Big Cedar/FP-CS 921026 f 1 /!--~'-':----. ~--~-'"q.'~ .... '~;~ · ---: /~
'~,/ /,i --~ ,-..' ~; ~..// · ,' ' i___, P.O. Box 478
.... !/ fl- "~'.,-. .: ~' ,':----.:...:-~i-=-:~7/ ~
///,) Coppell. Texas 75019
The City With A Beautiful Future 214-462-0022
October 26, 1992
Mr. Tim House
Matthews Southwest
5220 Spring Valley Lane #500
Dallas, Texas 75240
RE: BIG CEDAR SUBDIVISION- EASEMENT
Dear Mr. House:
This morning you posed a question to me regarding an access easement provided by the
developer of the Big Cedar subdivision. Specifically, you asked if the abutting home owner had
any liability for property technically owned by the home owner, but placed in a 10 foot access
easement to provide access to park land behind the land in question. I further understand that
the ten foot access easement will contain a five-foot walkway, will have screening fences
(provided by the adjacent land owners on their individual properties), and will contain no other
improvements such as plan landscaping, irrigation system, fountains, etc.
In a subsequent conversation with Larry Jackson, our City Attorney, and having described the
question as outlined above, I was advised that the home owner will not have liability for the area
contained within the access easement.
I believe this response from our legal counsel addresses the question posed this morning. If,
however, I misinterpreted your question, or if additional information or clarification is needed,
please contact me at your convenience.
C!.s truly,.
Gary ~L. Sieb, A.I.C.P.
Director of Planning & Community Services
GLS/lsg
house.eas