Gibbs Stat P2/PP-CS 920317' · Gibbs Station - Phase I! - Preliminary Plat
Coppell, Texas 75019
(~~ The City With A Beautiful Future 214-462-0022
March 17, 1992
Mr. Sam Wyse
Heath & Knight Properties
1660 Dallas Parkway
Suite #1400
Dailasr Texas 7524~
RE: ZONING & PLATTING - GIBBS STATION, PHASE t & ti
Dear Sam,
Attached are copies of Council actions regarding the above referenced
subjects. In summary, the City Council approved both the zoning cases and
the preliminary platting requests on November 12, 1991.
The zoning was changed from MF-2 to PD-SF-7 (PD-121) with four additional
conditions on Phase i:
1) lots allowed to front on Village Parkway
2) Gibbs Crossing between Blocks "A" & "B" south of Village Parkway
allowed a length in excess of 1600 feet
3) lots 15-19 in Block "A", and lots 1-42 in Block "E" approved
without alleys
4) prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
5) 20 foot front building line on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" {revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
6) 55% maximum coverage on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32, Block
"B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
7 5 foot side yard setback on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B": and lots 22-35, Block "C": (revised lots 16-28, Block
"C") corner lots maintain 15' side yard
8) 62 foot minimum lot width on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"; and lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block
Zoning was changed from MF-2 to PD-SF-7 (PD-122) with five additional
conditions on Phase II:
1) 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots 1-5, Block
2) maximum 55% coverage on lots i-i5, Block
3) 5 foot side yard setbacks on lots 1-15, Block "G": corner lots
maintain 15' side yard
4) 62 foot minimum width on lots 1-15 in Block "G"
5) prospective buyers provided a sin§le-page sheet disclosin§ the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
In regard to the preliminary subdivision plats, Phase I states:
1) lots allowed to front on Village Parkway
2) Gibbs Crossing between Block "A" ~ "B" south of Village Parkway
allowed a length in excess of 1600 feet
3) lots 15-19 in Block "A", and lots 1-42 in Block "E" approved
without alleys
4) prospective buyers provided a single-pa§e sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicatin§ the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
5) 20 foot front building line on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"~ lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
6) 55% maximum coverage on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32, Block
"B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
7) 5 foot side yard setback on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"; and lots 22-35, Block "C"; (revised lots 16-28, Block
"C") corner lots maintain 15' side yards
8) 62 foot minimum lot width on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"; and lot 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block
Preliminary plat of Phase II states:
1) 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots 1-5, Block
2) 55% coverage on lots 1-15, Block
3) 5 foot side yard setbacks on lots 1-15, Block "G"; corner lots
maintain 15' side yard
4) 62 foot minimum width on lots 1-15 in Block "G"
5) prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
These are the conditions which were approved regarding your zoning cases
and subsequent plats. If you have any questions or need clarification
regarding this information, please contact me at your convenience.
uly, .
ry I~ieb, A.I.C.P.
irec~or of Planning and Community Services
~: File
GIBBSCC.ACT
Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Study.
Councilman Robertson moved to approve the 1991 Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement
Plan and Impact Fee Study. Councilman Morton seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0,
with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and
Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 24 Consideration and approval of an Ordinance to replace Impact Fee Ordinance
ff90478 to adopt Impact Fees as set out in Schedules 1 & 2 as recommended by
the 1991 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study included as Exhibit 'C' to the
ordinance.
Councilman Morton moved to approve Ordinance//91533.1 to replace Impact Fee Ordinance
//90478 to adopt Impact Fees as set out in Schedules 1 & 2 as recommended by the 1991 Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Study included as Exhibit MC' to the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tern
Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon
and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the
motion.
Item 25 Consideration and approval of a final plat (secondaxy plat) for Sandy Lake
Addition, Lot 1, Block B, located along the west side of Samuel Blvd., 335 feet
north of Sandy Lake Road at the request of Dr. Stephen King.
Planning and Community Setx, ices Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Following
discussion, Councilman Nelson moved to approve a final plat (secondary plat) for Sandy ~
Addition, Lot 1, Block B, located along the west side of Samuel Blvd., 335 feet north of Sandy
Lake Road at the request of Dr. Stephen King. Mayor Pro Tern Smotherman seconded the
motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 26 PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval of a zoning change for Case
//PD-121, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase I), from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd., and North of Parkway Blvd., at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Planning and Community Services DffecWr Gary Sieb made a presentation providing information
about the development. Hammond Heath of Heath and Knight properties made a presenlation
further explaining the subdivision. Mayor Wolfe declared the Public Hearing open and a.~lced
if there were any persons who wished to speak in favor of or in opposition to the plan and fees.
