Gateway BP(1.6)-LR061024CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94061163.0118
Service Date: September 25, 2006
l~~rracon
8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client:
ProLogis
Attn: Keith Porter
2310 LBJ Freeway Ste 200
Dallas TX 75234
Report Date: October 24, 2006
Project: Freeport Corporate Ctr. Bldg. 6
Freeport Pkwy & Gateway
Coppell, TX
Project No.: 94061163
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 2:50am Plant: 27
Supplier: Southern Star
Truck No: 31 Ticket No: 1435490
Mix I.D. No.: 9339
Water Added Onsite Before Test: SGallons
Sample Information
Date Cast: September 25, 2006 Time: 3:51am
Sampled by: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 50
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #1
Placement Location: Pavement, E of Building
Field Test Data
Test Result Specification Test Method
Slump, inches: 5.50 3-5 ASTM C143
Air Content, %: 3.4 3-6 ASTM C231
Concrete Temperature, °F: 80 ASTM C1064
Ambient Temperature,~F: 54 ASTM C1064
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: 145.6 ASTM C138
* =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications.
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
1 1 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 86,410 3,060
1 2 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 90,780 3,210
Average (7 Days) 3,140
1 3 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 124,990 4,420
1 4 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 124,930 4,420
Average (28 Days) 4,420
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 1 of 5 ~~-^~~~~-F~a KaY
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94061163.0118
11~rr~con
Service Date: September 25, 2006 8901 Carpenter Fnvy, ste#1oo
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Report Date: October 24, 2006
ProLogis Project: Freeport Corporate Ctr. Bldg. 6
Attn: Keith Porter Freeport Pkwy & Gateway
2310 LBJ Freeway Ste 200 Coppell, TX
Dallas TX 75234
Project No.: 94061163
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 4:02am Plant: 27
Supplier: Southern Star
Truck No: 120 Ticket No:
Mix I.D. No.: 9339
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature, of
Ambient Temperature,~F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf:
Samale Information
Date Cast: September 25, 2006 Time: 4:50am
Sampled by: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 120
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #2
Placement Location: Pavement, E of Building
Specification Test Method
3-5 ASTM C143
3-6 ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
Result
5.75
3.0
79
52
147.4
" =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications.
Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches} Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
2 1 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 78,830 2,790
2 2 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 79,060 2,800
Average (7 Days) 2,800
2 3 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 112,290 3,970
2 4 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 108,930 3,850
Average (28 Days) 3,910
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were pertormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consenk of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 2 Of 5 oi-ACSam7-FNUre Key
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94061163.0118
l~~rracon
Service Date: September 25, 2006 8901 Carpenter Fnny, Ste#too
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214)630-1010
Client: Report Date: October 24, 2006
ProLogis Project: Freeport Corporate Ctr. Bldg. 6
Attn: Keith Porter Freeport Pkwy & Gateway
2310 LBJ Freeway Ste 200 Coppell, TX
Dallas TX 75234
Project No.: 94061163
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 5:35am Plant: 27
Supplier: Southern Star
Truck No: 31 Ticket No: 1435507
Mix I.D. No.: 9339
Water Added Onsite Before Test: 10Gallons
Field Test Data
Test Result
Slump, inches: 5.50
Air Content, %: 3.4
Concrete Temperature, °F: 80
Ambient Temperature,oF: 53
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: 147.0
Samale Information
Date Cast: September 25, 2006 Time: 6:13am
Sampled by: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 220
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #3
Placement Location: Pavement, E of Building
Specification Test Method
3-5 ASTM C143
3-6 ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
* =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications.
Laboratory Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
3 1 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 81,070 2,870
3 2 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 86,040 3,040
Average (7 Days) 2,960
3 3 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 115,490 4,080
3 4 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 118,950 4,210
Average (28 Days) 4,150
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 3 of 5 Ot-ACSR201-F~re Key
CONCRETE COIVIPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
Report Number: 94061163.0118
Service Date: September 25, 2006
Client:
ProLogis
Attn: Keith Porter
2310 LBJ Freeway Ste 200
Dallas TX 75234
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 7:07am Plant: 27
Supplier: Southern Star
Truck No: 5019 Ticket No: 1435518
Mix I.D. No.: 9339
Water Added Onsite After Test: 5 Gallons
Field Test Data
lI~rracon
8901 Carpenter Fnnry, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Report Date: October 24, 2006
Project: Freeport Corporate Ctr. Bldg. 6
Freeport Pkwy & Gateway
Coppell, TX
Project No.: 94061163
Sample Information
Date Cast: September 25, 2006 Time: 7:33am
Sampled by: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 320
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #4
Placement Location: Pavement, E of Building
Test Result Specification Test Method
Slump, inches: 5.00 3-5 ASTM C143
Air Content, %: 3.4 3-6 ASTM C231
Concrete Temperature, °F: 79 ASTM C1064
Ambient Temperature,oF: 56 ASTM C1064
Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: 145.5 ASTM C138
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
4 1 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 84,150 2,980
4 2 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 83,260 2,940
Average (7 Days) 2,960
4 3 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 118,460 4,190
4 4 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 115,670 4,090
Average (28 Days) 4,140
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressi~re
strength samples.
