The URL can be used to link to this page

Vista Ridge Retail-SY071119 I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I . Traffic Signal Warrant Study Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive in Lewisville, Texas Prepared for: United Commercial Development Corporation Prepared by: Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. Dallas; Texas November 19,2007 KHA # 063855001 .........-J -1InI Kimley-Horn ~_~ and Associates, Inc. Traffic Signal Warrant Study Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive In Lewisville, Texas Prepared by: Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. 12700 Park Central Drive, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75251 November 19, 2007 ,-"qA11 pt,. I Contact: Scot Johnson, P.E., PTOE 972-770-1300 Kmey-Hom and Associates, Inc. I. Introduction Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA), was retained by United Commercial Development Corporation (UCD) to conduct a traffic signal warrant study at the intersection of Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive in the City of Lewisville, Texas. UCD is developing a commercial site in the southeast comer of the intersection and is concerned that site users cannot easily and safely reach southbound Denton Tap Road. A site plan is included in the Appendix. The main tenant is a high- end grocery store, with additional retail, restaurant, bank, and gas station uses. Since the existing median opening on Denton Tap Road between SH 121 and Highland Drive only allows left turns from Denton Tap Road, only the SH 121 westbound frontage road (WBFR) and Highland Drive offer opportunities for the site traffic to turn south on Denton Tap Road. The site has only a single driveway to the SH 121 WBFR, which is located approximately 330' from the WBFR intersection with Denton Tap Road. Outbound traffic desiring to turn left or make a U-turn must cross two lanes of heavy traffic with a 55 MPH speed limit in that short distance. As the other option for reaching southbound Denton Tap Road, Highland Drive is currently unsignalized and turning traffic there must cross the busy Denton Tap Road. To rectify this lack of access to southbound Denton Tap Road, UCD proposes to fund the signalization of the intersection of Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive if a signal is warranted. This report documents the application of the signal warrants to the intersection conditions. II. Study Procedures The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) defines eight warrants, or justifying sets of conditions, at least one of which should be fully satisfied before signalization is considered as an option for traffic control. Traffic volumes, the number of traffic lanes, the prevailing traffic speeds, traffic accident experience, and measured delay for minor street traffic are the factors included in the evaluation of these warrants. The traffic volumes used for the analysis will be the existing traffic at the intersection, plus an additional analysis which includes projections of traffic resulting from the adjacent UCD retail development. Retail traffic will be projected using standard trip generation and traffic assignment procedures. III. Intersection Conditions A. Current Roadway Conditions Exhibit 1 shows a map of the study area. Denton Tap Road is a six-lane divided major north-south thoroughfare with a 45 MPH speed . limit, and is designated a principal arterial P6D on the Lewisville Thoroughfare Plan. Highland Drive is a four-lane undivided collector with a 40 MPH speed limit, and is designated a collector C4U on the Thoroughfare Plan. The intersection of Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive is presently unsignalized, with left-turn bays for both directions of Denton Tap Road and a right-turn deceleration lane for northbound Denton Tap Road. There is presently no west leg of the intersection since Highland Drive does not extend to the west of Denton Tap Road. The westbound Highland Drive approach to Denton Tap Road has a right-turn deceleration lane, and with no through movements the center lane of the westbound approach is currently unused. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 1 ., ~ .1,1 ., -: . ..... , ... . 1 . ' . . ", . ., }k SCALE: 1" = 300' ~=~ =.,h:. B. Spacings Along Denton Tap Road, Highland Drive is located approximately 890' north of the existing signal at the SH 121 WBFR. There is an existing channelized left-in-only median opening approximately halfway between the WBFR and Highland Drive. North of Highland Drive, the next median opening is at Turnberry Lane, a distance of approximately 550'. It is approximately 2,300' to the next anticipated signal at Vista Ridge Mall Drive. C. Speeds The posted speed on Denton Tap Road north of SH 121 is 45 MPH, and the 85th-percentile free- flow speed is at least that high, so the warrant volume thresholds are eligible to use the 70% factors applied for roadways over 40 MPH. D. Number of Approach Lanes For the purposes of a signal warrant analysis, Denton Tap Road will clearly be the major street, with a six-lane cross-section which for the purposes of the signal warrant study will be "2 or more lanes". Highland Drive provides separate left- and right-turn lanes at the intersection with Denton Tap Road. Accordingly, the higher minor street thresholds for "2 or more lanes" will be used. E. Existing Traffic Volume Data To provide existing traffic volume data for the signal warrant analysis, the approach volumes at Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive were counted in 15-minute intervals for 24 hours on November 13,2007. Daily traffic was 21,671 on Denton Tap Road and 2,711 on Highland Drive. Table 1 shows the hourly totals for the existing traffic on each approach. The detailed data sheets are included in the Appendix. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 3 ~_~ :OOk~ates, Inc. Table 1. Existing Traffic Volumes Data Collected November 13, 2007 Weekday 12:00 AM to I :00 AM 61 42 103 2 I :00 AM to 2:00 AM 23 20 43 0 2:00 AM to 3:00 AM 30 16 46 4 3:00 AM to 4:00 AM 13 27 40 1 4:00 AM to 5:00 AM 25 64 89 6 5:00 AM to 6:00 AM 54 217 271 15 6:00AM to 7:00 AM 210 842 1,052 48 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM 427 1,757 2,184 120 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM 488 1,153 1,641 107 9:00AM to 10:00 AM 457 606 1,063 49 10:00 AM to II:OOAM 396 424 820 46 II:OOAM to 12:00 PM 543 447 990 80 12:00 PM to 1:00PM 653 545 1,198 74 1:00PM to 2:00 PM 579 576 1,155 67 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM 620 487 1,107 51 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM 747 485 1,232 64 4:00PM to 5:00 PM 1,249 545 1,794 87 5 :00 PM to 6:00 PM 1,769 573 2,342 120 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM 1,330 524 1,854 87 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM 647 340 987 33 8:00 PM to 9:00 PM 408 270 678 43 9:00 PM to 10:00 PM 295 200 495 23 10:00 PM to II :00 PM 175 III 286 13 II:OOPM to 12:00 AM 125 76 201 12 Notes: I Major Road (Denton Tap Road) hourly volume obtamed from 24-hour bi-directional tube counts found in the Appendix 'Minor Road (westbound