SS9901-CN000613COPPELL AGENDA RE4UEST FORM
e x b e ° CITY COUNCIL MEETING: June 13, 2000 ITEM #��
ITEM CAPTION:
Consider approval of a contract with Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. to perform an updated study associated
with improvements to the Deforest Road Lift Station and force main in the amount of $56,426.00 as funded
in the Series 1999 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds; and authorizing the City Manager to sign.
SUBMITTED
TITLE:
STAFF COMD
See attaRfied memo.
Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E.
Director of Engineering /Public
BUDGET AMT. $ AMT. EST. $ +\ -BID $
FINANCIAL COMMENTS:
Funds for this project are provided by the 1999 Water /Sever CIP Fund.
DIR. INITIALS: Y-7 FIN. REVIEW CITY MANAGER REVIEW:
Agenda Request Form - Revised 5/00 Document Name: #06133
C„ fit, Rcv a•�„ J 6'2 g�e» p�yL �V� �F q -.,� � 70.4& 6 /aj' /a- o �K—
1. .%N
MEMORANDUM
FROM THE
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., Director of Engineering/Public Works V-1
Date: May 9, 2000
RE: Consider approval of entering into a contract with Turner, Collie & Braden,
Inc. to perform an updated study associated with improvements to the Deforest
Road Lift Station and force main in the amount of $56,426.00 as funded in the
Series 1999 Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds; and authorizing the City
Manager to sign.
In an attempt to continue to implement portions of the City's Wastewater Collection Sewer
Master Plan and provide for the needs of the community, the City of Coppell has contacted the
firm of Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. to provide services associated with the upgrade of the
Deforest Road Lift Station and the installation of a new force main. In 1994, the City of Coppell
completed its Wastewater Collection Sewer Master Plan and began implementing numerous
projects contained within that plan. One project identified in the plan was the expansion of the
Deforest Road Lift Station and the construction of a new 16" force main along MacArthur Blvd.
The current lift station has an estimated capacity of approximately 7 million gallons per day. The
1994 study estimated that in 2004 a capacity of approximately 10 million gallons per day would
be needed.
One component of the project which has concerned me is the construction of a new force main
along MacArthur Blvd. from Deforest Road to Sandy Lake Road. The only available corridor to
install the force main is in the median section. My concern is that along MacArthur Blvd. there
are numerous trees in the median that could be compromised, damaged or removed with the
construction of a new force main.
Because of prior zoning changes within the drainage basin (see attached exhibit) and my concern
about the installation of a force main along MacArthur, I recommend approaching this project in
two phases. The first phase is the study contract before you this evening, which is a review of
information from the early 1990's used to generate the original recommendation. The study will
review all current flows out of the lift station, generate new flows into the lift station based on
current zoning and compare the 1994 Master Plan data with the new data and then cross
reference that with state requirements for lift stations to determine the ultimate size lift station
necessary. The study will also review new techniques utilized in lift station construction to
determine what modifications need to be made to the Deforest Road Lift Station in regards to
operation, pumps and odor control. Item 1.5 and Item 1.7 of the Scope of Services are the two
major items that deal with the aforementioned study.
"CrrY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING - EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN"
Once the consultant has obtained all the necessary information and evaluated our needs, he will
provide several recommendations to the City on how to modify the lift station and force main to
meet our future needs. Once the City has agreed upon a design approach to the Deforest Road
Lift Station modifications, then the City will enter into a second contract with the consultant for
the actual design of the modifications to the lift station and any force mains necessary for future
build out.
It is anticipated that the study phase will take four to five months. Therefore, the second contract
for design will probably not come before Council until some time in late 2000 or early 2001.
Frequently cities will enter into contracts to just design components of a master plan. However,
given the sensitivity of trying to construct a force main along MacArthur Blvd., prior zoning
changes and the age of the Wastewater Master Plan, I recommend that the City follow the 2-
phase approach to this project to insure that the final recommendation and design is what is
absolutely necessary to meet our future needs. This approach will also insure that if we are
required to install a force main along MacArthur that we have at least explored all other available
options prior to making that determination.
