Gatew-1.4/Re-AG 920526 AGENDA REQUEST FORM
ITEM C^PT[ON:
PUBLIC HEA~IN~: Oonsideration and approval of a repla: of ~a~e~ay Busine~ Park. Block 2. located
at the northwest corner of Freeport Parkway and ~ateway Boulevard. at the request of Catellus ~evel-
opment Corporation.
'" c rY
- 8.,~'L. ¢,e~. Planning Director
~' D:~t ors
~ OTHER REP.:
EVALUATION OF ITEM' DATE:
Date of P & Z Meetinfl: ~pril ltl.
~ecision of P ~ Z Commimion: ~pproval [5-0] with the rollowinfl conditions:
the'-andscaDino' ' in t~.e ParKway sP.a! i De c~,-,,-i~-~_um~_,,..._,_, as the
al~_ aDPizcabi.'e fees pertainzng to ~.r:dividual Lots r.o be
paid DY lot owners ~ rh~ indlviduaL lo~ are
shrubs Less ~.han 15' ir, height are tc be placed in the west
r~_~P.t-of-;:av of r~[~'r~c:~u.~-'~ Parkway, wi*~ ..... staff review~.nG_ and
:~_....~.~a?~ DiaD prior to any DU~.L,.~Lnc Dermits,
approv!r'..~ %he ~r,~-~ ~ ' . . - '' '
the deve~_opeT' provide ,;~f-siTe diainace ws~cp. IS
to cost S285:uuu.. a~ t~:e developers expense:
no sidewalks at ~his
the park~n§ setbacks lines on the plat w~'i' be removed,
5here De a I00' ~treet easement for a 60' streez, and the
deveigpe: w:~- sDecifv ~e [znal 60' street iocat:on by the
~{ay 12 Council meetin~ the ~ntersecTion w~i[ remain as
shown on ~he oresent D~ a~
N/A
BUDGET /kNiT. AMT. E~'I"ED
AMT +/- BUDGET FINANCIAL REVIEW BY
COMMENTS:
I.EGAL REVIEW BY' REVIEWED BY CM: ......
Rev.
SL~PORT aOCL'MENTATIOS FOR AGESDA ITEM
'ST&MP RECEIVED BY CITY P~NAGER'S OFFICE:
SL'?PORT DOCL?a~N~ATION SCBMITTED WITI~ AGENDA ITEM: NO. OF ORIGIIilLS IIEQUIR[1)
MEMOS, LETTERS/REPORTS/BiLLS/MI.WUTE$: ~ I each
T?':TL~eT.'AC~EL~.EST ................. : 3 originals for signature
C.i.P. CONTRACT ..................... : 6 ortgtmals for sign~ture
CH~WG~ ORDERS ....................... : 3 origtnal~ for ~ignature
O.KDiN&WCE ........................... : I blueback for signature + 3 copies
CAPT!O.w ............................. : 1 blueback for stgm~ture + 3 copies
R. ESOLUTION .......................... : 2 blueback~ for signature + 1 copy
PRCCI~MATION ........................ : 2 bluebacks for signature + 1 copy
BIL ................................. : I each
LOCATION MAPS ....................... : 12
ZONING PLA~'S ............ .......... _: 12
. R-I..MINARY/FINAL PLA.~.~ .......... w. , ~ 12
SITE PLUS .......................... : 12
~SC~E P~S ..................... : 12
~ ITEC~AL RE~ERINGS ............ : 12
DATE PUBLISHED IN THE ClTIZENS~ADVOCATE:
NOTIFICATION TO:
DATE/METHOD OF CONTACT:
NOYES
~';9 ~P~ET.O588DS
CiTY OF COPPELL
P LANN iNG DEPART}lENT
~,~.r ~ REPORY
........................... r~,- ~ T !'1 - - --~
'_3Ai__.EW__A_'( BUSi,~ESS PARK - ~..m. LA~ ..... .~.¥_v_C_K__A
P & Z HEARING DAiE: April' i6, !992
C. C H_~.~:N~ DAiE Xav 26, i992
LOCAiION: ihe northwest corner of Freeport Parkway and Gateway
Boulevard.
.......... 125
AREA: ~u. Acres
REQUEST: Approval of a repiat of Block 2 of Gateway Business Park.
APPLICANT: Cateiius
u_~__~p.n~n~ Corp bert Halff ~ Assoc
i. Owner'~ (Engineer
~,~r. We!don Davis }ir. Pat Acker
5429 LB3 F'reewav
Suite #600 Dallas, TX 75225
Dallas, TX 7524U (214) 739-U094
HISTORY: i'his is a portion of the 222 acre Catei!us Gateway Business
Park, formerly known as ti~e Santa Fe Pacific Realty
Corporation land, and is Phase ! of the development of this
acreage.
TRANSPORTATION:
Freeport Parkway is a C4D...6 roadway in the City, and
currently consists of a 4-1ane divided facility within 90'
of right-of-way. Gateway Boulevard is a C4U, 4-1ane,
undivided street, and is contained ~ithin a variaDie ....~u-~"z
foot right-of-waY.
=nSD USE & ZONING:
SURROUNDING ~'
North - Post Office ~ulk Mai! Center, railroad tracks; L!
