ST9902-LR070111In -Place Soil Moisture /Density Tests by Nuclear Method
C MJ ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -040
Report Date: 05/26/2006
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nall & Perkins
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction: +95% min +100% max Date Tested: 05/22/2006
Moisture Content: opt +0% to +5% Technician: Jory Goldring
Mat@fial;Refer,+ance �urYe �8� ` E,E .
Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No. Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
2207 ASTM D -698 Dark Brown Clay 22.0 99.0
2274 ASTM D -698 Reddish Brown Sandy Clay 13.5 115.0
In -Place Test Results
Test Elevation Ref. Probe Percent Wet Density Dry Density Percent
No or Lift Location Curve Depth Moisture (pcf) (pcf) Density
Roadway Fill Areas
162.0 Subgrade 50' West of Royal Lane, Sandy Lake Rd. 2207 6" 33.2' 118.5 89.0 89.9 ..-
163.0 Subgrade 200' West of Royal Lane, Sandy Lake Rd. 2207 6" 26.8 122.1 96.3 97.3
164.0 Subgrade 120' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2274 6" 17.1 133.3 113.8 99.0
165.0 Subgrade 270' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2274 6" 15.3 128.6 111.5 97.0
166.0 Subgrade 420' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2274 6" 15.9 131.1 113.1 98.3
167.0 Subgrade 570' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2207 6" 24.5 120.5 96.8 97.8
168.0 Subgrade 720' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2207 6" 26.2 121.7 96.4 97.4
169.0 Subgrade 850' South of Sandy Lake Rd., Royal Lane 2207 6" 24.1 122.5 98.7 99.7
An asterisk (') appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017 D -7
ADDITIONAL REMARK(s): ll I
�2
f
Contractor Notified
Non-Compliant:
r
�#
� r
Im
Gauge: CPN Gauge SN: 6660 Std. Density Count: 59568 Std. Moisture Count: 9521
�w it
s
C 0
CMJ Engineering, Inc R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07 Page l of I
In -Place Soil Moisture /Density Tests by Nuclear Method
C MJ ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -055
Report Date: 06/16/2006
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nall & Perkins
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction: +95% min +100% max Date Tested: 06/13/2006
Moisture Content: opt +0% to +5% Technician: Richard Jones
In -Place Test Results
Test
Elevation
Materiet' Reference -Gen Bata
Ref.
Probe
Percent
Wet Density
Dry Density
Percent
No
or Lift
Location
Curve
Optimum
Maximum Dry
Curve No.
Test Method
Material Description
Moisture %
Density pcf
2207
ASTM D -698
Dark Brown Clay
22.0
99.0
2308
ASTM D -698
Gray Brown Silty Sand w /Rock and Gravel & Trace of Lime
13.5
117.0
2276
ASTM D -698
Reddish Brown, Tan and Gray mottled Sandy Clay
14.0
115.0
In -Place Test Results
Test
Elevation
Ref.
Probe
Percent
Wet Density
Dry Density
Percent
No
or Lift
Location
Curve
Depth
Moisture
(pcf)
(pcf)
Density
Roadway Embankment of Fill **
191.0
3rd Lift
150' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2207
6"
23.1
118.5
96.3
97.3
192.0
4th Lift
150' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2308
6"
13.2*
119.8
105.8
90.4
193.0
3rd Lift
100' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2207
6"
22.4
120.7
98.6
99.6
194.0
4th Lift
100' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2207
6"
22.9
119.6
97.3
98.3
195.0
3rd Lift
50' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2276
6"
15.2
126.4
109.7
95.4
196.0
4th Lift
50' North of Sandy Lake, Centerline
2207
6"
17.7*
114.8
97.5
98.5
An asterisk ( *) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
ADDITIONAL REMARK(s):
Non- Compliant: Contractor Notified
** NORTH COPPELL DRIVE
Gauge: Troxler Gauge SN: 5381
Std. Density Count: 1757
Std. Moisture Count: 646
n COPY
CMJ Engineering, Inc R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07 Page I of 1
In -Place Soil Moisture /Density Tests by Nuclear Method
C M J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -100
Report Date: 08/07/2006
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nall & Perkins
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction: +95% min Date Tested: 08/01/2006
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +4% Technician: Richard Jones
� ": . , �IlaterlaE`�i�#erence Cie Data" ;
Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No. Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
2682 ASTM D -698 Lime Treated Light Brown Sandy Clay 16.0 99.5
In -Place Test Results
Test
Elevation
Ref.