Staff recommends the approval of the study contract with Turner, Collie & Braden, Inc. in the
amount of $56,426.00. Staff will be available to answer any questions at the Council meeting.
"CrrY OF COPPELL ENGINEERING • EXCELLENCE BY DESIGN"
DENTON COUNTY
/ ......'t..: .
forest
Lift Station --J Proposed Force Main W
1994 Wastwater System
Master Man
*Mnap
n t
• N
a - 4 1 T Y 0 1
COPPELL
4000 0 4000 Feet
CITY OF COPPELL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS CONTRACT
STATE OF TEXAS §
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS
CITY OF COPPELL §
THIS ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT, hereinafter referred to as "Contract," made,
entered into and executed this the day of 2000, by and between the City of Coppell
GtryMANA4�R.
acting by and through the M ym with approval of the City Council hereinafter referred to as "City ",
and Turner Collie & Braden Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Engineer ".
WHEREAS, the City desires to contract for Professional Engineering Services, hereinafter referred to
as "Services ", in connection with the DeForest Wastewater Lift Station and Force Main Improvements,
hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer is acceptable to the City and is willing to enter into a Contract with the City
to perform the hereinafter defined Services necessary to complete the Project; and
WHEREAS, said Services shall be as defined herein and in the detailed Scope of Services, Exhibit A,
incorporated herein by attachment and by reference; and
WHEREAS, this contract shall be administered on behalf of the City by its City Engineer or his duly
authorized representative. The Engineer shall fully comply with any and all instructions from said
City Engineer.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Engineer, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained, do mutually agree as follows:
The City agrees to retain the Engineer, and the Engineer agrees to provide Services in connection
with the Project as defined herein, and for having rendered such Services the City agrees to pay to the
Engineer fee for these Services as mutually agreed. All Services under this Contract shall be
performed under the direct supervision of the City Engineer.
1. Scope of Services,
A. Basic Services: The work tasks and activities to be performed and deliverable to be
provided by the Engineer shall be in accordance with Exhibit A, Scope of Services,
including modifications to the Basic Services as mutually agreed to by the City and the
Engineer in accordance with the provisions of this Contract.
B. Additional Services Not Included In Basic Services: When mutually agreed to in
writing by the City and the Engineer, the Additional Services shall be provided by the
Engineer. These Additional Services are not included as a part of Basic Services and
shall be paid for by the City in addition to payment for Basic Services. Should it be
determined that one or more of the requirements of this Contract conflict with the
requirements of the Scope of Services, including modifications to the Scope of
Services or any attachments to this contract; the requirement of the Contract shall
govern.
2. Proaress Schedule. Within ten (10) days after receiving Notice to Proceed (NTP) the
Engineer shall submit to the City a Schedule of Services consisting of a listing of the major
Project tasks, the estimated consultant hours required to perform the tasks, the percentage of the
Contract budget estimated to be allocated to each task and a bar chart schedule showing task
beginning and completion dates. Significant milestones for the Project shall be identified. The
Engineer shall provide to the City information to report and monitor the design tasks within
the Project Schedule by completing a "Design Progress Report" on a form provided by the
City. The Engineer shall complete and provide to the City said report at two week intervals.
3. Compensation.
A. Basic Services Fee: The Engineer shall be paid a fee for Basic Services under this
Contract pursuant to the Fee Schedule described in Exhibit B. Basic Services Fee shall
not exceed the lump sum of Fifty-six thousand, four hundred twenty six dollars
($56,426) provided, however, that modifications to the Basic Services, or other
conditions defined herein may necessitate a change of Fee which shall be reduced to
writing and approved by the City or its designee.
B. Invoices: The Engineer shall submit invoices at not less than thirty (30) calendar days
for Basic Services on or before the twenty fifth (25th) calendar day of the month, or the
preceding business day if the twenty fifth occurs on a weekend and/or observed
holiday. Payment shall be based on the invoices submitted to the City, provided that
Services completed as indicated in the Design Progress Reports approved by the City
equals or exceeds the increment percentage requested on the Engineer's invoices.
