Lake Park/Re-AG 940111The Cl(y ~ ^ B~ufi~ Fu~um
AGENDA REQUEST FORM
CITY COUNCIL ~G ._lan,tory
ITEM NUMBER
ITEM CAPTION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Consideration and approval of the Replat of Lake Park Addition, Block E, Lots 10-14,17,19-22,24-25, located
west of MacArthur Boulevard, along DeForest Road and Lake Park Drive, at the request of Glen Hinckley.
SUBMITTED BY:
STAFF REP.: Gary ~.~of
OTHER REP.:
DATE:
EVALUATION OF ITEM:
Date of P&Z Meeting: December 16, 1993
Decision of P&Z Commission: Approval (5-0-1) with Commissioners Alexander, Wheeler, Meador, Redford
and Hildebrand voting in favor. Commissioner Thompson abstained due to possible conflict of interest.
Chairman Tunnell was absent. The following condition applies:
(1) The Maintenance and Access Agreement be implemented
BUDGET AMT.
AMT. +/- BUDGET
LEGAL REVIEW BY:
AGENDA REQUEST FORM REVISED 2/93
AMT. ESTIMATED ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW BY ~' - ~
REVIEWED BY CM/~/
CASE;
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Replat of Lake Park Addition, Block E, Lots 10-
14,17,19-22,24-25
P & Z HEARING DATE:
C. C. HEARING DATE:
December 16, 1993
January 11, 1994
LOCATION:
West of MacArthur Boulevard, along Deforest Road and Lake
Park Drive
SIZE OF AREA:
CURRENT
ZONING:
Tract 1 contains five lots of 1.77 acres; Tract 2 is one lot
containing approximately 9,800 square feet; Tract 3 shows four
lots with a total of 39,728 square feet; Tract 4 consists of two lots
with 19,127 square feet.
PD SF-7
REQUF3T:
APPLICANT:
HISTORY:
Replat property to add land to lots 10-14, Block E; lot 17, Block
E; lots 19-22, Block E; lots 24-25, Block E
Univest Properties Corp
(Owner of some lots)
Glen Hincldey
12201 Merit Drive
Dallas, TX 75251
991-4600
Dowdey, Anderson & Assoc.
(Engineer)
Bill Anderson
16250 Dallas Pkwy, Ste. 100
Dallas, TX 75211
931-0694
On September 16, 1993, Planning Commission recommended approval of
a replat which included all the lots affected by a flood plain discrepancy
with the exception of lot 16. By the time the replat was forwarded to
Council on October 12, several neighbors included within the plat had
concerns which had not been resolved, and the applicant asked to have the
plat denied. Council denied the request. On November 18, the applicant
resubmitted the plat, and this time four lots were left off the replat
document. Because of a problem with access to maintain land areas
behind the four lots, Commission denied the plat. It is now being
reconsidered in the same form as the November 18 submittal.
TRANSPORTATION:
Item 6
MacArthur Blvd. is a six-lane divided thoroughfare serving this
property
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North -
South -
East -
West -
flood plain; C
single family; PD-SF-7
single family: PD-SF-7
single family; PD-SF-7
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Plan shows single family uses as most appropriate for
this area
ANALYSIS:
ATTACHMENTS:
This is the same plat that was submitted for the November Planning
Commission hearing (see History section, above). At that meeting, staff
expressed concern that the lots which were not included in the replat had
no access to the unplatted property behind them for maintenance. An
instrument was presented Coy the applican0 to the Commission at the
public hearing which, in essence, stated that the property owner included
in the replat adjacent to the unplatted property would agree to maintain
that unplatted land behind his neighbors lot. Staff had not seen the
exhibit, and although the applicant asked to have the plat approved
conditioned upon the exhibit/instrument being accepted by the city, staff
urged Commission to deny the plat, forward the instrument to our legal
counsel and, based on legal's opinion, take appropriate action at a later
public meeting. Commission denied the plat and directed staff to forward
the instrument to legal counsel for review. Our attorney has
recommended that we not endorse the instrument presented at the
November hearing. He has stated that the instrument is, in essence, a
contract between individuals,and the city should not be a party to such an
agreement. He went on to state that approval of the plat would be
appropriate if there is a lawful means to maintain the unplatted parcels,
such as an easement from the public right-of-way to the unreplatted
sections of the leave out tracts. Because we have not received anything
that addresses this possible solution to the problem, staff will recommend
denial unless a lawful means is introduced to maintain the leaveouts such
as access easements, and they are so noted on the face of the plat
document.
1) Approve the Replat
2) Deny the Replat
3) Modify the Replat
1) Replat Document
20.
Consideration and approval of Valley Ranch Self Storage Addition,
Preliminary Plat, located along the south side of Beltline, 1,320 feet east of
MacArthur Boulevard, at the request of Robert Gross.
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Services made a presentation to the Council.
Councilmember Reitman moved to approve Valley Ranch Self Storage Addition, Preliminary
Plat, located along the south side of Beltline, 1,320 feet east of MacArthur Boulevard with the
following conditions: 1) if, for some reason, the Valley Ranch Baptist Church fails to develop,
then the Valley Ranch Self Storage will be required to extend the water and sanitary sewer line
from its existing location at the Tom Thumb Shopping Center to the site; and 2) that the 30-foot
easement on the back side of the property not be a requirement of plat approval.
Councilmember Mayo seconded the motion; the motion carried 5-2 with Councilmembers
Weaver, Stahly, Reitman, Mayo, and Garrison voting in favor of the motion and Mayor Pro
Tem Robertson and Councilmember Watson voting against the motion.