Rick Earl of 607 Allen Road on behalf of the homeowners association spoke in favor of the
proposal. There being no other persons who wished to speak, Mayor Wolfe declared the Public
Hearing closed. Discussion followed. Councilman Morton moved to approve zoning case
change for Case ~/PD-121, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase I), from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd., and North of Parkway Blvd., at the requeat of Heath
& Knight Properties with the following four conditions: 1) Front lots be allowed on VillaEe
Parkway which is a collector street, 2) Gibbs Crossing between blocks A and B south of Village
Pazkway be allowed to have a length of +/- 1600 feet, 3) lots 15-19, Block A are approved
without alleys in the rear, lots 142 in Block E are approved without alleys in the rear, and 4)
prospective buyers be provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11' sheet disclosing the existence of the
l ake.~ of Coppell Homeowners Association indicating the tax rate at the time and this be
prodded to them at the time the earnest money contnet on the home is executed. Mayor Pro
Tem Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tem
Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor
of the motion.
Item 27 Consideration and approval of a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station, Phase I
Addition, located along the east aide of MacArthur Blvd. north of Parkway Blvd.,
at the reqt_u~__ of Heath & Knight Pro~.
Smothermon moved to approve a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station, Phase I Addition, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. north of Parkway Blvd., at the request of Heath &
Knight Properties, with the following four conditions as approved in item #26: 1) Front lots be
allowed on Village Parkway which is a collector street, 2) Gibbs Crossing between blocks A
and B south of Village Parkway be allowed to have a length of +/- 1600 feet, 3) lots 15-19,
Block A are approved without alleys in the rear, lots 1-42 in Block E are approved without
_ alleys in the rear, and 4) prospective buyers be provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11' sheet
disclosing the existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association indicating the tax rate
at the time and this be provided to them at the time the earnest money contract on the home is
executed. Councilman Morton seconded the motion. Discussion followed. Ray Warren of 2215
Lakeland in Carrollton, owner of the land made presentation regarding street names. The
motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas,
Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
· ii Item 28 PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval of a zoning change for Case
#PD-122, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase II) from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway, at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Planning an~LCommunity Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Mayor Wolfe
declared the Public Hearing open and asked if there were any persons who wished to speak in
favor of or in opposition to the plan and fees. There being no persons who wished to speak,
Mayor Wolfe declared the Public Hearing closed. Discussion followed. Councilman Morton
moved to approve a zoning change for Case #PD-122, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase II) from
MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway,
at the request of Heath & Knight Properties, with the following five conditions: 1) 20 foot front
yard building line on lots 1-5, Block G, 2) 55% lot coverage, 3) 5 foot side yard side building
line (interior lots), 4) 62' minimum lot width on Block G, Lots 1-15, 5) prospective buyers be
provided a single page 8-I/2 x 11~ sheet disclosing the existence of the homeowners association
indicating the tax rate at the time and this be provided to them at the time the earnest money
contract on the home is executed. Councilman Robertson seconded the motion. The motion
carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton,
Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 29 Consideration and approval of a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station Addition,
Phase II, located along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village
Parkway, at the request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon moved to approve a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station Addition,
Phase II, located along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway, at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties, with the following five conditions as approved in item
//28: 1) 20 foot front yard building line on lots 1-5, Block G, 2) 55% lot coverage, 3) 5 foot
side yard side building line (interior lots), 4) 62' minimum lot width on Block G, Lots 1-15,
5) prospective buyers be provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11 ~ sheet disclosing the existence of the
homeowners association indicating the tax rate at the time and this be provided to them at the
time the earnest money contract on the home is executed. Councilman Nelson seconded the
motion. The motion carded 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Robert.son, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 30 Consideration and approval of a final plat for the Big Cedar Addition, located
along the west side of Bethel School Road (north/south) and north of Bethel Road
at the request of Matthews Southwest.
Planning and Community Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Tim House
representing Matthews Southwest made a presentation, requesting waiver of park fees in lieu of
donation of park property, and stated that the developer does not feel changing the line from
overhead to underground should be their responsibility because the road change will benefit
others besides their development. Bob Macioch representing Paragon Cable, made a
presentation staling their position, that if the City requests them to move the line they have to
do it under franchise, but that the cost would be borne by the subscribers, while the direct