Cambridge P2/FP-AG 961112 AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITY COUNCIL MEETIN(~: November 12, 1996 ITEM
ITEM CAPTION:
Consider approval of The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase II, Final Plat,
to allow the development of ten Single Family-12 lots and the extension of
Castle Creek Drive within The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase II,
subdivision located on t~ n~th side of DeForest Road, approximately 2,200
feet east of ~Arthur Bouleva~.
SUBMITTED BY:~gry~ L. Sieh /
TITLE.' ~rector of Planning and Co--unity Services
ST~F RECOVERS: Approval ~ Denial
ST~F CO~ENTS:
Date of P&Z Meeting: October 17, 1996
Decision of P&Z Commission: Approval (6-0) with Commissioners Lowry,
Wheeler, McCaffrey, Jones, Mabry and DeFilippo voting in favor.
Commissioner Cruse was absent.
Sub4ect to the following conditions:
1) Compliance with Engineering cogent, as follows:
a) A floodplain easement line needs to be shown on the rear of
the properties if the total lot is not going to be reclaimed
out of the floodplain.
2) Subject to City Council granting a variance of street
construction and drainage requirements for DeForest Road and a
variance of alley requirements.
.. ......... ~ .. ~ '~ ~ .... ~ za '~
Castle Creek Drive within the Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase I1 subdivision located on the
north side of DeForest Road, approximately 1,(:~0 feet east of MacArthur Boulevard.
Councilmember Tunnell seconded the motion; the motion to deny carried 4-3 with Mayor Pro
Tem Mayo and Councilmembers Watson, Tunnell, and Sheehan voting in favor of the motion
and Councilmembers Alexander, Sturges and Robertson voting against the motion.
12. Consider approval of Carter Addition, Phase Two, Preliminary Plat, to allow
the development of a S-lot residential subdivision on approximately 13.2S34
acres of property located at the southwest corner of Moore Road and Carter
Drive.
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Services, made a presentation to the Council.
Councilmember Robertson moved to approve Carter Addition, Phase Two, Preliminary Plat, to
allow the development of a 5-lot residential subdivision on approximately 13.2534 acres of
property located at the southwest comer of Moore Road and Carter Drive and that the Planning
and Zoning Commission be the authority responsible for the approval of the Final Plat and that
the Final Plat need not be brought back for final approval of the City Council unless required
by law. Councilmember Sheehan seconded the motion; the motion carried ?-0 with Mayor Pro
Tem Mayo and Councilmembers Alexander, Sturges, Watson, Tunnell, Robertson, and Sheehan
voting in favor of the motion.
13. Consider providing that the Planning and Zoning Commission be the authority
responsible for the approval of the Final Plat of Car~ Addition, Phase Two,
to allow the development of a S-lot FesideDfial subdivision on approximately
13.2S34 acres of property located at the southwest corner of Moore Road and
Carter Drive and that the Final Plat need not be brought back for f'mal
approval of the City Council nnless required by ]aw.
This item was considered under Item 12. See Item 12 for minutes.
14. Consider approval of The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase II, Final Plat,
to allow the development of ten Single Family-12 lots and the extension of
Castle Creek Drive within The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Pha~ H,
subdivision located on the north side of DeForest Road, approximately 2,200
feet east of MacArthur Boulevard.
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Service, made a presentation to the Council.
Councilmember Robertson moved to approve The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase II, Final
Plat, to allow the development of ten Single Family-12 lots and the extension of Castle Creek
Drive within The Estates of Cambridge Manor, Phase H, subdivision located on the north side
of DeForest Road, approximately 2,200 feet east of MacArthur Boulevard subject to the
CMII~
conditions as stated on the Agenda Request Form and changing the setback from 20 foot back
to 30 foot. Mayor Pro Tern Mayo seconded the motion; the motion carried %0 with Mayor Pro
Tern Mayo and Councilmembers Alexander, Sturges, Watson, Tunnell, Robertson, and Sheehan
voting in favor of the motion.
15. Consider approval of Magnolia Park, Final Plat, to allow the development of
a 124-1ot residential planned development located on the west side of Denton
Tap Road, approximately 752.10 feet south of the future SH 121 Bypass.
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Service, made a presentation to the Council.
Bill Anderson, representing the Applicant, made a presentation to the Council. After questions
and lengthy discussion between Council, Staff and Applicant, a recess was called to review
previous minutes.
A recess was held at this time.
Mayor Morton reconvened and advised the minutes of December 12, 1995 stated that the
Applicant was willing to donate 26 acres and place $300,000 of park improvements on that 26-
acre tract. Mayor Pro Tem Mayo moved to approve Magnolia Park, Final Plat, to allow the
development of a 124-1ot residential planned development located on the west side of Denton
Tap Road, approximately 752.10 feet south of the future SH 121 Bypass, subject to all
conditions as listed on the Agenda Request Narrative and that a disclaimer regarding airport
noise be added to the plat. Councilmember Robertson seconded the motion; the motion tarried
7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Mayo and Councilmembers Alexander, Sturges, Watson, Tunnell,
Robertson, and Sheehan voting in favor of the motion.
16. Consider approval of replacing the current GTE E-911 system with the GTE
MARRS system to include: (1) Approval of installation of MARRS System
including equipment by GTE at a cost of $92,440.53; (2) Approval of
installation of Tandem Network by GTE at a cost of $660.00; (3) Approval of
interface between the ICS-DCAD and MARRS System to be performed by
ICS at a cost of $3,500.00; and (4) Approval of monthly maintenance for the
MARRS and Tandem agreements, which is a recurring cost, to GTE in the
amount of $3,352.78 to be paid out of the E-911 fund.
