DR9101-AG 890926AGENDA REQUEST FORM
I~,M CAPTION: (Consent agenda)
Consideration of authorizing the City Manager to p~eed with work on capital
improvement projects funded from the balance of ca~ f~un_d_a previotmly
for a~ halt overlays by the city council on D mber 15, 1988 for engineering
ential pro~rty flo~i~
services to investiga
in the back yards o~a,~t~ha~ A a~d ~a,e B engines,'ins
~ot to ekceed $7.40~.~ _ . ~.
_..,,,...,.,...,.,.,.,,,,..
This is the third and last site that staff is aware of that ~a either
residential flooding/damage or (in this case) causes conditions . : the health
and welfare of the general public. The other two sites are Pelican ami Bethel School
Road (completed except for the inlets at Blue Jay) and in the~lle~ behi~, l&l amd I&3
Hill Drive.~' - '
The Hill Drive project is under final design and it is pt~ed to cOmbine this Oak
Trail site drainage improvements into one construction project with Dill Drive to attempt
to get lower unit costs in the bid costs of both projects.
Staff recommends approval. If this item is approved then staff will design a silution
for Oak Trail and return to the city council to consider and approve ~he awerdin&of a
contract for construction of improvements for both Hill Drive and Oak Trail; -i~tached
is background information 1) letter to Dill Drive residents and 2) the propoee~ costs
for Oak Trail site listed with other needed improvemeeta as presented at the.!~f~,_1989~O
budget work shop.
BL~OGET AHT.:
COMMENTS_:
$7,400
&GEI~'I)A REQ ~
0588DS
October 26, 1989
Mr. Russell Doyle, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Coppell
255 Parkway Blvd.
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re: 141 Oak Trail
Drainage Problem
Proposal
Dear Mr. Doyle:
We are pleased to submit this proposal to provide engineering
services regarding the referenced site.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
PHASE A
1. Using record drawings and field observations, become familiar
with current and past drainage patterns in the subject area.
2. Perform topographic survey as needed to define the drainage
problem and evaluate potential solutions.
3. Meet with city staff and homeowners to a maximum of 5
hours.
4. Prepare a technical memorandum stating our assessment of the
problem and our recommended solution.
PHASE B
1. Design Surveying.
2. Preparation of construction plans and specifications.
COMPENSATION
For the services of our staff, for BASIC SERVICES or
ADDITIONAL SERVICES, the charge will be the "Salary Cost" of
each employee so engaged times a multiplier of 2.25 except for
Principals, whose time will be billed at $125.00 per hour. "Salary
Cost" is defined as the cost of salaries (total hours worked times
Mr. Russell Doyle, P.E.
October 26. 1989
Page 2
the time directly Chargeable to the Project, plus thirty percent
(30%1 for social security contributions, unemployment, excise and
payroll taxes, employment compensation insurance, retirement
benefits, incentive pay, medical and insurance benefits, sick leave,
vacation, and holiday pay applicable thereto). The overtime
premium I required by the Fair Labor Standards Act for non-exempt
classificationsl will be billed for overtime hours worked because of
client's requirements. For all telephone toll charges, reproduc-
tions, etc., and travel and subsistence for our officers and staff,
all as required for the proper execution of the work. and for all
work subcontracted, the charge is the actual invoice cost plus ten
percent I10%) service charge. The charge for providing the
services described previously in this proposal under SCOPE OF
SERVICES will not exceed $7,400.00.
The proposed fee is based on an assumed solution employing a "Y"
inlet and approximately 600 feet of 24" RCP with an estimated
construction cost of $27,000. It is our understanding that the City
will provide construction administration services.
PAYMENT
Payment to DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc. for authorized services
will be due upon presentation of our monthly statements for such
services.
This proposal will serve as an agreement if you will execute both
copies and return one to us. We appreciate the opportunity to be
of service.
Sincerely,
Paul A. kipscomb, P.E.
Vice President
David E. Lucado, P.E.
Project Manager
PAL/DEL/np
encl
ACCEPTED: C~T'Y. OF GOI~,PEI.~../
Scope of Work for Sewage Collection System
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF SERVICE5
1.0 PHASE I - IDENTIFY SYSTEM NEEDS AND DEFICIENCIES
This first phase of the study will entail collection and analysis of data
with respect to the existing system, existing flows and condition of facihties.
1.1 ESTABLISH FACILITY DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Develop a set of uniform criteria by which facilities will be judged.
Identify and catalog existing state and local criteria. Work closely with the CITY
stair to establish unL~orm criteria or standards where such criteria or standards have
not been established.
