Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PD152R-DR 970807
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING August 7, 1997 Response to Staff Comments UPPER IMAGE CAR WASH Agree & have Agree & will Have questions provided provide & want to discuss accordingly accordingly at meeting Disagree & want to proceed with case as presented SP1. SP2. SP3. SP4. Monument sign Sonic concurrence on access drive Southbound deceleration lane Utility & drainage plans Engineering Department Comments regarding: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Planning Department Comments regarding: 1. Riverchase Architectural Review Board [] [] [] [] 2. Monument sign [] [] [] [] 3. Attached sign [] [] [] [] 4. Building material specifications [] [] [] [] 5. Removal of front driveway [] [] [] [] 6. Landscape ratios [] [] [] [] 7. Dwarf lilyturf [] [] [] [] SP5. LP1. Roadway impact fees Landscaping on utility easements Agree & have provided accordingly Agree & will provide accordingly Have questions & want to discuss at meeting Disagree & want to proceed with case as presented Building Inspection Comments regarding: 1. Drying shed 2. Landscape shortage 3. Monument sign Fire Prevention Conunents regarding: 1. Fire lanes 2. Nearest fire hydrant 3. Number of stories Leisure Services Department Comments regarding: 1. Irrigation plan 2. Fire lane width [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] TU Electric Commems regarding: 1. Easements 2. Load information Agree & have provided accordingly Agree & will provide accordingly Have questions & warn to discuss at meeting Disagree & want to proceed with case as presented