South - Vacant, LB3 Freeway; hl
East - Vacant; Li
West - Vacant, LB3 Freeway; Li
A~;ALYSTq' This applicant is attempting to create legal Duilding sites
for warehouse use. Ihere are six deviations from the
Subdivision Ordinance requested:
i'~ Landscaping of parkways shall be completed as
individual lots are developed
staff has no objection
2) All applicable fees pertainina to individual lots
shall be paid by the lot owners as the individual lots
are developed
staff would recommend adding the underlined
section, and the City Engineer may wish to
address this request
3 Although Freeport Parkway is a secondary imaae
zone...no trees permitted...west right-of-way
staff wouid point out that a note appears on
face of this plat which states "shrubs less than
!5' in height are to be placed along wes~
right-of-way of F~eeport Parkway..." We would
further add that staff needs to review and
approve landscape plans p~ior to building permit
procurement
4) A portion of the drainage shall be carried by the
existing grass lined channel along the north property
iine...without concrete invert or brick facing on head
walks.
· although staff has no objection to this channel,
there is an off-site d~ainage problem which will
be impacted by this development. The Halff
drainage report addressed this issue and
estimated an expenditure of approximately
$280,u0~ would be required to resolve the
problem. This item has very iow priority in the
Haiff report, and staff feels an obligation
point out that fact here· We understand this
applicant will construct the off-site channel at
his expense, that it is a condition of plan
approval.
5 No sidewaiks...at this time
staff has no objection
6 Farking setbacks shall be as shown on the above plat··.
· the zoning ordinance requires '30 foot front yard
setbacks with no parking, 60 foot with parking.
The applicant is attempting to obtain a Cront
yard parking variance through platting. This
issue is properly addressed through the Board of
Adjustment, and staff would recommend removing
this statement and the platted parking line from
the plat·
Staff recom~mends approval of this plat with the
stipulations that the applicant will resolve, to the City's
satisfaction, the drainage issue discussed as item 4 above,
the parking issue described in item 6 above, that applicant
adds the suggested wording to item 2 above, applicant
submits landscape plans for staff review and approval as
stated in item 3 abover and that the applicant meet ali
other legal requirements of the City, including fire
hydrant location and appropriate utility easements.
One final com.~ent regardinG the City property situated in
the northwest corner of this plat - negotiations are
currentiv underway for the City to sell this parcel to
Cateiius. !t would have been preferable to consummate that
deal first, then wrap the roughly one-half acre tract into
this 70 acre repiat. The applicant has indicated a desire
to proceed with the plat as submitted, to include the City
property at a later date after the purchase has been
consummated.
na~ERNa~I~aS: i Approve the repiat
2 Deny the repiat
3 Modify the repiat
AITACHI, iENTS: !] Replat of Block 2
GWAYREP.STF
Item ll PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval of a replat
of Gateway Business Park, Block 2, located at the
Northwest corner of Freeport Parkway and Gateway
Boulevard, at the request of Catellus Development
Corporation.
Planning and Community Service Director, Gary Sieb, made the
presentation to the Council. Mr. Sieb recommended approval with
the following seven (7) conditions:
1) the landscaping in the Parkway shall be complete as
the individual lots are developed,
2) all applicable fees pertaining to individual lots
to be paid by lot owners as the individual lots are
developed,
3) shrubs less than 15' in height are to be placed in
the west right-of-way of Freeport Parkway, with
staff reviewing and approving the landscape plan
prior to any building permits,
4) the developer provide off-site drainage which is
estimated to cost $285,000, at the developers
expense,
5) no sidewalks at this time,
6) the parking setbacks lines on the plat will be
removed,
7) there will be a 100' street easement for a 60'
street, and the developer will specify the final
60' street location by the May 12 Council meeting,
the intersection will remain as shown on the
present plat.
Mayor Wolfe declared the Public Hearing open and asked if there
were any citizens who wished to speak in favor of the proposal;
there were none. He then asked for those persons wishing to speak
against the proposal. Again, there were none. Mayor Wolfe then
declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Morton moved to
approve Item 11 as submitted, including the above-stated seven (7)
items. Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon seconded the motion; motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Mayo, Robertson and Garrison voting in favor of the
motion.
Item 12 Consideration to award bid No. Q-0392-03 for the purchase
of concrete parking curbs to be placed at Andrew Brown
Park to Parkway Concrete Products in the amount of
$6,300.00.
Following discussion, Mayor Pro Tem moved to award bid No. Q-0392-
03 for the purchase of concrete parking curbs to be placed at
Andrew Brown Park to Parkway Concrete Products in the amount of
$6,300.00. Councilman Thomas seconded the motion; motion carried
7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas,
Morton, Mayo, Robertson and Garrison voting in favor of the motion.
Item 13 Consideration to award bid No. Q-0492-02 for the purchase
of aggregate material in the amount of $7,179.70 to be
placed at Andrew Brown Park to Pioneer Aggregates or
Texas Industries by the drawing of lots as directed by
the Mayor.
Following the drawing of lots as directed by the Mayor, Councilman
Thomas moved tkat bid No. Q-0492-02 for the purchase of aggregate
material in the amount of $7,179.70 be awarded to Pioneer
Aggregates. Councilman Robertson seconded the motion; motion
carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Mayo, Robertson and Garrison voting in favor of the
motion.
Item ~4 Consideration of approving a c~ntract with Barton-
Aschman, Associates, Inc. to provide professional
engineering services for design ~nd inspection of traffic
CM052692
Page 3 '~f 6