CF-Justice Center-LR060916
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
eM J ENGINEERING, me.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client: Harrison, Walker, & Harper
Project: Police and Fire Renovation
City of Cappel!
Report Distribution: (1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-006
Report Date: 09/06/2006
Specifications
Percent Compaction: +95% min
Moisture Content: opt +0% to +4%
Test Data
Date Tested: 08/31/2006
Technician: Phil Sommerville
2777
2756
Test Method
ASTM D-698
ASTM 0-698
Material Description
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
Curve No.
Dark Brown and Gray Clay
Grey Sandy Clay w/Some Organics
20.5 99.0
14.0 113.0
In-Place Test Results
Test Elevation Ref.
No or Lift Location Curve
Trench Utility Backfill
7.1 -2' BFG Retest of #7.0, Report #875-6111-003 2777
8.1 Final Retest of #8.0, Report #875-6111-003 2777
8" Waterline
11.0 -1' BFG 40' West of East 45 degree Bend 2777
12.0 -1' BFG 10' North of Existing Curb at 10' East of 2777
East 45 degree Bend
Probe
Depth
Percent Wet Density Dry Density Percent
Moisture (pet) (pet) Density
24.0 119.4 96.3 97.3
23.1 120.3 97.7 98.7
23.8 122.2 98.7 99.7
21.6 119.7 98.4 99.4
6"
6"
6"
6"
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s):
{BFG} Below Final Grade
Retest of Report #875-6111-003; Date Tested: 8/24106
CMJ Engineering, In
R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
Gauge: CPN
Gauge SN: 6430
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07 Page I of I
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
eM J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client:
Project:
Harrison, Walker, & Harper
Police and Fire Renovation
City of Coppel!
Report Distribution: (1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-007
Report Date: 09/06/2006
Specifications
Percent Compaction: +95% min
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +5%
Test Data
Date Tested: 08/31/2006
Technician: Phil Sommerville
2777
Test Method
ASTM D-698
Material Description
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
Curve No.
Dark Brown and Gray Clay
20.5 99.0
In-Place Test Results
Wet Density Dry Density
(pet) (pet)
Percent
Density
Test Elevation Ref. Probe
No or Lift Location Curve Depth
Site Sub grade & Fill **
13.0 1 st Lift 40' South, 40' East of SE Existing Building 2777 6"
Corner
14.0 Subgrade 25' South, 25' East of SW Existing Building 2777 6n
Corner
Percent
Moisture
29.6*
122.5 94.5
95.5
23.5
122.9 99.5
100.5
An asterisk (*) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
T~st Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s):
* Non-Compliant: Contractor Notified
** Building Addition at Firehouse
Gauge: CPN
Gauge SN: 6430
Std. Density Count:
R. Carl Le , S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
\
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items,' d areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07
CMJ Engineering, Inc
Page I of I
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
eM J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client:
Project:
Harrison, Walker, & Harper
Police and Fire Renovation
City of Coppell
Report Distribution: (1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-008
Report Date: 09/06/2006
Specifications
Percent Compaction: +95% min
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +5%
Test Data
Date Tested: 08/31/2006
Technician: Phil Sommerville
Curve No.
Material Description
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
2777
Test Method
ASTM D-698
Dark Brown and Gray Clay
20.5 99.0
In-Place Test Results
Probe
Depth
Percent
Moisture
Wet Density
(pet)
Dry Density
(pet)
Percent
Density
Test
No
Elevation
or Lift Location
Ref.
Curve
13.1
Site Subgrade & Fill **
1 st Lift Retest of #13.0, Report #875-6111-007
2777
6"
24.6
119.2
95.7
96.7
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s): ** Building Addition at Firehouse
Retest of Report #875-6111-007 Tested Earlier this Date
CMJ Engineering, In
R. Car' ee, SET.
Vice President/CMT Manager
Gauge: CPN
Gauge SN: 6430
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
O? Page I of I
Moisture-Density Relationship
eMJ ENGINEERING,INC
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client: Harrison, Walker, & Harper Report Distribution:
Project: Police and Fire Renovation
City of Coppel!
(1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-009
Report Date: 09/06/2006
Project Information
Material Origin:
Sample Location:
Material Description:
Material Use:
On Site
South Side of Police Station
Brown and Dark Brown Clay
General Fill
Tested By: Shawn Wood, P.G.
Sample Date: 08/31/2006
Moisture-Density Relationship - Curve No. 2793
109
107
Dry
Density
(pet)
105
103
101
! 1\ J( 0% S tura ion
i (nc: ') 71l\
\
'\
,
-- - -- --- . \
~ .....
/ I " ,
I
/ I \ \
I : " r\
/ I \ \
I : \ \
14 16 18 20 22 24 26
Moisture Content (%)
Material Properties and Test Information - Curve No. 2793
Maximum Dry Density: 104.5 Liquid Limit: 51
Optimum Moisture Percent: 18.0 Plastic Limit: 16
Plasticity Index: 35
Test Method(s): ASTM D-698, ASTM D4318
Rammer Description:
Mechanical
Preparation Procedure: Moist
CMJ Engineering, Inc
L1MlTATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
06 Page I of I