ParkW CC-1/FP-SY 891208 ADDENDUM REPORT
ROADWAY SIZING STUDY
FOR SOUTHWESTERN BOULEVARD
IN COPPELL, TEXAS
Prepared for=
Prentiss Properties Limited, Inc.
and
Santa Fe Pacific Realty
Prepared by=
DeShazo, Starek & Tang, Inc.
330 Union station
Dallas, Texas
(214) 748-6740
J89310
December 8, 1989
INTRODUCTION
At present the current City of Coppell Thoroughfare Plan
shows Gateway Blvd. to be constructed as a P6D - a six lane
divided principal arterial between Belt Line and Royal. Due
to existing capacity constraints which occur within the
study area Justify this roadway being classified as a four
lane divided thoroughfare with intersection widening between
Belt Line and Freeport and a four lane undivided section
between Royal and Freeport. This study analyzes the
capacity differences between the existing Gateway alignment
and the proposed Southwestern alignment and then sizes the
roadway based upon the year 2010 worst case scenario as
outlined in the companion thoroughfare alignment study. The
locations of the Prentiss Properties and Santa Fe Pacific
sites are shown in Figure 1.
An overview of the study corridor indicates capacity
constraints which impact the ability to carry through
movement through the area. They include the following=
o The intersection of Cotton Rd. (which is the extension
of Southwestern Blvd.) with Royal Ln. The close
proximity of this intersection to the diamond
interchange of Royal and I.H. 635 limit capacity
capabilities of this roadway to turning movements in
and out only.
o The existing design of the Freeport interchange at I.H.
635, a parclo A-B, which has limited capacity
capabilities due to the design of the ramps and the
difficulty of trucks to negotiate the turns
effectively.
o The location of North Lake to the east, I.H. 635 to the
I I I I I '1 I I I I I I I I ! I I i I
BETHEL
STL & SW RR
SOUTHWESTERN
BELT LINE
AIRLINE
FIGURE 1
Proposed Prentiss Properties and
Santa Fe Pacific Realty Developments
south, and DFW Air~ort property to the west act as
natural barriers to the extension of east/west
thoroughfares.
o The St. Louis & Southwestern Railroad to the north the
major north/south movements in Coppell and directs the
existing major north/south movements to Denton Tap/Belt
Line and MacArthur.
Between Royal and Belt Line both alternatives show one
continuous east/west roadway south of the RR tracks. The
difference between the two alternatives is that the existing
Thoroughfare Plan shows a collector which circulates through
the sites and ties into Gateway before Royal and Belt Line
are reached.
The recommended alignment decreases the impact of interior
traffic along Southwesternts route and disperses site
traffic in an east/west direction to Belt Line south of the
Belt Line/Denton Tap intersection and to Freeport south of
Grapevine Creek. As the following analysis will show, the
recommended alternative reduces the amount of interior site
traffic along its route and reduces the impact of site on
the heavily utilized Belt Lint/Denton Tap intersection.
The following data were generated as part of the alignment
study and will be used in this study=
The year 2010 24 hour base volumes for the current and
recommended alignments are shown in Figures 2 and 3,
respectively.
The year 2010 pm peak hour base volumes are shown in
Figures 4 and 5, respectively.
The pm peak hour site traffic are shown in Figures 6
and 7, respectively.
The year 2010 pm peak hour base plus site traffic are
shown in Figures 8 and 9, respectively.
ANALYSIS
The roadways of the two alternatives were sized based on the
projected year 2010 pm peak hour base plus site traffic in
Figures 8 and 9. The results of the roadway sizing analysis
is shown in Figures 10 and 11, respectively. The link
volume Level of Service criteria based on SDHPT traffic
modeling procedures are as follows:
Roadway Level Of Service
A B C D ~
4 Lane Divided 2,500 2,920 3,300 3,750 4,150
4 Lane Undivided 1,670 1,940 2,220 2,250 2,780
2 Lane Undivided 830 970 1,110 1,250 1,390
The points where roadway links lose capacity are at the
intersections. Proper lane geometry at the intersections
provide significant capacity enhancements where there are
predicted high turning volumes. An estimate of the future
geometry of the Belt Line/ Denton Tap and Freeport/South-
western intersections are shown in Figures 12 and 13,
_ 4
I I I I I i I ! I I ~ i I I I ! I ! i
BETHEL
n.- STL & SW RR
10000
10000
....
