CF-Justice Center-LR060928
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
eMJ ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client:
Project:
Harrison, Walker, & Harper
Police and Fire Renovation
City of Coppell
Report Distribution: (1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-022
Report Date: 09/28/2006
Specifications
Percent Compaction: +95% min
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +5%
Test Data
Date Tested: 09/23/2006
Technician: Randy Boots
2777
Test Method
ASTM D-698
Material Description
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
20.5 99.0
Curve No.
Dark Brown and Gray Clay
In-Place Test Results
Wet Density
(pet)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Percent
Density
Test Elevation Ref. Probe
No or Lift Location Curve Depth
Paving (site) Sub grade & Fill
25.0 Final 50' South of Sally Port 2777 6"
26.0 Final 50' South, 5' East of SW Building Comer 2777 6"
Percent
Moisture
23.0
23.7
121.6
118.0
98.9
95.4
99.9
96.4
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017
CMJ Engineering, I c
Gauge: Humboldt
Gauge SN: 4674
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
07 Page I of I
In-Place Soil Moisture/Density Tests by Nuclear Method
eM J ENGINEERING, INC.
7636 Pebble Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76118 Tel: (817) 284-9400 Fax: (817) 589-9993
Client: Harrison, Walker, & Harper
Project: Police and Fire Renovation
City of Coppell
Report Distribution: (1) Harrison, Walker, & Harper
(1) City of Coppell
(1) Brinkley Sargent Architects
(1) Structural Engenuity
(1) Teague, Nail, & Perkins
CMJ Report No.: 875-6111-021
Report Date: 09/28/2006
Specifications
Percent Compaction: +95% min
Moisture Content: opt -2% to +5%
Test Data
Date Tested: 09/22/2006
Technician: Randy Boots
Curve No.
Test Method
Material Description
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture % Density pcf
2777
ASTM D-698
Dark Brown and Gray Clay
20.5 99.0
In-Place Test Results
Test Elevation Ref. Probe
No or Lift Location Curve Depth
Site Fill & Subgrade **
23.0 Final 30' South, 10' West of SW Corner 2777 6"
24.0 Final 30' South, 5' East of SW Corner 2777 6"
Percent
Moisture
Wet Density Dry Density
(pet) (pet)
Percent
Density
21.6
20.0
119.4 98.2
115.8 96.5
99.2
97.5
Test results on this report meet project specification.
Test Method(s): ASTM 02922, ASTM 03017
Additional Remark(s):
** Site Fill & Subgrade, BUILDING PAD
Gauge: Humboldt
Gauge SN: 4674
Std. Density Count:
R. Carl Lee, SET.
Vice PresidentlCMT Manager
CMJ Engineering, In
LIMITATIONS: The test results presented in this report apply only to the specific samples, items, and areas described within this report. The test results
do not pertain to any other samples, items or areas regardless of similarity. Our reports are produced solely for the exclusive use of our
client. This report or any portion of this report may not be reproduced without the written consent of our client and CMJ Engineering, Inc.
~ Pqelcll