Amberpoint BP 2R-LR060626CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
b 94051418 0418
l~~rracon
Report Num er
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Service Date May 26, 2006 Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Report Date June 26, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project• AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No • 94051418
Material Information
Specified Strength 4600 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time 5 50am Plant 2
Supplier Potter Concrete
Truck No 104 Ticket No 101855
Mix I D No 7723
Water Added Onsite Before Test. OGallons
Water Added Onsite After Test. 0 Gallons
Field Test Data
Test Result
Slump, inches. 3.25
Air Content, % 2 8
Concrete Temperature, aF 85
Ambient Temperature,~F 75
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~ 144 1
Sample Information
Date Cast. May 26, 2006 Time 620am
Sampled by Eric G Jernigan
Weather Conditions Partly sunny, humid
Accumulative Yards 20/340
Placement Method Direct Discharge
Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #1
Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane
Specification
3-5
3-5
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
• =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications.
Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No ID (inches) (sq inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
1 1 6 00 28 27 06/02/2006 7 106,930 3,780
2 6 00 28 27 06/02/2006 7 135,100 4,780
Average (7 Days) 4,280
3 6 00 28.27 06/23/2006 28 134,120 4,740
4 6 00 28 27 06/23/2006 28 155,840 5,510
Average (28 Days) 5,130
Services - n/a
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 Of 3 oi-acsiaoi wn,~e Kav
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number 94051418 0418
Service Date May 26, 2006
l~~rracon
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-101 D
Client Report Date June 26, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No 94051418
Material Information Sample Information
Specified Strength 4600 psi @ 28 Days Date Cast. May 26, 2006 Time 8.25am
Sampled by Eric G Jernigan
Batch Time 8 02am Plant. 2 Weather Conditions Sunny, clear, nice
Supplier Potter Concrete Accumulative Yards 170/340
Truck No 110 Ticket No 101870 Placement Method Direct Discharge
Mix I D No 7723 Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #2
Water Added Onsite Before Test. 0 Gallons Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane
Water Added Onsite After Test 0 Gallons
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches
Air Content,
Concrete Temperature, ~F
Ambient Temperature,~F
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~
Laboratory Test Data
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No. ID (inches) (sq inches}
2 1 6 00 28 27
2 2 6 00 28 27
Result Specification
5 00 3-5
4 5 3-5
8s
80
2 3 6 00 28 27
2 4 6 00 28 27
Comments 'Does not comply with specified strength
SefVICeS - fl/a
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
06/02/2006 7 107,020 3,780
06/02/2006 7 104,090 3,680
Average (7 Days) 3,730
06/23/2006 28 122,360 4,330*
06/23/2006 28 147,170 5,200
Average (28 Days) 4,770
Not tested for plastic unit weight.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 2 of 3 m-ncs~aoi Fw~,e Kev
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number 94051418 0418
Service Date May 26, 2006
Sample Information
Date Cast. May 26, 2006 Time 10 30am
Sampled by Eric G Jernigan
Weather Conditions Sunny, nice
Accumulative Yards 320/340
Placement Method Direct Discharge
Sample Locations See attached sketch for Location #3
Placement Location Pavement, Parking and Fire Lane
Client Report Date June 26, 2006
Transwestern Commercial Services Project: AmberPoint Business Park
Attn David Gunderson Buildings 4, 5 and 6
5001 Spring Valley Rd Ste 600 W 505 South Royal Lane
Dallas TX 75244 Coppell, TX
Project No. 94051418
Material Information
Specified Strength 4600 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time 10 OOam Plant 2
Supplier Potter Concrete
Truck No 107 Ticket No 101885
Mix I D No 7723
Water Added Onsite Before Test. OGallons
Water Added Onsite After Test 0 Gallons
Field Test Data
Test Result
Slump, inches 3 50
Air Content, % 3 7
Concrete Temperature, ~F 89
Ambient Temperature,~F 83
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf~
Laboratory Test Data
Set Specimen Diameter Area
No ID (inches) (sq inches)
3 1 6 00 28.27
3 2 6 00 28.27
3 3 6 00 28.27
3 4 6 00 28.27
Specification
3-5
3-5
l~~rr~con
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Test Method
ASTM C143
ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Age at Maximum Compressive
Date Test Load Strength
Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi}
06/02/2006 7 131,390 4,650
06/02/2006 7 125,280 4,430
Average (7 Days) 4,540
06/23/2006 28 154,600 5,470
06/23/2006 28 166,570 5,890
Average (28 Days) 5,680
COI7lments Not tested for plastic unit weight.
SefVICeS - n/a
Terracon Rep Eric G Jernigan
Report Distribution
(1) Transwestern Commercial Services (1) TechniStructures
(1) City of Coppell TX (1) Rogers O'Brien Construction Co Reviewed by
s'
(1) City of Coppell TX Hussein H Abusaad, P E.
(1) O'Brien & Assoc
Senior Project Manager
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 3 Of 3 ovacsiROVw~~.e kaY
moo a moo
~3 ~' OdD
~1
~P _ ~~
~.~, ~ _ ~-
1 Lt
;` ~
~:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~,
~ ~ ~
y ~, Z 2 ~ `~J
~ ~ ~
~ry ~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~~ ~~
~ ~
~,..
~~
',~ `
wa~~ ~`
:~ ~ ~.
,- _ a5'~~ _b6
z~ ~ a 6 caa REpoR~ ao.
/ // _' ~Pv~~ ~~ ~ERRQ
l..E~H~ • ....
r „_,7 (s ~A~ bS i ~ Pars-~' N ~- (,
Q