Engineer's invoices to City shall provide complete information and documentation to
substantiate Engineer's charges and shall be in a form to be specified by the City
Engineer. Should additional documentation be requested by the City Engineer the
Engineer shall comply promptly with such request.
Page 2
C. Payments: All payments to Engineer shall be made on the basis of the invoices
submitted by the Engineer and approved by the City. Following approval of invoices,
City shall endeavor to pay Engineer promptly, however, under no circumstances shall
Engineer be entitled to receive interest on amounts due. The City, in compliance with
Texas State law, shall process a maximum of one payment to the Engineer per month.
City reserves the right to correct any error that may be discovered in any invoice
whether paid to the Engineer or not, and to withhold the funds requested by the
Engineer relative to the error.
4. Fee Increases. Any other provision in this Contract notwithstanding, it is specifically
understood and agreed that the Engineer shall not be authorized to undertake any Services
pursuant to this Contract requiring the payment of any fee, expense or reimbursement in
addition to the fees stipulated in Article 3 of this Contract, without having first obtained
specific written authorization from the City. The written authorization for additional Services
shall be in the form of a Modification to the Scope of Services approved by the City Engineer
and/or the City Council, if required.
5. Modifications to the Scope of Services. Either the Engineer or the City Engineer may
initiate a written request for a Modification to the Scope of Services when in the opinion of the
requesting Party, the needs and conditions of the Project warrant a modification. Upon the
receipt of a request by either Party, the Engineer and the City Engineer shall review the
conditions associated with the request and determine the necessity of a modification. When the
Parties agree that a modification is warranted, the Engineer and the City Engineer shall
negotiate the specific modification(s) and any changes in the Total Maximum Fee or Project
Schedule resulting from the modification(s). Approval of a modification shall be in the form of
a written Modification to the Scope of Services which clearly defines the changes to the
previously approved Scope of Services, Fee and/or Project Schedule. Said written Modification
shall be approved by Engineer, authorized by the City Council, if required, and issued by the
City Engineer. Issuance of the approved Scope of Services modification shall constitute a
notice to proceed with the Project in accordance with the modified Scope of Services. The
City Engineer may issue written Modifications to the Scope of Services without prior approval
of the City Council when the modifications are to be accomplished within the authorized Total
Maximum Fee and do not materially or substantively alter the overall scope of the Project, the
Project Schedule or the Services provided by the Engineer.
6. Proiect Deliverables. For each submittal identified in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, the
Engineer shall provide the City with one set of reproducibles, one set of bluelines or hard copy
and electronic media of the submittal documents. For any required environmental assessment,
the Engineer shall provide one set of draft and one set of final Environmental Reports. The
Environmental Reports shall be submitted as original reproducibles and on electronic media.
The electronic file may omit photographs and government prepared maps. If photographs are
included in the report they shall be taken with a 35 mm camera or larger format camera. Color
laser copies may be substituted for the original photographs in the final report.
Page 3
1100� ''1
A transmittal letter shall be included with the Environmental Reports and shall include an
executive summary outlining: a.) Findings of the Reports; b.) Conclusions; c.)
Recommendations; and d.) Mitigation/remediation cost estimates.
Project Control. It is understood and agreed that all Services shall be performed under the
administrative direction of the City Engineer. No Services shall be performed under this
Contract until a written Notice to Proceed is issued to the Engineer by the City Engineer. In
addition, the Engineer shall not proceed with any Services after the completion and delivery to
the City of the Conceptual Design Submittal, Preliminary Design Submittal, or the Final PS &E
Submittal as described in the Basic Services without written instruction from the City. The
Engineer shall not be compensated for any Services performed after the said submittals and
before receipt of City's written instruction to proceed.
