Loading...
Coppell/121 Off Pk-LR040712ACT~C ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING CLIENT: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES 2557 SOUTHWEST GRAPEVINE PKWY SUITE 200 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 PROTECT: HWY 121 BUSINESS PARK REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY PAGE 1 OF 2 MACTEC Engineering and Consulting 2200 Gravel Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118-7123 Tel: 817-284-7755• Fax: 817-589-1420 PROJECT NO.: 9 0 2 3 7 4 7 REPORT NO.: 4 0 4 6 7 4 DATE OF SERVICE: 7/ 0 7/ 2 0 0 4 AUTHORIZATION: REPORT DATE: 7/12/2004 SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree of field compaction. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES GAUGE:TROXLER 3430B METHOD OF TEST: GAUGE SERIAL NO.: 2 3 3 3 4 STANDARD COUNTS DENSITY: ASTM D2 922 MOISTURE - CURRENT3~IA PREVIOUS: NA MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 DENSITY - CURRENT:NA PREVIOUS: NA SPECIFICATION: TEST MODE: Direct Transmission DENSITY: 95$ PROBE DEPTH (in.): 6 MOISTURE: NA MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS REFERENCE TEST OF MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY pcf REPORT NO ON SITE Brn & Drk Brn Clay 19.5 104.0 404403 TEST NO LOCATION. 1. WATER LINE STA 10+40 3RD LIFT 2. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 3. SAME @ 1ST LIFT 4. SAME @ FINAL 5. SAME @ STA 12+40 3RD LIFT 6. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 7. SAME @ 1ST LIFT REPORT OF TESTS FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD DENSITY MAXIMUM MOISTURE MOISTURE (pc f) DENSITY DENSITY (%) (%) WET DRY (Pcfl (% max) 20.8 19.5 120.8 100.0 104.0 96 20.5 19.5 121.9 101.2 104.0 97 21.0 19.5 123.5 102.1 104.0 98 20.8 19.5 122.0 101.0 104.0 97 20.9 19.5 120.3 99.5 104.0 96 19.8 19.5 120.5 100.6 104.0 97 20.4 19.5 121.8 101.2 104.0 97 Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2 Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in tull without the approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and repons I(>07 TT apply only to the sample tested and~'or inspected, and are not indicative of the quantities of apparently tdenucal or similar products. J MACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SALYER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT NO. 9 0 2 3 7 4 7 DATE OF SERVICE: 7/07/2004 REPORT OF TESTS (continued) REPORT NO. 4 0 4 6 7 4 PAGE 2 OF 2 FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD DENSITY MAXIMUM TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE (pct) DENSITY DENSITY NO LOCATION (%) (%) WET DRY (Pcf1 (%a max) 8. SAME Q FINAL 20.7 19.5 123.1 102.0 104.0 98 Test results on this report meet project specifications as noted on page 1. Technician: Scott Jaeger Started: 09:OOAM Stopped: 12:OOPM Report Distribution: i 1) SALYER AND ASSOCIATES M TEC i 1) CITY OF COPPELL Tim Begole, CET. Our letters and reports arc for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and repons 1007 TT apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not indicative of the quantities of apparently tdenncal or similar products. ACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING CLIENT: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES 2557 SOUTHWEST GRAPEVINE PKWY SUITE 200 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 PROJECT: HWY 121 BUSINESS PARK REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY PAGE 1 OF 2 MACTEC Engineering and Consulting 2200 Gravel Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118-7123 Tel: 817-284-7755• Fax: 817-589-1420 PROJECT NO.: 9 0 2 3 7 4 7 REPORT NO.: 4 0 4 6 4 7 DATE OF SERVICE: 7/ 0 6/ 2 0 0 4 AUTHORIZATION: REPORT DATE: 7/12/2004 SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree of field compaction. PROJECT DATA CONTRACTOR: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES METHOD OF TEST: DENSITY: ASTM D2922 MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 SPECIFICATION: DENSITY: 9 5 MOISTURE: NA GAUGE:TROXLER 3430B GAUGE SERIAL NO.: 2 3 3 3 4 STANDARD COUNTS MOISTURE - CURRENT3QA PREVIOUS: NA DENSITY - CURRENT:NA PREVIOUS: NA TEST MODE: Direct Transmission PROBE DEPTH (in.): 6 MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS REFERENCE TEST OF MATERIALS MOISTURE °/a DENSITY pcf REPORT NO ON SITE Brn Drk Brn Clay 19.5 104.0 404403 ON SITE BRN.~LT.BRN.SILTY,SANDY CLAY 13.0 118.5 404273 TEST NO LOCATION 1. WATER LINE STA 2+40 3RD LIFT 2. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 3. SAME @ 1ST LIFT 4. SAME @ FINAL 5. SAME @ STA 4+40 3RD LIFT 6. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 7. SAME @ 1ST LIFT REPORT OF TESTS FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD DENSITY MAXIMUM MOISTURE MOISTURE (pc fj DENSITY DENSITY (%) (%) WET DRY (Pcf) (% max) 15.0 13.0 132.3 115.0 118.5 97 22.5 19.5 124.0 101.2 104.0 97 15.4 13.0 134.1 116.2 118.5 98 20.8 19.5 123.2 102.0 104.0 98 15.4 13.0 133.2 115.4 118.5 97 21.8 19.5 122.8 100.8 104.0 97 22.4 19.5 124.2 101.5 104.0 98 Report Of Tests Continued On Page 2 Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall mt be reproduced except in full without the approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our let[ers and reports 1 W7 TT apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. ~1MACTEC f ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SALYER AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT NO. 9 0 2 3 7 4 7 DATE OF SERVICE: 7/06/2004 REPORT OF TE5TS (continued ~ REPORT NO. 4 0 4 6 4 7 PAGE 2 OF 2 FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD DENSITY MAXIMUM TEST MOISTURE MOISTURE (pcf) DENSITY DENSITY NO LOCATION (°k) (°k) WET DRY (Pct (°lo max) 8. SAME @ FINAL 22.7 19.5 125.3 102.1 104.0 98 9. SAME @ STA 6+40 3RD LIFT 15.1 13.0 133.3 115.8 118.5 98 10. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 15.4 13.0 132.7 115.0 118.5 97 11. SAME @ 1ST LIFT 21.8 19.5 122.9 100.9 104.0 97 12. SAME @ FINAL 21.5 19.5 123.2 101.4 104.0 98 13. SAME @ STA 8+40 3RD LIFT 21.8 19.5 122.4 100.5 104.0 97 14. SAME @ 2ND LIFT 21.4 19.5 122.9 101.2 104.0 97 15. SAME @ 1ST LIFT 21.0 19.5 123.4 102.0 104.0 98 16. SAME @ FINAL 21.8 19.5 124.7 102.4 104.0 98 Test results on this report meet project specifications as noted on page 1. Technician: Scott Jaeger Started: 10:00AM Stopped: 12:30PM Report Distribution: (I) CITY OF CO PELL~~~T~~ A EC Tim Begole, CET. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reprodtued except in Lull wi[hout the approval of [he testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and repors I(A)7 T'I~ apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not indicative of the quantities of apparently identical or similar products. ~ ~~ ACTEC ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING CLIENT: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES 2557 SOUTHWEST GRAPEVINE PKWY SUITE 200 GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 PROJECT: HWY 121 BUSINESS PARK REPORT OF IN-PLACE DENSITY PAGE 1 OF 1 MACTEC Engineering and Consulting 2200 Gravel Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76115-7123 Tel: 817-284-7755• Fax: 817-589-1420 PROJECT NO.: 9 0 2 3 7 4 7 REPORT NO.: 4 0 4 7 0 6 DATE OF SERVICE: 7/08/2004 AUTHORIZATION: REPORT DATE: 7/ 12 / 2 0 0 4 SERVICES: Perform in-place density and moisture content tests to determine the degree of field compaction. CONTRACTOR: SALYER AND ASSOCIATES METHOD OF TEST: DENSITY: ASTM D2922 MOISTURE: ASTM D3017 SPECIFICATION: DENSITY: 9 5 $ MOISTURE: 0 TO +4 ~ OF OPT . PROJECT DATA GAUGE:TROXLER 3430B GAUGE SERIAL NO.: 2 3 3 3 4 STANDARD COUNTS MOISTURE - CURRENTi~TA PREVIOUS: NA DENSITY - CURRENT:NA PREVIOUS: NA TEST MODE: Direct Transmission PROBE DEPTH (in.): 6 MOISTURE/DENSITY RELATIONS REFERENCE TEST OF MATERIALS MOISTURE % DENSITY pcf REPORT NO ON SITE Brn & Drk Brn Clay 19.5 104.0 404403 TEST NO LOCATION 1. PARKING AREA N END 1ST LIFT ---~ 2. SAME @ S END 1ST LIFT 3. SAME @ N END 2ND LIFT REPORT OF TEST5 FIELD OPTIMUM FIELD DENSITY MAXIMUM MOISTURE MOISTURE (pcf) DENSITY DENSITY (°k) (%) WET DRY (Pcf) (% max) 21.5 19.5 121.7 100.2 104.0 96 21.8 19.5 123.0 101.0 104.0 97 22.0 19.5 123.5 101.2 104.0 97 4. SAME @ S END 2ND LIFT 21.4 19.5 123.2 101.5 104.0 98 Test results on this report meet project specifications as noted above. Technician: Scott Jaeger Started: 01:OOPM Stopped: 04:OOPM Report Distribution: (I) SALYER AND ASSOCIATES l I) CITY OF COPPELL M C C Tim Begole, CET. Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the client to whom they are addressed and shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of the testing laboratory. The use of our name must receive our written approval. Our letters and reports 100' TT apply only to the sample tested and/or inspected, and are not indicative of the quantities of apparently Identical or similar products.