HigWand Drive) hourly volume obtamed from 24-hour bi-directional tube counts fron in the Appendix Page 4 Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisvillc, Texas November 2007 IV. Signal Warrant Application - Existing Traffic As previously stated, the Texas MlITCD sets forth eight warrants, or justifying sets of conditions, at least one of which should be fully satisfied before consideration is given to installing a traffic signal. The two major volume-based warrants are applied to the collected data to determine if the traffic volumes are above the warrant thresholds. The detailed warrant analysis worksheets, including the warrant curves described below, are included in the Appendix. A. Warrant lA - Eight Hour Volume - Minimum Vehicular Volume - NOT MET For Warrant 1 Case A, Minimum Vehicular Volume, the 70% thresholds for the major roadway and minor roadway are 420 and 140 vehicles per hour, respectively. Although the Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of the threshold, the existing Highland Drive traffic does not meet this threshold for any hours ofthe day. Warrant lA is not met. B. Warrant IB - Eight Hour Volume - Interruption of Continuous Traffic - NOT MET For Warrant I Case B, Interruption of Continuous Traffic, the 70% thresholds for the major roadway and the minor roadway are 630 and 70 vehicles per hour, respectively. The Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of this threshold, and the existing Highland Drive traffic also exceeds the threshold for seven hours per day, just below the minimum of eight hours required. Warrant 1 B is not met. C. Warrant 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume - MET Based on Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume, the 70% thresholds for meeting the warrant vary by the major roadway volume, down to a minimum of 80 minor roadway vehicles if the major roadway volume is in excess of 900 vehicles and the minor street has a two-lane approach. The Denton Tap Road volumes and Highland Drive volumes combine to meet the threshold for at least six hours per day, exceeding the minimum of four hours required. Warrant 2 is met. D. Other Warrants Warrant 3 - Peak Hour - MET The peak hour warrant is typically used for special locations where a specific event such as a shift change or school drop-off could need signalization, but roadway volumes do not meet the longer- term volume warrants. More restrictive than the other volume warrants, the 70% thresholds for meeting the peak hour warrant vary by the major roadway volume, down to a minimum of 100 minor roadway vehicles if the major roadway volume is in excess of 1,125 vehicles and the minor street has a two-lane approach. Although the intersection does have the adjacent Vista Ridge United Methodist Church, a use which sometimes generates significant peaks of traffic demand, the peak hour warrant is assumed not to be applicable. Still, the existing intersection traffic meets the 70% Warrant 3 thresholds for at least three hours ofthe day. Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume - NOT MET The satisfaction of this warrant would require very high pedestrian volume levels that almost never exist except in a large central business district or at a large school or university campus. Therefore, it can be assumed that this warrant will not be satisfied. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 5 ... Kinley4iom and Associates, Inc. Warrant 5 - School Crossine - NOT APPLICABLE The subject intersection is not a designated school crossing. Therefore, this warrant is not applicable. Warrant 6 - Coordinated Sienal System - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be applicable only at a location between existing coordinated traffic signals if the adjacent signals "do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation." This warrant is presumed not to be applicable. Warrant 7 - Crash Experience - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be satisfied if five or more reported crashes of types susceptible to correction by signal control had occurred during a 12-month period and if traffic volumes were at least 80 percent ofthose required to satisfy Warrant I or Warrant 4. Crash data was not available, so this warrant is assumed not to be applicable. Warrant 8 - Roadwav Network - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be applicable only at the common intersection of two or more designated major routes. Although Denton Tap Road is clearly a major route, Highland Drive is only a major collector. Accordingly, this warrant is not applicable. E. Warrant Analysis Summary - Existing Traffic With Warrant 2 being met with existing traffic conditions, it is clear that the intersection meets the technical requirements to be eligible for signalization even before the addition of the UCD site. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 6 Kiliey-Hom and Associates, loc. V. Den Site-Generated Traffic Volume To find the future magnitude of minor-street traffic after addition of the UCD site, the site- generated traffic from the UCD site contributing to the Highland Drive westbound traffic will need to be projected. Portions of the site traffic were estimated in a limited traffic impact analysis (TIA) dated August 7, 2007 was produced by DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc., parts of which are used in this analysis. Unfortunately, the TIA covered only the SH 121 side of the site and did not include any analysis of the Denton Tap Road conditions at Highland Drive or the channelized median opening. A. Projected Site-Generated Traffic Volume Data The site's trip generation was calculated in the DT&A report, with a daily total of 13,068 one- way trips, 342 outbound trips in the AM peak hour, and 735 outbound trips in the PM peak hour. Excerpts from the DT &A report which are used in this analysis can be found in the Appendix. B. Projected Site-Generated Traffic Assignment UCD's research indicates that the demographics of high-end grocery store customers shows that approximately 75% of the site traffic should be to and from the south on Denton Tap Road. The DT &A traffic assignment does not appear to be complete, as it does not account for 100% of the site traffic in either the inbound or outbound directions. Taking UCD's demographics into account while remaining conservative, this analysis assumes that 50% of the outbound traffic seeks to travel south on Denton Tap Road. The other 50% is distributed between north on Denton Tap Road and east or west on SH 121. Of the 50% destined for southbound Denton Tap Road, a conservative 20% is assumed to use the westbound left turn from Highland Drive. The only other option is the driveway to SH 121 WBFR, which has a difficult movement to reach southbound Denton Tap Road, and is also occupied with a significant portion of the site traffic destined for SH 121. Besides the relative attractiveness of the two routes to southbound Denton Tap Road, the 20% using Highland Drive is also conservative since the grocery store and the 20,200 SF retail building which are immediately adjacent to Highland Drive make up 6,967 daily trips, or 53%, of the site's trip generation. Of the site traffic destined for the north on Denton Tap Road, 5% is assumed to use the westbound right-turn from Highland Drive to northbound Denton Tap Road. The other northbound traffic can enter Denton Tap Road directly from the two site driveways. C. Projected Site-Generated Traffic Volumes by Hour For the specific AM and PM peak hours, the actual outbound site trips generated with the trip generation procedure are used. The AM or PM peak hour outbound volumes are multiplied by the traffic assignment percentages on westbound Highland Drive. For other hours in the day, the outbound volumes on Highland Drive are found by taking the percentage of daily retail site traffic that occurs in each hour, using percentages from the retail category in the ITE Trip Generation. The overall number of exiting vehicles is multiplied by the percentage of site traffic using westbound Highland Drive to find the number of vehicles in each hour. Table 2 shows the resulting volumes which will be used in the warrant analysis. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 7 ~=~ =~~~~S, Inc. T bl 2 E . t" T ffi V I PI S' G dT ffi VI a e XIS In ra IC o urnes us Ite- enerate ra IC o urnes Weekday 12:00 AM to 1:00AM 61 42 103 2 2 100 AM to 200 AM 23 20 43 0 0 200 AM to 300 AM 30 16 46 4 4 300 AM to 400 AM 13 27 40 I 1 400 AM to 500 AM 25 64 89 6 6 500 AM to 600 AM 54 217 271 15 15 600 AM to 700 AM 210 842 1,052 48 48 7.00 AIVl to 800 AM 427 1,757 2,184 120 TIA' 68 17 205 800 AM to 900 AM 488 1,153 1,641 107 107 900/\1\1 to 10 00 AM 457 606 1,063 49 49 10 00 AM to IIOOAM 396 424 820 46 6.5% 85 21 152 1]00 AI\1 to 1200 PM 543 447 990 80 8.4% 110 27 217 1200 PM to I 00 I'M 653 545 1,198 74 8.2~o 107 27 208 100 PM to 200 PM 579 576 1,155 67 75% 98 25 190 2:00 PM to 3:00 PM 620 487 1,107 51 7.8% 102 26 179 300 PM to 400 PM 747 485 1,232 64 9.5%. 124 31 219 400 PM to 5:00 PM 1,249 545 1,794 87 10.4% 136 34 257 500 PM to 6:00 PM 1,769 573 2,342 ]20 TIA' 147 37 304 600 PM to 7:00 PM 1,330 524 1,854 87 8.3% 108 27 222 7.00 PM to 8:00 PM 647 340 987 33 5.3~~o 69 17 119 8.00 PM to 900 PM 408 270 678 43 4.3~1o 56 14 113 900 PM to 10:00 PM 295 200 495 23 L8~,'O 24 6 53 10 00 PM to 1100 PM 175 III 286 13 13 1100 PM to 1200 AM 125 76 201 12 12 Dailv Traffic Calculations: Development Traffic Weekday 13,068 6,534 20% 5~'o Daily Net Trip Generation: Daily Outbound Trips: 50% Outbound Left Turn Distribution Using Highland Drive: Outbound Right Turn Distribution Using Higbland Drive: Daily Outbound Left Turning Vehicles Using llighland Drive: Daily Outbound Right Turning Vehicles Using Highland Drive: 1,307 327 Notes: I Major Road (Denton Tap Road) hourly volume obtained from 24-hour bl-directional tube counts found in the Appendix :2 Minor Road (westbound Highland Drive) hourly volwne obtained from 24-hour hi-directional tube counts fron in the Appendix ] Hour]y dIstrIbution percentages based on ITE Trip Generation for Sbopping Centers (820) 4 AM (7-8AM)and PM (5-6PM) Peak Hours generated directly from ITE Trip Generation rates multiplied by distribution percentages Page 8 Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas l\ovember 2007 ~t"~ :nmes, We. VI. Signal Warrant Application - Existing Plus Site-Generated Traffic The same warrant analysis is applied to the volumes shown in Table 2. It should be noted that the Denton Tap Road traffic volumes remain as the existing traffic volumes, and do not include any site traffic. For an additional conservative analysis, each warrant will also be tested with the with the more strenuous 100% conditions, as if Denton Tap Road was 40 MPH or less. The detailed warrant analysis worksheets, including the warrant curves described below, are included in the Appendix. A. Warrant lA - Eight Hour Volume - Minimum Vehicular Volume - MET For Warrant 1 Case A, Minimum Vehicular Volume, the 70% thresholds for the major roadway and minor roadway are 420 and 140 vehicles per hour, respectively. The Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of the threshold, and the existing Highland Drive traffic plus the projected site traffic combine to meet this threshold for at least ten hours of the day, exceeding the minimum of eight hours required. Warrant 1 A is met. The Warrant lA 100% thresholds for the major roadway and minor roadway are 600 and 200 vehicles per hour, respectively. The Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of the threshold, but the existing Highland Drive traffic plus the projected site traffic meets this threshold for only seven hours of the day, less than the minimum of eight hours required. B. Warrant IB - Eight Hour Volume - Interruption of Continuous Traffic - MET For Warrant 1 Case B, Interruption of Continuous Traffic, the 70% thresholds for the major roadway and the minor roadway are 630 and 70 vehicles per hour, respectively. The Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of this threshold, and the existing Highland Drive traffic plus the projected site traffic combine to meet the threshold for at least thirteen hours per day, exceeding the minimum of eight hours required. Warrant 1B is met. The Warrant 1B 100% thresholds for the major roadway and minor roadway are 900 and 100 vehicles per hour, respectively. The Denton Tap Road traffic is well in excess of the threshold, and the existing Highland Drive traffic plus the projected site traffic combine to meet this threshold for at least eleven hours of the day, exceeding the minimum of eight hours required. C. Warrant 2 - Four Hour Vehicular Volume - MET Based on Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume, the 70% thresholds for meeting the warrant vary by the major roadway volume, down to a minimum of 80 minor roadway vehicles if the major roadway volume is in excess of 900 vehicles and the minor street has a two-lane approach. The Denton Tap Road volumes and Highland Drive volumes combine to meet the threshold for at least twelve hours per day, exceeding the minimum of four hours required. Warrant 2 is met. The Warrant 2 100% thresholds for meeting the warrant vary by the major roadway volume, down to a minimum of 115 minor roadway vehicles if the major roadway volume is in excess of 1,100 vehicles and the minor street has a two-lane approach. The Denton Tap Road volumes and Highland Drive volumes combine to meet the threshold for at least nine hours per day, exceeding the minimum of four hours required. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 9 . Kinley-Horn . and Associates, Inc. D. Other Warrants Warrant 3 - Peak Hour - MET The peak hour warrant is typically used for special locations where a specific event such as a shift change or school drop-off could need signalization, but roadway volumes do not meet the longer- term volume warrants. More restrictive than the other volume warrants, the 70% thresholds for meeting the peak hour warrant vary by the major roadway volume, down to a minimum of 100 minor roadway vehicles ifthe major roadway volume is in excess of 1,125 vehicles and the minor street has a two-lane approach. Although the intersection does have the adjacent Vista Ridge United Methodist Church, a use which sometimes generates significant peaks of traffic demand, the peak hour warrant is assumed not to be applicable. Still, the existing intersection traffic meets the 70% Warrant 3 thresholds for at least ten hours of the day. The 100% Warrant 3 threshold is met at least four hours of the day. Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volume - NOT MET The satisfaction of this warrant would require very high pedestrian volume levels that almost never exist except in a large central business district or at a large school or university campus. Therefore, it can be assumed that this warrant will not be satisfied. Warrant 5 - School Crossine: - NOT APPLICABLE The subject intersection is not a designated school crossing. Therefore, this warrant is not applicable. Warrant 6 - Coordinated Sie:nal System - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be applicable only at a location between existing coordinated traffic signals if the adjacent signals "do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive operation." This warrant is presumed not to be applicable. Warrant 7 - Crash Experience - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be satisfied if five or more reported crashes of types susceptible to correction by signal control had occurred during a 12-month period and if traffic volumes were at least 80 percent of those required to satisfy Warrant 1 or Warrant 4. Crash data was not available, so this warrant is assumed not to be applicable. Warrant 8 - Roadwav Network - NOT APPLICABLE This warrant would be applicable only at the common intersection of two or more designated major routes. Although Denton Tap Road is clearly a major route, Highland Drive is only a major collector. Accordingly, this warrant is not applicable. E. Warrant Analysis Summary - Existing Plus Site-Generated Traffic With Warrant lA, Warrant lB, and Warrant 2 being met with existing traffic conditions plus the site-generated traffic, it is clear that the intersection meets the technical requirements to be eligible for signalization. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 10 VII. Conclusions A traffic signal is proposed for the intersection of Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive in Lewisville, Texas. The intersection is north of SH 121, with the nearest adjacent signal being approximately 890' south at the SH 121 WBFR. The signal spacing is considered adequate for signal installation at Highland Drive. The proposed signal installation was analyzed using the signal warrant procedure from the Texas MUTCD. Using only the existing traffic volumes, the proposed signal was found to meet Warrant 2. Current development of the UCD site in the southeast comer of the intersection will result in more traffic on Highland Drive within a short time period. Using the existing traffic volumes plus the projected site-generated traffic volumes, the proposed signal was found to meet Warrant lA, Warrant 1B, and Warrant 2. The proposed signal also meets the more stringent 100% factors of Warrant 1B and Warrant 2. Due to existing prohibition of outbound left-turning movements at the median opening between SH 121 and Highland Drive, the UCD site traffic must use SH 121 WBFR or Highland Drive to reach southbound Denton Tap Road. The SH 121 WBFR path requires difficult maneuvering within heavy traffic flows, while Highland Drive traffic likewise requires a difficult unsignalized left turn onto a busy arterial. The proposed signal at the intersection of Denton Tap Road and Highland Drive will provide important access to southbound Denton Tap Road for both the existing Highland Drive users and the future UCD site traffic. With the appropriate coordination the proposed signal will not negatively affect the Denton Tap Road through traffic conditions, and may actually improve conditions at the SH 121 frontage road intersections by forming southbound traffic into platoons before they reach the frontage roads. Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Page 11 APPENDIX DentOD Tap R.oadat Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lew1sville, Texas November 2007 Page 12 DentotrTap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Volume Start Date 11'1312007 Location 1 Highland Dr east of Denton Tap Location 2 Lewlsville, TX Date Time 11/1312007 12:00 AM 0 11/13/2007 12:15AM 1 11/13/2007 12:30 AM 0 11/13/2007 1245 AM 1 11/1312007 0100 AM 0 11/1312007 0115AM 0 11/1312007 0130 AM 0 11/13/2007 0145 AM 0 11/1312007 02:00 AM 0 11/13/2007 02:15AM 2 11/1312007 02:30 AM 1 11/13/2007 02:45 AM 1 11113/2007 03:00 AM 1 11/1312007 03:15AM 0 11/1312007 03:30 AM 0 11/13/2007 03:45 AM 0 0 11/13/2007 04 :00 AM 1 1 11/1312007 04:15AM 0 0 1111312007 04:30 AM 0 1 11/13/2007 04:45 AM 0 4 11/13/2007 05:00 AM 0 0 11/1312007 05:15AM 1 4 11/13/2007 05 :30 AM 0 4 11/13/2007 05:45 AM 2 7 15 11/13/2007 06:00 AM 3 4 11/1312007 06:15 AM 6 7 11/1312007 06:30 AM 16 16 11/1312007 06:45 AM 15 40 21 48 11/1312007 07:00 AM 20 22 11/1312007 07:15 AM 33 35 11/1312007 07:30 AM 67 29 11/1312007 07:45 AM 67 187 34 120 1111312007 06:00 AM 32 29 11/1312007 0815 AM 30 29 1111312007 0830 AM 31 23 11113/2007 DB 45 AM 17 110 26 107 1111312007 09:00 AM 22 16 11/13.12007 09:15 AM 17 18 11/13/2007 09:30 AM 16 12 11/1312007 0945 AM 12 67 3 49 11/1312007 10:00 AM 17 5 11/1312007 1015AM 11 11 11/1312007 1030 AM 23 14 1111312007 10:45 AM 21 72 16 46 11/1312007 1100AM 12 22 11f1312007 1115AM 20 12 11/13/2007 11:30AM 14 26 11f1312007 11:45AM 16 62 20 80 11/13/2007 12:00 PM 25 19 11/13/2007 12:15PM 24 12 11/1312007 12:30 PM 2/ 21 11/1312007 12:45 PM 29 105 22 74 11/13/2007 01 :00 PM 21 18 11/13/2007 01:15 PM 14 15 11/13/2007 01 :30 PM 19 21 11/13/2007 01 :45 PM 27 81 13 67 11/1312007 02:00 PM 25 14 1111312007 02:15 PM 24 10 11/1312007 02:30 PM 30 16 11/1312007 02:45 PM 25 104 11 51 1111312007 03:00 PM 26 25 1111312007 03:15 PM 26 14 11/1312007 03:30 PM 15 10 11/1312007 03:45 PM 13 80 15 64 1111312007 04:00 PM 20 26 11/1312007 04:15 PM 32 19 1111312007 04:30 PM 28 26 11/1312007 04,45 PM 25 105 16 87 11/1312007 0500 PM 37 45 11/1312007 0515 PM 36 30 11/1312007 05:30 PM 33 27 11/1312007 0545 PM 57 163 18 120 11/1312007 0600 PM 39 25 11/1 312007 0615 PM 35 20 11/1312007 06 30 PM 35 21 11/1312007 06 45 PM 25 134 21 87 11f1312007 0700 PM 21 14 11/13/2007 0715 PM 19 4 11/1312007 0730 PM 17 9 1111312007 07 45 PM 19 76 6 33 11/13/2007 08:00 PM 22 13 11/13/2007 0815 PM 23 8 11/1312007 0830 PM 18 15 11/13/2007 0845 PM 10 73 7 43 11/13/2007 09:00 PM 8 11 11/1312007 09:15 PM 14 5 11/1312007 09:30 PM 11 4 11/1312007 09-45 PM 6 39 3 23 1111312007 10:00 PM 10 5 11/1312007 10:15 PM 8 5 1111312007 10:30 PM 9 3 1111312007 1045 PM 5 32 0 13 11113/2007 1100PM 5 11/1312007 1115 PM 11/1312007 1130 PM 11/1312007 ! 