Gibbs Stat P1/FP-CS 920317The City With A Beautiful Future
P.O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
214-462-0022
March i7, i992
Mr. Sam Wyse
Heath & Knight Properties
1660 Dallas Parkway
Suite ~1400
Dallas, Texas 75248
RE: ZONING & PLATTING - GIBBS STATION, PHASE I & II
Dear Sam,
Attached are copies of Council actions regarding the above referenced
subjects. In summary, the City Council approved both the zoning cases and
the preliminary platting requests on November 12, 1991.
The zoning was changed from MF-2 to PD-SF-7 (PD-121) with four additional
conditions on Phase i:
1) lots allowed to front on Village Parkway
2) Gibbs Crossing between Blocks "A" & "B" south of Village Parkway
allowed a length in excess of 1600 feet
3) lots I5-19 in Block "A", and lots 1-42 in Block "E" approved
without alleys
4) prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
5) 20 foot front building line on lots 6-19, Block "A"; lots 1-32,
Block "B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
6} 55% maximum coverage on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32, Block
"B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
7) 5 foot side yard setback on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32,
Block "B"; and lots 22-35, Block "C": (revised lots 16-28, Block
"C") corner lots maintain 15' side yard
8) 62 foot minimum lot width on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32,
Block "B"; and lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block
Zoning was changed from MF-2 to PD-SF-7 (PD-122) with five additional
conditions on Phase II:
1) 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots 1-5, Block "G"
2} maximum 55% coverage on lots 1-i5, Block "G"
3} 5 foot side yard setbacks on lots 1-15, Block "G": corner lots
maintain 15' side yard
4) 62 foot minimum width on lots 1-15 in Block "G"
5) prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
In regard to the preliminary subdivision plats, Phase I states:
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7}
8~
lots allowed to front on Village Parkway
Gibbs Crossing between Block "A" & "B" south of Village Parkway
allowed a length in excess of 1600 feet
lots 15-19 in Block "A", and lots 1-42 in Block "E" approved
without alleys
prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
20 foot front building line on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32,
Block "B": lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block "C")
55% maximum coverage on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32, Block
"B"; lots 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block
5 foot side yard setback on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32,
Block "B": and lots 22-35, Block "C": {revised lots 16-28, Block
"C") corner lots maintain 15' side yards
62 foot minimum lot width on lots 6-19, Block "A": lots 1-32,
Block "B": and lot 22-35, Block "C" (revised lots 16-28, Block
Preliminary plat of Phase II states:
1) 20 foot front yard setbacks on lots 1-5, Block
2) 55% coverage on lots 1-15, Block "G"
3) 5 foot side yard setbacks on lots 1-15, Block "G": corner lots
maintain 15' side yard
4] 62 foot minimum width on lots 1-15 in Block "G"
5) prospective buyers provided a single-page sheet disclosing the
existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association
indicating the tax rate at the time the earnest money contract
on the house is executed
These are the conditions which were approved regarding your zoning cases
and subsequent plats. If you have any questions or need clarification
regarding this information, please contact me at your convenience.
uly,
~ ~ieb, A.I.C.P.
irec~or of Planning and Community Services
File
GIBBSCC.ACT
Improvement Plan and Impact Fee Study.
Councilman Robertson moved to approve the 1991 Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement
Plan and Impact Fee Study. Councilman Morton seconded the motion. The mofun carried 6-0,
with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and
Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 24 Consideration and approval of an Ordinance to replace Impact Fee Ordinance
~90478 to adopt Impact Fees as set out in Schedules 1 & 2 as recommended by
the 1991 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Study included as Exhibit 'C* to the
ordinance.
Councilman Morton moved to approve Ordinanee ~91533.1 to ~plaea Impact Fee Ordimmcc
~v90478 to adopt Impact Fees as set out in Sct~iules 1 & 2 as recommended by the 1991 Water
and Wastewater Impact Fee Study included as Exhibit 'CN to the ordinance. Mayor Pro Tem
Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried &0, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon
and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and Nelson votng in favor of the
motion.
Item 25 Consideration and approval of a final plat (secondary plat) for Sandy Lake
Addition, Lot 1, Block B, located along the west side of Samuel Blvd., 335 feet
north of Sandy Lake Road at the request of Dr. Stephen King.
Planning and Community Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Following
discussion, Councilman Nelson moved to approve a final plat (secondary plat) for Sandy Lake
Addition, Lot 1, Block B, located along the west side of Samuel Blvd., 335 feet north of Sandy
lake Road at the request of Dr. Stephen King. Mayor Pro Tem Smotherman seconded the
motion. The motion carried (>-0, with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Rbbertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 26 PUBLIC HEARI~IG: Consideration and approval of a zoning change for Case
ffPD-121, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase I), from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of MacA~hur Blvd., and North of Parkway Blvd., at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Planning and Community Services DL~ctor Gary Sieb made a ~tufion providing information
about the development. Hammond Heath of Heath and Knight ~ made a p~:sematino
further explaining the subdivision. Mayor Wolfe declared the Public Hearing ottam and ~,,ar.d
if there were any parsons who wished to steak in favor of or in opposition to the plan and foes.
