ST9902-LR060801 (2)
Moisture-Density Relationship
eM J ENGINEERING, INC
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client:
Project:
City of Coppell
West Sandy lake Road
Reconstruction
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nail & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 687-5192-084
Report Date: 08/01/2006
Project Information
Material Origin:
Sample location:
Material Description:
Material Use:
On Site
Royal South Bound lane Sta.11 +50
Lime Treated Light Brown Sandy Clay
Lime Treated Subgrade
Moisture-Density Relationship - Curve No. 2682
Tested By: Brent Talcott
Sample Date: 07/26/2006
106
104
Dry
Density
(pc!)
102
100
98
! J- I ! \ 1 0% ~ atura ion
"________-'__.._ _H_ -- \1
I
,
-- \.
I \
!
\
\
- - I- - - ~:.. \.
. I
~~ ........ i
... , """"-
./ V I ! ~ "-
I
/' I ",
i I
16 18 20
Moisture Content (%)
Material Properties and Test Information - Curve No. 2682
12
14
22
24
Maximum Dry Density:
Optimum Moisture Percent:
99.5
16.0
Liquid Limit:
Plastic Limit:
Test Method(s):
Plasticity Index: Non-plastic
ASTM 0-698, ASTM 04318
Rammer Description:
Mechanical
Preparation Procedure: Moist
/
CMJ Engineering, Inc
R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice PresidenUCMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
06 Page 1 of 1