1.2 EXISTING DATA COLLECTION
Collect and catalog existing available data, including:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
Reports
Studies
Maps
Maintenance Records
Flow Meter Records
Documents that outline City policy
Agreements with other entities
City Population Projections
Contact the foUowing agencies that may have information~ or may be
affected by the project= City of Oallas~ City of Piano, City of Addison, City of
Coppell~ Trinity River Authority, Denton County, State Agencies, DART, and major
pipeline and utility companies.
A-i
1.3
EXISTING DATA EVALUATION
Evaluate data and reports furnished by the CITY. The ENGINEER will
make use of the previous reports and studies while maintaining an independent
evaluation.
ADDITIONAL DATA COLLECTION
Collect additional data as required, including the following if available~
0
0
0
Flow Measurement Tests
Pipe Condition Evaluations
Geographic Distribution of Flow Contributions
FORECAST WASTEWATER FLOWS
Develop low, most probable, and high projections for wastewater flows
for average and peak conditions. Take the following into account in making such
projections for the study area.
O
o
O
O
O
City's Population Projections
Historic Data
Distribution of Flow Contribution
residential
commercial
industrial
Potential Development or Redevelopment
Diurnal Flow Patterns
Flow Contributions vs. Capacities
Wastewater Policy
A-2
Flow projections shall be tabulated by year to match the Denton County
Water and Wastewater Study (currently underway) and the City of Carrollton's
Water Distribution System Analysis (dated 1986).
1.6
INVENTORY SYSTEM FACILITIES
Utilizing data provided by the CITY, update system maps and develop an
updated inventory of system components. Considerations included during execution
of this task will be:
O
Utilization of AUTO-CAD on an IBM-PC for Wastewater System
mapping.
Utilization of computer-based inventory.
Spot or field check of data for key facilities.
The CITY will provide the inventory data and the ENGINEER will
prepare the maps.
1.7
IDENTIFY EXISTING SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES AND FUTURE NEEDS
Assess, based upon data, reports, and independent evaluations, the City's
existing system's ability to han~e existing and projected wastewater flows, and
assess, based on information provided by the Trinity River Authority, the
downstream systemfs ability to handle existing and projected wastewater flows.
PHASE I REVIEW
During the course of Phase I) the ENGINEER will meet with the stal! as
necessary to collect, review and evaluate data and findings. The ENGINEER will
prepare and distribute a project memorandum for Phase I for review and comment.
After the City staff has had an opportunity to review the Phase I memorandum,
meet in a workshop format to present and discuss the memorandum and findings and
to receive comments and guidance.
2.0
PHASE II - DEVELOP ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES
This phase will address the needs and deficiencies identified in Phase I
and will evaluate alternative strategies,
2.1
IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES
Identify alternatives available to meet system needs and deficiencies.
The initial set of alternatives will consider a wide variety of elements,
including:
Pumping
Cross Town Transmission
Interconnections with Other Cities
Cotlection System Replacement.
Impact of Drainage System.
Impact of Interstate 190 Construction.
Impact of Redevelopment Plan
Downstream Service Conditions
2.3 '
PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Produce an intermediate set of alternatives for which a preliminary
analysis will be made. The intermediate set of alternatives will be analyzed using a
computer model (EH&A Sewer 3). The analysis will take into consideration the
iollowing:
O
O
O
O
Capital Cost
Operating Convenience
Operation and Maintenance Cost
Reliability
O
O
Minimization of Disruption of City (streets, traffic, etc.)
Technical Feasibility
2.4
FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES
A Phase II project memorandum will be developed which documents the
preceding alternatives analysis and describes the selected alternatives (three
maximum). The memorandum will contain.'
Development of Alternatives
Selected Alternatives
Preliminary Project Identification
2.5
PHASE II REVIEW
Conduct a review session with the City staff. Review and revise the
alternatives.
3.0
PHASE III - TRANSLATE ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES INTO
PRIORITIZED PRO3ECTS
3.1 '
PRO3ECT DEFINITION
The ENGINEER will convert the most feasible alternatives for meeting
system needs and deficiencies into specific projects. Technical and physical
constraints will be considered~ including.'
Siting and Routing
Impacts of Construction
Environmental
Traffic
Service Disruption
o Reliability
o Constructability
o Rehabilitation vs. Replacement
o Cost
3.2
COST ESTIMATES AND CONSTRUCTION TIMES
Utilizing current local construction cost data, the ENGINEER will
develop estimates of construction costs following information provided by City staff
and time required for construction. Where project components or individual projects
are dependent on one another, these relationships will be defined.
