Amberpoint BP 2R-LR060424CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
• 94051418 0222
Sample Information
Date Cast February 24, 2006 Time 9 35am
Sampled by' Daniel J Drogos
Weather Conditions Overcast, cool
Accumulative Yards 220
Placement Method Direct Discharge
Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #1
Placement Location Pavement
Report Number
Service Date Februa 24, 2006 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
ry Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client Report Date April 24, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project• AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No 94051418
Material lnformafion
Specified Strength 3600 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time 8 49am Plant. 2
Supplier Potter Concrete
Truck No 123 Ticket No 103221
Mix I D No 7752
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches
Air Content,
Concrete Temperature, ~F
Ambient Temperature,°F
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~
Result
4 75
34
60
57
143.2
Laborafory Test Dafa
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No ID (inches) (sq inches)
1 1 6 00 28.27
2 6 00 28.27
3 6 00 28.27
Specification
3-5
3-6
l~~rr~con
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
03/03/2006 7 128,870 4,560
03/24/2006 28 176,290 6,230
03/24/2006 28 177,950 6,290
Average (28 Days) 6,260
1 4 6 00 28.27 04/21 /2006 56 185,140 6,550
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 3
oi-ncsiaoi F~~a kev
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
N b 94051418 0222
l~erracon
Report um er
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Service Date February 24, 2006 Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Report Date April 24, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project• AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No • 94051418
Material Information
Specified Strength 3600 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time 10 OOam Plant. 2
Supplier Potter Concrete
Truck No 109 Ticket No 103232
Mix I D No 7752
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches
Air Content,
Concrete Temperature, °F
Ambient Temperature,~F
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~
Result
5 00
35
63
57
143 7
Laboratory Test Data
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No ID (inches) (sq. inches)
2 1 6 00 28.27
Sample Information
Date Cast. February 24, 2006 Time 10 13am
Sampled by Daniel J Drogos
Weather Conditions Overcast, cool
Accumulative Yards 330
Placement Method Direct Discharge
Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #2
Placement Location Pavement
Specification
3-5
3-6
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
03/03/2006 7 134,430 4,750
2 2 6 00 28.27 03/24/2006 28 176,050 6,230
2 3 6 00 28.27 03/24/2006 28 179,520 6,350
Average (28 Days) 6,290
2 4 6 00 28.27 04/21/2006 56 200,830 7,100
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples
The tests were pertormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 2 of 3 °'_"`SR°' ""°'e Kay
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
R ort Number 94051418 0222
(1) TechniStructures
(1) Rogers O'Brien Construction Co Reviewed by'
ep
Service Date Februa 24, 2006 8901 Carpenter Fnvy, Ste #100
rY Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Report Date April 24, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No • 94051418
Material Information
Specified Strength 3600 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time 11 09am Plant 2
Supplier Potter Concrete
Truck No 102 Ticket No 103237
Mix I D No 7752
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches
Air Content,
Concrete Temperature, °F
Ambient Temperature,~F
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~
Result
4 75
39
60
57
142.8
Laboratory Test Data
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No ID (inches) (sq inches)
3 1 6 00 28.27
3 2 6 00
3 3 6 00
3 4 6 00
28.27
Sample Information
Date Cast. February 24, 2006 Time 11.28am
Sampled by' Daniel J Drogos
Weather Conditions Overcast, cool
Accumulative Yards 365
Placement Method Direct Discharge
Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #3
Placement Location Pavement
Specification
3-5
3-6
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
03/03/2006 7 131,270 4,640
03/24/2006 28 175,100 6,190
28.27 03/24/2006 28 180,520 6,380
Average (28 Days) 6,290
28.27 04/21/2006 56 205,910 7,280
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples
Terracon Rep Daniel J Drogos
Report Distribution
(1) Transwestern Commercial Services
(1) City of Coppell TX
(1) City of Coppell TX
(1) O'Brien 8 Assoc
lferr~con
~-
Hussein H. Abusaad, P E
Senior Project Manager
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 3 of 3 °'_"`~'°,-~NUe"a°
6F
-~
^
Z
W
0
4
lit
~,.
0
V
W
1~
Y
o
~ 1
AA``
si
.~
//
,~ ~ ~' ~
/~,
,,
j / ~ ~~
i'/ ~ ,,
', j~ ~/ / /
,'
f
I I
I I
i r
I l
I I
i
I I