Loading...
ST9905-LR080529 CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94081124.0006 Service Date: April 29, 2008 lrerracan 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste #100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Batch Time: 1 :20pm Plant: 3 Supplier: Lattimore Materials Truck No: 972 Ticket No: 3247893 Mix I.D. No.: 1701 Water Added Onsite Before Test: OGallons Water Added Onsite After Test: 0 Gallons Field Test Data Test Slump, inches: Air Content, %: Concrete Temperature, of: Ambient Temperature,oF: Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Report Date: May 29. 2008 Project: Bethel Road I - #ST 99-05 Roadway & Drainage Improvements City Limit Line to Freeport Parkway Coppell, TX Project No.: 94081124 Sam"/e Information Date Cast: April 29, 2008 Time: 2:25pm Sampled by: Gregory L. Warren Weather Conditions: Clear, mild winds Accumulative Yards: 10 Batch Size (cy): 10.00 Placement Method: Direct Discharge Sample Locations: Sta. 63+15 Placement Location: Culvert Walls Client: City of Coppell TX Attn: Rick O'Dell Engineering Dept PO Box 9478 Coppell TX 75019 Material Information Specified Strength: 3600 psi @ 28 Days Result 3.00 3.0 80 80 146.0 Specification Test Method ASTM C143 ASTM C231 ASTM C1064 ASTM C1064 ASTM C138 Laboratorv Test Data Age at Maximum compressive Date Test Load Strength Tested (days) (Ibs) (psi) 05/06/2008 7 104,880 3,710 OS/27/2008 28 128,510 4,540 OS/27/2008 28 127,600 4,510 . Average (28 Days) 4,530 Services _ Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. Set No. 1 1 1 Specimen 10 1 2 3 Diameter Area (inches) (sq. inches) 6.00 28.27 6.00 28.27 6.00 28.27 Report Distribution: (1) City ofCoppell TX (1) Tiseo Paving Company Reviewed by: Terracon Rep: Gregory L. Warren ErlcJ. Cleve and, P.E. Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed In general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report Is exclusively for the use of the client Indicated above and shall not be reproduced except In full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein are only applicable to the actual samples tested at the locatlon(s) referenced and are not necessarily Indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or Identical. materials. Page 1 of 1 01-M'NBIRO'\.FtAan Key CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST Report Number: 94081124.0006 Service Date: April 29, 2008 . lrerracan 8901 Carpenter Frwy, Ste#100 Dallas, Texas 75247 (214) 630-1010 Batch Time: 1 :20pm Plant: 3 Supplier: Lattimore Materials Truck No: 972 Ticket No: 3247893 Mix 1.0. No.: 1701 Water Added Onsite Before Test: o Gallons Water Added Onsite After Test: 0 Gallons Field Test Data Test Slump, inches: Air content, %: Concrete Temperature, of: Ambient Temperature,DF: Plastic Unit Weight, pcf: Report Date: May 29,2008 Project: Bethel Road I - #ST 99-05 Roadway & Drainage Improvements City Limit Line to Freeport Parkway . Coppell, TX Project No.: 94081124 Sample Information Date Cast: April 29, 2008 Time: 2:25pm Sampled by: Gregory L. Warren Weather Conditions: Clear, mild winds Accumulative Yards: 10 Batch Size (cy): 10.00 Placement Method: Direct Discharge Sample Locations: Sta. 63+15 Placement Location: Culvert Walls Client: City of Coppell TX Attn: Rick O'Dell Engineering Dept PO Box 9478 Coppell TX 75019 Material Information Specified Strength: 3600 psi @ 28 Days Result 3.00 3.0 80 80 146.0 Specification Test Method ASTM C143 ASTM C231 ASTM C1064 ASTM C1064 ASTM C138 Laboratorv Test Data Age at Maximum Compressive Date Test Load Strength Tested (days) Ubs) (psi) 05/0612008 7 104,880 3,710 05/27/2008 28 128,510 4,540 05/27/2008 28 127,600 4,510 Average (28 Days) 4,530 Services _ Obtain samples of fresh concrete at the placement locations, perform required field tests and cast compressive strength samples. Set No. 1 1 1 Specimen 10 1 2 3 Diameter Area (inches) (sq. inches) 6.00 28.27 6.00 28.27 6.00 28.27 Report Distribution: (1) city of Cappell TX (1) Tiseo Paving Company Reviewed by: Terracon Rep: Gregory L. Warren Eric J. Clev and, P.E. Senior Project Engineer The tests were performed In general accordance with applicable ASTM, AASHTO, or DOT test methods. This report is exclusively for the use of the client indicated above and shall not be reproduced except In full without the written consent of our company. Test results transmitted herein ate only applicable to the actual samples tested at tile loeatlon(s) referenced and are not necessarily indicative of the properties of other apparently similar or identical materials. Page 1 of 1 OI-MWBIR01-FUin Koy