CC approval on 4/10/90 iTEM CAPTION:
PUBLIC HEARING To comsider a zoning change request, Case #ZC-SZ4, from (R)
Retail, to (SF-9) Single-Family-9, located at 316 W. Bethel Road, at the request of Mrs. J,li~nno Otts.
SUBMITTED BY: S't'AFF' REP.: Taryon Bowman, P&Z Coordinator
e tgnat ~'
OTHER REP-.-:-
EVALUATION OF ITEM: DATE:
Date of Planning and Zoning Meeting: March 15, 1990
Decision of Planning & Zoning Commission: Approved (6-0).
Applicant is requesting approval of a zoning change from (R) Retail to (SF-9) Single-Family-9. Case
~ZC-SZ4 was first submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission on February 15, 19905 however,
the Commission tabled the zoning change request until the March 15th meeting in ca'der to review
decisions made by a-joint session of the City Council and the Historical Committee. At that combined
meeting, it was determined that the rezoning of this parcel would not have an impact on the Historical
Committee's plans.
--- .,~ ,-- ~ , . f'
BUDGET AMT.: N/A AMT. ESTIM~ATED: AMT. +/- BL-DGET:
COM~,ENTS: FINANCIAL REVIEW BY:
bEGAL REVIEW BY: REVIEWED BY CM: ~ /
AGENDA REQ FORM
0588DS
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTM. ENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE ~: ZC-524
P & Z HEARING DATE: March !5, 1990
C. C. HEARING DATE: April i0, 1990
LOCATION: 316 W. Bethel Road
REQUEST: Consideration of a zoning change from (R) Retail, to (SF-9]
Single Family-9.
SIZE OF AREA: 5.4 acres
APPLICANT: Mrs. Julianna Otts
HISTORY: There has been no recent zoning activity on this parcel.
The tract to the north and east {approximately 20 acres)
was considered for rezoning to residential use. The
acception of the amending ordinance is, however, tied to
plat approval not yet accomplished. At the Planning
Con~nission meeting on February 15, 1990, the Commission
tabled the zoning case until the next meeting in order to
review decisions made by a joint session of the Historical
Ccm~ittee and the City Council.
T.~SPORTATiON:
Bethel Road is classified as a six-lane divided
thoroughfare; today it is a :wo-!ane street.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North- Single family structures; (R) & (SF} zoning
East - Single family structure_s: iR: '.oninq
~...,u ~.~ 7acan-~; ~' R ) :~ '"
:Jest - 7acanr.; i.R~ ~'onin~
COh~P~HENSiVE ?LAN:
~=~=d for ~i~i~-if~mli-; "~e~-~=' 'lses
ANALYSIS:
As was discussed during the February Planning Commission meeting, this
request for zoning change complies with the comprehensive !and use plan,
therefore, staff has no objection to this proposal. In addition to
complying with the future land use plan. this request will allow the
property owner to legally utilize the property for a use not permitted in
(R) Retail zoning - the keeping and maintaining of horses.
This tract had been used for boarding horses by the land owner for years.
Approximately a year and one-half ago, the owner moved away, took her
horses with her, and technically lost non-conforming status in this (R)
zoning district. After considerable difficulty in leasing her former
home, the applicant finally rented the property last winter with the
understanding That the lessee could board a horse. Shortly after the
renter moved in, a warning was issued stating that the keeping of horses
was not allowed in (R) districts. The City has cooperated with the land
owner as she goes through the re-zoning process, and has agreed to wait
until the outcome of this case before pursuing more aggressive compliance
with our zoning laws. If the zoning is granted, of course, a zoning
violation will no longer be present on the subject tract and this land
owner will: 1) comply with the comprehensive land use plan; and 2) be
allowed to continue a use on her property which had been long standing.
ALTERNATI~ZES: 1) Approval of the requested change of zoning
2) Denial of the change of zoning
ATTAC~{MENTS: 1) Zoning Exhibit
ZC524STF
Minutes of March 15, 1990 ~~-AFT
Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 2
right-of-way. In addition, the applicants request suggested
realignment of Cotton Road, eliminating Southwestern, both west
of Freeport Parkway. Staff has no objections to the
realignment/deletion request. Mr. Sieb further stated that the
Focus Group is studying all the thoroughfares west of Denton Tap
Road. He then stated that K.R. Marshall of Barton-Aschman was
at the meeting to answer any technical questions. In closing,
Mr. Sieb stated that the outcome of this amendment will directly
affect two of the plats to be considered later on the agenda.