145 PM 13 12 Total___~___~. --~--~ Volume Start Dale 11/1312007 localion 1 Denlon Tap approaching Highland Or- NB location 2 Lewls\lille TX Dale Time 11/13/2007 12:00 AM 18 11/1312007 12:15AM 15 11/1312007 12:30 AM 18 11/1312007 12:45 AM 1D 61 11/1312007 01 :00 AM 4 11/1312007 01:15AM 6 11/13/2007 01 :30 AM 8 11/1312007 01 :45 AM 5 23 11/1312007 02:00 AM 5 1111312007 0215 AM 4 11/13/2007 02:30 AM 15 11/1312007 02:45 AM 6 30 11/1312007 03:00 AM 3 11/1312007 03:15 AM 3 11/1312007 03:30 AM 5 11/1312007 03:45 AM 2 13 11/1312007 04:00 AM 1 11/1312007 04:15 AM B 11/1312007 04:30 AM 5 11/1312007 04:45 AM 11 25 11/1312007 05:00 AM 12 11/1312007 05:15 AM 12 11/1312007 05:30 AM 10 11/1312007 05:45 AM 20 54 11/1312007 06:00 AM 29 11/13/2007 06:15AM 34 11/1312007 06:30 AM 63 11/1312007 06:45 AM 84 210 11/1312007 07:00 AM 82 11/1312007 07:15AM 81 11/1312007 07:30 AM 121 11/1312007 07:45 AM '43 427 11/1312007 08 :00 AM 131 11/1312007 08:15 AM 135 11/1312007 08:30 AM 106 1111312007 08:45 AM 116 488 1111312007 09:00 AM 129 1111312007 09:15 AM 122 1111312007 09:30 AM 1D8 11/1312007 09:45 AM 98 457 11/1312007 10:00AM 94 11/1312007 10:15AM 80 11/13/2007 10:30AM 107 1111312007 10:45 AM 115 396 1111312007 11:00AM 132 1111312007 11:15AM 130 1111312007 11:30AM 142 11/1312007 11:45AM 139 543 11/1312007 12:00 PM 158 11/1312007 12:15 PM 171 11/1312007 12:30 PM 165 11/1312007 12:45 PM 159 653 11/1312007 01 :00 PM 153 11/1312007 01:15PM 145 1111312007 01 :30 PM 135 11/13f2007 01 :45 PM 146 579 11/1312007 02:00 PM 173 11/1312007 02:15 PM 146 11/1312007 02:30 PM 149 1111312007 02:45 PM 152 620 11/1312007 03:00 PM 159 11/1312007 03:15 PM 182 11/1312007 03:30 PM 204 1111312007 03:45 PM 202 747 1111312007 04:00 PM 242 11/1312007 04:15 PM 291 1111312007 04:30 PM 340 1111312007 04:45 PM 376 1249 11/1312007 05:00 PM 410 11/1312007 05:15 PM 480 11/1312007 05:30 PM 432 11/1312007 05:45 PM 447 1769 11/1312007 06:00 PM 440 11/1312007 06:15 PM 337 11/1312007 06:30 PM 305 11/1312007 06:45 PM 248 1330 1111 312007 0700 PM 194 11/1312007 07:15 PM 190 11/1312007 07:30 PM 135 11/1312007 07:45 PM 128 647 11/1312007 08:00 PM 119 11/1312007 08:15 PM 109 11/1312007 08:30 PM 90 11/1312007 08:45 PM 90 408 11/1312007 09:00 PM 79 11/1312007 0915 PM 89 11/1312007 09:30 PM 71 11/1312007 09:45 PM 56 295 11/1312007 10:00 PM 38 11/1312007 1015 PM 46 11/1312007 10:30 PM 44 1111312007 1045 PM 47 175 11/13/2007 1100 PM 40 11113/2007 11:15PM 39 11/1312007 1130 PM 29 11/1312007 11:45 PM 17 125 ---~._.._.- ~O!~lm._.__l~ Volume Start Dale: 11 '13/2007 Location 1 Denton Tap approaching Highland Dr" SB Location 2 Lewisville TX Date Time 11/1312007 12:00 AM 13 11/1312007 12:15AM 17 11/1312007 12:30 AM 5 11/1312007 12.45 AM 7 42 11/1312007 0100 AM 7 11/1312007 01:15AM 2 11/1312007 0130 AM 5 11/1312007 01 :45 AM 6 20 11/13/2007 02:00 AM 3 11/1312007 02,15 AM 6 11/1312007 02.30 AM 5 11/1312007 02:45 AM 2 16 11/1312007 03:00 AM 3 11/1312007 03:15 AM 2 11/1312007 03:30 AM 16 11/1312007 03:45 AM 6 27 11/1312007 04:00 AM 11 11/13/2007 04:15 AM 12 11/1312007 04:30 AM 16 11/1312007 04:45 AM 25 64 1111312007 05 :00 AM 32 11/1312007 05:15 AM 31 11/1312007 05:30 AM 68 11/1312007 05:45 AM 86 217 11/1312007 06:00 AM 105 11/1312007 06:15 AM 165 11/1312007 06:30 AM 264 11/13/2007 06:45 AM 308 842 11/13/2007 07:00 AM 438 11/1312007 07'15 AM 542 11/1312007 07:30 AM 433 11/1312007 07:45 AM 344 1757 11/1312007 08:00 AM 300 11/1312007 08:15 AM 297 11/1312007 08:30 AM 296 11/1312007 0845 AM 260 1153 11/1312007 0900 AM 193 11/13/2007 0915 AM 151 11/13/2007 09:30 AM 126 11/13/2007 09:45 AM 136 606 11/1312007 1000 AM 101 11/1312007 1015AM 109 11/1312007 1030 AM 106 11/13/2007 10:45 AM 108 424 11/1312007 1100AM 98 11/1312007 1115AM 118 11/1312007 1130AM 107 11/1312007 11.45AM 124 447 11/1312007 12:00 PM 132 11/13/2007 12:15PM 144 11/1312007 ~2:30 PM 134 11/1312007 12:45 PM 135 545 11/13/2007 01 :00 PM 145 11/1312007 0115 PM 146 11/1312007 01 :30 PM 150 11/1312007 0145 PM 135 576 11,/1312007 02:00 PM 134 11/1312007 02:15 PM 104 11113/2007 02:30 PM 114 1111312007 02:45 PM 135 487 11/13/2007 03:00 PM 120 1111312007 03:15 PM 117 1111312007 03:30 PM 120 11/1312007 03:45 PM 12' 485 11/1312007 04:00 PM 121 11/1312007 0415 PM 129 11/1312007 04:30 PM 145 11/1312007 04:45 PM 150 545 11/1312007 05:00 PM 182 11/1312007 05:15 PM 119 11/1312007 05:30 PM 123 11/1312007 0545 PM 149 573 1111312007 0600 PM 141 11/13/2007 06.15 PM 137 11/1312007 0630 PM 113 11113/2007 0645 PM 133 524 11/1 312007 07:00 PM 107 11/1312007 07:15 PM 76 '1/1312007 0730 PM 82 11/1312007 07:45 PM 75 340 1111312007 08:00 PM 92 11/1312007 08:15 PM 57 11/1312007 08:30 PM 60 11/1312007 08:45 PM 61 270 11/1312007 09:00 PM 70 11/1312007 09:15 PM 54 11/1312007 09:30 PM 48 11/1312007 09:45 PM 28 200 11/13/2007 10:00 PM 36 11/1312007 10.15 PM 27 11/1312007 1030 PM 32 11/1312007 10:45 PM 16 111 11/13/2007 11:00 PM 24 11/13/2007 1115PM 31 11/1312007 1130 PM 9 11/13/2007 1145 PM 12 76 }~ti!~=:=:}~347 DentooTap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville-, Texas November 2007 -- 3^'l:JO ! j I' Sll ," OJ I (II I itjW I We ~ r . 1,1 -. .!l: ;1 'E9 d " !NoRlH I r ~ I< ~ --.l flf ~ ~~ ~ ~ . 0 .00 .. U I j- ~ jO j . ::;l j ~~ I 0.. I Z ~ <C l- I ~i~ i z ! 0 I ~~3 I- ! :z I oId8u W I a I - p::\ ~ J:Q .~ ~::g 0 u ~ I I I I j i I i i! Ii ~II 10 -- I !:Ii Do ! ',1 ~ .1 al! i U lei i ~II i i ~ f mllila i ~i' i J~., i ~ I ;i~ i i tt1 i I~ ~ i o !i. f II i ~ Excerpts from DT&A August 1., 2007 TIA Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Sil,'llal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Prepared for: Winkelmann & Associates, Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR A RETAIL DEVELOPMENT IN COPPELL, TEXAS ~"""\ - :\E. OF r.,. \.. ;-;~~..*.""'.~~\" ", . . :*/ .....*'1 ,.: ~*' ,.. ............ .... ...... ... ..., . .., 1 JULIE M. KROLL ~ I..,...... ....... ..... .... ...........iI . . ~ ~~~ 95754 ~~~ . 0.. (/ ~Q..'~" t,:i('~....~~ N s.~.-;.~.:' ',OS's/ ........~"u-"" ,...-,pNA\. ,,_- """"" Prepared by: DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. Engineers. Planners 400 South Houston Street Suite 330 . Union Station Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone 214/748-6740 Fax 214/748-7037 www.deshazotang.com August 7, 2007 . DT&A #07145 DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Illc. August 7, 2007 3.0 TRIP GENERATION 3.1 Development Trip Generation and Mode Split Trip generation for the retail development was calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (7th Edition). ITE Trip Generation is a compilation of actual traffic generation data by land use collected over several decades by crE'ditable sources across the country, and it is accE'pted as the standard methodology to determine trip generation volumes for various land uses where sufficient data exists. It is assumed that "mode split" characteristics (i.e., consideration of vehicle occupancy, transit usage, and othE'r factors that may affect site-generated traffic volume) for the subject uses an' "typical" and are sufficiently incorporated in the default Trip Generation data. Trip generation is summarized in vehicular trip ends. A trip end is a one-way trip entering or leaving a site. This analysis evaluated typical weekday AM and PM peak hour conditions of the local street traffic. For analysis purposes the following land uses were used. . Specialty Retail (814) . Supermarket (850) . Drive-In Bank (912) . High Turnover Restaurant (932) . Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru (934) . Gas Station with Convenience Market (945) Table 3 provides a summary of the calculated trip generation data for the Project. Excerpts and a description from Trip Generation of these land uses are provided in Appendix B. Table 2. Development Trip Generation Summary Average Site-Related AM Site-Related PM Weekday Peak Hour Tri Ends Peak Hour Tri Ends Land Use Quantity Trips Out Total In Out _?~cialty Retail Center 20,200 SF 902 70 31 39 Su ermarket 69,800 SF 6,065 330 201 129 702 358 344 Drive-in Bank 4,736 SF 1,120 58 32 26 217 109 108 Drive-in Bank 4,440 SF 1,066 55 31 24 203 102 101 Hi h-Turnover Restaurant 5,500 SF 699 63 33 30 60 37 23 -------~ Fast-Food with Drive-Thru 3,200 SF 1,588 170 87 83 111 58 53 Gas Station w / Market 10 Pum 5 1,628 101 51 50 134 67 67 Total 13,068 777 435 342 1,497 762 735 Coppell Retail Development Traffic Impact Analysis Page 9 . Exhibit ~ Site Traffic Distribution Coppell Retail Development TIA 1? \) ()I~ ~: If<- SH 121 WB FR SH 121 EB FR "'0 ~ 0.. ro t-< ~ o ....... ~ Q) o @ Not To Scale J2cf!. ~~ -- cf2.cJ2- '- 4% (4%) C") C") .. 4% (5%) .. 2% (2% ~ ~ Highland Drive ~ Ia.. ~ 6% (6%) ~ 2% (2%) ~ 1% (1%) 1----- t ,. 4% (3%)... ., ,. 2% (2%) ... ., ,. cf?cf2- 13% (12%)""'1 ~;€ 3%(3%)""'1 ?J2.?f2. co '<:T ~~ .,., '<:T ~- ;;e. -,:J2. cf?-cf2. ';J2.a 0 o '<:T co N ~'cf2. co ~ "<:t- o ';J2. 0 ~ _0 ';J2.~ o ~ co - >--. >--. - 0 ad" ro ro C'- C") CO ~ ~ ~ ~Ia.. '-10% (11%) Q) Q) Driveway C ------- --~ ;> ;> t ...... ...... ,. ~ ~ 0 0 "#.cf2. = t-- ~- -;;cf2. d" co = ~ K' ~OO~ ;F- e ty ;F- co ( 011" ~ '- 4% (5%) <( Driveway B -- ------ >--. t ,. ro ~ 'c:J2?f2 Q) C") '<:T ;> ~- -;;;:12 ...... d"'<:T ;...., ""'" 0 ~ ~ -- a ~~ 0 ~ :::.-e '-10% (9%) ::R. cFcf2. ... 2% (2%) ....15% (15%) 00 '-12%(W ~.,., ~ .. 2% (2%) .J~ ~ 3% (3%) ~ 12% (13%) .J ... 8% (7%) t 2ft~ ?i ? C") ~ ~ ~~ - cf2cf2. ;F- ;F- CO N '<:T '<:T ~ ~ Ia.. Ia.. % (3%) ... 3% (3%) J t 4% (4%) ... ;F- XX% (YY%) ~ ;F- XX% = AM Peak Hour Traffic Dist co (YY%) = PM Peak Hour Traffic Dis 6 Yo) 3 ributions tributions Page 11 "'0 ~ 0.. (lj ~ c o ....... c C) Q <0- me '- 76 (140) :;;; ~ ... 13 (28) ...17 (37) ,J ~ ".. 24 (51) t SH 121 WB FR SH 121 EB FR 22 (38) ... II Exhibit 7 ~ Site Generated Traffic Coppell Retail Development TIA ~ ... 22(38)J t -.q- ~ L{) <<:> ~~ t:::.-~ -.q-o mm <<:> t:::.- -.q- -.q- 30 (64) ... ~ >. (lj ~ C) ;> ....... H Q ~ Not To Scale LO o ~ ~ '- 91 (160) ,J ... 61 (107) ...113 (219) ".. 90 (193) M 0> o 0> ... LEGEND: XX (YY) XX = AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (YY) = PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Page 12 Excerpts from ITE Trip Gelleratil1ft, 7* Edition Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 .... i i 1.. L Land Use: 820 Shopping Center 1 Description L A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned and managed as a unit A shopping center's composition is related to its. market area in terms of size, location and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands. Specialty retail center (Land Use 814) and factory outlet center (Land Use 823) are related uses. i Additional Data L L Shopping centers, including neighborhood centers, community centers,regional centers and super regional centers, were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained non- merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices, banks, health clubs and recreational facilities (for example, ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf . courses). The centers ranged in size from 1,700 to 2.2 million square feet of groSs"leasable area (GLA). The centers studied were located in suburban areas throughout the United States and therefore represent typical U.S. suburban conditions. L L Many shopping centers, In addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). . These buildings are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, Ifean be assumed that some of the data show their effect. . L I L The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the GLA of the center. In cases of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as the gross floor area of the building. I i I L Separate equations have been developed for shopping centers during the Christmas shopping season. Plots were included for the weekday peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the. Saturday peak hour of the generator. Information on approximate hourly, monthly and daily variation In shopping center traffic Is shown in Tables 1-4. It should be noted, however, that the Information contained in these tables is based on a limited sample size. Therefore, caution should be exercised when applying the data. Also, some Information provided in the tables may conflict with the results obtained by applying the average rate or regression equations. When this occurs, It Is suggested that the results from the average rate or regression equations be used, as they are based on a larger number of studies. Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1448 Institute of Transpo.;tationEngineers -l i ! -i ! i j -I 1 I -j \ Table 1 Hourly Variation in Shopping Center Traffic less Than 1 00.000 ' Sauare Feet Gross Leasable Area Thoe Averaae Weekdava ,Averaae Saturdayb Percent of 24 P~~nt of 24 Percent of,24 Percent of 24 Hour Entering Hour Exiting Hour Entering Hour Exiting , Traffic Traffic Tramc TraffIc 10-11 a.m. 7.6 6.5 6.8 5.8 11 a.m.-12 p.m. 7.6 8.4 8.8 "'8,9, 12-1 c.m. 7.6 8.2 9.4 ' ,,8.8 1-2 D.m. 6.9 7.5 10.0 10.1 2-3 D.m. 9~0 7~8 9.7 8.4 3-4 D.m. 9.6 9.5 10.3 -, :' ~.6 4-5 D.m. 9.7 10.4 10.7 10.7 5-6 p.m. 10.3 11.0 9.4 8.7 6-7 p.m. 7.4 8.3 7.3 8.3 7-S o.m. 5.4 , : 5:3 5.0 5.7 8-9 D.m. 4.2 ' i 4.3 , , 3.2 3.9 9-10 C.m. 1.9 ' - ,,' , 1.8 2.0 3.3 , " " Table 2 ~ Hourly Varlatlon In Shopping' Center Traffic More Than '300~oOO Sauare Feet Gro~ Leasable Area " , Time Averaae Weekdav- Average SaturdaY!> AverageSundayc Percent of Percent of Percent of Percent~f Percent of:' '-PerCent of ' ,24 Hour ~4 110ur, 24 Hour 2,4 Hour ,~.., Hour 24 Hour Entering Eidtfng '. Entering Exiting , . Entering EXitIng Traffic Traffic TraffIc Traffic Traffic, Tf8ff1c 10-11 a.m. 7.5 3.7 8.3 4.3 '3$ '. . 1.7 11 a.m.-12 p.m. 8.6 5.9 10.9 6.9 9.4 3.5 12.;..1 p.m. 9.5 7.9 11.9 8.9 15.3 6.3 1-2 D.m. 8.7 ' '8.~ '12.5 ' 10.4 17.3 11.0 2-3 D.m. 7.9 8.8: 12.4 12.0 .16.4 14.4 3-4 c.m. ' , 1.7 8.9- 11.2 12.9 13.8 16.2 , 4-5 D.m. 8.2 9.1 9.2 13.4 9.8 "16.8 5-6 D.m. 8.3 9.5 5.2 12.7 5.5 15.7 6-7 D.m. 7.8 7.7 2.9 8.0 2.2 6.1 7-S D.m. 8.4 7.0 1.9 2.1 1.3 1.9 8-9 p.m. 4.7' 7.7 1.4 1.2 '0.8 1.1 9-10 D.m. 1.8 9.1 2.9 0.8 0.6 0.9 " -I ~ . .~ . ~ 1 1~1 . -- ';"'";. \$, ,lJ 'k'-~. .",:~ -'H .::.~!: {i~. 'l",:~; -]',:',:,: ":'- It tJ -I:.;,', . ,-.. J} 8 Source numbers - 95, 124; based on four studies. b Source numbers - 95, 124; based on foill" stu~les. . 8 Source numbers - 48, 73, 88. 124;.based on seven sbJdles. b Source numbers - 73, 88; based on three SbJdies. ' C Source numbers - 88; based on two SbJdles. Trip Generation, 7th Edition 1449 Institute of Transportation Engineers , ' . Denton Tap Road at Highland Drive Signal Warrant Study, Lewisville, Texas November 2007 Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Existing Only Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes - Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic 70% Volume Thresholds Due to 45 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches Northbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes: 2 Approach Speed: 45 Total Approach Volume: 11,324 Southbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes: 2 Approach Speed: 45 Total Approach Volume: 10,347 Westbound: Highland Drive Number of Lanes: 2 Total Approach Volume: 1,152 Warrant Summary (Rural values apply.) Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volumes ............................................................................................ Not Satisfied Warrant 1A - Minimum Vehicular Volume .........................................................................................Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 0 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 1 B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic ..............................................................................Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 7 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 1 A&B - Combination of Warrants ......................................................................................Not Satisfied Required volumes reached for 2 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 2 - Four Hour Volumes ............................. ............................................ ..................................... Number of hours (6) volumes exceed minimum >= minimum required (4). Satisfied Warrant 3 - Peak Hour .............. ......... ....... ........... ......... ..... ...... ............................ ...... ............. ................. Satisfied Warrant 3A - Peak Hour Delay ...........................................................................................................Not Satisfied Total approach volumes and delays on minor street do not exceed minimums for any hour. Warrant 38 - Peak Hour Volumes ......................................................................................................satisfied Volumes exceed minimums for at least one hour. Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volumes ............................................................................................................. Not Satisfied Required 4 Hr pedestrian volume reached for 0 hour(s) and the single hour volume for 0 hour(s) Warrant 5 - School Crossing ................................................................................................................... Not Satisfied Number of gaps> .0 seconds (0) exceeds the number of minutes in the crossing period (0). Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System ................................................................................................. Not Satisfied No adjacent coordinated signals are present Warrant 7 - Crash Experience ................................................................................................................. Not Satisfied Number of accidents (-1) is less than minimum (5). Volume minimums are met. Warrant 8 - Roadway Network ................................................................................................................ Not Satisfied Major Route conditions not met. One or more volume requirement met. Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Existing Only Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes - Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic 70% Volume Thresholds Due to 45 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary '00 -r-- -~I --- ~~- -1-~ ~ j I ~ I I I I I . . i I ~ Warrant Curves I a.. 2: .c u C'll 2 Q. Q. <t Q) E ::l o > 600 Peak Hour Warrant Four Hour Warrant [Rural, 2+ major lanes and 2+ minor lanes curves us 500 400 8 7 ... Q) .c OJ I 300 I . I I -t- --+ Ui ~ U) 200 ... o c: :2: iOO 2 ED1 1~ 00 2 5~ (] 200 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 400 600 800 Analysis of 8-Hour Volume Warrants: Major Street - Total of Both Directions (VPH) Hour I Major ~ Higher Minor War-1A War-1B War-1A&B ! Begin Total Vol Dir Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? -~.,._. _._,-_._~,.~~- ~----- 00:00 103 I 2 WB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No I 01:00 43 I 0 EB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 02:00 46 4 WB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 03:00 40 1 WB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 04:00 89 6 WB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 05:00 271 15 WB 420-No 140-No 630-No 504-N 0 112-No 06:00 1,052 48 WB 140-No Major 112-No 07:00 2,184 120 WB 140-No Major 08:00 1,641 107 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 09:00 1,063 49 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 10:00 820 46 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 11:00 990 80 WB 140-N 0 Major 112-No Major 12:00 1,198 74 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 13:00 1,155 67 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 14:00 1,107 51 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 15:00 1,232 64 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 16:00 1,794 87 WB 140-No Major 112-No Major 17:00 2,342 120 WB 140-No Major 18:00 1,854 87 WB 140-No Major 19:00 987 33 WB 140-No Major 20:00 678 43 WB 140-No Major 21:00 495 I 23 WB 140-No Major 630-No 504-No 22:00 _~~~ 1_. ~ ~ WB 140-No 630-No 504-No 23:00 WB 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-N 0 Existing COBditiO. Plus Demon Tap Road at Highland Drive Signa! \Varrant Study, Le\',;svilIe, Texas Novemher 2007 Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes - Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic Plus Site Traffic 70% Volume Thresholds Due to 45 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches Northbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes: 2 Approach Speed: 45 Total Approach Volume: 11,324 Southbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes: 2 Approach Speed: 45 Total Approach Volume: 10,347 Westbound: Highland Drive Number of Lanes: 2 Total Approach Volume: 2,695 Warrant Summary (Rural values apply.) Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volumes ............................................................................................ Satisfied Warrant 1A - Minimum Vehicular Volume .........................................................................................satisfied Required volumes reached for 10 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 18 -Interruption of Continuous Traffic ..............................................................................Satisfied Required volumes reached for 13 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 1 A&8 . Combination of Warrants ......................................................................................satisfied Required volumes reached for 12 hours, 8 are needed Warrant 2 - Four Hour Volumes ........ ..... ............................................. .......... ..... ..................................... Number of hours (12) volumes exceed minimum >= minimum required (4). Satisfied Warrant 3 - Peak Hour .. .............. ...... ................................... ......... ............................ ..... .... ....... .... ........... Satisfied Warrant 3A . Peak Hour Delay ...........................................................................................................Not Satisfied Total approach volumes and delays on minor street do not exceed minimums for any hour. Warrant 38 . Peak Hour Volumes ......................................................................................................satisfied Volumes exceed minimums for at least one hour. Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volumes ............................................................................................................. Not Satisfied Required 4 Hr pedestrian volume reached for 0 hour(s) and the single hour volume for 0 hour(s) Warrant 5 - School Crossing ................................................................................................................... Not Satisfied Number of gaps> .0 seconds (0) exceeds the number of minutes in the crossing period (0). Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System ................................................................................................. Not Satisfied No adjacent coordinated signals are present Warrant 7 - Crash Experience ................................................................................................................. Not Satisfied Number of accidents (-1) is less than minimum (5). Volume minimums are met. Warrant 8 - Roadway Network ........ ..... .................... ..................................................... ..... ..................... Not Satisfied Major Route conditions not met. One or more volume requirement met. Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic Plus Site Traffic 70% Volume Thresholds Due to 45 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary I a... > son .c: u ctI 2 500 0- 0- <C Q) E 400 :::::i 0 > ~ Q) 300 .c: Ql I Q; 20(' ~ U5 0 .. OC ~ ~ 2 5~i 0 200 400 600 700 Warrant Curves Peak Hour Warrant Four Hour Warrant 2+ major lanes and 2+ minor lanes curves us .~ 1 1~ q-- t 8 1800 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Major Street - Total of Both Directions (VPH) Analysis of 8-Hour Volume Warrants: , Hour I Major Higher Minor : Begin I Total . Vol Dir i Major Grit ----;---~-- --.------ ~----+-==---_.~ 00:00 i 103 2 WB 420-No 01 :OO! 43 0 EB 420-No 02:00 I 46 4 WB 420-No 40 1 WB 420-No 89 6 WB 420-No 271 15 WB 420-No 1,052 48 WB 2,184 205 we 1,641 107 WB 1,063 49 WB 820 152 we 990 217 WB 1,198 208 WB 1.155 190 we ",107 179 WB 1.232 219 WB 1.194 257 WB 2.342 304 WB 1.854 222 WB 987 119 WB 678 113 WB 495 53 WB 286 13 we 420-No 201 12 WB 420-No 03:00 I 04:00 I 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 War-1A War-1B War-1A&B Minor Grit Meets? Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? ..._----_.,-,.~"- - 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 630-No 504-No 112-No 140-No 112-No 140-No 140-No 140-No 140-No Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic Plus Site Traffic Conservative Case 100% Volume Thresholds Due to 40 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary Major Street Approaches Minor Street Approaches Northbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes 2 Approach Speed 40 Total Approach Volume 11,324 Southbound: Denton Tap Road Number of Lanes 2 Approach Speed 40 Total Approach Volume 10,347 Westbound: Highland Drive Number of Lanes: 2 Total Approach Volume: 2,695 Warrant Summary (Urban values apply.) Warrant 1 - Eight Hour Vehicular Volumes Satisfied Warrant1A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Reql.wedJclumes reached for 7 hours 8 are nee(jed ,...............Not Satisfied Warrant 1 B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Requl!'ed volumes reached for 11 hours 8 are needed ,.,.............Satisfied Warrant 1 A&B . Combination of Warrants '". ...... ..,........ ,..,..,........,.........................................Satisfied Required \/clurnes reached for 9 hours. B are needed Warrant 2 - Four Hour Volumes ................... .................................................,................................... Number Of hours (9) volumes exceed minlmum'= minimum required (4). Satisfied Warrant 3 - Peak Hour ............. p, .'.. ,..... .. Satisfied Warrant 3A - Peak Hour Delay..... ............ .,............,.,.......,....,........,....,.............Not Satisfied Total approacr volumes and delays on 'Tllnor street do not exceed minimums for any hour Warrant 3B . Peak Hour Volumes ............ ,'.. .............satisfied Volumes ex'-;eed minimums for at least one hour Warrant 4 - Pedestrian Volumes ......... .... ............................................................................................ Not Satisfied Required 4 Hr pedestrian volume reached for 0 hour(s) and the single hour volume for 0 hour(s) Warrant 5 - School Crossing ................................ .......................................................................... Not Satisfied Number Of gaps> 0 seconds (0) exceeds the number of minutes in the crossing period (0). Warrant 6 - Coordinated Signal System No adjacent coordinated Signals are present Not Satisfied Warrant 7 - Crash Experience. ......... .... ...... .................................................................................. Not Satisfied Number Of accidents (-1) is less than minimum 5) Volume minimums are met. Warrant 8 - Roadway Network ". ......... ............... ....................................................................... Not Satisfied MaJo, Route conditions not met One or more volume requirement met. Denton Tap Road @ Highland Drive Major Street Volumes - Denton Tap Road Existing 2007 Traffic Minor Street Volumes Highland Drive Existing 2007 Traffic Plus Site Traffic Conservative Case. 100% Volume Thresholds Due to 40 MPH Speed Signal Warrants - Summary -r-----r------r- ... '00 I 0... > 600 .c u m e <;00 a. a. <( Q) E 400 :J 0 > ~ Q) 300 .c Ql I Q) :'0(; ~ us 0 00 ~ ~ 2 200 400 - [ I I '~t I' ~ ~I .,~ ! ~, .,~. ~ ~, lQ 600 800 Major Street - Total of Both Directions (VPH) 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Analysis of 8-Hour Volume Warrants: Hour Major Higher Minor. War-1A Beg~ 1 Totai Vol .. Dir~ajO~~~i!__ Minor Grit Meets? 00:00 i 103 2 WB 600-No 200-No 01 :00 43 0 EB 600-No 200-No 02:00 i 46 4 WB 600-No 200-No 03:00, 40 1 WB 600-No 200-No 04:00 i 89 6 WB 600-No 200-No 05:00 I 271 15 WB 600-No 200-No 06:00 I 1,052 48 WB 200-No 07:00 I 2,184 205 WB 08:00 t 1,64~ 107 WB I 09:00 I 1,06:1 49 WB 10:00 i 820 152 WB 11:00! 990 217 WB 12:00 i 1,198 208 WB 13:00 i ; 155 190 WB 14:00 i UO~ 179 WB 15:00, 1.23. 219 WB 16:00' 4 J9A 257 WB 17:00 2..34. 304 WB 18:00 '.85<> 222 WB l :::~~ :~~ :~: :: 21 :00 495 53 WB 600-No 22:00 286 13 WB 600-No 23:00 201 12 WB 600-No 200-No -- _"..~~ _g_ ~~_ w _~__--"--____ __~___ Warrant Curves Peak Hour Warrant Four Hour Warrant [Urban, 2+ major lanes and 2+ minor lanes curves u e ] ----r-- I -I I I i l~ -- I 1 1~ o 6300 War-1B War-1A&B Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? Major Grit Minor Grit Meets? 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 900-No 100-No 720-No 160-No 100-No 160-No