3.3
PROJECT PRIORITIES
Project priorities will be addressed on a basis of physical need, an
orderly implementation program and financial guidelines provided by the City.
A Phase III project memorandum will be produced documenting the
Phase III activities and presenting a prioritized project list by entity.
PHASE III WORKSHOP
Conduct a workshop with the City staff. Provide for review and
comments. Revise proposed projects and priorities as appropriate prior to finalizing
the study.
A-6
PHASE IV - DEVELOP FINAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND
LONG-RANGE PLANNING MAPS
alternatives. The
capabilities change.
DETERMINE RECOMMENDED PRO3ECTS
The ENGINEER will recommend a strategy with appropriate
CITY wlll have flexibility should conditions or financial
FINALIZE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED PRO3ECTS
Make final modifications and adjustments to the proposed projects based
upon comments from the City staff. Refine cost estimates and priorities.
DEVELOP PRO3ECT SCHEDULE
Recommended and alternative project schedules will be developed from
project priorities, estimated construction times, and financial capabilities. A
graphic representation of the recommended schedule will be developed utilizing the
ENGINEER's computer graphics and scheduling program for inclusion in the report
and for presentation purposes. A long-range planning map will be prepared showing
the 'proposed improvements, coded according to schedule.
PREPARE FINAL DOCUMENTS
The Final Report Documents will consist of:
o Final Report (100 copies)
o Technical Appendix (25 copies)
o Executive Summary, separately bound (50 copies)
o Maps (5 color coded)
o Presentation Exhibits
A-?
PUBLIC PRESENTATION
The ENGINEER will assist the
maximum).
DELIVERABLES
City staff in presentations, (three
The following will be delivered as a result o! this PRO3ECT:
1. Final report
2. Existing system maps
3. Proposed system maps
A-8
ATTACHMENT B
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
1.0 Provide Sewer 3 computer program software (including training).
2.0 Identify hardware and software required for computer mapping of wastewater
system.
3.0 Utilize AUTOCAD on an IBM-PC for mapping City's base map.
#.0 Perform field measurement of flow.
5.0 Provide services associated with the agreement between Carrollton and
Addison for wastewater service to Addison, including.*
5.1
Review the analysis of cost conducted by Touche Ross & Co. in March 1986,
and recommend a reasonable rate methodology for the services rendered by
Carrollton to Addison.
Review the terms and conditions of the proposed contract between CarroUton
and Addison to assure that the terms are adequate and fair for the services
· b,eing rendered.
5.3
Coordinate this evaluation with the Trinity River Authority to assure that the
terms and obligations of the agreement between Carrollton and Addison do not
impair Carrollton's rights as a member of the TRA system.
6.0 Perform other services as needed for the PRO3ECT and authorized by the
CITY.
B-I
"SANPLE' - Scope of Work for Water Distribution System
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
1.0
PHASE I - IDENTIFY SYSTEM NEEDS AND DEFICIENCIES
This first phase of the study will entail collection and analysis of data
with respect to the existing system and water demands and condition of facilities.
1.1
ESTABLISH FACILITY DESIGN AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Develop a set o! uniform criteria by which facilities will be judged.
Identify and catalog existing state and local criteria (such as for system operating
pressure, or fire flow requirements). Work closely with the steering committee to
establish uniform criteria or standards where such criteria or standards have not
been established.
1.2
EXISTING DATA COLLECTION
Collect and catalog existing availa~e data, including:
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Reports
Studies
Maps
Maintenance Records
Water Use Records and Water Loss Calculations
Fire Flow Tests
Documents that may outline water policy of the entities
lnterconnection Agreements
Water Commission or Water Development Board Guidelines for
Water Conservation
0
0
0
0
0
Potential Development or Redevelopment
Diurnal Demand Patterns
Demand vs. Availability
Water Policy
Sensitivity to Conservation
1.6
INVENTORY SYSTEM FACILITIES
Utilizing data provided by Town and City, update system maps and
develop an inventory of system components. Factors to be considered during
execution of this task are:
For Highland Park, utilize AUTO-CAD for mapping water lines on
an IBM-PC on AUTO-CAD base map to be furnished by town.
For University Park, utilize AUTO-CAD for mapping water lines on
a basis consistent with existing base maps.
Computer-based inventory.
Make spot or field check of data for key facilities.
The general approach is for the Town and City to provide the inventory
data and for the Engineer to prepare the maps.
