Corners of C/FP-CS 860320Lichliter/jameson & Fkssociates, Inc.
CONSULI'ING [NCj~N[ E 6q.NG I~L^N NI,~,G
March 20, 1986
Mr. Ed Powell
City Engineer
City of Coppell
616 S. Coppell Road
Coppell, Texas 75019
Re: Corners of Coppell Meeting of March 19, 1986
Dear Mr. Powell:
Attached are the minutes of the above referenced meeting. These minutes
are L/JA's understanding of the items discussed and conclusions agreed upon
and we shall assume our understanding correct, unless notice to the con-
trary is brought to our attention.
Very truly yours,
Tim Lackey
Project Manager
TEL/ccw
cc: Mr. Vivyon Bowman, City of Coppell Mr. Gabe Favre, Ginn, !nc.
Mr. Brian McDaniel, Lockwood, Andrews, Newnan
Mr. Billy Thompson, Lichliter/Jameson
Mr. Jim Anderson, Southwest Properties
Ms. Andrea Forman, SCH Architects
Attachment
File: 677-0100-07
1420 VI,'~ST MOCKINGBIRD LAJ~E. SUi'TE 300 D^~_AS. TEXAS 75247.4906 214/63C)-8867
Page I of 3
LICHLITER/JA/4ESON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
HEETXNG HINUTES
Meeting Date: March 19, 1986
Location: City Hall - City of Copoe!l
Purpose: Corners of Coppell Meeting for Final Plat/Plans
L/iA Job No.: 677-0100-07
Attendees Agency/Company
Mr. Ed Powell City of Co~pell
Mr. Vivyon Bowman City of Co~pell
Mr. Gabe Favre Ginn, Inc.
Mr. Brian McDaniel Lockwood, Andrews, Newnan
Mr. Billy Thompson Licnliter/Jameson & Associates
Mr. Wilson Chan Lichliter/Jameson & Associates
Mr. Tim Lackey Lichliter/Jameson & Associates
Meeting Minutes Issued by: Tim Lackey Date: March 20, 1986
Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 3
of March 19, 1986
Item Discussion
1. Powell (City Engineer) has questions about drainage channel. - Ownership
- Landscaping effects on velocities
2. McDaniel explains that $40,000 check was cut by previous
developer in January 1985 for landscaping and improvements.
Check was given to City. It is not escrowed for improve-
ments.
3. McDaniel explains that velocities are in 2 - 3 feet per
second range, and there is less area draining to channel than
originally designeo for.
4. Powell would like tD consider underground system for channel,
improvements, and the economics impact on the project.
5. Powell explains FIA maps were revised in 1984, channel was
designed in 1981.
6. McDaniel explains city accepteO channel with Plat and Plans
in Sections of Woodridge I, II or ii in the early 80's.
7. Powell questions the following: - Effects of '81 vs. '84 F!A ma~ changes
- Hydraulics of the channel
- Responsibility of maintenance
8. Favre suggested that a concrete channel had been talked about
instead of an enclosed system
9. McDaniel explains that in the Council's approval in '84, the
$40,000 was intend~ to accommodate drainage and landscaping
improvements. The Council was not in favor of concrete
channel because of i%s unsightlyness. That area was desig-
nated as a landscape area. The area discussed went as far as
600' +/- upstream of MacArthur (Then Allen Road).
10. Powell suggested thac date of check would be helpful.
McDaniel can get date from Tim Thompkins (previous owner).
If previous Councils have made commitments, Powell has no
problem with upholding original commitments.
Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 3
of March 19, 1986
Item Discussion
11. Bowman has problem with changes in site plan; specifically:
- change in out parcel
-change in Building/Parking layout
He would prefer new review of site plan by P & Z and Council.
P & Z and Council approved old site plan for what it was.
They may have new questions for what this new site plan could
represent.
12. Powell says he has been instructed that a site plan and final
plat cannot be acted on in the same session. The process
involves approving the site plan on one night and separate
approval of final plat on another night.
13. Powell says he will informally ask P & Z chairman to clarify
the significance of changes on site plan or if final plat
would be acceptable without new site plan. Powell would be
able to talk with chairman on night of March 20tn. Powell
would advise L/JA accordingly after meeting.
14. Favre received set of L/JA's plans resubmitted to Powell on
3/13/56
15. Powell says submittal date for April 20~h P & Z was March
17th. However, he would allow site plan to be schedule on
next P & Z if it was necessary. Site Plan could be presented
to P & Z by using an overlay of new plan to show changes to
P&Z.
16. Meeting concluded with:
1. McDaniel to find date of check
2. Powell to discuss with P & Z chairman
3. L/JA to check on '84 flood map revision and ownership of
ditch.
4. Also 20' radii to be used on driveway turn outs.
TEL/ccw