BEI Properties-LR051215In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
~~~ ENGI:N.EERW~G, iNC
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817} 589-9993
Client: Cooper General Contractors
Project: Bloom Retail Center
CMJ Report No. 502-5167-004
vo..~.-r Warn 12/15(2005
Report Distribution (1) Cooper General Contractors
(1 }Ray Mansoory
(1) City of Coppell
...-r.,.. _-_._
Specifications _, Test Data
Percent Compaction +92% min +96% max Date Tested 12!0912005
Moisture Content: opt +3% or above Technician Rick Campbell
f _ - ~
Material'Reference Curare Data " ~
~ Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
2015 ASTM D-698 Dark Brown Clay 24 0 95.5
In-Place Test Results
Ref Probe Percent Wet Density Dry Density Percent
Test
No Elevation
or Lift Location .
Curve Depth Moisture (pcf) (pcf) Density
M/C Subgrade for Bldg. Pad**
1 1 Subgrade Retest of #1.0 Report #502-5167-003 2015 6" 22.7' 104 7 85 3 89.3
2
1 Subgrade Retest of #1 1 Above 2015 6" 27.2 114 6 90 1 94.3
'
.
1
2 Subgrade Retest of #2.0 Report #502-5167-003 2015 6" 18.7"` 97 7 82.3 86.2
.
2
2 Subgrade Retest of #2.1 Above 2015 6" 28.0 113.5 88.7 92.9
.
3 1 Subgrade Retest of #3 0 Report #502-5167-003 2015 6" 23.3' 112.6 91 3 95.6
2
3 Subgrade Retest of #3.1 Above 2015 6" 27 9 113.6 88.8 93.0
.
4 0 1st Lift 30' South, 10' West from NE Corner of Pad 2015 6" 28.6 113.4 88.2 92.4
5 0 1st Lift 15' South, 15' East from NW Corner of Pad 2015 6" 29 0 114 7 88.9 93.1
0
6 1st Lift 20' North, 10' East from SW Corner of Pad 2015 6" 28.5 113 3 88.2 92.4
.
7 0 2nd Lift 10' South, 15' East from NE Corner of Pad 2015 6" 24 6" 110.9 89.0 93.2
8 0 2nd Lift 30' North, 10' East from SW Corner of Pad 2015 6" 19.5" 109.0 91.2 95.5
An asterisk (") appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s}• ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
* Non-Compliant: Sub-Contractor, Ralph with C I Hone, was Notified
*" Moisture/Conditioned Subgrade and Fill for Building Pad
Retest of Report #502-5167-003, Date Tested 12/07/2005
Gauge Humboldt Gauge SN 4953
Std Density Count: 3808
~ Steven S ~hnston
CMJ Engineering, Inc ! CMT Manager
LIMITATfONS The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc. page 1 of 1
o~
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
J~ PNG}N:EF..IZING, INC
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel. (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client: Cooper General Contractors Report Distribution (1) Cooper General Contractors
Project: Bloom Retail Center (1) Ray Mansoory
(1) City of Coppell
CMJ Report No. 502-5167-006
Report Date. 12/15/2005
Specifications Test Data
'ercent Compaction +92% min +96% max Date Tested 12/12/2005
vloisture Content: opt +3% or above Technician John Reid
Curve No Test Method
2015 ASTM D-698
In-Place Test Results
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
24 0 95.5
Test Elevation Ref Probe Percent Wet Density Dry Density Percent
No or Lift Location Curve Depth Moisture (pcf) (pcf) Density
M/C Fill for Bldg. Pad **
13 0 Final 15' North, 15' West of SE Corner 2015 6" 29.3 114.3 88.4 92.6
14 0 Final 40' North, 40' West of SE Corner 2015 6" 28.1 115.4 90 1 94.3
15.0 Final 15' South, 15' East of NW Corner 2015 6" 27 6 114.3 89 6 93.8
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
** Moisture-Conditioned Fill for Building Pad
Gauge CPN Gauge SN 6660
' Material Reference Curve Data:
Material Description
Dark Brown Clay
Std Density Count: 59825
CMJ Engineering, Inc / st~~n S Johnston
CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity Our reports are produced solely for e exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
o~ Page 1 of 1
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
]~ ENGIN:EFRII~iG, [NC
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 TeI (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client: Cooper General Contractors
Project: Bloom Retail Center
Report Distribution (1) Cooper General Contractors
(1) Ray Mansoory
{1) City of Coppell
CMJ Report No. 502-5167-005
Report Date 12/15/2005
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction +92% min +96% max Date Tested 12/10/2005
Moisture Content: opt +3% or above Technician Rick Campbell
Material Reference Curve Data
Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No. Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
2015 ASTM D-698 Dark Brown Clay 24 0 95.5
In-Place Test Results
Test Elevation Ref Probe Percent Wet Density Dry Density Percent
No or Lift Location Curve Depth Moisture (pcf) (pcf) Density
M/C Subgrade for Bldg. Pad**
7 1 2nd Lift Retest of #7 0 Report #502-5167-004 2015 6" 27 8 113.6 88.9 93.1
8.1 2nd Lift Retest of #8.0 Report #502-5167-004 2015 6" 29.5 114 1 88 1 92.3
9.0 2nd Lift 20' North, 10' West from SE Corner of Pad 2015 6" 29 1 114.9 89.0 93.2
10 0 3rd Lift 15' South, 15' East from NW Corner of Pad 2015 6" 27 9 112.7 88.1 92.3
11 0 3rd Lift 20' South, 10' West from NE Corner of Pad 2015 6" 30.5 114 7 87.9 92.0
12.0 3rd Lift 20' North, 15' East from SW Corner of Pad 2015 6" 29 4 114 1 88.2 92.4
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM 02922, ASTM 03017
Retest of Report #502-5167-004, Date Tested 12/09/2005
*'` Moisture/Conditioned Subgrade and Fill for Building Pad
Gauge Humboldt Gauge SN 4953 Std Density Count: 3808 Std
CMJ Engineering, Inc / Steven S Johnston
CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areasfdescribed within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
o~ Page 1 of 1