8. Partnering. The City shall encourage participation in a partnering process that involves the
City, Engineer and his or her sub - consultants, and other supporting jurisdictions and/or
agencies. This partnering relationship shall begin at the Pre- Design Meeting and continue for
the duration of this Contract. By engaging in partnering, the parties do not intend to create a
legal partnership, to create additional contractual relationships, or to in any way alter the legal
relationship which otherwise exists between the City and the Engineer. The partnering effort
shall be structured to draw on the strengths of each organization to identify and achieve
reciprocal goals. The objectives of partnering are effective and efficient contract performance
and completion of the Project within budget, on schedule, in accordance with the Scope of
Services, and without litigation. Participation in partnering shall be totally voluntary and all
participants shall have equal status.
9. Disputes. The City Engineer shall act as referee in all disputes under the terns of this
Contract between the Parties hereto. In the event the City Engineer and the Engineer are
unable to reach acceptable resolution of disputes concerning the Scope of Services to be
performed under this Contract, the City and the Engineer shall negotiate in good faith toward
resolving such disputes. The City Engineer may present unresolved disputes arising under the
terms of this Contract to the City Manager or designee. The decision of the City Manager or
designee shall be final and binding. An irreconcilable or unresolved dispute shall be considered
a violation or breach of contract terms by the Engineer and shall be grounds for termination.
Any increased cost incurred by the City arising from such termination shall be paid by the
Engineer.
10. Enaneer's Seal. The Engineer shall place his Texas Professional Engineers seal on all
engineering documents and engineering data prepared under the supervision of the Engineer in
the performance of this Contract.
11. Liability. Approval of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS &E) by the City shall not
constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of Engineer, its
employees, subcontractors, agents and consultants for the accuracy and competency of their
designs, working drawings, tracings, magnetic media and/or computer disks, estimates,
specifications, investigations, studies or other documents and work; nor shall such approval be
Page 4
t*�N 1
deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility by the City for any defect, error or omission
in the design, working drawings, tracings, magnetic media and/or computer disks, estimates
specifications, investigations, studies or other documents prepared by Engineer, its employees,
subcontractors, agents and consultants. Engineer shall indemnify City for damages resulting
from such defects, errors or omissions and shall secure, pay for and maintain in force during the
term of this Contract sufficient errors and omissions insurance in the amount of $250,000.00
single limit, with certificates evidencing such coverage to be provided to the City. The
redesign of any defective work shall be the sole responsibility and expense of the Engineer.
Any work constructed, found to be in error because of the Engineer's design, shall be removed,
replaced, corrected or otherwise resolved at the sole responsibility and expense of the
Engineer. The parties further agree that this liability provision shall meet the requirements of
the express negligence rule adopted by the Texas Supreme Court and hereby specifically agree
that this provision is conspicuous.
12. Indemnification. Engineer shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Coppell, its
officers, agents and employees from any loss, damage, liability or expense, including attorney
fees, on account of damage to property and injuries, including death, to all persons, including
employees of Engineer or any associate consultant, which may arise from any errors,
omissions or negligent act on the part of Engineer, its employees, agents, consultants or
subcontractors, in performance of this Contract, or any breach of any obligation under this
Contract. It is further understood that it is not the intention of the parties hereto to create
liability for the benefit of third parties, but that this agreement shall be solely for the benefit of
the parties hereto and shall not create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise to any person
or entity. The parties further agree that this indemnification provision shall meet the
requirements of the express negligence rule adopted by the Texas Supreme Court and hereby
specifically agree that this provision is conspicuous.
13. Delays and Failure to Perform Engineer understands and agrees that time is of the essence
and that any failure of the Engineer to complete the Services of this Contract within the agreed
Project Schedule shall constitute material breach of this Contract. The Engineer shall be fully
responsible for its delays or for failures to use diligent effort in accordance with the terms of
this Contract. Where damage is caused to the City due to the Engineer's failure to perform in
these circumstances, the City may withhold, to the extent of such damage, Engineer's
payments hereunder without waiver of any of City's additional legal rights or remedies. The
Engineer shall not be responsible for delays associated with review periods by the City in
excess of the agreed Project Schedule.
