Stoneleigh P1-LR 980326ALPHA TESTING, INC.
2200 Wisconsin St.
Suite 100
Duels, Texas 75229
(214) 620 -8911
FIRST WORTHING COMPANY
TESTED FOR:
DALLAS, TEXAS
PROJECT: STONELEIGH AT RIVERCHASE
COPPELL, TEXAS
REPORT OF CONCRETE
COMPRESSION TEST
DATE OF ISSUE:
OUR REPORT NO.:
MARCH 26, 1998
97060 -101
FIELD DATA
PAVING: 50' NORTH & 50' WEST OF NW CORNER OF
LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT BUILDING 18
03/26/98
TYPE
CURING
1
DATE PLACED 09:45
PST
12111
TIME 5
DELIVER TICKET NO
N/A
SLUMP (ASITIA C-143) 5
C
MIX PROPORTIONS (SSD)
CEMENT
N/A
AIR CONTENT (ASTM C -231 ❑ OR -173 ❑ ) 70
2,690
N/A
AIR TEMPERATURE
74
WATER
N/A
CONCRETE TEMPERATURE
03/27/98
FINE AGGREGATE
N/A
DATE ReCEfVED
COARSE AGGREGATE
04/23/98
FIELD DATA8U9MITTED BY D. H.
ADMIXTURE
N/A
MIX DATA SUBMITTED BY RED I - M I X
88
LAB
SPECIMENS CAPPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-617 ❑ OR C -1231 ❑
H
COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS
(NOMINAL CYLLNDER SIZE 6" X 12')
(ASTM C -39)
LAB
NO.
TYPE
CURING
DATE
TESTED
AGE
DAYS
TO AL
LOAD
AREA
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH, PSI
85
LAB
04/02/98
7
76,012
28.27
2,690
86
LAB
04/23/98
28
141,900
28.27
5,020
87
LAB
04/23/98
28
133,257
28.27
4,710
88
LAB
HOLD
H
28.27
Specifications 28
3. non
finders made by ALPHA
representsWe.
❑ Cylinders made by Architects
or Contractor's representative.
Ilndere picked up by ALPHA
laboratory.
❑ Cylinders deltvered to ALPHA
l aboratory.
2 mpression test results comply with
applicable specifications.
❑ Compression test results do not comply
with applicable specifications.
C#ETT ATSTly
C.
NER
ALPHA TESTING, INC.
22091Msconsin St.
/suite 100
Dakils, Texas 75229
(214) 620 -8911
FIRST WORTHING COMPANY
TESTED FOR: DALLAS, TEXAS
STONELEIGH AT RIVERCHASE
PROJECT: COPPELL, TEXAS
REPORT OF CONCRETE
COMPRESSION TEST
DATE OF ISSUE:
OUR REPORT NO.:
MARCH 26, 1998
97060 -96
FIELD DATA
PAVING: 25' WEST & 10' SOUTH OF NW CORNER OF
LOCATION OF CONCRETE PLACEMENT BUILDING 18
03/26/98
TYPE
CURING
1
DATE PLACED 06 :4 5
PLANT
12086
TIME 3
DELIVER TICKET NO
N/A
SLUMP O TM C -143) 4
MIX PROPORTIONS (SSD)
N/A
AIR CONTENT "TM C -231 ❑ OR C -173 ❑) 63
CEMENT
N/A
AIR TEMPERATURE
70
WATER
N/A
CONCRE1f TEMPERATURE
03/27/98
FINE AGGREGATE
N/A
DATE RECEIVED
COARSE AGGREGATE
04/23/98
FIELD DATA SUBMITTED BY D • H •
ADMIXTURE
N/A
MIX DATA SUBMITTED BY RED I - M I X
84
LAB
SPECIMENS CAPPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C-617 ❑ OR C -1231 ❑
H
COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS
(NOMINAL CYLINDER SIZE 6" X 12')
(ASTM C -39)
LAB
NO.