The tests were pertormed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 4 of 5 0,-~~~,-F~,a Hay
CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST lf~rr~con
Report Number: 94061163.0118
Service Date: September 25, 2006 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100
Dallas, Texas 75247
(214) 630-1010
Client: Report Date: October 24, 2006
ProLogis Project: Freeport Corporate Ctr. Bldg. 6
Attn: Keith Porter Freeport Pkwy & Gateway
2310 LBJ Freeway Ste 200 Coppell, TX
Dallas TX 75234
Project No.: 94061163
Material Information
Specified Strength: 3500 psi @ 28 Days
Batch Time: 8:OOam Plant: 27
Supplier: Southern Star
Truck No: 5019 Ticket No: 1435525
Mix I.D. No.: 9339
Field Test Data
Test
Slump, inches:
Air Content, %:
Concrete Temperature, ~F
Ambient Temperature,~F:
Plastic Unit Weight, pct:
Result
6.00
3.5
81
70
146.7
Samp/e Information
Date Cast: September 25, 2006 Time: 9:02am
Sampled by: Jose A. Martinez
Weather Conditions: Clear
Accumulative Yards: 410
Placement Method: Pump
Sample Locations: See attached sketch for Location #5
Placement Location: Pavement, E of Building
Specification Test Method
3-5 ASTM C143
3-6 ASTM C231
ASTM C1064
ASTM C1064
ASTM C138
* =Field Test Results do not meet project specifications.
Laboratory Test Data
Age at Maximum Compressive
Set Specimen Diameter Area Date Test Load Strength
No. ID (inches) (sq. inches) Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi)
5 1 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 89,860 3,180
5 2 6.00 28.27 10/02/2006 7 91,930 3,250
Average (7 Days) 3,220
5 3 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 116,030 4,100
5 4 6.00 28.27 10/23/2006 28 122,160 4,320
Average (28 Days) 4,210
Services - Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive
strength samples.
Terracon Rep: Jose A. Martinez
Report Distribution:
(1) ProLogis (1) Meinhardt & Assoc Architects PLLC
(1) City of Coppell TX (1) Jordan Construction Services Reviewed by:
(1) City of Coppell TX (1) Meinhardt & Assoc Architects PLLC
Robert D. Ray, S.E. .
(1) Haynes Whaley Assoc Inc
Senior Project M ager
The tests were performed in general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client
indicated above and shall not be reproduced except in full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable
to the actual samples tested at the location(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical
materials.
Page 5 of 5 o,-~S~RO+-F~~,BKeY
~ } ~ ~,,
~\
~ - -OZS- -
=~.-
-: r_-r
:,
~ ~
'~~.}~ ~ I
°8 3 :~ ~ ~' n t S
I ~ ;a
,.
~~ ~.
. ~I
1 / ~ e
~ _ n:, ~~ .
~ / i_6 ~ ~ t
f ~\
\ ~ I fiy ` ;:
\ ~, .~~,
5
-615-~. - /~
r
-~ ~
~ +:~
,,,, ..5' ~ ,~.
~'ERRAC~N REPORT N0. ~ ~ ~~~
~~;
I
0
` I
Ik
i
~ -.
P I
I .r ~yF 1-
;x~. _
1 ~~r~ ! y~~' `~t
;'~ rf .,,~ ~ ff ,~~I
i" ~ ?
~ ~: ~ (:-. ~~a
V ~ i i I
~, G. ~ ~ ~'
r~ II
~ ,L~ I << I
I ' ~'~~ -~~ ~i
I 1 I ',
I ~ ; ;.
~ '~I!
~~~
I ~I ~.
I I
I
'~
I ''
I
1 (~
II I
_~._-_---- h i ~- fl ~I
~.r, ~ ' I
~ - ,1
C a ~ ,y} I ~
~ ~1 M ' I yS
J ---- _ :~ .~~ ~ I
~ - `~' I f ~
a
s ~~~~ I F
~ ~~ ~
~ ~ C~
I
I
~\ ,~~ ~~
x3" I ~~ I I
I
_J
I
II
~~
~~ _I~ ~
"I
i
~~ /~ /
~'~--~~22 ~/
~ .~.
_{ I
;. i }
.~, ~.. ..
-/-- -- I I ~- - -•-/
i~ / I I I -'' r ~-- -
,~ _ _ -~
:~ - - __.-
:. _.,
. // ., 1
a ~ J?t
;~ - ~~~
~ /-~~
}" i ~ I
i
- ~'-- - I j
.`
'ICJ }'~ '~] !! I
f ~. t
~ _ i`
_ ~~ ~ I ~.
1~~ ~ '>~, l~ {
/ / '
~~ 1
°i ~ II
,1:~ _
~.
I~~. I ~ I r'~~ i~ ~
~,~ . ,.
.J~ ~~, ~ I ~ ~ I
,~
,~ ~ I VIII ... '
;_1 ~~ III ~'
«i ,.III ~- ~' ~~ ~ ! e
'~y'
(~ , ~ .; I ,
_. I~
_..___ ._._-- - ~ r--,~~_,-- ~ _ .- ,.
__ . _ _ J iI
i
it
~,_ ~
li
li
I~
j:
I,•
1.
I;
i;
I
~I.
,.
L ;
Q