PD106-CS 880818The City With A Beautiful Future
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
P.O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
214 - 462 - 0022
Date: August 18, 1988
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTHENT
Case #: PD-106
LOCATION:
East of Denton Tap Road and south of Hidden Valley Drive.
REQUEST:
Zoning Change from 2F-9 to a Planned Development for SF-12
and SF-9.
APPLICANT:
Hr. David Phillips
453 Hidden Valley Drive
Coppell, Texas 75019
HISTORY:
A preliminary and final plat with variances was approved by the City
Council on January 8, 1985. Hr. Phillips requested three (3) variances:
1) no dedicated streets; 2) no alleys; 3) no street lights; and they
were approved with the stipulation that the applicant be atreeable to a
City initiated zoning change on the property fro~ 2F-9 to SF-12.
This case (ZC-511) vas brought to City staffVs attention that this item had
not been taken care of, as stated in the Sanuary 8, 1985 City Council
a~tnutes, and staff has been working on this case for the past year to
resolve this matter.
The City Council remanded the case back to staff to look at some type of
PD-zoning classification, and to address variance requests made by H~.
Phillips.
STAFF RECO10~NDATION:
Several variances are being requested by the developer.
They are as follows:
VARIANCE il: Request for no alley.
STAFF COMMENT: There are presently no alleys in the surrounding neighborhood.
pick-up and utilities must be located in the front of lots.
Trash
VARIANCE 12: No sidewalks.
STAFF COMMENT: Sidewalks are required as per the Subdivision Ordinance, and the
surrounding properties do not have sidewalksl however, sidewalks serve
the purpose of supporting foot traffic, thereby offering safety for
pedestrians.
VARIANCE ~3, ~4, ~5, ~6:
Water mains and sewer mains be accepted.
STAFF COMMENT: Please see attached staff comments from Ginn, Inc. and the Public
Works Department.
VARIANCE #5:
That the City agree to release and abandon any/all easements on the
property if and when a sewer line must be relocated at no expense to
the owner.
STAFF COMMENT: This issue is not appropriate to be addressed during zoning, and
should be addressed during the platting stage.
VARIANCE #6: 24' wide crowned streets with surface drainage along each side.
STAFF COMMENT: Please see attached comments from Ginn, Inc. and the Public Works
Department.
VARIANCE t7: Request that water and sewer impact fees be waived.
STAFF COMMENT: Staff will address this item during the meeting.
ANALYSIS:
The variances requested by the Developer are all issues that are
normally addressed during platting procedures. If this PD is approved
as a concept plan, the Zoning Ordinance regulations require that prior
to any construction on the property, a detailed site plan must be
submitted and approved by the City Council. This means that more
detailed information must be submitted prior to the issuance of a
building permit, and that this plan will be approved in concept only.
Therefore, staff recommends that the variances be deferred until
either a detailed site plan or preliminary plat have been submitted.
STF.REPORT/FORM
PZAGN2
July 15,1988
Taryon Bowman
P & Z Coordinator
City of Coppell
As requested by the City Council in the 4-12-88 regular meeting I am
applying for PD zoning on my property as described.
Beginning at a point in the west ROW line of Hidden Valley Drive
being the NE corner of Phillips Addition ~I, thence east 50' to a
point in the east ROW line of Hidden Valley Drive being the NW
corner of Phillips Addition ~II, thence south 15', thence SE 165.92'
along the 105.63 radius of lot ~1 Phillips Addition ~II, thence east
144.23' to the SE corner of lot ~2, thence north 120' to the NE cor-
ner of lot ~2, thence east 300.93' along the south line of Northlake
Woodlands section ~6 to the NW corner of Phillips Addition ~III,
thence south 120', thence east 15', thence south 20', thence east
119.32' to the SE corner of Phillips Addition ~III, thence south
369.17' along the west line of Northlake Woodlands section ~4 to
a point being the NE corner of lot ~1 block ~3 of Northlake Wood-
lands section ~5, thence west 200', thence south 142.75' along the
west line of lot ~2, thence N 14°56'50" west 20.98', thence N 66°48'28''
west 46.35', thenceN 56'33'49" W 103.07', thence west 291.88' to a
point being the SE corner of First Baptist Church property, thence
north along the east line of First Baptist Church property 350',
thence east 53.22' to a point being the SE corner of Phillips Add.~I,
thence north 35.99' to the corner of Phillips Add. ~I, thence NW
245.97' along the 155.63' radius of Phillips Add. ~I, thence north
15' to the point of beginning containing approximately 7.5 acres of
land.