TYPE
CURING
DATE
TESTED
AGE
DAYS
TOTAL
LOAD
AREA
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH, PSI
81
LAB
04/02/98
7
95,046
28.27
3,360
82
LAB
04/23/98
28
172,344
28.27
6,100
83
LAB
04/23/98
28
143,491
28.27
5,080
84
LAB
HOLD
H
28.27
Specifications 28
3, 000
REMARKS
9 made by ALPHA
representative.
❑ Cylinders made by Architect's
or Contractor's representative.
9-t i i nders picked up by ALPHA
laboratory.
❑ Cylinders delivered to ALPHA
laboratory.
24mpresslon test results comply with
applicable specifications.
❑ Compression test results do not comply
with applicable specifications.
I led
*I NC
INC.
9AT ST
2209 Wisconsin SL, Suite 100
9 - ^0 'TION OF CONCRETE
Daffas, Tew 75, FIELD INSPI
1//
ix (972) 620,8911 FILE
Project Number '17060 Date oirPlacement 3 -26- 9
Client Name LeL + w I A 'km 6 eopovi Date Cyls. Rec In La
Project Name .S.6me te cA 44 2wer [ 1 1F Concrete Supplier M;x
I
Technician A% of
chnician Mame 11. t j 1 6,kAJ Spec(Arati 5 ons. Slump A ir 96
Set
#
Concrete
Supplier
Ticket #
Time
Truck
Disptch
Time
CYIS.
Molded
Time
Truck
Unloaded
Ms.
Of
Conc.
Unit
w
(W)
Slump
A ir 96
15
Notified of any item out of Spec#icadon: Time Item (s)
Signature of Person Notitied. • X
et A ir Conc. Reqd #
# Temp. Temp. Strength �'Yls* ded Placement Location of Test Sample
Mo6l
5,.o - '1v x 6,o'vi o4' tio eT k we-s47- C,
It/
Mv T-RT31
MAR 2 6 10
ALPHA TESTING, INC. Daily Field Report
2208 Wisconsin, Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75228
TESTED FOR = V. ' n " DATE
..
PROJECT NAME Ar leinL ALPM RPT alt 9 47040'
WEATHER TEMP. RANGE 6 6 TO 2 TECHNICIAN Da AI . A J � tJ
THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR
TY ON401NO WORK AND PERFORM FELD TESTWO AS REQUESTED.
S.G. SUBGRADE FOR
WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREA( *) HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE
WITH [Gsobdmical recommendations] (locally accepted standards).
WHALE ON SITE THE TECHNICIAN Oi1TADW SOIL SAMPLE(S) FOR LABORATORY
PLC • ANALYSIS. THE >ItAMPLE(S) [was] [were) OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING
LOCATM48):
F D T A TOTAL OF — FIELD DENSITY TESTS [was] [were] PERFORMED ON [fill] [select fill] [natural 8M (stabilimd soft) Jim~ soils] [base materials] FOR
AREA(S).
[see attaWb :11sport for results of OWd compaction testing] .
[sib representative was informed that results would be available as soon as laboratory testing was
complete
GRAMT*N WHILE ON SITE THE TECHNICIAN PERFORMED FIELD GRADATION(S) TEST(S) ON THE
[Lime stabilized] [cement modified] MATERIALS. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR TEST RESULTS
PRE -POUR THE TECHNICIAN OBSERVED THE PRE -POUR CONDITION OF
THE TECHMlCIAN OBSERVED THE AREA(s) FOR PROPER IvaW bwnwl [Grade beam size] [steel reinforcing]
AND [post tension cable lay out]. * [No deficiencies were noted during the observation]
[The-following exceptions were noted):
co R THE TECHNICIAN MOLDED 1 SET(S) OF test cyll d [flexural beams]
[cubes] [prisims) FROM [concrete] [mortar] [grout] PLACED F 3^ Z G'�a
SO'AJ X So'w a4 Na tik. iwl t�&4 /1 P n1 e.a: R 1.1a . IA —emu me- ON THIS DATE.
