Riverchase(6.4)-LR 980622Compaction
Test Report
aIENT: RNERCHASE PLAZA, LTD.
C/0 TRNEST INC. GENERAL PARTNERS
5429 LBJ FREEWAY, SURE 340
DALLAS, TEXAS 75240\
Patton, Burke 8z Thompson
10555 Newkirk Street
Suite 530
Dallas, Texas 75220
DATE: _.__ Oc5/22/98 JOB. NO ____1439 ___. __ _. __
REPORT NO ___._ ___ _ 1 1 ____. SHEET ____1 OF _ 1_ _._.
suBJECT RNERCHASE PLAZA II
750 SO. MACARTHUR
COPPELL, TX
LIME STABILIZED
SUBGRADE PREPARATION
LABORATORY FIELD
TEST
NO.
LOCATION DEPTH
FEET TEST
TYPE MAX
DENSITY
PCF OMC
% DRY
DENSITY
PCF MC
% COM-
FACTION
SOIL TYPE
35' idE3RT1.1.OF SOUTHWE:iT-CORNS- CURYEUNQ~3._ .
_-2p'-WEST C?F NORTHWEST CORNER _GURYE I~1S?. 3__
-~f}'-WEST#-SOUFHWESi CL3R{VI=R~- _~.URYE_I~O._3--
_,65'-WEST OF NOINHWEST CORNED... .C.URVE_N.O.._3___
.._._... ..__.__..
_ _
T BELOW SU~RADE
SPECIFICATIONS: -..-- 9~ _ _ _ % OF MAXIMUM__ _ASTM-D-698--
M0157URE WITHIN_ _. ('~TQ _.}.Q ____ _ % OF OPTIMUM
TYPE OF COMPACTION EQUIPMENTAND NO.OF UNITS:
MOISTURE ADDED BY_ __ _... __ _ _ _
THICKNESSOFLIFT .___ _ __ ___ .... _ _ __._ ___ INCHES
TYPE OF EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT AND NO OF UNITS.
THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS FORMED AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATION
OF FILL PLACEMENT, AS WELL AS THE TESTS SHOWN ABOVE WE HAVE RELIED
UPON THE CONTRACTOR TO APPLY THE NECESSARY COMPACTOE EFFORT AND
MOISTURE TO ACHIEVE SPECIFIED COMPACTION DURING TIMES WHEN OUR
OBSERVER IS NOT PRESENT, AND AT LOCATIONS OTHER THAN THOSE TESTED.
TEST DATA ARE NOT THE SOLE BASIS FOR OPINIONS ON WHETHER THE FILL MEETS
SPECIFICATIONS.
-_DE3ZER f }} ____ ..____ _ ___ _ . ___ _.__ __ __
PROGRESS REPORT AS RE6IUESTED BY PAUL WITH R.G.C. WE MADE A SITE VISIT TO TEST THE LIME TREATED
SUBGRADE FOR MOISTURE AND DENSITY. THE CONTRACTOR HAD MOISTURE TREATED AND COMPACTED PRIOR TO OUR
ARRNAL ON-SITE. TESTS NO. 21 AND 24 INDICATED LOW COMPACTION. WE RECOMMENDED THE CONTRACTOR
APPLY ADDITIONAL COMPACTNE EFFORT TO THE AREA REPRESENTED BY THESE TESTS PRIOR TO RETESTING. A
RETURN VISff IS SCHEDULED FOR 06/23/98.
~~;-~~Fe,~ F~ pF~1',
s~ c~; • ~+
_.__
^ IN OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION MEETS SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST NO (5) •'~ L1 23- S~~ 2ri ••• ~y~ I
^ JPI OUR OPINION, FILL COMPACTION DOES NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS AS INDICATED BY OUR OBSERVATIONS AND TEST Nd'~S~w.. a~ a '._~. ~ J
AND SHOULD BE REWORKED a,. ~,~. P"~r~1+~tiP9r7ERQ~IRCa
SCOPE OF OBSERVATION: ^ FULL TIME; ^ ~ERIODIC, ON CALL BASIS; ^ CONTRACTOR'S OR CLIENT'S REPRESENTATIVE dbVIS'~5~~„P~[~t~~~~(~
Patt~m, Buff ~- pst~a~~,a.:•~FC31ST~~l~.~!
_ _.._C, 1N. NICKOLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FIELD REPRESENTATNE
r_ ~ _.._ _ ____
nPPROVEDBV RI RD J. HAMMERS
BF