21.
Consideration and approval of Valley Ranch Baptist Church Addition,
Preliminary Plat, located along the south side of Boltline, 8~ feet east of
MacArthur Boulevard, at the request of Jim Riley.
Councilmember Mayo moved to approve the Valley Ranch Baptist Church Addition, Preliminary
Plat, located along the south side of Beltline, 825 feet east of MacArthur Boulevard with the
following conditions: 1) the building must be fully sprinklered; 2) as new buildings are added
to the platted site, fire lanes must be replatted prior to construction of any additional structure;
3) applicant comply with the Streetscape Plan; and 4) that the 30-foot easement on the back side
of the ~ not be a requirement of plat approval. Councilmember Garrison seconded the
motion; the motion carried 5-2 with Councilmembers Weaver, Stahly, Reitman, Mayo, and
Garrison voting in favor of the motion and Mayor Pro Tem Robertson and Councilmember
Watson voting against the motion.
2e
PUBLIC HEAR~G: Consideration and approval of ~1073, Special Use
Permit site plan for a driving range, to change the zoning from A to A.S.U.P.,
located at the northwest corner of I.H. 635W and Boltline, at the request of
Mr. Will~m PoweH.
Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Services, made a presentation to the Council
and discussed this applicant's request that this be a temporary S.U.P. Mayor Morton opened
the Public Hearing and asked for those persons wishing to speak against this proposal. There
were none. He then asked for those persons wishing to speak in favor of this proposal. Again,
there were none. William Powell, Applicant, made a presentation to the Council.
Councilmember Reitman moved to leave the public hearing open and continue to the February 8,
1994 City Council Meeting. Councilmember Stahly seconded the motion; the motion carried
7-0 with Mayor Pro Tern Robertson and Councilmembers Weaver, Stahly, Watson, Reitman,
Mayo, and Garrison voting in favor of the motion.
Items 9 and 10 were considered at this time. See Items 9 and 10 above for minutes.
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval of the Replat of Lake Park
Addition, Block E, Lots 10-14, 17, 19-22, 24-25, located west of MacAr~ur
Boulevard, along DeForest Road and Lake Park Drive, at the request of Glen
tIincldey.
Councilmember Reitman filed a conffict of interest and abstained from discussion or voting on
this item. Gary Sieb, Director of Planning and Community Services, made a presentation to the
Council. Mayor Morton opened the Public Hearing and asked for those persons wishing to
CM011194
speak against this proposal. There were none. He then asked for those persons wishing to
speak in favor of this proposal. Jeffrey Dixon, 559 Lake Park Drive and Dan Boyer, 591 Lake
Park Drive indicated their desire to have this item approved. Mayor Morton then closed the
Public Hearing. Bill, Dalstrom, representing Univest, made a presentation to the Council. Glen
Hinckey, representing Univest, addressed the Council. Following motion to deny which died
for lack of second, Mayor Pro Tern Robertson moved to approve the Replat of Lake Park
Addition, Block E, Lots 10-14, 17, 19-22, 24-25, located west of MacArthur Boulevard, along
DeForest Road and Lake Park Drive with the following conditions: 1) the maintenance
agreement to show on the face of the plat; 2) on page two of the plat under Tract II, legal
description, last line should read (8,983 square feet); and 3) on page two of the plat, the
paragraph following the legal description for Tract IV should have the language "Univest
Properties, Inc., et al' changed to read "The Property Owners described herein' and that the
10 foot easement be removed when the plat is redone due to the easement having been
abandoned previously. Councilmember Garrison seconded the motion; the motion carried 5-1
with Mayor Pro Tern Robertson and Councilmembers Weaver, Stahly, Mayo, and Garrison
voting in favor of the motion and Councllmember Watson voting against the motion.
4e
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration and approval to amend Section 31,
Parking Standards, and specifi~y amend 31-6, item number 28, changing
the parking requirement from one (1) parking space for each one hundred
(100) sqnnre feet of floor area to one and one-half (lt~) parking spaces for
each one hundred (100) ~ square feet of floor area.
This item was pulled from the agenda.
Consideration and approval of an ordinance approving changes to the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, addressing parking requirements for
restaurant uses and authorizing the Mayor to sign
This item was pulled from the agenda.
6e
Consideration and approval of Riverchase Plaza, Preliminary Plat, located
along the northeast corner of Beltline Road and MacArthur Boulevard, at the
request of Riverchase Plaza, Ltd.
Councilmember Reitman rejoined participation in the meeting at this point. Gary Sieb, Director
of Planning and Community Services, made a presentation to the Council. Don Penney,
Applicant, addressed the Council regarding the project. After discussion, motion and
reconsideration of motion, Councilmember Weaver moved to approve Riverchase Plaza,
Preliminary Plat, located along the northeast corner of Beltline Road and MacArthur Boulevard
with the following conditions: 1) the proposed 15-foot utility easement south of Riverchase
Drive should be a minimum 20-foot wide; 2) a more detailed drainage study will be required
before a final plat can be reviewed; 3) modification of MacArthur Boulevard median; 4)
additional stacking in median with regard to southbound MacArthur traffic; 5) right turn only
into the property at the southwest corner; and 6) a right turn lane from MacArthur Boulevard
to Riverchase Drive, as volunteered by the applicant. Councilmember Reitman seconded the
motion; the motion carried 7-0 with Mayor Pro Tern Robertson and Councilmembers Weaver,
Stahly, Watson, Reitman, Mayo, and Garrison voting in favor of the motion.
Item 32 D was considered at this time. See Item 32 D below for minutes.
C~10111~