1.7
REVIEW WATER SUPPLY AND TREATMENT
Review previously prepared reports which document the raw water rights
and firm yield permitted to the District. Compare and correlate available supply
with projected demands. Evaluate the availability of and probable cost of acquiring
supplemental raw or treated water, if needed~ from City of Dallas or other nearby
sources.
Review report dated October 1986 prepared by
Associates for Hogan and Rasor concerning the treatment plant.
for improvements in context of total system.
Chiang, Patel &
Evaluate the need
3
Coordinate with Dailas Water Utilities regarding their plans
modifying or relocating the Bachman Raw Water intake. Determine effect on Park
Cities MUD, consider alternatives and make appropriate recommendations.
1.8
REVIEW HIGH SERVICE PUMPING AND TRANSMISSION MAIN
Review previously prepared reports regarding the high service pumping
system. Consult with the District staff and evaluate the pumping operation to
determine if any changes or improvements are indicated.
Assess the age and condition of the 36-inch transmission line. Estimate
remaining useful lite. Evaluation techniques that may be used include'-
0
0
0
0
Visual inspection of pipe at locations where pipe may be inspected
without excavation.
Consultation with the pipe manufacturer.
A review of maintenance history.
Consultation with operating personnel.
Determination of average expected life of similar pipelines.
Recommend whether further studies are needed, especially as to the
routing of a replacement or second pipeline.
1.9
PREPARE A COMBINED SYSTEM MODEL
Make maximum use of the previous modeling studies to prepare a
combined model of the complete delivery and distribution system. The model will
simulate the delivery system beginning at the District's high service pump station.
Use the University of Kentucky model for this project.
1.10
CALIBRATE THE SYSTEM MODEL
Assure that the computer model depicts a reasonable assessment of
actual system pressures under known demand conditions. Work with District, City,
and Town staffs to establish the most efficient and least interruptive method of
obtaining field data for this purpose. Generally sufficient data can be gathered by
concurrently conducting fire flow tests and recording system pressures, reservoir
elevations, pump runs, and meter usages. We will provide personnel to assist with
the data-recording process while City and Town fire crews conduct the actual tests.
The system model will be run to simulate the observed field conditions
(i.e., reservoir levels, pumps running, system demand, fire flows, etc.) The system
pressures predicted by the model will be compared to the observed pressures and the
model adiusted accordingly. The model will be calibrated to predict pressures as
were observed. EH&A will not be required to incur more than $6,500 in billable
costs in conjunction with this task without specific authorization from the
Committee.
1.11
ANALYZE EXISTING TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
Once the model is established and calibrated, the existing transmission
and distribution system can be analyzed under a variety of demand conditions. We
will consider a broad spectrum of conditions, including the following:
O
O
2#-hour Extended Period Simulation
Existing Demand Conditions
Strategic Fire Demands (SMU, etc.)
Projected Future Demands
High Service Pumping & 36" Transmission Main
Cross-Town Transmission Capabilities
Storage Location and Volume
Pumping Location and Capacity
Emergency Operating Scenarios
- Power failure
- Main source at 50%
- Main source unavailable
- Elevated storage out of service
- Critical lines out of service
- Emergency interconnection locations
1.12
IDENTIFY EXISTING SYSTEM DEFICIENCIES AND FUTURE NEEDS
Prepare and distribute a project memorandum for Phase I for review and
comment. This document, in its edited form, will later be incorporated into the
final report.
Assess, based upon data, reports, and independent evaluations and
computer modeling, the existing system's ability to meet existing and future water
demands. Elements which are to be considered for evaluation include:
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Water Supplies
Water Treatment
High Service Pumping Capability
36" Transmission Line
Booster Pumping
Storage Volume and Location
Cross Town Transmission Line
Distribution System
Emergency Interconnections
1.13
PHASE I REVIEW
During the course of Phase I, we will meet with the staff as necessary to
coilect~ review and evaluate data and findings. The conclusion of Phase I will be the
first major milestone event in the study process. After the Agency Staffs and
Steering Committee have had an opportunity to review the Phase I memorandum,
meet in a workshop format to present and discuss the memorandum and findings and
to receive comments and guidance. This event is envisioned to provide the
following:
0
0
0
0
0
An In-depth Project Status Report
Review and Editing of Project Memorandum
Acceptance of Work to Date with revisions as indicated
Fine Tuning of Phase II Work Plan
Authorization to Proceed with Phase [I
2.0
PHASE II - DEVELOP ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES
This phase will address the needs and deficiencies identified in Phase I
and will evaluate alternative strategies.