Probe
Percent
Wet Density
Dry Density
Percent
No
or Lift
Location
Curve
Depth
Moisture
(pcf)
(pcf)
Density
8" Lime Stabilized Paving S/G
238.1
Final
Retest of #238.0, Report #687- 5192 -096
2682
6"
25.2*
106.3
84.9
85.3 "
242.1
Final
Retest of #242.0, Report #687 - 5192 -096
2682
6"
19.7
116.1
97.0
9
249.0
Final
EASTBOUND SANDY LAKE RD.
2682
6"
19.7
115.5
96.5
97.0
Sta. 19 +00 on Centerline
250.0
Final
Sta. 21 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
17.8
114.1
96.9
97.4
251.0
Final
Sta. 23 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
19.8
115.5
96.4
96.9
252.0
Final
Sta. 25 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
18.5
114.6
96.7
97.2
253.0
Final
Sta. 26 +75 on Centerline
2682
6"
17.6
115.0
97.8
98.3
254.0
Final
Sta. 29 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
17.5
114.6
97.5
98.0
255.0
Final
Sta. 31 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
17.4
116.5
99.2
99.7
256.0
Final
Sta. 33 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
17.8
114.6
97.3
97.8
257.0
Final
Sta. 35 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
19.9
115.8
96.6
97.1
258.0
Final
Sta. 37 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
19.8
115.0
96.0
96.5
259.0
Final
Sta. 39 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
19.5
116.5
97.5
98.0
260.0
Final
Sta. 41 +00 on Centerline
2682
6"
16.3
110.1
94.7
95.2
An asterisk ( *) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s):
{S /G} Subgrade
* Non - Compliant: Contractor Notified {John Gay}
Retest of Report #687- 5192 -096; Date Tested: 7/31/2006
Gauge: Humboldt Gauge SIN: 5000
Std. Density Count: 3765
Std. Moisture Count: 531
COPY
CMJ Engineering, Inc R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President /CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
Page 1 of l
07
In -Place Soil Moisture /Density Tests by Nuclear Method
C M J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -201
Report Date: 12/13/2006
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nall & Perkins
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction: +95% min +100% max Date Tested: 12/08/2006
Moisture Content: opt +0% to +5% Technician: Jon Lewis
Material) Reference Ctirite.Data
Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No. Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
2208 ASTM D -698 Tan and Dark Brown Silty Clay 21.0 100.5
In -Place Test Results
Test
Elevation
Ref.
Probe
Percent
Wet Density
Dry Density
Percent
No
or Lift
Location
Curve
Depth
Moisture
(pcf)
(pcf)
Density
Roadway Embankment **
308.0
-2' BFG
Sta. 53 +80, 30' Right of Centerline
2208
6"
27.4*
122.4
96.1
95.6
309.0
-2' BFG
Sta. 53 +80, 30' Right of Centerline
2208
6"
26.4`
118.9
94.1
93.6'
310.0
-2' BFG
Sta. 53 +80, 30' Right of Centerline
2208
6"
27.6`
121.2
95.0
94.5'
An asterisk (') appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s): {BFG} Below Final Grade
" Non- Compliant: John Gay with Tiseo Paving Company was Notified
** Roadway Embankment: West Sandy Lake Road
Gauge: Humboldt Gauge SN: 5368
Std. Density Count: 3549
Std. Moisture Count: 528
COP T
CMJ Engineering, Inc R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07
Page l of 1
In -Place Soil Moisture /Density Tests by Nuclear Method
C MJ ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -203
Report Date: 12/18/2006
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nall & Perkins
Specifications Test Data
Percent Compaction: +95% min Date Tested: 12/12/2006
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +4% Technician: Josh Bridges
Mat 1a1'RofeiremeCurveCl�ta
Optimum Maximum Dry
Curve No. Test Method Material Description Moisture % Density pcf
3063 ASTM D -698 Brown and Light Brown Sandy Clay (Cement Treated) 17.0 101.5
In -Place Test Results
Test
Elevation
Ref.