Councilmember Robertson moved to approve replacing the current GTE E-911 system with the
GTE MARRS system to include: (1) Approval of installation of MARRS System including
equipment by GTE at a cost of $92,440.53; (2) Approval of installation of Tandem Network by
GTE at a cost of $660.00; (3) Approval of interface between the ICS-DCAD and MARRS
System to be performed by IC$ at a cost of $3,500.00; and (4) Approval of monthly
maintenance for the MARRS and Tandem agreements, which is a recurring cost, to GTE in the
amount of $3,352.78 to be paid out of the E-911 fund, and authorizing the Mayor to sign.
CMIII2~
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
CASE NO: THE ESTATES OF CAMBRIDGE MANOR,
PHASE II, FINAL PLAT
P & Z HEARING DATE: October 17, 1996
C.C. HEARING DATE: November 12, 1996
LOCATION: North side of Deforest Road, approximately 2,200 feet east of
MacArthur Blvd.
SIZE OF AREA: 4.103 acres; 10 lots
CURRENT ZONING: PD-SF-12 (Planned Development, Single Family-12)
REQUEST: Approval of a final plat
APPLICANT: Developer: Engineer:
Jack Bommarito Bill Anderson
Beamer Development, Inc. Dowdey, Anderson & Associates
P.O. Box 2312 16250 Dallas Parkway, #100
Coppell, TX 75019 Dallas, TX 75248
(972) 908-1068 (972) 931-0694
Fax (972) 393-5597 Fax(972) 931-9538
HISTORY: The property was classified as a Planned Development District in early
1994. The first phase of development was platted in late 1994. There
have been two minor amendments to the PD site plan since, involving side
yard fences in front of an established building line on individual lots.
TRANSPORTATION: Deforest Road is an existing residential street consisting of a 2-lane
uncurbed asphalt pavement within a 40' wide right-of-way. The
Subdivision Ordinance requires upgrading the right-of-way width
to 50 feet.
Item # 7
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - vacant; "LI" Light Industrial zoning
South - existing single-family residential; PD- 140 (Planned Development)
East - vacant and existing single-family residential; "A" Agriculture
West - vacant and existing single-family residential; "A" Agriculture
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan shows low density residential use.
DISCUSSION: If the companion request for amendments to the Planned Development
District is approved, the final plat will comply with zoning and
subdivision requirements. However, because builders and homebuyers
have had difficulty understanding the fence provisions of the PD, Lot 5
of Block A appears to be a candidate for additional misunderstandings.
Designating the building line on the plat as a building and fence setback
line will make it more easily understood.
RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Staff recommends approval of the Final Plat with the condition that each
building line on Lot 5, Block A, be shown as a "Building and Fence
Setback Line", subject to Engineering Comments, and subject to City
Council granting a variance of street construction and drainage
requirements for DeForest Road and a variance of alley requirements.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Recommend approval of the Final Plat
2) Recommend disapproval of the Final Plat
3) Recommend modification of the Final Plat
ATFACHMENTS: 1) Final Plat
2) Landscape Plan
3) Departmental Comments
Item # 7
Iii ~]-
[u ut
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMII'I'EE
ENGINEERING COMMENTS
ITEM: The Estates of Cambridge Manor. Phase Two. Final Plat. to allow
the derelopment of ten additional single family-12 lots and the
extension of Stirling Court within the Estates of Cambridge Manor
Phase Two subdirision located on the north side of DeForest Road,
approximately 2,200 feet east of MacArthur Blvd., at the request of
Dowdey, Anderson and Associates, Inc.
DRC DATE: September 26, 1996 and October 3, 1996
CONTACT: Mike Martin, E.I. T., Assistant City Engineer (304-3679)
PRELIMINARY REVISED
AFTER P&Z
1. A floodplain easement line needs to be shown on the rear of the properties if the total
lot is not going to be reclaimed out of the floodplain. Also, a note needs to be
provided on the plat stating "Only decorative metal or like fence will be permitted in
floodplain easement". No other buildings or pools will be allowed unless the structure
is raised two feet above the floodplain. The fence is allowed because the flood study
submitted showed the whole property to be reclaimed.
.,~..~,,~ ,-;-7-: '
' ' ' ,~ ,-~ ,~ ~:,.~.~..-4.~, - ~ :~-i ...... : -- .
~ : -! ' i ~ ._: _ :
: f - i i ~ ·
- /~ --I ;( : ..........
, ,~ ~_~ ~ : ~ .
,/ ~
· .. : ....
~ ~ "I-'~C--'r-:* ' ' ' ' ' :"'~- ~'1 ~' , ' ' ' 4t ,
!: ' ~ ~'. ~" ' ~" .I. . ( . ' : ~ --
'/[~ ~,' y~.~:.,-;.,,c.._. ~ -.-~"'-~':~' . . : ~.~ ~A~ .; ; , .
'..../ ~, ..... :/~_;.._~ ~ ~' ~._~_:.g ~;~; ;,~...
~ ~;".. · . 'G...
~ .,~ .............. ~.· .....: ,..
.. . +.. ~-.-~.-..
IL~
~ , : · : :
. . .... .. ~.~ ,. . /~[~/~~ ~.'/.~.~ ~-
. ., , ~ ~( ~',~;~'.'7'<,../
'~ :i ,
'~[ ' ~.~ ....