Civil Engineer Shohre Daneshmand stated that the Public Works
Department is recommending the four-lane divided thoroughfare.
Mr. K.R. Marshall of Barton-Aschman was present to represent
this item before the Commission. Mr. Marshall started that they
basically did a more detailed technical analysis of the traffic
in the area, and have determined that a six-lane thoroughfare is
not necessary in this area.
Following discussion Commissioner Gross moved to amend the
Thoroughfare Plan per the applicants request, and from a
six-lane divided thoroughfare to a four-lane divided
thoroughfare. Commissioner Tunnell seconded the motion; motion
carried (4-2) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Gross,
Redford and Tunnell voting in favor of the motion, and
Commissioners Green and Scott voting against the motion.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item 6: Consider a zoning change, Case #ZC-524, from (R) Retail to
(SF-9) Single Family-9, located at 316 W. Bethel Road, at the
request of Julianna Otts.
P&Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman introduced the item to the
Commission. Ms. Bowman stated that at the last Planning and
Zoning meeting the Commission informed Mrs. Otts it would not be
necessary for her to attend this meeting. She stated that this
zoning change is being requested in order to allow the boarding
of horses on the property. Ms. Bowman then stated that the
Historic Committee had met, and this request does fit in with
their intentions for the area.
Chairman Munsch opened the public hearing and asked for persons
wishing to speak in opposition to this request. There were
none. He then asked for persons wishing to speak in favor of
the request. Again there were none. The public hearing was
then declared closed.
Minutes of March 15, 1990
Planning & Zoning Commission
Page 3
Following discussion Commissioner Redford moved to approve Case
#ZC-524. Commissioner Gross seconded the motion; motion carried
(6-0) with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green, Gross,
Redford, Scott and Tunnell voting in favor of the motion.
PLATTING
Item 7: Consider approval of a final plat for Meadows Addition, Section
6, Phase 2, located at the southeast corner of Parkway Boulevard
and Samuel Boulevard, at the request of Meadowglen Properties.
P&Z Coordinator Taryon Bowman introduced the item to the
Commission. Ms. Bowman stated this plat is actually Phase 2 of
the Meadows Addition, or Case #PD-105. If approved, this plat
will allow the construction of thirteen single-family structures
on 2.68 acres. She further stated that all DRC comments have
been addressed; therefore, staff has no objections to the plat.
Mr. Glen Hinckley was present to represent this item before the
Commission. He stated that all utilities are already in place,
and that this property should have been included with the final
plat with D.R. Horton's project directly adjacent to this
property. Mr. Hinckley stated that it was due to an oversight
that this property was not included.
Following discussion Commissioner Tunnell moved to approve the
final plat for the Meadows Addition, Section 6, Phase 2.
Commissioner Scott seconded the motion; motion carried (6-0)
with Chairman Munsch and Commissioners Green, Gross, Redford,
Scott and Tunnell voting in favor of the motion.
Item 8: Consider approval of a final plat for Park West Commerce
Center Addition (formerly Gateway Park @ Coppell), located at
the southwest corner of Southwestern Drive and Beltline Road, at
the request of Prentis/Copley Properties.
Director of Planning Gary L. $ieb introduced the item to the
Commission. Mr. Sieb stated that this is a 328 acre tract, with
the preliminary plat already approved. He also stated that
staff would recommend approval of this final plat, however, he
would like to point out that the Public Works Department has
several concerns, as outlined in their memo dated March 14,
1990. Mr. Sieb also stated that the applicant has included a
letter dated March 15, 1990, which says that they do agree to
follow through with all their construction drawings and
everything will be submitted for City approval within ninety
(90) days of this plat going to City Council.
