Park N Fly/FP-CS 930706To:
From:
RE:
Date:
Taryon Bowman, Planning and Zoning Coordinator
Kenneth M. Griffin, P.E., City Engineer [-~
Engineering Comments for DRC 6/24/93 & 7/1/93
July 6, 1993
S-1067-SUP Request for gift shop - located at 416 Bethel Road, at the request of
Phillip Jewett.
We briefly reviewed this request at the July 1, 1993 DRC meeting. The Engineering
Comments were as follows:
Escrow should be provided for the section of the property adjacent to Bethel Road.
It was noted that the property is not being platted, therefore, the Engineering
Department would like to pursue the use of the same type of agreement that we
utilized for the Chambers Addition i.e., no money switching hands at this time but
the property owner acknowledges that they will pay their fair share at some point in
the future.
2. The Parking should be correctly shown and dimensioned on-site for both customer
and employees.
®
Replat of Country Estates Block A, Lot 3 - located at 472 Country Estates Lane.
The Engineering Department had a concern whether or not the property owner of
Block A, Lot 4 had been contacted about revising their drainage easement. Staff has
reviewed the supporting documentation for the deletion of a portion of the drainage
easement and does not have a problem with it. However, it is our understanding that
this has been withdrawn from consideration.
®
Park and Fly Addition, preliminary plat - located at the northeast corner of Royal
and Cotton Road.
1. Sidewalks are required along Royal Lane.
2. The drive return radius should be a minimum 10 foot.
3. The width of the driveway should be shown and because of the width, a median
should be provided for separation of egress and ingress traffic.
e
Brick pavers should be provided along the driveway per the Streetscape Plan.
Changes to Gateway Blvd. and Royal lane should be constructed per the
Thoroughfare Plan.
A variance should be requested for the parking space sizes.
Escrow will be required for the portion of the property adjacent to Gateway Blvd.
The water and sanitary sewer should be looped. The Engineering Department raised
an issue at the July 1, 1993 DRC as to whether or not the developer of this property
should extend the 12" sewer line on the north side of the property as shown on our
sewer master plan. I have reread the letter supplied by the applicants concerning the
extension of the utilities and it specifically talks about an 8" sewer line in Gateway
and Cotton. Therefore, they have not at this point agreed to extend the sewer line.
However, some consideration should be given to the extension of the sewer line at
this time.
The drainage has been revised to include underground drainage. However, there still
needs to be contact made with the property owner to the east (Cattellus) to obtain
permission to grade to drain onto their property and discharge the water.
10. Proposed elevations for the parking lot should be provided.
11. Utilities should be provided to the van service building.
Austin Place f'mal plat - located 250 feet north of Sandy Lake Road, along the east
side of Moore Road.
1. Moore Road should be built with this development.
2. Curves 3 and 4 fall below our minimum requirement. Therefore, a variance should
be requested for those two centerline radius.
3. Twenty-five foot should dedicated for Sandy Lake Road (55 foot from centefline of
existing Sandy Lake Road).
4. Street names should be provided.
5. The drainage issue needs to be addressed and resolved prior to final approval of this
plat.
®
Latter Day Saints Addition Block A, Lot 1 preliminary plat - located approximately
1056 feet from the southwest corner of MacArthur Blvd and Samuel Blvd.
Drainage easements should be provided for the on-site drainage system. I am
concerned about the drainage plan as submitted and feel that it could cream a problem
in the future if it is allowed to be constructed as submitted. They are currently
purposing to cut a "temporary'' ditch on the northwest side of the property to route
the water to a Y-inlet and then pick it up and take it parallel to MacArthur Blvd. to
the existing storm drain system. The prospect of a open ditch for a period of time
is unacceptable.
e
Utility plans should be provided. They should !nclude. the public~ sewer line that will
go off site onto the school property.
We need to see real drainage plans that include the proper collection of off-site
drainage. Also, any drainage system that transverses this property that will be
conveying water from another site should be contained within a minimum 20 foot
drainage easement.
file/meetings/dfc0624.93