14. Termination of Contract. It is agreed that the City or the Engineer may cancel or terminate
this Contract for convenience upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the other. Immediately
upon receipt of notice of such cancellation from either party to the other, all Services being
performed under this Contract shall immediately cease. Pending final determination at the end
of such fifteen -day period, the Engineer shall be compensated on the basis of the percentage of
Services provided prior to the receipt of notice of such termination and indicated in the final
Design Progress Report submitted by the Engineer and approved by the City.
Page 5
15. Personnel Oualifications. Engineer warrants to the City that all Services provided by
Engineer in the performance of this Contract shall be provided by personnel who are
appropriately licensed or certified as required by law, and who are competent and qualified in
their respective trades or professions.
16. Ouality Control. The Engineer agrees to maintain written quality control procedures. The
Engineer further agrees to follow those procedures to the extent that, in the Engineer's
judgment, the procedures are appropriate under the circumstances.
17. Ownership. All Engineer's designs and work product under this Contract, including but not
limited to tracings, drawings, electronic or magnetic media and/or computer disks, estimates,
specifications, investigations, studies and other documents, completed or partially completed,
shall be the property of the City to be used as City desires, without restriction; and Engineer
specifically waives and releases any proprietary rights or ownership claims therein and is
relieved of liability connected with any future use by City. Copies may be retained by
Engineer. Engineer shall be liable to City for any loss or damage to such documents while
they are in the possession of or while being worked upon by the Engineer or anyone connected
with the Engineer, including agents, employees, consultants or subcontractors. All documents
so lost or damaged while they are in the possession of or while being worked upon by the
Engineer shall be replaced or restored by Engineer without cost to the City.
18. Proiect Records and Rieht to Audit. The Engineer shall keep, retain and safeguard all
records relating to this Contract or work performed hereunder for a minimum period of three
(3) years following the Project completion, with full access allowed to authorized
representatives of the City upon request for purposes of evaluating compliance with provisions
of this Contract. Should the City Engineer determine it necessary, Engineer shall make all its
records and books related to this Contract available to City for inspection and auditing
purposes.
19. Non - Discrimination. As a condition of this Contract, the Engineer shall take all necessary
action to ensure that, in connection with any work under this Contract it shall not discriminate
in the treatment or employment of any individual or groups of individuals on the grounds of
race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex or physical impairment unrelated to experience,
qualifications or job performance, either directly, indirectly or through contractual or other
arrangements.
20. Gratuities. City of Coppell policy mandates that employees shall never, under any
circumstances, seek or accept, directly or indirectly from any individual doing or seeking to do
business with the City of Coppell, loans, services, payments, entertainment, trips, money in any
amount, or gifts of any kind.
21. No Waiver. No action or failure to act on the part of either Party at any time to exercise any
rights or remedies pursuant to this Contract shall be a waiver on the part of that Party of any of
its rights or remedies at law or contract.
Page 6
22. Compliance with Laws. The Engineer shall comply with all Federal, State and local laws,
statutes, City Ordinances, rules and regulations, and the orders and decrees of any courts, or
administrative bodies or tribunal in any matter affecting the performance of this Contract,
including without limitation, worker's compensation laws, minimum and maximum salary and
wage statutes and regulations, and licensing laws and regulations. When required, Engineer
shall furnish the City with satisfactory proof of compliance therewith.
23. Severability. In case one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any
reason be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or
unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof and this Contract shall be
construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein.
24. Venue. With respect to any and all litigation or claims, the laws of the State of Texas shall
apply and venue shall reside in Dallas County.
25. Prior Negotiations. This Contract supersedes any and all prior understandings and agreement
by and between the Parties with respect to the terms of this Contract and the negotiations
preceding execution of this Contract.
26. Contacts. The Engineer shall direct all inquiries from any third party regarding information
relating to this Contract to the City Engineer.
Page 7
27. Notification. All notices to either Party by the other required under this Contract shall be
delivered personally or sent by certified U.S. mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such Party at
the following respective addresses:
City: City of Coppell, Texas
Mss PAjtccw►y bLV
140. &ac 478
CopPELL . , :
7SG /7
Engineer: Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
17300 Dallas Parkway
Suite 1010
Dallas, Texas 75248
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Coppell, Texas and the Engineer has caused these
presents to be executed by duly authorized representatives on the day and year set forth above.