LAB TEST LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR ALL RELATED ITEMS REFERENCED ABOVE WILL FOLLOW ON A
SEPERATE REPORT.
WHO WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS.
CANCEL THE TECHNICIAN WAS INFORMED THAT NO TESTING WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR
AS
TYPE AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RET40100 E.
j
2 BN
••• `...
Owa 01 3 - 2!0 - r18 FIL
Dl* C)& M W bk Lab
Steller +� ,• � i t`n � r�
M
,' Slinep s Air
A�q�ct MwW er cl 7 0 60
G
Ivan" F►r J Wort �� 4 �oM�1 Rol
— Mame 540Ne `P V\ R� F �UP C _
ician Aflamo e --, V� t N6
Set
onc
T #
? inie
�'d
,TlOw
Time
L4� hw&d
MS.
�
P
�J�'') Air 916
� ao
MMOed of any item out of Sp��w: lbw he Fn (
Signature of Person Not#ie+d• x
Set Air C Req'd Cam. Placement Location of Test Sample
# Temp. Temp. Struegdlt olded
- O- r!JD?6 A- L -
1 b3_ '7o
y r �
ALPHA TESTING, INC. Daily Field Report
2208 Wisconsin, Suite 100
Dallas, Texas 75228
------------ - - - - --
TESTED FOR r C m m, t2ANt - - - - - -- DATE - - - - -9 ------ - - - - --
8
PROJECT NAME N k v i 5 IE ALPHA RPT # q7 0 O
WEATHER 2kOkkr C \n s4 T MP. RANGE TO TECHNICIAN Q . H I oN
THE ALPHA TECHNICIAN TRAVELED TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT AS REQUESTED TO MONITOR
TYPE) ON -GOING WORK AND PERFORM FIELD TESTING AS REQUESTED.
S.G. SUBGRADE FOR
WAS OBSERVED TO VERIFY THAT AREA(s) HAD BEEN PREPARED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE
WITH [Geotechnicai recommendations] [locally accepted standards].
MATERIAL WHIILE ON SITE THE TECHNICIAN OBTAINED SOIL SAMPLE(S) FOR LABORATORY
PICK -UP . ANALYSIS. THE SAMPLES) [was] [were] OBTAINED FROM THE FOLLOWING
LOCATION(S):
F D T A TOTAL OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS [was] [were] PERFORMED ON [fill] [select fill] [natural sg]
[stabilized soils] [modified soils] [base materials] FOR
AREA(S).
[see attached report for results of field compaction testing] '
[site representative was informed that results would be available as soon as laboratory testing was
complete]
GRADATION WHILE ON SITE THE TECHNICIAN PERFORMED FIELD GRADATION(S) TEST(S) ON THE
[Lime stabilized] [cement modified] MATERIALS. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR TEST RESULTS
PRE -POUR THE TECHNICIAN OBSERVED THE PRE -POUR CONDITION OF
THE TECHNICIAN OBSERVED THE AREA(s) FOR PROPER [vapor barrier] [Grade beam size] [steel reinforcing]
AND [post tension cable lay out]. ' [No deficiencies were noted during the observation]
[The following exceptions were noted]:
CONCRET THE TECHNICIAN MOLDED ti SET(S) OF st cylinders ? exural ams]
[cubes] [prisims] FROM J c ` oncrete] [mortar] [grout] PLACED FOR
a5 u ] X 10 S L*4 Nf.'r - t n ,e r N)"' rn r Q\ 4C. I ii, ON THIS DATE.
LAB TEST LABORATORY TEST RESULTS FOR ALL RELATED ITEMS REFERENCED ABOVE WILL FOLLOW ON A
SEPERATE REPORT.
WHO WAS INFORMED OF ALL OBSERVATIONS AND FIELD TEST RESULTS.
CANCEL THE TECHNICIAN WAS INFORMED THAT NO
AS
TESTING WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR
TYPE AT THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHEDULED TESTING THE TECHNICIAN RETURNED
�v ti - - :� V - ' � —
= j � , '
DALLjr F ICE.
X1998 Lj