As discussed in the 4-12-88 City Council meeting I am asking for
approval of the following variances as a permanent and binding
contract that will allow the Planned Development that began in 1980
to be completed at any future date with these variances:
1. No alleys required. (none in surrounding development)
2. No sidewalks required." " " "
3. 6" sewermains are acceptable (maximum of 20 connections)
4. 6" watermains are acceptable ( " - 20 -
5. The City of Coppell agrees to release and abandon any/all
easements on the property if and when a sewer line must be
relocated at no expense to owner.
6. A~2~' wide crowned, concrete street with surface drainage
along each side would be accepted. No underground storm
sewer would be required. No curb and gutter would be required.
Proper culvert diameter and inverted drive approaches will be
required at time of sU~4iNi~on.
7. No water impact fees or sewer impact fees will be charged
on this property since pro-rata to cover these was pai~
in 1982.
I believe this planned development will be compatible with the
surrounding development and dispel any fears of how the property
might be used in the future.
Sincerely,
David Phillips, owner tract 20.1 & tract 28
COPPELL PUBLIC WOIU[S
August 9, 1988
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Planning & Zoning Department
Public Works Departments
Review of: Preliminary - Hagar Containers Addition; Zoning
- Phillips Addition, Gifford Hill, Salernos Restaurant
Phillips Addition
The variancy and special conditions are inappropriately submitted
and should be submitted at time of platting. However, if this
is acceptable for Council review, staff submits the following:
Variance 1 & 2
Inspections)
- No comments (better addressed by Building
Variance 3 - The Subdivision Ordinance/ Standard Construction Details
require alleys, sidewalks and drainage systems in new developments.
The area contiguous to this property does not have sidewalks, alleys
or underground storm sewers. If this variance is approved by
Council, it would be Public Work's recommendation that it not be
allowed for the construction of inverted driveways with sufficient
culverts being installed during the building phase. Also, once
the infrastructure should be installed prior to b~ilding permits
being issued, every area within the drainage way be completed sodded,
and that this exist throughout the construction of homes in the
area.
Variance 4 - The area to the east and south of this development
does not have curbs and presently is facilitated by 6" water and
6" sanitary sewer. The utilities will be connecting to a 6" line
and as long as the Fire Department is satisfied with the fire flow
capability, staff has no objection to 6". It is felt, however,
that curb and gutter is necessary.
Variance 5 - Staff feels this will be at Council's descretion.
Variance 6 - Staff is unclear to the request of this variance and
needs further information before recommendation can be formulated.
GINN, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
August 11, 1988
Taryon Bowman
Kevin Peiffe//~
Phillips Addition IV
We have made a cursory review of the preliminary plans for
paving, drainage, water and sanitary sewer for the above
referenced project.
In general, variances number 2 and 3 requested, waive most of the
requirements of the sub-division ordinance. We are not in favor
of these requested variances since they produce a sub-standard
sub-division. Appearance, maintenance and fire protection are
some of the reasons our standards are what they are in the city's
sub-division ordinance.
We will be present at the meetings to discuss any item in detail
if requested.
cc: Russell Doyle
17103 Preston Road · Suite 100 · LB 118 · Dallas, Texas 75248 · Phone 214/248-4900
July 27,1988
Taryon Bowman
P & Z Coordinator
City of Coppell
As requested by the Review Committee yesterday I am providing
proof of pro-rata payment,letters of acceptance of the existing
water and sewer lines,a rough drawing of the proposed drainage
showing the elevations of all lots in this PD and all surrounding
lots, arough drawing of the existing and proposed water and sewer
layout. I also show a typical drive approach/ leadwalk detail.