THE CITY OF COPPELL
BY:
ENGINEER: Turner Collie & Braden Inc.
BY:
e eC. Re a c , P. E.
Vice President
Date: d
ATTEST:
W F
M A M --6-
Date: - Jwte- (, 2000
ATTEST:
,m
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
COPPELL, TEXAS
DEFOREST WASTEWATER LIFT STATION
AND FORCE MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
0.0 GENERAL
0.1 Project Description
The services to be provided for this project include preparation of a preliminary
design report for the improvements to be made to the DeForest Wastewater Lift
Station and force main facilities. The services include:
• Evaluation of the capacity of the existing pumping facilities to meet
pumping requirements in the year 2020 at the wastewater lift station.
• Evaluation of the force main required to transfer wastewater from the
DeForest Lift Station to the Sandy Lake Lift Station.
• Evaluate alternative routes for the force main in Samuel Street and
MacArthur Boulevard.
• Determine the odor control facilities to be provided at the lift station to
control odors.
0.2 Project Phasing
This project shall be performed in one phase. The Preliminary Design Report
phase includes data collection, evaluation of the existing facilities and
recommended improvements, and development of preliminary improvement
recommendations for the City's review and approval.
0.3 Design Standards
Design and preparation of construction drawings and technical specifications
required for the project shall be in accordance with the following standards.
a. North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG)
b. City of Coppell Design Standards.
C. City of Coppell Standard Drawings and Specifications.
d. Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission (TNRCC)
1.0 Preliminary Design Report
1.1 Data Collection
Obtain available reports, plans, pumping records, flow records, zoning maps,
aerial photographs, master plans, and other data relevant to the project from the
City.
-�1
1.2 Design Meeting
Meet with the City of Coppell staff to review and discuss the preliminary design
criteria, operational concerns, and other preliminary data. The Engineer shall
prepare a record of the preliminary design meeting and distribute it to all
attendees.
1.3 Evaluation of Existing Facilities
Evaluate the existing lift station facilities, force main, and gravity sewers affected
by the proposed improvements.
1.4 Ultimate Development of Drainage Basin
Determine the projected ultimate build -out date for the sanitary sewer drainage
basins A & F. The estimated date will be based on historical growth trends
provided by the City of Coppell
1.5 Determination of Required Pumping Capacity of the Lift Station
Determine the required pumping capacity of the DeForest Lift Station for the
ultimate build -out date of the drainage basin (Basins A & F in the 1994 Master
Plan) served by the lift station. The following tasks will be performed to
determine the required pumping capacity of the lift station:
a. Prepare an estimate of current wastewater flow based on existing land
use. This will include counting connections to the existing wastewater
collection system using existing block/lot development maps, zoning
maps and land use master plan provided by the City. Two field visits are
anticipated to verify land use.
b. Compare estimated flow rates with pumping records provided by the
City. Adjust the estimated flow rates as required to correlate with the
pumping records.
C. Review peak wet weather flows based on available past rainfall data and
wastewater flows. Estimate peaking factors based on rainfall data and
lift station pumping records provided by the City.
d. Using the peaking factors established above, estimate flows based on the
projected full development of Basins A & F.
e. Compare year 2020 and ultimate peak flow and pumping requirements
with the 1994 Master Plan projections and TNRCC existing and
proposed regulations.
Prepare a Task Report and review findings with the City.
1.6 Force Main Alternatives
Determine the size of the force main required to transfer wastewater from the lift
station to the Sandy Lake Lift Station. Evaluate alternative routes for the force
mains in Samuel Street and MacArthur Boulevard.
1.7 Lift Station Modifications
Develop pump /system head curves for the existing force main and lift station and
proposed improvements to the lift station and the alternative routes of the
proposed force main. Evaluate the following five alternatives for upgrading the
lift station and force main facilities.
a. Convert the existing DeForest Lift Station to a station using only
submersible pumps.
b. New force main in Samuel Street and new submersible pumps at the
DeForest Lift Station.
