SS9901-LR051223C
°iLexas CMT Inc.
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive
Dallas, Texas 75229
(214) 352 -6957 Fax (214) 352.6972 0 www.texascmt.com
GENERAL REPORT
High
Report Date
December 23, 2005
Test Date: December 16, 2005
Client
City of Coppell
General Report No. 1
Project
DeForest Lift Station
Project No.. 205 - 126
Identification
Coating Observation
Page 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
COATING MATERIAL
Date:
12/16/2005
Material Used: Raven 405
Time:
2.30 pm
Batch No.
Dry Bulb-
53
Part A 1207501
Wet Bulb-
44
Part B 1202503
Humidity
47%
Part C N/A
Dew Point:
33
Thinner N/A
Surface Temp
54 -57
Color Light Blue
Weather
Cloudy, Calm Winds
Application method. Plural Component Airless
DRY FILM THICKNESS
Area
Number of Readings
Low
High
Mean
Comments
Ceiling and Top 5 Feet of Vault
30
104
142
DFT Gage IJsed. Wet Film Thickness Gage
Additional Information:
The application of the Raven 405 material to the interior walls and ceiling of the concrete vault started today One coat of material
was spray applied at 50 to 60 mil thickness. This was allowed to gel and then troweled over to fill holes. A second coat was then
spray applied at 50 to 60 mils. Wet film thickness readings were taken with a wet film thickness gage supplied by Raven Coating
Systems. Readings to bare concrete (through both coats) ranged from 104 mils to 142 mils. This is acceptable per specified thickness
of 100 to 125 mils.
Note Raven 405 material is 100% solids so readings taken while wet are the same as when material is cured.
cc: Mr Rick O'Dell - City of Coppell
Mr Todd C Hoff- Canfer Construction Co.
Ms. Erika K. Cooper - Turner, Collie & Braden
Mr Bobby Barr - Onsite cell: 469 -556 -6469
Texas CMT, Inc Reviewed by
All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use of our name must receive our prior written approval. Our letters and
reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.
A T �'exas CMT Inc.
Construction Materials Testing
and Environmental Consulting
10044 Monroe Drive Dallas, Texas 75229 (214) 352 -6957 Fax (214) 352.6972 0 www.texascmt.com
GENERAL REPORT
Report Date December 23, 2005
Client City of Coppell
Project DeForest Lift Station
Identification Coating Observation
Test Date December 17, 2005
General Report No 2
Project No. 205 - 126
Page 1 of 1
ENVIRONMENTAL
Date:
'Time:
Dry Bulb
Wet Bulb
Humidity
Dew Point:
Surface Temp
Weather
COATING MATERIAL
Material Used:
Batch No.
Part A
Part B
Part C
Thinner
Color
Application method.
Raven 405
1207501
1202503
N/A
N/A
Light Blue
Plural Component Airless
12/17/2005
7 40 am
54
48
64%
42
51 -54
Cloudy, Southeast Wind 5 mph
DRY FILM THICKNESS
Area
Number of Readings
Low
High
Mean
Comments
Walls
80
104
142
112
DFT Gage Used. Wet Film Thickness Gage
Additional Information:
The application of the Raven 405 material continued today Applications method is the same as 12 -16 -05 Application started on
second level and moved downward (tied in with coating applied 12- 16 -05). A few pinholes were found in the ceiling and were
recoated today Wet film thickness readings were taken at random locations during application. Any reading found below 104 mils
was recoated prior to moving on. Area coated today includes all walls north of divider wall and all four walls at second and trird level.
Area remaining to be coated are all walls south of the divider wall and underside of the slopped floor
cc: Mr Rick O'Dell - City of Coppell
Mr Todd C Hoff- Canfer Construction Co.
Ms. Erika K. Cooper - Turner, Collie & Braden
Mr Bobby Barr - Onsite cell: 469 -556 -6469
Texas CMT, Inc Reviewed by \ '\\
All letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced without the full approval of Texas CMT, Inc. The use of our name must receive our poor written approval. Our letters and
reports apply only to the sample tested and/or observed and are not necessarily indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products.