Meadows P4/FP-CS 840419 (2)The City With A Beautiful Future
P. O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
214 - 462 - 0022
STAFF REPORT
Scott Barnett, Planning Co-Ordinator
RE:
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
April 19, 1984
Case #84-03-19/The Meadows, Phase 4
North of Sandy Lake Rd. and East of
Samuel Blvd.
Final plat approval of Phase 4, The
Meadows Addition
Braewood Development Corp. represent-
ed by Brian McDaniels
The applicant is requesting final plat approval for 103 lots zoned "SF-9", Single
Family-9,000 sq. ft. lots being the fourth phase of The Meadows subdivision. The
development meets the minimum standards required in the Subdivision Ordinance
Regulations with the following exceptions:
1. Alley "A" intersects Samuel Blvd., collector street, where as a relocation
is necessary to prohibit alley accessibility to a collector street.
2. Alley "C" intersects both Parkway Blvd. and Samuel Blvd., collector
streets, which pertains to the same explanation given for Alley "A".
In regards to the Zoning Ordinance regulations, there are a few descrepencies
relating to building line setbacks and are as follows:
Lots 6, ll and 23, Block M, Lots 1 & 20, Block N, Lot 7 Block P, Lot 8
Block J and Lots 6 & 7, Block G reflect a 15' building line, which these
lots are classified as double frontage lots and should have a 30' building
line setback instead of the 15' building line setback.
STAFF EVALUATION:
The applicant has been consulted regarding these matters specified above, and
resolutions have been made and are as follows:
Alley "A"; with the deletion of the alley right-of-way between lots 6 &
7 and the relocation of this right-of-way to lots 1 & 2, the intersecting
point of the alley to Samuel Blvd. can be deleted and still have access-
ibility to a street right-of-way. In addition, the applicant will
extend Alley "A" east to Greentree Street to relieve any possible con-
gestion that might occur with only one alley exit.
STAFF REPORT
Page 2
April 19, 1984
2. Alley "C", the concept, as explained above, will occur with Alley "C"'s
intersection with Samuel Blvd. Regarding the intersection with Parkway
Blvd., the deletion of the alley right-of-way from Parkway Blvd. north
to lot 23's northern lot line would prohibit the accessibility of this
alley right-of-way to the blvd. but still allows all lots to be serviced
by the alley.
Zoning Regulations:
1. The applicant has consented in redesigning these specified lots to
reflect the necessary 30' building line setback required.
The applicant was not able to complete, in plat form, the necessary
changes by the time of distribution of packets, but will have one
prepared for their presentation the evening of the hearing. In
addition, these changes will be in plat form prior to distribution
to the City Council.
It is the staff's recommendation that an approval be made of this final
plat.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a 3-0 vote on this
final plat.
The City With A Beautiful Future
P. O. Box 478
Coppell, Texas 75019
214-462-0022
CITY COUNCIL
May 8, 1984
The purpose of this re-submittal is a matter of formality. The applicant has
requested that lots eight (8) through nineteen (193, Block J, be deleted in
addition with the alley right of way for the reason of a purchase of these lots.
The purchase was made by the adjacent property owner to the south who intends to
incorporate this area with their proposed development to be submitted at a later
date. The deletion of this Block will reduce the number of lots from 104 to 92.
The over design of this developemtn, referring to streets, utilities, etc. will
not change, therefore an approval of this final plat is recommended.
SB/asm
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION:
Case #84-03-19/MEADOWS 4
This request was initially brought to the City Council on May 8th, 1984 for final
plat approval. The applicant requested that twelve (12) lots be deleted on
the southwest sector of the plat because of a purchase being made by the adjacent
property owner who intends to incorporate this area into a proposed development
to be submitted at a later date. As a matter of formality the plat was requested
by Council to be taken back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration.
On May 17th, 1984, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the final plat and
approved the request by a 5-0 vote.
SB/asm