Villages of CC 6-CS 940728DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI EE
DItC DATE: July 28,1994 & August 4,1994
CONTACT: Ken Griffin, P.E., Assistant City Manager/City Engineer (393-1016)
COMMENT STATUS: INITIAL I PRELIMINARYI FINAL
Show the Hike and Bike Trail easement on the north side of lots 45 through 63 and
adjacent to lot 13, Block ??. Also, the Hike and Bike Trail should be constructed.
Show Denton Creek.
6.
7.
8.
10.
11.
Provide some type of access to the floodway easement/common area.
An off-site easemem should be provided for the discharge of your drainage improvements
adjacent to lot 13.
The floodplain should be shown adjacent to lot 13.
Escrow will be required for Coppell Road.
All medians on Parkway Blvd. should be shown.
The subdivision immediately east (Copperstonc) is showing alleys adjacent to lots 65
through 71. You should coordinate your lot widths and your alley locations with those
proposed alleys. However, if your subdivision goes first you will need to coordinate the
construction of the alley at the time of the construction of your subdivision.
The alley location between lots 80 and 81 is on a blind curve for the street. Please
reconfigure.
Turn alley back between lots 13 and 14 to intersect the east/west street as opposed to the
current location between 12 and 13.
You are showing an alley adjacent to lot 6, which is adjacent to a cul-de-sac. The
landscape treatment on the south side of Parkway had open screening adjacent to the cul-
de-sacs. Some type of solid screening should be considered along this cul-de-sac to
Village of Cottonwood ~reek, Section VI Preliminary Plat
Page 2 of 2 (Engineering Comments)
shield the alley.
12.
It appears as though none of the streets on the east side of this subdivision that are
accessing Parkway are accessing at a median opening. Therefore, you should consider
your street that accesses Parkway at Hampton Court to be a collector street for traffic
wanting to exit this subdivision and turn back to the east. Hence, it should be at least a
60 foot right-of-way.
13. Minimum finish floors should be provided for all lots adjacent to the floodplain.
14.
The street configuration, access and cul-de-sacs in this subdivision do not lend themselves
very well to traffic flow either with the existing streets on the south side or the existing
median openings in Parkway. Some consideration should be given to providing different
points of access to Parkway Blvd.
15.
The Stormwater Master Plan shows a drainage system that would be adjacent to lots 12
and 13 and Coppeil Road to be picking up an off-site drainage basin of approximately
1500 cfs. Your drainage plans should reflect that system.
16.
There currently exist a 90 inch RCP running north and south through this site. Your
current lot configuration does not lend itself to homes being constructed on several lots
due to that existing drainage system. I would request that you reconfigure your street
so that a north/south street is more closely aligned with the alignment of the existing 90
inch RCP. Also, the existing easement appears to be 15 foot. Because of the size of the
90 inch RCP, a minimum 25 to 30 foot easement should be provided for the 90 inch
RCP, if it is not located within a street right-of-way.
17. All drainage areas should be shown on the drainage map.
18.
The existing 90 inch RCP and the proposed 30 inch RCP should be extended further
north of the proposed lots so that they discharge directly into the existing creek.
19.
Manholes should be provided at the upstream end of most of the proposed 8" sewer lines
in lieu of the cleanouts.
20.
The proposed 8" water lines should be connected in several places to the system in
Parkway Blvd.
21. Does this need to be a replat of some existing lots or is it really a preliminary plat?
City of Coppell
Development Review Committee Comments
Plam~ Department
Village at Cottonwood Creek, Section VI, Preliminary Plat
DRC Date: August 4, 1994
Planning & Zoning Commission Men,lng: August 18, 1994
City Council Meeting: September 13, 1994
1) Show current zoning of the site.
2) Property ownership and current zoning of prope~y Ioc~_!_,~4 within 200 feet of tho site needs to bo
3) Concern with cul-de-sacs abutting to Parkway Blvd., ~ needed.
4) Includ~ datailed legal description of the propen'y.
5) Utility layout nesds to bo shown. (Water, gas, sewer lines etc.)
6) No description of edge traam~ent along Parkway Blvd.
7) Floodplain ne~ds to bo clearly shown on the faco of tbo plat.
8) Any plans for the Floodplain Common Area (i.a. pa~k, playground or trails) ?
