Loading...
Lost Creek TH-CS060316CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD-213-H, Coppell Commons P & Z HEARING DATE: C.C. HEARING DATE: March 16, 2006 April 11,2006 STAFF REP.: Gary L. Sieb, Planning Director LOCATION: Along the east side of Coppell Road, approximately 210 feet north of Bethel Road. SIZE OF AREA: 5.561 acres of property CURRENT ZONING: H (Historic) REQUEST: Zoning change request from H (Historic) to PD-213-H (Planned Development-213~Historic), with a Concept Site Plan to allow the development of 39 townhouse units, recreation, open space and common areas. APPLICANT: Owner: Jay Khorrami 335 Martel Lane Coppell, TX. 75019 (214) 734-3604 Fax: None Engineer:. Mardy Brown Dowdey, Anderson & Assoc., Inc. 5225 Village Creek, Suite 200 Plano, TX 75093 (972) 931-0694 Fax: (972) 931-9538 HISTORY: Page 1 of 5 This property was zoned Historic Overlay some time back. In April of 2002, the City Council accepted the Old Coppell Master Plan. In August of that same year, Council questioned the residential component of the Plan, particularly as it related to D/FW Airport flight patterns. In December of 2002, Council and the Planning Item # 4 Commission held a joint workshop to discuss the airport issue, among others. D/FW Airport staff was in attendance and at the conclusion of the meeting, it was determined that there was no compelling reason to discourage residential development here, based upon airport noise issues. On May 13, 2003, Council amended the Land Use component of the 1996 Comprehensive Plan and enlarged the Historic district to include roughly 100 acres. Subsequently, residential development was begun on the property just north of the subject tract. In May of 2005, Council changed the zoning in the area from Historic Overlay to simply Historic. TRANSPORTATION: Coppell Road is an unimproved, two-lane asphalt road contained within a 50- to 60-foot right-of-way. It is projected to be improved to a concrete two-lane undivided road with a 60-foot right-of-way beginning in 2007. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North - South - East - West - single-family townhouses; H (Historic) single-family house, Senior Center; H (Historic) single-family residences, (PD-89-SF-7) retail/commercial buildings; H (Historic) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan of May 1996, as amended and including the Old Coppell Master Plan, indicates the property should be used for medium-density residential uses on the interior of the parcel; office/commemial uses along the Coppell Road frontage. DISCUSSION: In 2002 the 1996 Comprehensive Master Plan was updated in an area known as Old Coppell. This plan, the Old Coppell Master Plan, outlined uses appropriate for Old Coppell, an approximate 100-acre land area, and elaborated on such topics as urban design, streetscape enhancements, landscape features, access/parking, and land use, among others. An important element of the study was a density parameter. Included in the Plan was a residential component suggesting densities of approximately six-dwelling units per acre and retail/commercial uses along Coppell Road. Since Council's acceptance of this study, there has been increasing interest and development proposals for the area--all in compliance with the Plan. Page 2 of 5 Item # 4 Page 3 of 5 One such proposal is located just north of the case before you tonight-- Old Coppell Townhomes. A developer began implementation of a portion of the residential component of the Plan, respecting the land uses proposed. Reflecting success in complying with the Plan, that development is now approaching residential build-out. Densities are 6.5 du's per acre, slightly above those recommended in the Plan. In addition, potential development of the commercial sites adjacent to Coppell Road is being contemplated, and staff is currently reviewing a submittal for an approximate 2500-square-foot commercial/retail building on the north side of Mobley Way. In addition, the Vaughn building has recently been remodeled, the Hard Eight Bar-B-Que restaurant is about to begin, the Historic Coppell Properties project is under construction, and talks are continuing on an adaptive reuse for the Kirkland house. These examples are cited to bring attention to the fact that the Old Coppell Master Plan is working and projects being occupied, constructed, completed or contemplated all conform to the Master Plan. With regard to the application before you, it violates the Plan in a variety of important ways. It is too dense, the Tree Survey is incomplete, street names need further alteration, it violates the Old Coppell Master Plan land use proposal, and if allowed, violates the premises of a residential/office/retail mixed-use project. To elaborate, staff has reviewed several proposals for this property, all exceeding the development densities suggested in the Old Coppell Master Plan. In each instance, we have advised this landowner (through his development agents) to refine and reduce his density, to no avail. The current request is no different but also includes a component that violates the land use proposed along Coppell Road. In its current form, this applicant is asking for unit counts and densities in excess of seven-dwelling units per acre. Staff cannot support this increased density. More alarming is the request to modify the land uses of the Plan and allow residential development along Coppell Road across the street from heavy commercial activities. The proposal would back/side residences to the street and screen them from Coppell Road by a six-foot tall masonry wall. This would be in violation of the Plan's directive to have individual businesses locate in commercial/retail structures close to the street, creating an interesting front door to the roadway. The introduction of a brick wall creates nothing but monotony, does not establish a vibrancy along the street, violates the Land Use Plan, and does not make good land planning sense. In addition, the proposed Landscape Plan adjacent to the wall is totally inadequate. By eliminating the residential use along Coppell Road and extending the commercial/retail uses to a depth of 100-110 feet (as shown in the Plan and as was approved to the north), this application would fall more in line with Council's vision for ultimate development of this area. In addition to eliminating the residential use adjacent to the road, the density would fall into an acceptable dwelling-unit count per acre. The decreased density Item # 4 would allow deeper lots, eliminate the seven-dwelling units in a row (another violation of Townhouse zoning), and reduce the required parking substantially. In general terms, by following the Old Coplvell Master Plan, ten-dwelling units would be removed, bringing this Concept Plan in line with the overall plan for Old Town development. In addition, the street system, as designed, needs some modification to bring it into conformance with the one outlined in the Old Coppell Plan. Street rights-of-way of 50 feet and pavement widths of 27 feet would be easily accommodated with the proposed density reduction and would remove some of the awkward parking bays shown on the applicant's plan. The overall street layout itself is acceptable as it continues the existing dead-end Mobley Way south and west to tie back into Coppell Road. That said, the proposal before you is not without some merit. We like the open space element. Design of the units is compatible with Old Town guidelines. We could support a development with lower densities, elimination of the units that side and back up to Coppell Road, redefined guest parking areas, compliance with townhouse standards and assurance that street furniture, address identification, street lights, sidewalk dimensions, curb and gutter construction matches the development to the north. All in all, however, we cannot support this request, as submitted. It is too dense, violates the Old Coppell Master Plan, ignores the concept of"street friendly" retail/commercial development as described and illustrated in the Plan and disregards basic townhouse guidelines, such as lot depth/maximum number of attached units. The applicant submitted an incomplete tree survey, requests development standards that ignore the Plan and existing construction to the north and attempts to create a development project in conflict with good planning principles. Perhaps most importantly, the Old Coppell Master Plan has been followed by applicants who have built in the district, be they residential, commercial or retail developers since its inception almost three years ago. That the Plan is viable can be seen by what's been built in the area. Staff has worked hard with developers to ensure the integrity of the Plan was followed, with the utmost cooperation from these builders. They followed the Plan, why should this developer not? It is for these reasons that staff cannot endorse the application before you tonight. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Staff is recommending DENIAL of the request, as submitted. Page 4 of 5 Item # 4 ALTERNATIVES I) Recommend approval of the request 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Concept, Landscape/Wall, Tree Survey, Elevations Packet 2) Coppell Commons PD Conditions Exhibit "A" 3) Draft HOA Agreement (Title page only) 4) Departmental comments (Parks, Engineering, Fire) Page 5 of 5 Item # 4