Lakewood Est/PP-CS 920116P & Z HEARING DATE:
C. C. HEARING DATE:
CITY OF COPPELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
LAKEWOOD ESTATES - PRELIMINARY PLAT
January 16, 1992 (DENIED & RESCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY
20, 1992)
March 10, 1992
LOCATION:
Along the east side of MacArthur Boulevard, south of
Parkway Boulevard, and alon§ the east and west side
VillaGe Parkway.
of
SIZE OF AREA: 44.04 acres (Tract A = 13.97 acres, Tract B = 30.07 acres),
with 66 lots in Tract A, and 103 lots in Tract B.
REQUEST:
Approval of a preliminary plat.
APPLICANT:
Schnurbusch & Unzicker
(EnGineer)
Mr. Lynn Meyer
8700 Stemmons Freeway
Suite #400
Dallas, TX 75247
(214) 643-3300
LOC Estates
(Prospective Developer)
302 Sheridan Trail
Irving, TX 75063
(214) 220-3415
HISTORY:
There has been no recent zoning history on this parcel,
although property north of this request was rezoned to
single-family use in late 1991.
TRANSPORTATION:
MacArthur Boulevard is a major (P6D) thoroughfare built to
standard; VillaGe Parkway is a two lane residential-type
street constructed in a 60 foot riGht-of-way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
North - Vacant: PD §F-7
South - Vacant buildinG: R
East - Vacant; SF-12 & City limits of Carrollton
West - Vacant; TH-1
ITEM 11
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan shows residential development at
medium and high densities.
ANALYSIS:
Provided the applicant addresses the subdivision issues
pointed out in the zoning request which accompanies this
plat - that is, density, lot widths, circulation pattern,
common areas and their maintenance, general drainage
configuration, and the other physical development elements
discussed - staff could support the preliminary plat.
Without those concerns being resolved, we would recommend
denial of the preliminary plat.
Because the applicant was still working on several concerns
expressed by staff as this docket was being prepared, our
final staff analysis must wait until applicant
documentation has been received (which is after our docket
preparation deadline). Staff will be prepared to discuss
in detail the merits of a revised plat at the briefing
session held immediately prior to the Planning Commission
public hearing.
This plat was denied on January 16 because of problems with
the accompanying zoning case (PD-123). The revised plat
addresses the same concerns expressed in the zoning case,
and provided those concerns have been resolved, this plat
can be recommended for approval.
ALTERNATIVES: 1) Approve the preliminary plat
2) Deny the preliminary plat
3) Modify the preliminary plat
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Preliminary Plat
LKWOOD.STF