2.1
FINANCIAL GUIDELINES
To help assure that final recommended projects, schedules and priorities
are reasonable and implementable, it will be advisable for the Committee to develop
financial guidelines. Assist the Committee in development of such guidelines. Take
such guidelines into account during the following activities and report alternatives
in comparison with the guidelines. Ideas for such guidelines include:
O
Identify maximum capital improvements that can be funded per
year and the impact of these on water costs per 1,000 gallons.
Set a maximum desired increase in customer rates.
Establish a maximum acceptable ratio for Park Cities' water rates
with neighboring cities.
7
EH&A will not be required to incur more than $2,000 in billable costs in
conjunction with this task without specific authorization from the Committee.
2.2
ASSESS WATER CONSERVATION OPPORTUNITIES
EH&A staff will work closely with agency staff and the Steering
Committee to identify and quantify opportunities for water conservation. Both the
demand side (District) and supply side (Town and City) will be considered. An
assessment of the sensitivity of alternative strategies to potential conservation
efforts will be made. The results of this task will be woven into the balance of the
study. Research model ordinances and make recommendations.
EH&A will not be required to incur more than $3,000 in billable costs in
conjunction with this task without specific authorization from the Committee.
2.3
IDENTIFY ALTERNATIVES
Identify a wide spectrum of alternatives available to meet system needs
and deficiencies. This is a delicate time during the study period since some
approaches may not be popular with all three entities, and some approaches may not
be feasible from a practical~ cost or physical aspect. However~ the best final results
will come from a thorough consideration of available alternatives. For the purposes
of this initial evaluation, the system will be considered to be a single unit. In later
steps, priority projects will be identified by entity.
The initial set of alternatives will consider a wide variety of elements.
These are typical:
O
Water 5ource
Grapevine Reservoir Operations
Agreements with the City of Dallas
Projected Demands
Water Conservation
Interconnections with Dallas.
Other Water Sources
Water Treatment
WTP Rehabilitation
WTP Replacement
3oint participation with Dallas.
High
Service Pumps & 36-inch Transmission Line
Pump Capacity and Controls
Surge Protection
Transmission Line Rehabilitation/Replacement
Transmission Pressure
Booster Pumping at Cities
Storage Location.
O
Distribution Systems
Storage Volume/Location
Booster Pumping
Cross Town Transmission
Interconnections with Dallas
Fire Protection Levels
On-Site Fire Protection Requirements
Conservation
Distribution Pipe Cleaning
Distribution System Replacement.
WORKSHOP TO SCREEN ALTERNATIVES
A workshop session with the steering committee to present the tull
spectrum of identitied alternatives and conduct a methodical screening and rating
process. During this screening, the process of identifying alternative components by
entity will be initiated. Identify likely effects on the present operating
relationships.
2.5
PRELIMINARY ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The previous screening process will produce an intermediate set of
alternatives for which we will conduct a preliminary analysis. Use a computer
model if necessary or appropriate to analyze a large set of alternatives. Evaluate
for varous characteristics, including:
0
0
0
0
0
0
Capital Cost
Operating Convenience
Operation and Maintenance Cost
Reliability
Minimize Disruption of City (streets, traffic, etc.)
Technical Feasibility
2.6
"WHAT IF" WORKSHOP
During the process of analyzing alternatives, conduct a workshop in the
EH&A offices using computer modeling tools. Agency staffs will participate with
EH&A staff in actually fine-tuning and modeling alternative strategies.
2.7 FINALIZE ALTERNATIVES
A Phase II project memorandum will be developed which documents the
preceding alternatives analysis and describes the selected two to tour alternatives.
The memorandum will contain:
Development of Alternatives
Screening Matrix
10
0
0
0
Selected Alternatives
Preliminary Project Identification
Preliminary Division by Entity
2.8
PHASE II REVIEW
This is the second major milestone event during the study. Conduct a
review session with the Steering Committee. Review and revise the alternatives.
Authorize Engineer to proceed with Phase III, the development of project priorities.
3.0
PHASE III - TRANSLATE ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES INTO
PRIORITIZED PROJECTS
3.1
PROJECT DEFINITION
In this task~ EH&A will convert the two to four most feasible alterna-
tives for meeting system needs and deficiencies into specific projects within each
entity's jurisdiction. Technical and physical constraints will be considered,
including:
O
O
0
0
0
0
Siting and Routing
Impacts of Construction
Environmental
Traffic
Water Service Disruption
Reliability
Constructability
Rehabilitation vs. Replacement
Cost
11
3.2
COST ESTIMATES AND CONSTRUCTION TIMES
Utilizing current local construction cost data~ we will develop estimates
of construction costs and time required for construction. Where project components
or individual projects are dependent on one another, these relationships will be
defined.
