PD145R(CH)-NR 960912Since clearly over half the houses do not have the space to accommodate a backyard car shelter
with room to head in and park cars between the car shelter and the alley pavement, what type
of ear shelters, if any, do you think the city should permit on the 67 smallest lots? (cheek as many
as you think appropriate)
33 % attached 1-ear garage with manual garage door
33 % attached 2-car garage with manual garage door
67% attached 1-ear garage with garage door opener
83 % attached 2-ear garage with garage door opener
33 % detached 1-car garage with manual garage door
33 % detached 2-ear garage with manual garage door
50% detached 1-ear garage with garage door opener
67% detached 2-car garage with garage door opener
50% attached 1-car carport
83% attached 2-car carport
33% detached 1-car carport
67% detached 2-ear carport
0% open, uncovered parking only
If our standards permit ear shelters within 15 feet of the near side of the alley pavement, and
sometimes even closer, should we apply higher standards on lots that can accommodate higher
standards?
33% The standard should be the same. Whatever we are willing to
accept on the smaller lots we should be willing to accept on the
larger lots as well.
67% If possible there should be space to head-in park between the
structure and the alley. We should accept less only in those cases
where space is unavailable or topography makes providing more
setback impractical.
If a structure or parking will occur in the rear 10 feet of a lot, do you think the ordinance
language can be drafted adequately to preserve proper clearance for turning, or do you think the
property owner should submit a layout of the turning movements for review?
17% I think it would be best for the City to review a site plan.
83 % I think it would be best for the City Ordinance to specify the standards.