Probe
Percent
Wet Density
Dry Density
Percent
No
or Lift
Location
Curve
Depth
Moisture
(pcf)
(pcf)
Density
Paving Subgrade **
311.0
Final
5' East, 10' North of SW Corner of Cutout
3063
6"
16.4
105.9
91.0
89.7 *
312.0
Final
10' North, 10' West of SE Corner of Cutout
3063
6"
17.4
105.9
90.2
88.9 *
313.0
Final
15' South, 5' East of NW Corner of Cutout
3063
6"
16.5
111.1
95.4
94.0 *
An asterisk ( *) appears next to test results which do NOT meet the project specifications.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
Additional Remark(s):
* Non - Compliant: John Gay with Tiseo Paving Company was Notified
*` Paving Subgrade: 15x10 paving cutout at the SE corner of Sandy Lake and N. Coppell
Gauge: Humboldt Gauge SN: 5000
Std. Density Count: 3726
Std. Moisture Count: 556
0
CMJ Engineering, Inc R. Carl Lee, S.E.T.
Vice President/CMT Manager
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07 Page I of I
Concrete Compression Test Report
C M J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284 -9400 Fax: (817) 589 -9993
Client: City of Coppell
Project: West Sandy Lake Road
Reconstruction
Report Distribution: (1) City of Coppell
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Tiseo Paving Company
(1) Teague Nail & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 687 - 5192 -184
Report Date: 01/05/2007
_ Specifications
Cylinder
#
Test Data
Strength
3600 psi @ 28 Days
Placement Date
11/07/2006
Slump
5 in max
Sampled By
Zach Hartgraves
Air Content
3 % min 6 % max
Weather
Clear /Sunny
Concrete Temperature
n/a
Supplier /Mix
On Site/
Ambient Temperature
40° F min
Air Content Method
ASTM C231
'k
.. Fibltl
Ticket Number: N/A Time Batched: 09:35 Time Sampled: 10:00
Slump: 4.5 in Air Content: 4.0% Unit Weight: N/A
Concrete Temperature: 78° F Ambient Temperature: 67° F Yardage (c.y.): 30 of 120
Placement Location: Paving: Median at Intersection of Sandy Lake Rd and North Point, West half of Median
Sample Location: 2' South of North Curb at Sta. 27 +00
Concrete Compression Test Results
Set #
Cylinder
#
Test Date
Age
(days)
Max Load
(lbs. force)
Area
(sq.in.)
Stren th
(ps
02
SLR11070605
11/10/2006
3
61280
27.90
2200
02
SLR11070606*
11/14/2006
7
71220
28.09
2540
02
SLR11070607
12/05/2006
28
87440
28.18
3100
02
SLR11070608
12/05/2006
28
89330
28.18
3170
02
SLR11070609*
01/02/2007
56
89810
27.99
3210
28 day average
3140
Normal cylinder size: 6" x 12"
The average 28 day compressive strength test results do not meet specifications.
Field and laboratory tests by CMJ are per applicable ASTM Standards: C31, C39, C138, C143, C172, C1064, and C617 or C1231.
0 Gallons of Water Added On -Site
* 7 -DAY TEST RESULT INDICATES A MARGINAL 28 -DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
* 28 -DAY TEST RESULTS NON - COMPLIANT; CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED VIA FAX ON 12/05/2006.
"HOLD" CYLINDER TO BE TESTED AT 56 DAYS.
*56 Day Non Compliant Contractor Notified
CMJ Engineering, In
Fracture
Type
C- cone /shear
B- cone /split
C- cone /shear
C- cone /shear
C- cone /shear
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
Page 1 of 1
J1
Vice President/CMT Manager