PD115-NR 910217February 17, 1991
Dear Mayor Wolfe,
The following homeowners and taxpayers obiect to the proposed zoning and
drainage platt of the land east of ,Southern Bell Dr. and north of Plantation Dr.
for the following reasons:
1 ) Any usa of the land beyond its natural state will impose seYere hal-llShll~ on
the property and safety of the homeowners along Stream (32 in Shadowrldge and
along 13rapevine Creek in Northlake Woodlands and Creekview. Homeowners have
already experience rising water up to the easement line. If construction is to
proceed, proper drainage must be addressed to prevent flooding and land erosion.
2)For over two years the city has ~.llJJB~l_~,G_[~Lexistlng drainage errosion
problems along Stream I32 by lot A:~O as well as between lots A26 and A27.
Some work was done at both sites, but the problem of repeated cave-ins between
A26 and A27 was just patched because the,cost of repair was too expensive. The
concern is that the city will also have this attitude towards any new problems
caused by the increased water drainage.
3) D. QDAJ.t~- If structures are to be built on this platt, we would support zoning
of at least $F9 with the following considerations~ lots should have minimums of
8 ft. side yards, 25 ft. front yards, 20 ft. back yards and only 35% lot coverage
on 9000 sq. ft. lots with minimums of1850 sq. ft. living area homes
4) Esthetic problems between perimeter two story houses along 3outhern
Belle Dr. and lot A20 with unlandscaped wooden fences along the southern
proberty border, any view of alleys or trash cans by existing homeowners, and
any cement retaining walls or views of drainage pipes or culverts is
unacceptable. The alternative to retaining existing property value is one story
houses with a 6 ft. landscaped brick wall along bordering lots between the two
subdivisions. After all, Plantation Dr. is the subdivision entrance for Shadow
Ridge Estates and any views of the aforementions items would be an eye sore,
5) Crime problems are associated with alleys. Bordering existing
homeowners chosa front entry versus alley access due to this concern. Homes
along the west and south exposure should not have alleys.
6) Prevent possible costly downstream erroslon damage from proposed drainage
and fence posts on a southern retaining wall of Stream (32.
cc: Peyton Weaver
David fhomas
Tom Morton
B ill Smother man
dim Oowan
Ron Roberson
John Nelson
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
5
..
1
11
1
13..
1
1
1
ITT
Peyton Weaver
David f boreas
Tom Morton
Bill SrnothePman
dim Oowan
Ron Roberson
dohn Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
9
cc: Pe~ton Weaver'
David Thomas
Tom Morton
B ill Smotherman
Jim rowan
Ron Roberson
dohn Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
.,.,~ .? ....
· '.,:..".
:?
:i:i:i:?..'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.iz;
:::::::::::::::::::::: .:.:.:.:.:.:::, ·
:.:.:.::.~ .:.:.. :.:.:....
I r WlnVii I F
' #d~Hlc#kt~llU'J[ ,n~
DR:~FT
DENTON TAP ROAD ×
X
Jl
fiji,
iff il
cc: Peyton Weaver
David [homas
Tom Morton
Bill Smotherman
,Jim Cowan
Ron Roberson
John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
~ "" " '/'" '-7, 7-/r-- rj J < ~.::_/ -"-": '~'' '' '" ~''
_ ' ' -'~'/Y,i/.'2~ ~
~' - · ' ' r: , /ge Ft',, /Y~--,:~ ~-). 4~:; ,.¢~s.
5
~1 ! ? ' , ., _-/, , ., - /
/ . -~ /'F~
13.
. . ,-,
Peyton Weaver
Da¥io l Inomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smother'man
,Jim Oowan
Ron Robe~'son
,John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
3
1
1
1
13..
14,.
1
16,
1
20,
21
22
23,
24.
25
26,
27.
28.
29,
30,
31
32,
33.
34,
35.
36,
37
38.
39.
40
cc: Peyton Weaver
David Thomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smotherman
Jim Cowan
Ron Roberson
John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
10.
11
12,
13
14i
15,
16,
17
March 11, 1991
Dear Mayor Wolfe,
The following homeowners and taxpayers object to the proposed zoning and
drainage plat of the land east of Southern Belle Drive and north of
Plantation Drive for the following reasons:
1) Any use of the land beyond its natural state will impose severe
~ on the property and safety of the homeowners along Stream G2 in
Shadow Ridge and along Grapevine Creek in Northlake Woodlands and
Creekview. Homeowners have already experienced riding water up to the
easement line. If construction is to proceed, proper drainage must be
addressed to prevent flooding and land erosion.
2) For over two years the city boa ~ existing drainage erosion
problem, along Stream G2 by lot A20 as well as between lots A26 --d A27.
Some work was done at both sites, but the problem of repeated cave-ins
between A26 and A27 was just patched because the cost of repair was too
expensive. The concern is that the city will also have this attitude towards
any new problems caused by the increased water drainage.
3) ~- If structures are to be built on this plat. we would support
zoning of at least 8179 with the following considerations: lots should have
mlnlmnmA of 8 ft. side yards, 25 ft. front yards, 20 ft. back yards and only
35% lot coverage on 9000 sq. ft. lots with rnlnlm~]mR of 1850 sq. ft. living area
homes.
4) Aesthetic problems between perimeter two-story houses along
Southern Belle Drive and lot A20 with unlandscaped wooden fences along
the southern property border, any view of alleys or trash cans by existing
homeowners, ~d ~ny cement retaining walls or views of drainage pipes or
culverts is on~cceptable. The alternative to ret_~inlng existing property
value is one story houses with a 6 f~ landscaped brick wall along bordering
10ts between the two subdivisions. After all, Plantation Drive is the
subdivision entrance for Shadow Ridge Estates and any views of the
aforementioned items would be an eyesore.
