DR8802-AG 901211 (4) NORTH KAYE STREET DRAI~E IMPROVEMENT
OPTION I
PROPOSED SOLUTION= Installation of PVC area drainage in the back
yard of the lots and routing 15' PVC and 18'
PVC outfall to the closest inlet on Spanish
Moss Court.
ESTIMATED COST= $102,000.00
COST SHARE= - Centex/Fox & Jacobs $ 40,000.00
(30K in cash + 10K Engineering)
- Affected Home Owners' $ 30,000.00
Pa,ticipation in covering
grassing, resodding, shed
replacement and re~oval and
tree d~m~ge.
- City of Coppell $ 32,000.00
PRO's= o Enginocring and construction t~me is 3-4 months, once
this project is approved by the City Council.
o Min~m~l m~intenance required.
o System can be constructed without d~m~ges to any
pe~anent structures.
o Home Owners' Cooperative effort can expedite the
~mpl~mentation of this ~mprov~ment before the next
heavy rain.
CON's= o There is no drainage easement available along s~hject
back yards where needed;
o Lots of obstacles, such as sheds, fences, trees exist
in the back yard.
o Home owners participation in covering some of costs,
such as grassing, resodding, shed removal and
replacement, etc.
KAYE STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT
OPTION III
PROPOSED SOLUTION: Paving and drainage {mprov~ment on Kaye
Street, and installation of curb and gutter.
This option needs to be studied in more
detail, than available presently.
ESTIMATE COST: On-site ~mprov~ment to $ 380,000.00
1,550 LF of street
Off-site drainage $0-$140,000.00
~mprovement
COST SHARE:
Alternative (1) - Centex/Pox & Jacobs Contribution and
Participation
- City of Coppell
Alternative (2) - Centex/Fox & Jacobs Contribution and
Pazticipation
- Affected Home Owners' Participation in Some
Cost
- City of Coppell
Alternative (3) Consideration of Creation of Public Improvement
District;
- Garland, for example, has established
Drainage Improvement District with City
participating in 1/3 and citizens in 2/3 of
the cost.
- City could consider this alte£native, but it
needs to be looked at in more detail.
KAYE STREET DRAINAGE I~PROVEMENT
OPTION III
(Cont.)
PRO's: o The best ultimate solution to resolve drainage
concezJ~s on both sides of Kaye Street.
o If extended drain lines and area drains to the back
yard are considered privately owned, there will be no
need for drainage easements.
o Kaye Street will be a standard residential street
compared to it's existing condition as a substandard
street.
o Less coordination with affected home owners as
compared to other options.
CON's: o Construction and engineering t~me is 6-8 months, once
this project is approved by the City Council.
o The consideration of creation of Drainage and/or
Public Improvement District can be t{me cons-m{ng,
delaying completion project by 6-8 months, in
addition to construction t{me.
o Creation of such district needs to be carefully
looked at.
o Since there is no outlet from Kaye Street in the
easterly direction, staff has concerns regarding
traffic engineering and public safety, etc.
o This option is more time consnm{ng than any other
option.
o The drainage outfall needs to be carefully studied to
make sure there is no and/or minimal impact on any
existing drainage systems.
GENERAL NOTES:
- Option III is actually rebuilding Kaye Street.
- Such ~mprov~ment would benefit all affected property owners.