9) Show any $' or larger trees.
10) Scr~ning walls and landscaping needs to bo shown along the 30' dedication adjacent to Coppull Rd.
11) Subdivision needs street names.
12) Submit a preliminary Property Own~s Association Agreement.
13) Submit a landscape plan and a Tr~ Pres~vation Plan.
14) Alley on east property - properly located?
15) Submit a letter requesting abandonmeat of allays along floodplain.
16) Legal conmel has detmnined this is a replat not a preliminary plat; so indicate on face of Plat.
17) After reviewing staff r~commandafions provided at the DRC maeting, submit twenty-six (26)
folded copies thres (3) reduced paper copies and one (1) transpet-~a¢ies of each axhibit to the
Planning Depamnent prior to noon, Tuesday, August 9, 1994.
COPPELL PUBLIC WORKS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
6.
7.
8.
July 27, 1994
Planning and Community Services
Public Works Staff
Comments on Villages of Cottonwood Creek, Section VI, Preliminary
Plat
A 20 foot wide Hike and Bike Trail easement and concrete trail is required in the
floodway easement/common area identified.
Location is to be coordinated with the Parks and Recreation Division at 462-8495.
The Parkland Dedication Ordinance will be in effect tbr this development. Dedication
of 1.88 acres or a fee of $1,285.00 per dwelling unit is required at the time of final
plat approval.
Does the 12" sewer line located along the eastern perimeter of the property need to be
larger as identified in the 1994 Master Plan?
Please provide water, wastewater, and proposed demands and tlow.
No curves are allowed in sewer.
Tie in all dead ends as indicated on plan sheets.
Will homes located on lots 11, 18, & 26 along the existing 90" storm sewer be built
on top of this line?
cc: Engineering Dept.
Central File
PLANS.VILCTFN.VI
I ELECTRIC
Preliminary/~lll~lPlat for
Date
Comments for the City of Coppell
Development Review Committee
./Preliminary/F~l Plat i~-4~t~acceptable.
/~Easements will be required for proposed electric facilities.
A plat with easement requirements will be provided to the
0vel°per'
ad information (size of structure, A/C / Heat Load) will
be required from the developer before easements can be
determined.
Please call me at 214-888-1307 if you have any questions.
Tim Brancheau
14400 $~sey Lane Farmers Branch, Texas 75234
CITY OF COPPELL
Development Review Committee
Departmental Comments
Department: Fire
Date: July 28, 1994
Reviewed by.'
Project: Village at Cottonwood Creek,
Plat
Section VI, Preliminary
Comments:
Ingress for emergency traffic.
Street access on Parkway should
development.
line up with existing
L$~ RICHflRDSON TEL:21~-255-~5~U Jut
I~qir ~14.,3S9-0123
6
Per qaemiaao eomeraln8 these comments aod/or namriJ f~s service call:
WI Naboes - t,one Star Cms Co - (214) 235-4672
~kesi~ village
roads
ng
Birdso~__~additio~
V~eedzoningon p%a~ "Agriculturgl"
I_pt width insufficient 200' minimum
~-~inirmmmdwelling size 2400 s.f.
~/Utili~y easement needed algng Deforest
Existmng non-conforming buildings removed
~ning "LI"
30' Bldg line along Beltline ~~ .~
Fence set~ck inco~rat~ ~ts 1,~d 14 Bl~k C, 1 ~d 12 ~
~k B, ~d 1, 16, 26, ~d 32 Bi~ ~~ /~' ~
~ca~ ~ sc~i~ ~11 eas~t ~t~ 15' alley ~d 20'
R.O.W. de,cat ion
~~ ~Itcz~ti%~ to ~=~ -~i! aL iut~2 ~'~ tc ~i~Y~P'
~et ~s
Vill~ ~ ~~-
~11 out bl~ks
C~ll)
15' B.B. fence se~ck callout (tm ~ to list)e~cially alon~
Par~y Bi~.
~ence se¢~ck a~ lo~ 1~ (key lot)~[ ~
~t-t~ alley at Bl~k ? (acmss rrm ~Sf~ord ~)
Jefferso~ at Rivexchase
Too many variances- D~pster, setbacks at North, screen wall, 3
story, parking.
Oourtyards at River=h~.e