Loading...
Amberpoint BP 2R-LR060606CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94051418 0418 l~~rracon Service Date: May 26, 2006 8901 Carpenter Envy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214)630-1010 Client: Report Date: June 06, 2006 Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6 5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX Project No.: 94051418 Material Information Specified Strength 4600 psi Gm 28 Days Batch Time 5 50am Plant: 2 Supplier- Potter Concrete Truck No 104 Ticket No 101855 Mix I D No 7723 Water Added Onsite Before Test: OGallons Water Added Onsite After Test. 0 Gallons Field Test Data Test Result 3.25 28 85 75 144 1 Samale Information Date Cast: May 26, 2006 Time 6.20am Sampled by• Eric G Jernigan Weather Conditions: partly sunny, humid Accumulative Yards: 20/340 Placement Method Direct Discharge Sample Locations. See attached sketch for Location #1 Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane Specification 3-5 3-5 Test Method Slump, inches. Air Content, Concrete Temperature, ~F Ambient Temperature,aF Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~ Laboratory Test Data ASTM C143 ASTM C231 ASTM C1064 ASTM C1064 ASTM C138 * =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications. Set Specimen Diameter Area No. ID (inches (sq. inches) 1 1 6 00 28.27 1 2 6 00 28.27 1 3 1 4 Services - n/a Age at Maximum Compressive Date Test Load Strength Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi) 06/02/2006 7 106,930 3,780 06/02/2006 7 135,100 4,780 Average (7 Days) 4,280 06/23/2006 28 06/23/2006 28 The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicafed above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location{s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 3 Ot-ACSIR01-F~re Key CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94051418 0418 Service Date: May 26, 2006 l~~rracon 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630.1010 Client: Report Date: June 06, 2006 Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6 5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX Project No.: 94051418 Material Information Specified Strength 4600 psi @ 28 Days Batch Time 8 02am Plant: 2 Supplier Potter Concrete Truck No 110 Ticket No 101870 Mix I D No 7723 Water Added Onsite Before Test. 0 Gallons Water Added Onsite After Test. 0 Gallons Sample Information Date Cast. May 26, 2006 Time 8.25am Sampled by' Eric G Jernigan Weather Conditions Sunny, clear, nice Accumulative Yards: 170/340 Placement Method Direct Discharge Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #2 Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane Field Test Data Test Result Specification Test Method Slump, inches 5 00 3-5 ASTM C143 Air Content, % 4 5 3-5 ASTM C231 Concrete Temperature, ~F 86 ASTM C1064 Ambient Temperature,~F 80 ASTM C1064 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf• ASTM C138 Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi) 2 1 6 00 28.27 06/02/2006 7 107,020 3,780 2 2 6 00 28.27 06/02/2006 7 104,090 3 680 Average (7 Days) 3,730 2 3 06/23/2006 28 2 4 06/23/2006 28 Comments: Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - n/a The tests were pertormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 2 of 3 Ot-ACS?t01-FWwe Hey CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94051418 0418 Service Date May 26, 2006 lf~rracon 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Client: Report Date. June 06, 2006 Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6 5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX Project No.: 94051418 Material Information Specified Strength 4600 psi ~ 28 Days Batch Time 10.OOam Plant. 2 Supplier Potter Concrete Truck No 107 Ticket No 101885 Mix I D No 7723 Water Added Onsite Before Test: 0 Gallons Water Added Onsite After Test. 0 Gallons Sample Information Date Cast. May 26, 2006 Time 10.30am Sampled by' Eric G Jernigan Weather Conditions: Sunny, nice Accumulative Yards. 320/340 Placement Method Direct Discharge Sample Locations• See attached sketch for Location #3 Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane Field Test Data Test Result Specification Test Method Slump, inches 3 50 3-5 ASTM C143 Air Content, % 3 7 3-5 ASTM C231 Concrete Temperature, ~F 89 ASTM C1064 Ambient Temperature,~F 83 ASTM C1064 Plastic Unit Weight, pcf• ASTM C138 Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) psi) 3 1 6 00 28.27 06/02/2006 7 131,390 ,650 3 2 6 00 28.27 06/02/2006 7 125,280 4 0 Average (7 Days) 4,540 3 3 06/23/2006 28 3 4 06/23/2006 28 Comments' Not tested for plastic unit weight. Services - n/a Terracon Rep Eric G Jernigan Report Distribution (1) Transwestern Commercial Services (1) TechniStructures (1) City of Coppell TX (1) Rogers O'Brien Construction Co Reviewed by' (1) City of Coppell TX ~ (1) O'Brien & Assoc Hussein H. Abusaad, P.E. Senior Project Manager The tests were pertormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 3 of 3 °'_^`s"'°'_F'a"' "aY .S ~~1~ ~ ~ ~poa ~3 ~ 0 ~~ ~. t,E~~~' ~~ ~ -- ~d ~1 ~ / ~~ ~PvED `C 5' ~~- o b Q ~ -~- cy~~~ °~ _, { s~A~b.~ in Pam N ~" ~-~ Q ~ ~'' -~. . ~a LtiM ~~ ~~~~ o~`{'~ ~ q~ _ o ~ d5" 2~ RA~OM REp~R~ NO. E'ER