Park N Fly/SPAm-DR 990527 (3)B Uitding--':tnspection
Comments
Park N'.FJy ._site .plan..amaruJment
May 27, 1999
1. The)re _ar~ several, problems .with ordin-n¢~- compUance regs., rding this
propo,~,d .co~o.n..The first _is.that the. a~,sem_ry..cna~tr,-Jct~n
percentage is not met. The structure proposes no masonry at all.
2. AIt. h_ougi'J the .rox:rfi-ng materJet raay not be.specJfi~y..~r~i~: by
zoning p~dinance, there is a serious question regarding long term
performance of-the product re~ufldng .jn:-~aest~jtlc_:complaints~:.
material complaints, fading and degradation of .the .mater[aC _etc.
also ~ ICBO..evaluation and listings .on __this material.
3. The structures are proposed on the back of the project, however; on
Gateway~ lit ~aiso:_Js actjacent._to,..-and -in .Une ~/he _~r~3J:tt yard :setback_of
Haverty's.
4. Is thurs,_any ~emoval of existing planUng mate, rial ~-the result of this
project? _Are there modifications, to' the .entrance .as..referenced .by _the
drawings?