c:_)ncessic-~ .'-~.-_~n(i '~,-' ~r~v,.'~ :-;P'rk. 2~is .,'::.c'~'],-.-,/ ~-..~ .'..'. h.~ corr.-'.r:~
fo.~wa.rd i!.p. eh~ ~ p..-:
~CN-',2-C:.Z 'B'..:A.~P - Co'_~nc~'ma.n Rcherls'c-n J.n~c_'.rme:.'; the t'..'.:._:r.r_:i.~ ..-_.~.:-2~
· '"' ~- : ¼ .~r-! '
~h~- i' .i.a ~ ~<).n_.~ and ;,-, ew ~a_f.' F Nece:qti v -m~_-.e ~.-.) '! (-.,.':k .~-~ ~'~
c~ _ ..; .~ ~ .... :^~ C. ~ '< .................. . .... N .... 2 ...... . .
C:ounci..!man Mc.r.rc~ also reported on the Metro,:_:re_~:.:t Yc,,~th a~.d [:'~i.[y
":~:"" cee ~:] c~:~ ~,-;; ~'~ ,' : ~ ~.=.c -" ~ = '~ ~'::+ ~"~ ~T'' f "~,aD.~ i_~
: ~...'~r"'cpr'"-'a~_.'...~.:. _:_~ D~i'.- _~O S~,~.. P,',,' ~,-~- c..=-" ~..~ ~, ...~q~.~ =~'"' u..'-~:'F-]l'.e
...."'e~),~'-s,' ....... C-'. ~.~. ........ ~anaco~ with ,c.c.~p~es c',f the se.cc'nd quarter reuort fr,,:')m
...... ".z-:ice c,n Aqinq. A,~,-'~-~ ,~j ..... ~.-~1.].'..: Cou.nci.-ma.,:- :~'.,.c, rt ..... -"--,",~ ..... '.-' :.~.--au
the North r.=n,~a'l i:exas ,'", ,, r-~ f : .....
i-. te~ =~,.-]d~:~ for :it _. east. h .,z, "o n t ~ -- '}' 'reoort " ....... =.'~ '~ ~c~ -"e d'rus
;.~.~'~i~.+~'~ ~ .-~.:.~' q~,,,~,: cc-~m_-'.-+~ v,::~. C'!ficer u:~.- ' inc
Staff :' ': a '-'-_son Councilman ~.J~ 1_ s.'.'.F., then re..'~u~?ed -;-.e ~ e a
u.r~-'-:~eat-'-sn ~.~ ,-~ the Asr.ii 24 '.~'?l'] ac~--'i~ c'::)r.-"e'rninc the
'-': ~Po drug ew..:~_ ..;_ess prc..o~;~'.~
/~ ?_'(.'.- 5 2,1 , f_, .... ....... ,"e } 'Rata -.;_ i , e~,_.. "q ~:-:- ~, } ::J [ na_l. e-F'am~_._] ,,_c,; _ ,
J u'ii.anPa C.'-t t s.
~'.'.'.' ro(-'~ 'r ' __.(.. ........ ...~
=o._ C.f.' p I ;~n,~ { nc and Com~unitv Services G~:'~v S: ~.~, :n+'~ ',~ ',"~'~
-e-~c '~'~' ~" t~'~' '~ '~ .... . Pi .......................... · .....
commission has recommended a,.eprovai of this zc-ning .:-:ha:a'~]e. '2?-e
.~eques-~ is [:.,einq ma!e in c..~-der u,c a"!c,,.; -~'ne '£'/ca..~-':ii.~o'. .,:= hc.F:?es C-h
t~= nropert,/. "['he ~ii .... ;,- n,}mmit~ has met a~,'~ this request cioes
t._i ~ i__~ w~ th Tnei r intent: ..... for u.h~s are~,. !'--{aver ~"-~.~....
~,-.' ik~q,,,~ ~.r~,i the ~ub!tc. hearino an.i as'ke,i t'(:r ff~r,q.--~ p,--.rs,-,~q
'...;.is, n 5c s~.-ea~ f(;.r tire prop-ese-.:; z(:.n:.q.'.l cnanq, e, there WC;.Fe RC.'le. ~-]e
~hen asked for t.h:)se u, erscns who w-'.;~'e to ~"-'--'"' i ns~ the
_v~.-~.._, hq. ,.. :_..-.: ,.~... ~'-~ :~"'~= ._. .-; ~. ~ -~ ~'~ i.n. there .'.,..-'e~:. ..... ~.,=._: ....... =.'~ ~_ p.s,--:~. - r.. "~ ~'- ~: ~ :.....~ ..... ...~,', ~.,;c--: s.