C. New force main in MacArthur Boulevard to the existing gravity sewer to
the Sandy Lake Lift Station.
d. New force main in MacArthur Boulevard to the existing Sandy Lake Lift
Station wet well using new submersible pumps at the DeForest Lift
Station.
e. New force main in MacArthur Boulevard to the existing force main out
of the existing Sandy Lake Lift Station using new submersible pumps at
the DeForest Lift Station.
1.8 Lift Station Electrical Schematics
Prepare preliminary electrical requirement schematics for the proposed
improvements to the DeForest Lift Station.
1.9 Odor Control
Review the odor control technologies available for use at the lift station and
recommend facilities to control odors at the DeForest Lift Station.
1.10 Cost Estimates
Develop capital and operating cost estimates for each of the proposed
alternatives.
1.11 Draft Report
Prepare a preliminary report of findings and recommendations and submit five
copies to the City for review and approval.
1.12 Review Meeting
Meet with City staff to review the preliminary report and address City comments
and concerns.
1.13 Final Report
Modify report to include final comments provided by the City
1.14 Submittal
Prepare Final report and submit 10 copies to the City.
2.0 Schedule
The draft report will be completed and submitted to the City within three months of
receipt of the Notice to Proceed from the City. The final report will be submitted with
one month after receipt of comments from the City.
The following tasks are not included in the Contract:
• Flow monitoring
• Rain event monitoring
• Geotechnical investigations
• Field Surveying
C;ty of Coppell, Texas EXHIBIT B
D6Forest Wastewater Lift Station and Fo., illain Improvements
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
BASIC SERVICES
06/01/00
TASK LISTING
Pr o j ect
Manage er
e
En ngi lose r
Staff
Engineer
Senior
Technician
Technician
Clerical
TOTAL
�
$100
Deliveries
$150
Postage
E50
Mileage
1.0 Preliminary Design Report
5150
Computer Use
24 hours CADD $10/hr
$240
dminisVative
15.00% E146
1.1 Data Collection
4
8
2
$1,100
1.2 Design Meeting
4
8
2
$1,480
1.3 Evaluation of Existing Facilities
4
8
4
$1,700
1.4 Ultimate Development of Basin
4
8
16
8
$3,080
1.5 Required Pumping Capacity of Station
a. Land Use Analysis
40
24
$6,000
b. Pumping records analysis
4
4
$980
C . Peaking factor determination
4
8
$1,400
d. Estimate flows
4
$420
e. Evaluate results
4
$420
f. Task report
4
20
2
$2,740
76 Force Main Alternatives
20
20
$3,600
13 Lift Station Modifications
a. Alternative "A"
2
8
16
16
$3,280
b. Alternative "B"
1
2
8
$950
c. Altemative "C"
1
2
8
$950
d. Altemative "D"
1
2
8
$950
e. Alternative "E"
1
4
16
$1,760
1.8 Lift Station Electrical Schematics
16
20
20
$5,840
1.9 Odor Control
8
8
16
$3,160
1.10 Cost Estimates
8
8
24
$3,760
711 Draft Report
8
16
40
8
$6,120
1.12 Review Meeting
4
8
$1,400
113 Final Report
4
8
20
$2,900
114 Submittal
4
8
4
$1,320
TOTAL HOURS
821
2141
256
241
1
1781
594
LABOR EXPENSE TOTALS
$11,480
$22,470 1
$19,200
$1,440 1
1
$720
$55,310
TCSB NON -LABOR ESTIMATE
Plotting
10 sheets x 2 submittals x$7 /sheet
$140
Reproduction (Plans)
10 sheets x 20 sets x $0.70 /sheet
$140
Reproduction (Reports)
50 sheets x 20 sets x $0.10 /sheet
$100
Deliveries
$150
Postage
E50
Mileage
10 trips @ $15/trip
5150
Computer Use
24 hours CADD $10/hr
$240
dminisVative
15.00% E146
NON-LABOR TOTAL
$1,116
TOTAL ESTIMATE 1 $56,426