Loading...
PD110R-CS 980917 CITY OF COPPELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT CASE NO.: PD-110R, PECAN HOLLOW P & Z HEARING DATE: September 17, 1998 C.C. HEARING DATE: October 13, 1998 LOCATION: 325 Beechwood Lane. SIZE OF AREA: 8,280 s.f.; approximately 2,250 s.f. 2-story structure and proposed approximately 800 s.f. 2-story addition CURRENT ZONING: PD-SF-9 REQUEST: Amendment to the Planned Development. APPLICANT: Applicant: Mitchell and Kay Sclmurman 325 Beechwood Dr Coppell TX 75019 972-462-8023 HISTORY: City Council rezoned this property from SF-12 to PD-SF9 in 1990. In 1992 Council amended the PD site plan to permit a 23' front yard setback on Lot 17, Block C (324 Beechwood Lane), instead of 25'. TRANSPORTATION: Beechwood Lane is a 28'-wide residential sn'eet within a 50'-wide right-of-way. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North- Single-family residential; SF-7 & PD-Residential South - Single-family residential; TC, SF-9 & PD-SF9 East - Single-family residential; PD Residential West - Single-family residential; SF-7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows the property as suitable for medium-density residential uses. Item # 6 DISCUSSION: Since the property is within a Planned Development District, the Board of Adjustment has no jurisdiction over side yard variances. Therefore, because the applicant wants to extend a building addition one foot within a required side yard, the appropriate procedure is to request a PD site plan amendment. The purpose is to accommodate a proposed new washer/dryer area. This can be accomplished with or without the site plan amendment, because Section 32-3 of the Zoning Ordinance permits the projection of architectural features such as window sills and cornices by as much as 12 inches. However, to do that would require cantilevering the floor out from the foundation. With no foundation upon which to rest the exterior brick veneer, the practical solution would be to face this portion of the structure with wood siding, while the applicant and the applicant's next-' door neighbor prefer an all-brick exterior. Consequently the site plan amendment accomplishes a better result with no greater intrusion on the side yard than that which is already permissible. RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The planning staff recommends approval subject to the site plan and building elevations as submitted. ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the request 2) Recommend disapproval of the request 3) Recommend modification of the request 4) Take under advisement for reconsideration at a later date. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Site Plan, Elevations & Applicant's Supporting Material Item # 6