3.3
PROJECT PRIORITIES
Project priorities will be addressed on a basis of physical need~ an
orderly implementation program and financial guidelines.
A Phase III project memorandum will be produced documenting the
Phase III activities and presenting a prioritized project list by entity.
PHASE III WORKSHOP
Conduct a workshop with the Steering Committee. Provide for review
and comments. Revise proposed projects and priorities as appropriate prior to
finalizing the study.
4.0 PHASE IV - DEVELOP FINAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND
LONG-RANGE PLANNING MAPS
DETERMINE RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
natives.
change.
We intend to recommend a preferred strategy with appropriate alter-
The entitles will have flexibility should conditions or financial capabilities
12
FINALIZE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSED PRO3ECTS
Make final modifications and adjustments to the proposed projects based
upon comments from the steering committee. Refine cost estimates and priorities.
DEVELOP PRO3ECT SCHEDULE
Recommended and alternative project schedules will be developed from
project priorities~ estimated construction times~ and financial capabilities. A
graphic representation of the recommended schedule will be developed utilizing
EH&A's computer graphics and scheduling program for inclusion in the report and
for presentation purposes. A long-range planning map will be prepared showing the
proposed improvements, coded according to schedule.
PREPARE FINAL DOCUMENTS
The Final Report Documents will consist of:
o Final Report (30 copies)
o Technical Appendix (15 copies)
o Executive Summary, separately bound (50 copies)
o Maps
o Presentation Exhibits
PUBLIC PRESENTATION
EH&A will assist the Committee in presentations to a joint meeting of
the three governing bodies.
5.0
PHASE V - OPTIONAL SERVICES
Included in this phase are optional services which may be authorized by
the Steering Committee with fees to be negotiated.
13
5.1
DAILY WATER DEMAND PREDICTION
In conjunction with The University of Texas~ we can provide an IBM-PC
program specifically tailored to your demand patterns which will accurately predict
daily water demands one to five days in advance. This tool could be invaluable to
your operations staff during peak summer conditions~ allowing them better manage-
ment of their resources and warning of possible shortfalls.
The model we are proposing was developed by Dr. David Maidment at
The University of Texas at Austin and has been in use in several Texas metropolitan
areas including Austin for several years. Its accuracy and reliability are yeti:lied.
Dr. Maidment will work with EH&A staff to calibrate the model to the Park Cities
service area.
We estimate the cost of this optional task to be $§~000.
5.2
WATER SYSTEM ANALYSIS MODEL
One of the deliverable items in this study is the data file we develop for
the system analysis using the University of Kentucky Modeling Program. If any of
the entities desire to have the Kentucky Model installed on their IBM-PC~ EH&A
staff are available to obtain the program for them and provide installation and
training services at their facility. We estimate a cost of $2,000 for each
installation.
5.3
WATER RATE STUDIES
If desired, EH&A can perform cost-of-service and utility rate studies for
the MUD and the Town and City reflecting the finances of the proposed system
improvements. We understand that this will involve the delineation of both
wholesale and retail cost and rate aspects relative to the various entities involved.
EH&A will identify the current and near-term levels of capital costs,
operations and maintenance costs, administrative costs and other relevant costs of
the existing system as well as the projected capital costs and other operating costs
involved with the facility improvements. These costs will be delineated according
to the respective responsibilities of the individual parties.
EH&A will then identify the various revenue recovery means available to
each party (i.e. rate, fee, tax or other revenues) and determine what activities or
portions of activities should be supported with rate revenues. We will then develop
appropriate alternative rate structures that will yield fuji revenue recovery and
reflect a fair and equitable cost-of-service allocation. Sample utility bills and a
comparison with the current rate structure(s) will be provided.
Cost of such study would vary according to the actual scope of services
to be rendered.
ROUTE STUDY FOR TRANSMI551ON LINE
If the study as outlined above (particularly in Section 1.8) indicates a
need for replacement of the transmission line or for an alternate route for the line,
we can perform the necessary engineering services to make a definitive recommen-
dation. Cost of such services would vary according to the actual scope of services
to be rendered.
6.0 BUDGET
Phase I
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Total Budget
$ 35,000
20,000
l#~000
15~000
$ 8~000
15