I will bring a copy of the as-built sewer line to the meeting of
August 2.
The property is now graded generaly to the elevations shown on
this plan.
Thank you,
David Phillips
471-2042
Hinutes of August 18, 1988
City of Coppell
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Coppell met in
pre-session at 7:00 p.m. and in regular session at 7:30 p.m., on
Thursday, August 18, 1988, in the Coppell Town Center, 255 Parkway
Boulevard, Coppell, Texas 75019. The following members were present:
Chairman Joe Munsch
Commissioner Robert Green
Commissioner William Johnson
Commissioner David Thomas
Commissioner Marsha Tunnell
Commissioner Peyton Weaver
Commissioner Pope was absent.
Also present were City Engineer Russell Doyle, P&Z Coordinator Taryon
Bowman, Consultant Engineer Kevin Peiffer and Administrative Secretary
Linda Glidewell.
Chairman Munsch called the meeting to order and everyone was asked to
stand while Commissioner Green gave the invocation.
Item 4:
Approval of Hinutes of July 21, 1988
Commissioner Thomas moved to approve the minutes of July 21,
1988 as submitted. Commissioner Weaver seconded the motion;
motion carried (6-0) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners
Green, Johnson, Thomas, Tunnell and Weaver voting in favor of
the motion.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item 5:
To consider amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Section 29.15(3)A and (3)(F), to provide that a private club
shall not be located closer than 300 feet of any residential
structure and defining residential structure.
P&Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman made the introduction to the
Commission.
Chairman Munsch then opened the public hearing and asked for
persons wishing to speak in opposition to the request. There
were none. He then asked for persons wishing to speak in
favor of the request. Again there were none. The public
hearing was then closed.
Following discussion, Commissioner Tunnel1 moved to deny the
amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner
Johnson seconded the motion; motion carried (5-1) with
Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green, Johnson, Thomas and
Tunnell voting in favor of the motion, and Commissioner Weaver
voting against the motion.
Item 6: To consider approval of a zoning change, Case tPD-106, from
(2F-9) to a Planned Development for (SF-12) and (SF-9),
Hinutss of August 18, 1988
Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 2
DRAFT
located east of Denton Tap Road and south of Hidden Valley
Drive, at the request of Hr. David Phillips.
Again P&Z Coordinator Taryon Boatman introduced the item to the
Commission.
Hr. David Phillips, the property owner, made the presentation
to the Commission.
Chairman Munsch then opened the public hearing and asked for
persons wishing to speak in opposition to the request. There
were none. He then asked for persons wishing to speak in
favor of the request. Those persons speaking were:
Leon HcCaskill
Jane Pomykal
BriJ La1
Brian Tompkins
138 Sandy Oak
537 Oakcrest
149 Headovcreek
437 Hidden Valley
The public hearing was then declared closed.
Following discussion, Commissioner Johnson moved to approve
the zoning change for PD-106, with a special note for the
record, that we are not approving any of the variances.
Commissioner Thomas seconded the motion; motion carried (4-2)
vrlth Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green, Johnson and
Thomas voting in favor of the motion, and Commissioners
Tunnell and Weaver voting against the motion.
Item 7:
To consider approval of a zoning change, Case tZC-515, from
(A) Agricultural to (LI) Light Industrial to allow the devel-
opment of an industrial park, located approximately 1,600 feet
east of Denton Tap Road, south of the St. Louis and Southwest-
ern Railroad and fronting along Beltline Road, at the request
of Northlake Beltline Limited Partnership.
Taryon Bowman again introduced the item to the Commission.
Nathan Haier of Nathan Haier Engineering, was present to make
the presentation to the Commission. Hr. Haier stated that he
is representing the property owner, Hr. Thompson. Hr. Peter
Staks of Nathan ~ater Engineering was also present.
Chairman Hunsch then opened the public hearing and asked for
persons wishing to speak in opposition to this request. There
were none. He then asked for persons wishing to speak in
favor of the request. Again there were none. The public
hearing was then declared closed.
Following discussion, Commissioner Johnson moved to approve
Case ~ZC-515. Commissioner Green seconded the motion; motion