Woodlands-CS 971006 COPPELL STI~.EE TS
I~NTEI~CE ~ INSPECT'rC~ REPORT
DATE:
PROJECT:
TO:
INSPECTIO~ BY:
October 6, 1997
Woodlands of Coppell
Larrs[ Davis, Construction Inspector
LarryMorton, Streets Division
Listed below are Streets Division comments relative to the
Maintenance Bond inspection:
1. Area at end of acceleration lane along Coppell Road holds
water on east end.
2. Crack in pavement on Winding Hollow in front of %13; rout
and seal.
3. Barrier-free ramps (wheelchair) on the corners of Winding
Hollow and Dartmouth Lane; Dartmouth Lane and Manchester;
Breckland Heights and Manchester Lane northeast and southeast
corners; Breckland Heights and Newcastle east and west side;
Breckland Heights and Winding Hollow south side.
4. Cracks in cul-de-sac of Manchester Lane, rout and seal; also
curb broken up across from 106 Manchester Lane crack in road next
to and south of 106 Manchester Lane and at Manchester Lane and
Breckland Heights; cracks in road at 105 Manchester Lane; large
crack in intersection of Breckland Heights and Winding Hollow.
5. Joint in curb on right turn lane off Coppell Road need to be
refilled with sealant.
Note: Ail areas are painted in white.
MESSAGE CONFIRMATION
10/08/97 10:12
ID=CITY OF COPPELL
DATE
10/08
S,R-TIME
~0'5~"
DISTANT STATION ID MODE PAGES
CITY OF COPPELL CALLING 03
RESULT
OK ~0
I~ed~ Finished.
Phone: (hml
ROAD/ALI .k'IYS
~/~- Grid
Employee~ map.
Address:
(wk).
1. fl'ype of material A. C~crete* 2~ of Problem D.Pfevious .... site has ~
B. Asphalt A. Holding water E. Roiling sUeet
C. Gravel B. Pot hole F. Tree Roots
D. Din C. Mud hole G. Other
*Street Repair , Alley Repair , Sidewalk Repair Sq. Ft. Priority 1 2 or 3
Who caused the problem or who is responsible for the problem
A. The city E. Another utility company
B. The customer p. Stnt~_ of Texas
C. The conu-actor G. Other
D. The developer
How were the repairs made:
A. Cut out and blocked yes no
B. If concrete - was k doweled and pinned with steel, yes no
C. If asphalt - was site cleaned out
2 inch yes no
D. If asphalt - was site dry yes no
E. If asphalt - was site cleaned from dust or lose particles yes no
F. If asphalt - was TAC added to all joihts, yes no
G. If asphalt - was seal coat applied? yes no
H. If site is asphalt or base, was it compacted with a yes no
"Wacker Packer" or lumping lack?.
I. Was a miler used yes no
Note why did this problem occur A. Settling of site
B. Poor construction
C. Shoulder rolling off
D. Turning radius
E. Other
Were barricades used yes or no
Were barricades removed yes or no
Barricades for Other Departments
Were the customers informed yes or no
Was door knocker left yes or no
7. Weather conditions
A. Dr~
B. Wet
C. Hot
S. Does the ditch need deaned out:
9. Does the culvert need to be cleaned or replaced:
10. Do the brick ~ven need to be replaced:
11. Was there an accident/incident:
12. How many trips to do ta~k?
D. Cold
E. Other
yes or no
ye~ or no
yes or no
Signature
Did you r~x~: yes or no
A. Main Line
valves
Service Line
Hydronce
B.Watoc Tover
C. S~mplee
O. BqUilXnent
1.Backflow Zeno.
Backflow Znmp.
Bk~low Ce~--..DaCe
Re--Cn.-~. Date
Reason f~= ~ai!ure: A. Electrolysis 2. New cona=.'uc=ion
A.LlneLocate
B.Znopec~lon
D.Excavetion
C. Poor
D. Other
6. Linc of safco7 equipment at site if applicable:
A. ~ar=icades ~. Cones C. Tape D. Lights E. OCher
Request for Serviceman: ' '
?.If Mecer/Se--'vice Leik: Classify - City=
A.Wa=er Leal ~b~nmi: O~M Fire plug flushing
$.wal Water Metered: YII No
S.If Meter Chm3ge Ouc:
A.Old Mecer~ Readinq
$.New Mecnr~ Reading
Tote! ~&llons
Vehicle/~q~Lpeenc Used
Unit # H~lee Kcs
=.Old Meter
E.Type of work perfo~-~mdo= findingm:
New Xecer Sine/Type
9.Zf miinline or deep eeL"v~ce repair, ~tiicr~J*,e c~ of pipe or service line and condition:
ll.Lilc M&teriaLI Uled=
12.If you had aa accident/incident whale performing tale roqve~d you repoL-~ lc~ yen or so
13.Water Utilities Mter Lflepectlont ~il O~ fall ~ / /W
SLgnacu~e~