Rick Earl of 607 Allen Road on behalf of the homeowrm's association ~ in favor of the
proposal There being no other persons who wished to speak, Mayor Wolfe danlar~ the Public
Hearing closed. Discussion followed. Councilman Morton moved to al~prove zoning case
change for Case ffPD-121, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase 1), from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of ManArthur Blvd., and North of Parkway Blvd., at the n~luest of Heath
& Knight Properties with the following four conditions: 1) Front lots be allow~ no Village
Parkway which is a collector stnxt, 2) Gibbs Crossing between blocks A and B south of Village
Parkway be allowed to have a length of +/- 1600 feet, 3) Iota 15-19, Block A am at.l'oreal
without alleys in the rear, lots 1-42 in Block E are approved without alleys in the rent, and 4)
prospective buyers be provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11° sheet disclosing the existence of the
lalce~ of Coppell Homeowners Association indicating the tax rate at the tilr~ and this be
provided to them at the time the earnest money contract on the home is executed. Mayor Pna
Tern Smothermon seconded the motion. The motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tern
Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas, Morton, Robextann, and Nelson voting in favor
of the motion.
Item 27 Consideration and approval of a proliminary plat for Gibbs Station, Phaan I
Addition, locatud elong tbe east ~ide of MacArthor Blvd. north of IMfltwaY Blvd.,
Smothermon moved to approve a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station, Phase I Addition, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. north of Parkway Blvd., at the request of Heath &
Knight Properties, with the following four conditions as approved in item g26: 1) Front lots be
allowed on Village Parkway which is a collector street, 2) Gibbs Crossing between blocks A
and B south of Village Parkway be alinwed to have a length of +/- 1600 feet, 3) iota 15-19,
Binck A are approved without alleys in the rear, lots 1-42 in Block E are approved without
alleys in the rear, and 4) prospective buyers be provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11' sheet
disclosing the existence of the Lakes of Coppell Homeowners Association indicating the tax rate
at the time and this be provided to them at the time the earnest money contract on the home is
executed. Councilman Morton seconded the motion. Discussion fellowcd. Ray Warren of 2215
Lakeland in Carrollton, owner of the land made presentation regarding street names. The
motion carried 6-0, with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver, Thomas,
Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 28 PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval of a zoning change for Case
#PD-122, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase Il) from MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located
along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway, at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Planning an<;L Commanity Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Mayor Wolfe
declared the Public Hearing open and asked if there were any persons who wished to speak in
favor of or in opposition to the plan and fees. There being no persons who wished to speak,
Mayor Wolfe declared the Public Heaxing closed. Discussion followed. Councilman Morton
moved to approve a zoning change for Case #PD-122, (Gibbs Station Addition, Phase II) from
MF-2 to PD-SF-7, located along the cast side of ManArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway,
at the request of Heath & Knight Properties, with the following five conditions: 1) 20 foot front
yard building line on lots 1-5, Block G, 2) 55% lot coverage, 3) 5 foot side yard side building
tine (interior lots), 4) 62' minimum lot width on Block G, Lots 1-15, 5) prospective buyers be
provided a single page 8-1/2 x 11 ~ sheet disclosing the existence of the homeowners association
indicating the tax rate at the time and this be provided to them at the time the earnest money
conh-act on the home is executed. Councilman Robertson seconded the motion. The motion
carried 6~), with Mayor Pro Tern Smothermon and Councilmen Wcaver, Thomas, Morton,
Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 29 Consideration and approval of a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station Addition,
Phase II, located along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village
Parkway, at the request of Heath & Knight Properties.
Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon moved to approve a preliminary plat for Gibbs Station Addition,
Phase II, located along the east side of MacArthur Blvd. and north of Village Parkway, at the
request of Heath & Knight Properties, with the following five conditions as approved in item
g28: 1) 20 foot front yard building line on lots 1-5, Block G, 2) 55% lot coverage, 3) 5 foot
side yard side building line (interior lots), 4) 62' minimum lot width on Block G, Lots 1-15,
5) prospective buyers be provided a single page 8- I/2 x 11' sheet disclosing the existence of the
homeowners association indicating the tax rate at the time and this be provided to them at the
time the earnest money contract on the home is executed. Councilman Nelson seconded the
motion. The motion carried 60, with Mayor Pro Tem Smothermon and Councilmen Weaver,
Thomas, Morton, Robertson, and Nelson voting in favor of the motion.
Item 30 Consideration and approval of a final plat for the Big Cedar Addition, located
along the west side of Bethel School Road (north/south) and north of Bethel Road
at the request of Matthews Southwest.
Planning and Community Services Director Gary Sieb made a presentation. Tim House
representing Matthews Southwest made a presentation, requesting waiver of pa~'k fees in lieu of
donation of park property, and stated that thc developer docs not feel changing thc line from
overhead to underground should be their responsibility because the road change will benefit
others besides their development. Bob Manioch representing Paragon Cable, made a
preparation stating their position, that if the City requests them to move the linc they have to
do it under franchise, but that the cost would be borne by the subscribers, while the direct