley behind Lots 30-41.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Approve the replat
2) Deny the replat
3) Modify the replat
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Replat Document
VLG3B.STF