Villages of CC P5-CS 940728 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COM
ENGINEERING_ COMMENT I
.... I
tlCONTAC~' KenG~ffin, PE,AssistantCi~Manager/Ci~Engineer(3931019~ I
COMMENT STA~S: INITI~ ~ P~LIMINAR~~n
The alley between lot 1 and 2, Block A should be turned back to the west to intersect
with the main street. There should be some contact with the people that currently live
on Tanbark to eliminate the alley connection currently existing to Minyard Drive. This
will create more efficient traffic control in the future, especially when the school site is
constructed to the west.
All easements should be shown on the face of the plat.
3
As previously stated, the street access to Coppell Road should be shifted to be more
equally divided between existing Winding Hollow and Coppell Road. The proposed
location will not allow a median opening in the future when Coppell Road is constructed.
The median opening will be provided at Winding Hollow.
4. Escrow will be required for both sections of Coppell Road.
The center line radius of all streets should be provided and if they are less than the
minimum required by the Subdivision Ordinance then a variance will be required.
6. Sanitary Sewer service should be provided to the lot 12 retail site.
The utality plans show the sewer lines down the center line of the street. They should be
offset to the right-of-way.
Village of Cottonwood Creek Section III plans show approximately 20 acres of off-site
drainage coming onto this site basically between lots 9 and 10 of Block B. Please
reevaluate those plans and reevaluate your drainage design to ensure that all off-site
drainage is being adequately picked up and conveyed through this site.
Village of Cottonwood ,~reek, Section V Preliminary Plat
Page 2 of 2 (Engineering Comments)
Village of Cottonwood Creek Section III plans show that approximately all of the area
south of the Lone Star Gas Easement drains back to the east between lots 14 and 15 of
Villages of Cottonwood Creek Section 1. Please reevaluate those plans and your
drainage design to ensure that the drainage is being adequately conveyed thorough this
site.
10.
It appears as though the drainage boundary lines between the various drainage areas have
not been shown. Please make sure that the limits of all drainage areas are accurately
shown.
City of Coppell
Development Review Committee Comments
~lannlug Deparhnent
Village at Cottonwood Creek, Section V, Preliminary Plat
DRC Date: August 4, 1994
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting: August 18, 1994
City Council Me~iug: Sept~nber 13, 1994
1) Property is bounded by Coppell Road and Coppell Road, not by Thweatt Road.
2) Provide legal description of property.
3) Cistercian misspelled on plat document, zoning is SF-12.
4) Show all current zoning adjacent to site.
5) Coppell Rd. tn Thweatt Rd. is a primary image zone; landscape plan, screening wall need more
detail.
6) Submit a landscape plan and a Tree Preservation Plan.
7) Retail lot needs to have separate lot and block number.
8) Thirty (30') ft. dedication is difficult to see.
9) Provide street names.
10) Submit a preliminary Property Owners Association Agreement.
11) 80' r.o.w, needs median.
12) After reviewing staff recommendations provided at the DRC meeting, submit twenty-six (26)
folded copies three (3) reducad paper copies and one (1) transparency of cach exhibit to the
Planning Department prior to noon, Tuesday, August 9, 1994.
Preliminary/~Plat for
Date
Comments for the City of Coppell
Development Review Committee
eliminary/~ Plat is~ acceptable.
/~Easements will be required for proposed electric facilities.
A plat with easement requirements will be provided to the
Level°per.
oad information (size of structure, A/C / Heat Load) will
be required from the developer before easements can be
determined.
Other comments
Please call me at 214-888-1307 if you have any questions.
Tim Brancheau
14400 Josey Lane Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
CITY OF COPPELL
Development Review Committee
Departmental Comments
Department: Fire
Date: July 28, 1994
Reviewed by: ~'~f~ ~
Project: Village at Cottonwood Creek, Section V, Preliminary
Plat
Comments: Need street names.
LSG RICHRRDSON
WILL
TEL:214-235-4690
29'94
Po~ 9u/io~ concen~8 t~csc comments md/or ~ ~ service ~ll:
Will NJbo~ - [,4~e St~r g-~ Co - (214) 2354672
Lakeside Village
roads
ng
Birds~ng additio~
~eed zoning on plat "Agricultural" n
Lpt width insufficient 200' minimum ~9~
~-~inimum dwelling size 2400 s.f.
~/TJtility easement needed along Deforest
Existing non-conforming buildings removed
Valley Ranch
~ooning "LI"
30' Bldg line along Beltline
~/~ning
Fence setback incorporated Lots 1,[ 8~ and 14 Block C, 1 and 12/__/~
B~lock B, and 1, 16, 26, and 32 Block~
~"Landscape and screening wall easement between 15' alley and 20'
R.O.W. dedication
-~ .... ~' ...... ight?
~.u,..--3 2 +'" he
t,Street names
Village IV
~--Zoning
Call out blocks
t/'~creening wall/landscape dedication at Lots 7,8,9 (Parkway at Coppe 11 )
15' B.L. fence setback callout (too many to list)especially along
Parkway Blvd.
Fence setback at lot 14 (key lot)~
V~star B.L. general note at lots with panhandle
reet names
cut-thru alley at Block ? (across from Gifford Dr)
Jefferso~ at Riverchase
Too many variances- Dumpster, setbacks at North, screen wall, 3
story, parking.
Courtyards at Riverchase