5) Crime oroblems are associated with alleys. Bordering existing
homeowners chose front entry versus alley access due to this concern.
Homes along the west and south exposure should not h~ve alleys.
6) Prevent possible costly downstream erosion damage from proposed
drainage and fence posts on a southern retaining wall of Stream G2.
March 11, 1991
Dear Mayor Wolfe,
The following homeowners and taxpayers object to the proposed zoning and
drainage plat of the land east of Southern Belle Drive and north of
Plantation Drive for the following reasons:
1) Any use of the land beyond its natural state will impose severe
~ on the property and safety of the homeowners along Stream G2 in
Shadow Ridge and along Grapevine Creek in Nor~.hlake Woodlands and
Creekview. Homeowners have already experienced riding water up to the
easement line. If construction is to proceed, proper drainage must be
addressed to prevent flooding and land erosion.
2) For over two years the city has ~ existing drainage erosion
problem~ along Stream G2 by lot A20 as well as between lots A26 and A27.
Some work was done at beth sites, but the problem of repeated cave-ins
between A26 and A27 was just patched because the cost of repair was too
expensive. The concern is that the city will also have this attitude towards
any new problem~ caused by the increased water drainage.
3) ~- If structures are to be built on this plat, we would support
zoning of at least SF9 with the following considerations: lots should have
mlnlm,,m~ of 8 ft. side yards, 25 ft. front yards, 20 ft. back yards and only
35% lot coverage on 9000 sq. ft. lots with m{n{ml~m.~ of 1850 sq. ft. living area
homes.
4) Aesthetic oroblems between perimeter two-story houses along
Southern Belle D~ive ond lot A20 with unlandscaped wooden fences along
the southern property border, any view of alleys or trash cans by existing
homeowners, and shy cement retaining walls or views of drainage pipes or
culverts is unacceptable. The alternative to ret~inlng existing property
value is one story houses with a 6 ft. landscaped brick wall along bordering
lots between the two subdivisions. After all, Plantation Drive is the
subdivision entrance.for Shadow Ridge Estates and any views of the
aforementioned items would be an eyesore.
5) Crime oroblems are associated with alleys. Bordering existing
homeowners chose front entry versus alley access due to this concern.
Homes along the west and south exposure should not have alleys.
6) Prevent possible costly downstream erosion damage from proposed
drainage and fence posts on a southern retaining wall of Stream G2.
March 11, 1991
Dear Mayor Wolfe,
The following homeowners and taxpayers object to the proposed zoning and
drainage plat of the land east of Southern Belle Drive and north of
Plantation Drive for the following reasons:
1) Any use of the land beyond its natural state will impose severe
~ on the property and safety of the homeowners along Stream G2 in
Shadow Ridge and along Grapevine Creek in Northlake Woodlands and
Creekview. Homeowners have already experienced riding water up to the
easement llne. If construction is to proceed, proper drainage must be
addressed to prevent flooding and land erosion.
2) For over two years the city h_ss ~ existing drainage erosion
problems along StreAm G2 by lot A20 as well as between lots A26 and A27.
Some work was done at beth sites, but the problem of repeated eave-in_~
between A26 and A27 was just patched because the cost of repair was too
expensive. The concern is that the city will also have this attitude towards
_~y new problems caused by the increased water drainage.
3) ~- If structures are to be built on this plat, we would support
ZOning of at least SF9 with the following considerations: lots should have
mlnlm~]m~ of 8 ft. side yards, 25 ft. front yards, 20 fL back yards and only
35% lot coverage on 9000 sq. ft. lots with mlnlmum~ of 1850 sq. ft. living area
homes.
4) Aesthetic problems between perimeter two-story houses along
Southern Belle Drive _s~d lot A20 with unlandscaped wooden fences along
the southern property border, any view of alleys or trash cans by existing
homeowners, and Any cement retaining walls or views of drainage pipes or
culverts is unacceptable. The altern~tive to retaining existing property
value is one story houses with a 6 fL landscaped brick wall along bordering
lots between the two subdivisions. After all, Plantation Drive is the
subdivision entrance.for Shadow Ridge Estates and any views of the
aforementioned items would be an eyesore.
5) Crime nroblemA are associated with alleys. Bordering existing
homeowners chose front entry versus alley access due to this concern.
Homes along the west and south exposure should not have alleys.
6) Prevent possible costly downstream erosion damage from proposed
drainage and fence posts on a southern retaining wall of Stream G2.
Peyton Weaver'
David Thomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smother'man
Uim Cowan
Ron Rober'son
Uohn Nelson
1
,5
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
10
11
12
13
14,
16,
17
cc: Peyton Weaver
David I'nomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smotherman
Jim Cowan
Ron Robeffson
John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
10.
11
12
13
14,
15
16,
17
cc: Peyton Weave~
David Thomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smother'man
,Jim C~wan
Ron Roberson
,John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
17
cc: Peyton Weaver
David Thomas
Tom Morton
B ill Smother'man
,Jim Cowan
Ron Roberson
dohn Nelson
NAME ADDRESS
3,
4
PHONE
5
6.
7
10
11
12,
13
14.
15
16,
17
Peyton Weaver'
David Thomas
Tom Morton
Bill Smother'man
dim Cowan
Ron Roberson
,John Nelson
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
10
11
12
13
14,
15.
16,
17