':iec'ared closed. F.:)!!ow'~_nq dis;"ussLon bv the Count{J, C,.)unc!".'.'?.,..an
subm { et~,i Count ~ !man Roberts,on ~ -"-'~,-~.-'~ ? ~,~ m,".-'~' ~ oR moti,on
,,, ..... . ._e...;:.._~ .... , .............. ;
.............. w: ~... ?.ayor Pro TeF. ~,~ I i ke.~.q, oR- , ~lr:£.i (;c;'~.qc ~ '~ ~ ~' ........
< ,-.~m ;r' "--~,m',~ [~ '~ ~"~-,g,-:m V-.'.lti ~ t~'-~
~'~ ~ POBL.!C ~;Fk, RTNu': C'¢-n~:~, ~e{-n -:f'
~_e.,. 8: ........... , ......... :]e_~,_.c.., .... an amendme-:~t to the City
,'q'- ~ .'2o[:,[~e~= :: ~'.':, =t=~. ...... q'-~.,-'~-'~,",¼{~re El ..~.'-~. ...... ~o ~'~:'~".¢'~., ~ .....
w~,.;~ _For Southwestern n~,..._. .... e,/.":e,~,; .... .... waz { ~r(::. ~.'.-.~ s. e:::]. ~, :-~.~. ...... .. c'ha~,o~ i......
.... .~_e ..:~ ........... =_[x-i ~:~= ,'~: v ,.';~r:~ · : ' ~'. ~=~ ..: -.
way} tO-' ~c. ur-iane un,l~, '..r';~," .'...~-',.-'.,-'~.' feet c. 9
~; CF....~- C ~ -W~V ' ~ ~a i i cP?:~r.C ~+ :'-'.: S'Z .-_. 'oF R,Dad ~ ~,-'~
...... - e :-- , e' ,- ~"teFr: . ~ , b,.-.)~'.q
~ :[ruination of ~h.~ extension .) .... :,.)~,_nw...>. fir:ye
wes: o.! '.[.'.~eeport ll'.~iFkk~Et'./.
.................. ~ ................ ,~., Services C:.arv Sled a.:sc, made the
iis~ed a:~ a uubl_Lc hearino, it is not an -'of'f~_c:ia'~ puh':ic hearing
T!:--~ ~.~,, ': red for zen:' nq ...,:.-~_..~e=,.-"~-'~'- ~'- H'-:,:~,,~r.~..~ ~ , :~ -: c: ?-.~.-i......, nc. (::.'.}ndu.'.l:~ec
such ;r, order to cive interested parties -~, c. pp.,.:.rtun:ev t,, speak
· ~,,~-- -,' . ........... ~_n the
Mr .:-:ieh informed the Counc.{.[ that three p .... :~.,..rt?
a ~ f e..';~ed ::are?. had requesTe-n ~.wo .-Imencime.~ .i s ~ '- c::~_
thorough'~are p'l. an. The f'.': ret requested a?end'~ent was for the
realignment of Cotter_ 'Rea(;. and e_l.'imtnaticn cf the S.'::-ur. nwestern
:-~ou'..ievard extension. ..... :.i'he second amendment ~;;_~s ~e .... ]u(..e the
right-of-w.~v (feur-'Jane d,.iv~ded h£ghwa¥ 'f~z'..-.)m r)ento, n '?ap/Be!tiine
.~o Freepor~ ;. and v,,--, foot ~-: ~ht-o.,.-'-wav '.' fc;ur-] aris ~;: ~ ~ ,.i~_:-i ~
.......... : ...... . _. , .......... , _ ~ ; ~' ;..;~.'..~,m...~..] ~.:g t
The '-"h,,'~o,,,~-~are ~'-'ar. be amended ~ ~nciude a fsur-].sn-c- ~zv_~-'~-,<~.,
Page 3 cf ..'.'~
~ , /