VINE CREEK
4000
.mlllllllllllllll
GATEWAY
A~RLINE
BELT LINE
COWBOY
uJ
FIGURE 2
Current Alignment Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes
I t I t I I I I I I I I t I ! t I ~ I
BETHEL
149~
STL & SW RR
55OO
10000
JlllJll
CREEK
II
A~RLINE
ERN
~j~jl~ l i.. l l. l
BELT LINE
2324
COWBOY
FIGURE 3
Recommended Alignment Year 2010 24 Hour Base Volumes
BETHEL
149
LU
STL 8, SW RR
25O
O0
1000
1000
VINE CREEK
AIRLINE
BELT LINE
COWBOY
LM
FIGURE 4
Current Alignment Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes
J I I J I I i I I I !, I I I I I i ~,
BETHEL
STL & SW RR
1000
lllll
CREEK
AIRLINE
1000
ESTERN
BELT LINE
COWBOY
FIGURE 5
Recommended Alignment Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base Volumes
I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I ~ I
BETHEL
STL 8, SW RR
oO 569
600
itIliIllllllllllllll
""-..6,11
VINE
CREEK
789
_..iiliililllliiI It
Itu' GATEWAY
A/RLINE
1324
1312
535 BELT UNE
COWI~)y
1048
1174
FIGURE 6
Current Alignment PM Peak Hour Site Traffic
BE[HEL
STL & SW RR
1189
IlllJllllllllll
CREEK
AJRLINE
~STERN
llllllllllllj~l
1512
BELT LINE
535
COWBOY
1046
1174
FIGURE 7
Recommended Alignment PM Peak Hour Site Traffic
BETHEL
J
STL & SW RR
9
iiIiIIII II Jl~ll I
",.,.~lj.
VINE CREEK
1188 t~
__milllllllllllllll
P'"' GATEWAY
AJRLINE
1312
Z
BELT UNE
1632
COWBOY
1046
1174
FIGURE 6
Current Alignment Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base + Site Traffic
i I I I i I ! ! I I I I I I I t I I i
BETHEL
STL & SW RR
1044 1]'30
llll~lllllllll
CREEK
AIRLINE
BELT LINE
COWBOY
;32
1048
1174
FIGURE 9
Recommended Alignment Year 2010 PM Peak Hour Base + Site Traffic
I I I I I i I I I I i I I I I t I I I
BETHEL
SD
6D
STL & SW RR
2U
VINE CREEK
'IIi- ,41IUlIIiInIIIIIIIIIm Iii Il · ~.~$ ' R,' GATEWAY
AIRLINE
4U
COWBOY
4U
8D
BELT UNE
6
FIGURE 10.
Current Alignment Roadway Sizing
I I I I I I ~ ! ! I I I I I I I I ! I
BETHEL
6D
STL & SW RR
FIGURE 11
Recommended Alignment Roadway Sizing
6D
4U Los '^'
2U
III
CREEK
AIRLINE
COWBOY
4U
ESTERN
6D
8D
BELT LINE
6D
4 LANES
DIVIDED
6 LANES
DIVIDED
7 LANES
DIVIDED
Southwestern Blvd.
6 LANES
DIVIDED
FIGURE 12
8 LANES
DIVIDED
6 LANES
DIVIDED
Belt
Line Rd'.
10 LANES
DIVIDED
8 LANES
DIVIDED
Estimated Intersection Geometry @ Belt Line/Denton Tap
15
t I I ! I I i ! ! i
4 LANES
UNDIVIDED
6 LANES
DIVIDED
'O
O
FIGURE 13
Estimated Intersection Geometry
@ Freeport/Southwestern
I I
i I
I I
t t I ! I i I
6 LANES
DIVIDED
7 LANES
DIVIDED
5 LANES.
DIVIDED
4 LANES
DIVIDED
Southwestern Blvd.
8 LANES
DIVIDED
6 LANES
DIVIDED
respectively. Despite being four lanes divided between
Freeport and Belt Line, Southwestern will likely be six
lanes divided at Belt Line and five lanes divided or more at
Freeport. West of Freeport, Southwestern should be four
lanes undivided, flaring out to six lanes divided at the
Freeport intersection.
CONCLUSION
By utilizing existing counts, SDHPT and NCTCOG Year 2010
projections and the City Of Coppell Thoroughfare Plan, the
area 2010 base conditions have been estimated. Over 500
acres of warehouse/office development have been added over
and above the year 2010 base conditions to reflect a worst
case scenario. The resulting link volumes were analyzed to
determine the size of each thoroughfare. This study shows
that the recommended route of Southwestern Blvd. will
operate at Level of Service #A" as a four lane divided
roadway between Belt Line and Freeport and as a four lane
undivided roadway between Royal and Freeport. The
Thoroughfare Plan's alignment of Gateway would also opreate
at Level of Service "A" as a four lane divided roadway
between Belt Line and Freeport and as a four lane undivided
roadway between Royal and Freeport. Therefore, regardless
of which alignment, Southwestern/Gateway worst case volumes
do not justify a six lane divided roadway.